I categorically DO NOT like Wenger, but could he take on the LFC job and excel? I want Dalglish to continue as our manager beyond this season, but there is this sinking feeling at the back of my mind that the owners do not want him to 

Pity him really... Worked so hard for the team in early season and get frozen by both bosses. 

yea agree with the above post, looks like old jerseys design...

Anyhow, i just thougth of C.Adam... He can put lots of quality long balls for Carroll btw =)

match highlights

http://footballocks.net/index.php/3889/liv...y-highlights-2/

Incidentally, why do you not think Arsenal will win the title ever again under Wenger, provided he stays on? Because of his reluctance to sign stars, relying instead on youngsters? If this is the case, then one must always remember how Alan Hansen himself put his foot in his mouth by claiming that you can't win the title with kids. Well a certain Alex Ferguson did

Actually, it's nothing we can do about it for now. The two blood sucking cowboys at that time wanted him out, and he was getting too much pressure from the owners, fans and players. I do understand his frustrations of not signing the players he wanted, but any good manager will not go anywhere without the backing of the club owners. Similar to Jose's exit from Chelski. The worse thing is the owners already talking to Klinsmann and other alternatives when Rafa is still around. What a shame from those two cowboys, undermining our own club. 

But the ship has sailed and I hope he gets a good club with owners that willing listen to him instead of doing things their own way.

Btw, Kenny is doing so well now, thats why not many people mentioning about Rafa now. But I think he will be very happy now to see Liverpool have good new owners who willing to invest.

Scholes is able to accept a bit-part role. Probably the main reason why I think that Gerrard should be sold if there are any offers is that given his personality he will not be willing to accept a bit part role. Heck, he doesn't even drifts everywhere when started at right wing.

Again I stress - I have no problems with his abilities as a player at the moment, but I feel that given another season or so, his presence will be detrimental to the squad. We have lived on sentiments for long enough, and at times it pays to be ruthless.

Hence he should be backup. Else how to expose him to high level matches when we're buying a 1st team LB & with Warnock as backup.
I did not see Robinson as future international, its not even in the equation on this debate.
Point is to get Warnock in will limit the exposure of them. To see Robinson have the consistency, the club must have a platform for him to express the consistency, by bringing in Warnock as backup it severely hindering their progress.
Furthermore we all know how little backup fare in matches, by putting in Warnock in front of them, they'll see no action for years.

It's more like Roy Hodgson's signings is dominating the list 

if we want quality passing skill.. i think marek hamsik from Napoli did quite good job.. can play defensive & attacking also..

Wanna ask u guys this, a question that an arsenal supporting friend posted on FB for Liverpool fans: which would u prefer, Man Utd winning the 19th title, or Torres winning the league immediately after leaving Liverpool?

I tried to put myself in a liverpool fans shoes and wow...it is a dilemma and I think there would be different opinions. Any thoughts?

odemwinge was really great for wba.. i'll more like having rather than overprice young