QUOTE(Eithanius @ Mar 3 2006, 08:15 PM)
....The latter database has much more comets listed than the original.... by more than ten fold....so if I were to input manually....

hehe finger exercises! I think most of the comets listed are only of academic interest. Almost always the only new objects added in any update are comets and numerous asteriods. It should be okay to wait for news of these objects and then manually input only the specific object ephemerides. That should keep the database compact and tidy. I used to have this habit of trying to update everything, and the software just ran slower and slower with the added unused data to churn through.
Anyway, unless you are using SNP to control a telescope, you don't really need the extra accuracy of the NASA figures....
BTW can i request you run a simulation of the comet and Venus at 6.30 am 4th March 2006 for Kuala Lumpur? Then export the image and post it here. I'm curious to see how much more realistic they've made Version 5+. I always thought 4.50 was cool enough.
This post has been edited by March05: Mar 3 2006, 09:07 PM
Mar 3 2006, 09:02 PM
Quote

0.0309sec
0.56
7 queries
GZIP Disabled