Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 INTEL OVERCLOCKING THREAD, TIPS,Q n A, Results...Great For NueBis

views
     
-pWs-
post Jun 27 2007, 11:05 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
8,545 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: 224.0.0.6


QUOTE(Dovienya @ Jun 27 2007, 07:53 AM)
I'm wondering, why is there such a high differences between a Gigabtye's Hardware monitor, SpeedFan, Intel TAT and CoreTemp ?

Using my pc for testing,
Gigabyte = avg 30-40 degree
SpeedFan = avg 40 degree

Intel TAT = avg 50 degree
CoreTemp = avg 50 degree
*
Gigabyte is measuring of cpu temperature. I not sure about SpeedFan.

But, Intel TAT and CoreTemp is measuring based on ur DTS of the processor which is the hottest part in the processor itself. That why Intel TAT and CoreTemp will report more higher temperature than others.


-pWs-
-pWs-
post Jun 8 2008, 01:21 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
8,545 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: 224.0.0.6


Use Realtemp will do wink.gif

-pWs-
-pWs-
post Jun 18 2008, 09:28 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
8,545 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: 224.0.0.6


QUOTE(sakurakinomoto @ Jun 12 2008, 09:58 PM)
Yaya >.<

I dunno how.

Someone showed me the appropriate value to set in Overclocking.

then I tested with 1000MHz FSB on RAM, and it works!

but after I set to 1600MHz FSB for my 9300, the mobo died and everything was reseted.

So now I'm running on 1500MHz for Proc, Stock (800MHz) for RAM
*
I do tried until 1800MHz FSB for my 9300.
Not problem at all for the 1st few hours for those who know my story. laugh.gif

-pWs-

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0570sec    0.48    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 12:09 AM