» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
This post has been edited by Andy214: Mar 19 2011, 11:24 AM
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V7, Nikon announcement on Mar/Apr ?!
|
|
Mar 19 2011, 11:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
Sharing some pictures of new collection; please ignore the background
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by Andy214: Mar 19 2011, 11:24 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 19 2011, 12:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(vearn27 @ Mar 19 2011, 11:56 AM) Guys, Are you on "Quiet" mode?Need some help here. Why when shooting, the shutter sound like "chap ..... chak" instead of "chap-chak"? The " ..... " indicates some delay like 1 second? Even I use high speed shutter, it still behaves the same. I wonder if this is normal? I'm not really familiar with my DSLR yet. How fast shutter you use? |
|
|
Mar 19 2011, 12:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(vearn27 @ Mar 19 2011, 12:14 PM) No. I tried fastest at 1/8000 also the same. Check your Exposure Delay mode settings. If you turn it on, there will be delay about 1s.Nope. I'm not using "Quiet" mode. I suppose the "chap-chak" is like a swift thing, but mine is "chap ..... chak". I wonder if this is normal or something I configured? Won't be body fault gua... It's under Shooting/Display settings. This post has been edited by Andy214: Mar 19 2011, 12:43 PM |
|
|
Mar 21 2011, 04:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Mar 21 2011, 04:03 PM) somehow i feel funny when look at your statement with your avatar...Jesus Christ.... Bro, if you're shooting still objects and have all the time, you can slowly adjust your camera, epecially the white balance, play with the lightings, flash, etc. If you're shooting event, you want to get it right in camera 100% without PP? It's godlike... (Edit: you can preset WB, but still, it's not 100% fooproof)uploading my noob shot.. looks nice in D70s monitor but looks bad in monitor. Had to re-adjust all colour... now my target skill is shoot until no need PP » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Shoot raw, you have more control over PP especially the WB. This post has been edited by Andy214: Mar 21 2011, 04:36 PM |
|
|
Mar 21 2011, 04:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
Mar 21 2011, 04:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(mmohdnor @ Mar 21 2011, 04:46 PM) When shooting RAW ... i notice once i imported into LR ...the color is not the same as i shoot it. Does LR do a basic editting first? I already set the white balance 'as-shot'. Lightroom have preset settings for RAW files, so it will adjust the brightness, contrast, etc when you import the RAW files and loaded the presets.Most of the times, my shot seems brighter/over-exposed once imported. I had to go and 'double click' each value to make it back to default. And clicking the auto tone just makes it under-exposed/darker ... correcting the color and white balance again is very tricky ... *i shoot products too. and corecting the the colors/whitebalance is important to me. i want them to look natural and the color matches the real item as much as possible. There is also Lens correction which you can apply. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 21 2011, 05:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(mmohdnor @ Mar 21 2011, 04:55 PM) so how do i get back the image which i saw on screen when i shoot it? I think you can set it in the settings, I never bother to disable it though.how to disable the auto adjust feature in LR? ... sometimes the pic on the camera just needs a little tweaking. sorry, just started trying to shoot RAW .. hehe. used to shoot jpg all these while. When you shoot in raw and view in camera, what you see is the preview with settings applied, like what you would see when you shoot in jpeg. If you camera have in-camera raw processing, you can process it with different settings, even adjust the exposure, wb, etc. to ouput to the jpg output you desired. I think you can change the default preeet for the raw file as well, so it will always use the preset when you import it. |
|
|
Mar 21 2011, 05:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
Mar 21 2011, 05:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Mar 21 2011, 05:05 PM) Strange thing is he says his WB changes. As far as I know, the WB does not change unless you tell LR to change the WB. Not sure how he define the WB changed, unless he specifically compare the WB settings, if by looking at the picture alone in camera, then there can be many factors, such as the monitor, then the contrast applied on the picture when loaded in LR with preets, etc.To know the actual WB changed or not, will need to check the data of the image. |
|
|
Mar 21 2011, 05:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Mar 21 2011, 05:05 PM) Getting WB right in the camera is important not just because you need less PPing. It has got to do with noise. Wrong WB will give more noise after WB correction. Hm... something new learned... I thought adjusting under-expose will introduce more noise. This will be difficult during event shooting as we can't always get the right WB.Shooting under-expose image with lower iso will give mopre noise than shooting right exposure with higher iso. |
|
|
Mar 21 2011, 05:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Mar 21 2011, 05:42 PM) Yes, difficult to get correct. Trying to get the right WB is tricky especially under mixed lighting. Getting your flash to match the mixed lighting was difficult too. Nowadays, the current Nikon DSLRs have very good high ISO. Minor WB tweaks is fine and not so apparent unless you shoot extreme Sunny WB and change to Tungsten under low light. It's tricky especially if you're shooting event and have no time to set the wb, will use auto and trust the camera, even so when I pp, will notice the wb not consistent due to different condtion of lighting as you move around. Usually these are just minor tweaksTalk about flash, it gives different wb feel comapred to no flash, hence, the natural vs with lighting. The hard to get WYSIWYG image is even harder with flash, but you can get some nice effect or lighting with flash off the wall. It's harder to get the WYSIWYG image indoors especially like Karaoke room with very dim lightings. QUOTE(jchue73 @ Mar 21 2011, 05:42 PM) Yup. Back when before D3 and D700 were available, it is a common trick to overexpose and then PP back to the right exposure to reduce noise. Even now I think this trick still applies especially for DX even for D7000 which said to have good high ISO. once shot undereposed, even iso 800 or lower gets really noisy, losing lots of details and sharpness. I guess thats one reason why some people complaint the iso is not good but actually they're under-exposing their image?This post has been edited by Andy214: Mar 21 2011, 05:56 PM |
|
|
Mar 22 2011, 11:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Mar 22 2011, 10:55 AM) Nice one Can change WB in LR for jpeg, but not as flexible like RAW. RAW file you can adjust by small increments of temperature.You can change WB/Hue for JPEG in LR and ACDSee, I think it is also possible in the latest CaptureNX, whoever uses CaptureNX here can help to verify? I too have 2 bags. One is a sling and another is a backpack style |
|
|
Mar 22 2011, 11:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(SIWIS @ Mar 22 2011, 11:42 AM) Using manual focus is really pain in the ass. If you know the distance, you can use pre-focus technique, focus on somethingelse of same distance roughly, hold the shutter half way to keep the focus lock or use the AE-L button then move back to your subject. Depend in you want to lock the exposure or not, you can set this in settings.Object/model/moment can't wait so sometime need capture fast. What about setting to 3D tracking can solve problem? If you're using wide apeeture and close distance, it'll be harder to get the focus right. These are the basics when you're using point and shoot or phone camera with no manual focus control. This post has been edited by Andy214: Mar 22 2011, 11:51 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 23 2011, 02:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Mar 23 2011, 09:30 AM) Yes, he has the experience and background education but that does not mean that he cannot be misinformed? If somebody tells me I'm wrong, I will go back and find out for myself and see if I'm indeed wrong. I will humbly admit and move on to say that I've learned something new today if indeed what I said earlier was incorrect. Perhaps being at where he is makes it harder to take it from a nobody like me? Indeed, the hardest part is for people to admit their own mistakes; but those that does, will move on and go further. Usually, the biggest obstacle is the part to admit and learn. I guess it also depends on how a person is brought up, as usual, most peopl will tend to tease, laugh and make joke at someone who did wrong, this will shape the person into someone who's not willing to admit mistakes, so if we have kids, its important for us to make them understand its ok to make mistakes and learn from it. Knowdlege, skills, experience is never ending and its nothing to do with age or if the person is newbie or profesional. Personally, I wouldn't look down on someone who is new or fresh, who knows, he/she might know something that I don't even know, or have more creative ideas. This applies to any field. Disclaimer: The statement above is not meant for anyone, but just find its good to mention this since jchue73 mention this. My cheap 2 shutter clicks. |
|
|
Mar 25 2011, 11:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(cik_tak @ Mar 25 2011, 10:47 AM) 1 button option ?? tell me more .. i dont get it. SB700 can get around RM950 or cheaper.how much ?? i checked last week, it's about RM1000/- can get any cheaper . SB600 more powerfull .... SB900 . expensive gile bro . i tot SB900 somewhere around RM1800/- SB900 can get around RM1500 or cheaper. My friend say wanna buy till today still surveying and unsure which to get. He almost gotten SB800 BRAND NEW, apparently some shops clearing stock? But he is slow a bit, someone book it first. For most situation, I'd say SB700 is good enough, unless you need more Powah or Range? Plus the SB700 looks good, nice menu, nice shape, and have nice accessories. Just sharing my opinion. This post has been edited by Andy214: Mar 25 2011, 11:53 AM |
|
|
Mar 25 2011, 12:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(cik_tak @ Mar 25 2011, 12:06 PM) Internet source:MyLensDB.com shows RM950 by J-One. PhotoMalaysia, someone from Penang got it for RM900. some others posted around RM950 +/- I think my friend found RM950 somewhere in LowYat. Need to check with him again first. This post has been edited by Andy214: Mar 25 2011, 12:17 PM |
|
|
Mar 25 2011, 12:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(SSY22 @ Mar 25 2011, 12:20 PM) mylensdb no update yet Maybe the hike up the price again, checked with my friend, it was one of the shops in LowYat but he can't remember which, should be the 3rd or 4th floor area. should be rm990 for sb-700 in J-one. =) Added on March 25, 2011, 12:23 pm I post the link before that. Check the previous post see. Added on March 25, 2011, 12:26 pm And look for the uncle ! lol Added on March 25, 2011, 12:28 pm Straight go for SB-900 if you need more range and power. Think which one serve your need. Do you need high power? high range? SB-700 is enough for general situation d. I am not sure whether good in shooting wedding or some event or not lar. Maybe someone can confirm more about it. Its adequate for weddings, but how good/great it depends on how one judges it. Of course, if can get SB900 will be great. |
|
|
Mar 30 2011, 12:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
Nikkor 35mm shoot-out:
http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Nikon_Ni..._compared.shtml 85mm f/1.4G: http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Nikon_Ni...F-S_85mm_f1-4G/ |
|
|
Mar 30 2011, 12:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(faareast @ Mar 29 2011, 11:15 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « wonder why i always failed to capture tacksharp photo~ Added on March 29, 2011, 11:19 pm haha.. dont buy a dslr la like that~.... if u wanna it to be safe, keep using it.... percentage shows that thief did the job when u are not with ur camera... When you lock on, if the baby or kid moved, the focus plane may shift and you will not get the correct focus; For these kind of shooting, it's harder to get the right moment when you want and you most probably need to re-focus a lot (of use AF-C); Also if you want to use focus and recompose method, then you need to be more careful. |
|
|
Mar 30 2011, 04:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(faareast @ Mar 30 2011, 01:35 PM) Shooting babies/kids which constantly moves unpredictably is hard, especially if you keep close distance and using wide aperture. Stop down your aperture, use flash to compensate lower iso and fast enough shutter speed to stop motion.Try aperture like f3.5? or f4? Use flash and shutter speed 1/80 or faster if need to prevent blur, and try to keep iso below 400 to minimize noise and maximize sharpness and details. QUOTE(faareast @ Mar 30 2011, 01:59 PM) Camera Nikon D90 That's very slow shutter speed... the kid is not moving? your lens got VR?Exposure 0.05 sec (1/20) Aperture f/2.8 Focal Length 50 mm ISO Speed 500 Exposure Bias +2/3 EV Flash No Flash Orientation Horizontal (normal) X-Resolution 300 dpi Y-Resolution 300 dpi Custom Rendered Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Digital Zoom Ratio 1 Focal Length In35mm Format 75 mm Added on March 30, 2011, 2:00 pmyup.. too shallow DOF.... scared to increase the ISO further Try use external flash and bounce off the wall, maintain low iso and smaller aperture especially at such close distance, with wide aperture, when you focus and the kid move later, the focus plane will be changed, plus if you recompose also same. Try with external flash and low iso, you'll love the sharpness, detail, clarity and also the lighting effects of bouning off wall. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0218sec
0.71
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 07:18 AM |