Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 SETIA ECO GLADES @ CYBERJAYA, by SP Setia

views
     
supersp
post Jul 7 2012, 11:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
159 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
QUOTE(UFO-ET @ Apr 17 2012, 12:42 PM)
Setia Alam quality is terrible

Added on April 17, 2012, 12:46 pm
Lakeside still got land?
*
I beg to diff .... Having owned multiple hses in SA before and currently staying in one, their quality is definitely not top notch, but not worst in class ...i would say it is on par with other projects i have seen by gamuda, inp and wct
supersp
post Aug 3 2012, 07:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
159 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
QUOTE(yankicip @ Aug 3 2012, 06:43 PM)
not correct for wct, sp, gamuda, inp.

I invested in gamuda project I know that.

gamuda quality is the top in malaysian , just check this

http://www.corenet.gov.sg/homeowners/lists...VMgUFJPSkVDVFM=

1  2012  Ambang Botanic 2 Ph 23A 23B Show Houses  Lim Hoo Seng Constr Sdn Bhd Gamuda Land Harum Intisari Sdn Bhd  NA  91.4  NA  NA 
2  2008  Bandar Botanic Ph 18D Show Unit (Malaysia)  Private  Gamuda Land  Harum Intisari Sdn Bhd  NA  88.5  NA  NA 
3  2009  Bandar Botanic Ph 18A and 18B (Malaysia)  Private  Gamuda Land Harum Intisari Sdn Bhd  NA  86.9  NA  NA 
4  2009  Bandar Botanic Ph 6A2 (Malaysia)  Private  Gamuda Land Harum Intisari Sdn Bhd  NA  85.9  NA  NA 
5  2009  Valencia Garden Precint Ph 4D (Malaysia)  Hasil Construction Sdn Bhd  Gamuda Land Valencia Devt Sdn Bhd  NA  84.8  NA  NA 
6  2010  Bandar Botanic Ph 18 D2 Semi D House (Malaysia)  Lim Hoo Seng Constr Sdn Bhd  Gamuda Land Harum Intisari Sdn Bhd  NA  83.7  NA  NA 
7  2010  Bandar Botanic Ph 8 B1 Link Terrace House (Malaysia)  Timbunan Bakti Sdn Bhd  Gamuda Land Harum Intisari Sdn Bhd  NA  83.6  NA  NA 
8  2009  Bandar Botanic Ph 15C (Malaysia)  Private  Gamuda Land Harum Intisari Sdn Bhd  NA  83.5  NA  NA 
9  2010  The Serai (Malaysia)  Inta Bina Sdn Bhd  Vantage Lifestyle Sdn Bhd  NA  83.5  NA  NA 
10  2010  Fenix Villas Setia Tropika (Malaysia)  Tay Hup Brothers Constr Sdn Bhd  Setia Indah Sdn Bhd  NA  83.2  NA  NA 
11  2009  Valencia Ph 5B Bungalows (Malaysia)  Inta Bina Sdn Bhd  Gamuda Land Valencia Devt Sdn Bhd  NA  83.2  NA  NA 
12  2012  The Golf, Phase 1B11  Wai Choy Construction Sdn Bhd Horizon Hills Development Sdn Bhd  NA  83.2  NA  NA 
13  2012  Ambang Botanic 2 Phase 21A D - Link  Timbunan Bakti Construction Sdn Bhd Harum Intisari Sdn Bhd / Gamuda Land  NA  83.1  NA  NA 
14  2009  The Golf Ph 1B1-2 (Malaysia)  Private  Gamuda Land JV UEM Land Horizon Hills Development Sdn Bhd  NA  82.9  NA  NA 
15  2011  Bandar Botanic 8B2 Akasia Terraces (Malaysia)  Lim Hoo Seng Constr Sdn Bhd Gamuda Land Harum Intisari Sdn Bhd  NA  82.8  NA  NA 
16  2010  Bandar Botanic Ph 18 D1 Semi Detached House (Malaysia)  Inta Bina Constr Sdn Bhd  Gamuda Land Harum Intisari Sdn Bhd  NA  82.3  NA  NA 
17  2010  Verve at Suites Block Vibe B (Malaysia)  Bukit Kiara Builders Sdn Bhd Bayland Sdn Bhd and Bukit Kiara Prop Sdn Bhd  NA  82.2  NA  NA 
18  2010  Go Hout Hing Bungalow (Malaysia)  Active Bungalow Builder Sdn Bhd  Active Bungalow Builder Sdn Bhd  NA  82.1  NA  NA 
19  2012  Jade Hills Ph 1B2  Inta Bina Sdn Bhd Gamuda Land Jade Homes Sdn Bhd  NA  82.1  NA  NA 
20  2009  Bandar Botanic Ph 19C4 (Malaysia)  Private  Gamuda Land Harum Intisari Sdn Bhd  NA  82.0  NA  NA 
21  2012  Aura & Caria @ Setia Pearl Island  Tan Ngee Hong Construction Sdn Bhd S P Setia Berhad Group  NA  81.9  NA  NA 
22  2009  10 Mont Kiara (Malaysia)  Aston Star Sdn Bhd  Sunrise Berhad  NA  81.6  NA  NA 
23  2011  Bandar Botanic Ph 8A1 Akasia 2 (Malaysia)  Lim Hoo Seng Constr Sdn Bhd Harum Intisari Sdn Bhd  NA  81.6  NA  NA 
24  2009  The Golf Ph 1C2 (Malaysia)  Private  Gamuda Land JV UEM Land Horizon Hills Development Sdn Bhd  NA  81.5  NA  NA 
25  2010  Mr Teo Chee Yow Bungalow (Malaysia)  Active Bungalow Builder Sdn Bhd  Active Bungalow Builder Sdn Bhd  NA  81.5  NA  NA 
26  2007  Bandar Botanic Ph 16B4 (Malaysia)  Private  Gamuda Land Harum Intisari Sdn Bhd  NA  81.4  NA  NA 
27  2011  Ambang Botanic Ph 18C2 Semi D Hse (Malaysia)  Lim Hoo Seng Constr Sdn Bhd  Gamuda Land Harum Intisari Sdb Bhd  NA  81.3  NA  NA 
28  2012  Ambang Botanic 2 Phase 20C Semi - D  Inta Bina Sdn Bhd Harum Intisari Sdn Bhd / Gamuda Land  NA  81.0  NA  NA 
29  2006  Bandar Botanic Bungalow Homes Ph 1 (16A1) (Malaysia)  Private  Gamuda Land  Harum Intisari Sdn Bhd  NA  80.9  NA  NA 
30  2011  Bandar Botanic Ph 26A1 Shop Office (Malaysia)  Timbunan Bakti Sdn Bhd  Gamuda Land Harum Intisari Sdn Bhd  NA  80.8  NA  NA 
31  2011  Nusa Duta Ph 3A1 and 3B1 Semi D House  Road builders IJM Land Bhd  NA  80.6  NA  NA 
32  2008  Jade Hills Resort Club (Malaysia)  Private  Gamuda Land  Jade Homes Sdn Bhd  NA  80.6  NA  NA 
33  2009  Bandar Botanic Ph 19C3 (Malaysia)  Private  Gamuda Land Harum Intisari Sdn Bhd  NA  80.6  NA  NA 
34  2011  Ambang Botanic Ph 18C1 Semi D Hse (Malaysia)  Lim Hoo Seng Constr Sdn Bhd  Gamuda Land Harum Intisari Sdb Bhd  NA  80.5  NA  NA 
35  2012  The Golf, Phase 1B9a  Wai Choy Construction Sdn Bhd Horizon Hills Development Sdn Bhd  NA  80.4  NA  NA 
36  2011  The Golf Ph 1B12A  Inta Bina Sdn Bhd Horizon Hill Devt Sdn Bhd  NA  80.2  NA  NA 
37  2012  Valencia Ph 5E  Timbunan Bakti Constr Sdn Bhd Valencia Devt Sdn Bhd  NA  80.1  NA  NA 
38  2009  Kota Kemuning RP5C (Malaysia)  Syabasbina Sdn Bhd  Gamuda Land Hicom-Gamuda Devt Sdn Bhd  NA  80.1  NA  NA 
39  2012  Ambang Botanic 2 Phase 21B Semi - D  Timbunan Bakti Construction Sdn Bhd Harum Intisari Sdn Bhd / Gamuda Land  NA  80.0  NA  NA 
40  2012  The Golf, Phase 1B9b  Wai Choy Construction Sdn Bhd Horizon Hills Development Sdn Bhd  NA  79.9  NA  NA 
41  2008  Mont Kiara Meridin (Malaysia)  Haw Ah Bee Constr Sdn Bhd  Sunrise Berhad NA  NA  79.9  NA  NA 
42  2009  Horizon Hills Ph 10 Shop Offices (Malaysia)  Tay Hup Brothers Constr Sdn Bhd  Gamuda Land JV UEM Land Horizon Hills Development Sdn Bhd  NA  79.9  NA  NA 
43  2009  Bandar Botanic Ph 16B2B (Malaysia)  Private  Gamuda Land Harum
*
U see most entries here belong to gamuda bcs gamuda is a strong supporter of conquas and other developers are not. However, this doesn't mean that gamuda product is more superior than others. I have seen gamuda products in AB and i would say they r on par with the developers i mentioned above.

I have invested in gamuda products also and infact one of them is under con, in the same "kampung" as u, JH biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by supersp: Aug 3 2012, 07:06 PM
supersp
post Aug 3 2012, 07:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
159 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
QUOTE(yankicip @ Aug 3 2012, 07:13 PM)
I see it another ways. other developer worry their products bad quarity. and if use thus Singapore product point system will make them bad( as everyone can see it from website)

Gamuda is transparent nothing to hind. Maintenance its quality.

Wandering how can u make conclusion of your under con in jh quality is not superior with others.
*
As investors, i dun look at the house itself. I look at the overall development. Now buyers are more complicated, they r looking for a home, no longer a house. I like JH bcs of this, low density, loads of greens, clubhse, tight security etc.
supersp
post Aug 4 2012, 12:20 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
159 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
QUOTE(yankicip @ Aug 3 2012, 11:48 PM)
On 7 Jul. u comment about quality on par.

I show u not on par. with website evident.

Know u talk about others density. facilities? What is this discussion?

Taiko. I doubt u even invest in jh now.
*
Ur website shows nothing but developments who adopted conquas and their respective scores. As said , how do u know other dev who did not go for conquas and fare better than those listed?

I am just sharing the fact on what i have experienced in gamuda development previously, and comparing the quality of botanic houses to other developments from sps (SA) inp (BK9) and wct (bkt tinggi) ... As said in other thread, we should not apply a blanket statement on the quality of houses from a developer, as diff developements (also diff phases within a development) are developed by diff contractor. Hope u understand this ...

Anyway, i don't need to prove to u what i have invested, nor i need to prove u right or wrong.. Believe or not, up 2 u ... and every reader should do their due deligence before making any conclusion/decision ...

Lets agree to disagree, and move on ...

This post has been edited by supersp: Aug 4 2012, 12:32 AM
supersp
post Aug 4 2012, 11:46 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
159 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
Must go and check it out today, c what is so attractive abt this project, 1.1m for a dsl in cyberjaya , kau lat!
supersp
post Aug 6 2012, 10:11 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
159 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
QUOTE(UFO-ET @ Aug 6 2012, 10:03 AM)
26'x95' is a superb land size, never thought of SPS not taking full advantage of it, I must say the best superlink design goes to YTL The Reed. I hv to drop my initial rating fr BBBx10 to BB now  biggrin.gif
SEG will be a successful Taman still.
*
The one back facing the beautiful garden is 1.4m for intermediate linked villa, whereas the same setup, back facing garden for the 41x95 semid is selling 1.77m ... So i think the semid is more 'value for money' ...What do u think?

This post has been edited by supersp: Aug 6 2012, 10:11 AM
« Next Oldest · Property Talk · Next Newest »
 

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0389sec    0.54    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 01:28 AM
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Removal Request
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.