RM4 mini-review (pointers) compare to TT:1. Seems to be made of softer (but thicker) plastic than HT's TT.
2. More limited shoulder articulation, the shoulder holes has space for more movement, but is seems to be imhibited by the internal shoulder.
3. Matt's fixed neck is not suppose to separated from the neck socket, but it could be done (Pics below). With a little grinding to enlarge the socket, you can fit Matt's head on a TT body.
4. Almost no up/down neck articulation allowed.
5. Tall body (Pics)
6. EB's Abs/Pelvis articulation range is better than TT's (As TT's at that region is more for twisting and foward/backward).
7. Joints are tight enough, but EB has kind-of-odd/akward/un-natural shape to the knees and elbows. Much simpler elbow/knee joint, not sure if it's adjustable.
8. It's ball jointed inside the feet... but not much range is provided.. I would say 10 to 15 degrees off center. Enough for some wide stance with the feet flat, but HT's double ball could achieve much more.
Neck socket not meant to be separated:


EB + HT's Unholy Union, UU.

Comparison pics:


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
This post has been edited by BeastX: Apr 25 2011, 09:56 PM