Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 STDs (Sexually Transmitted Diseases), important info

views
     
kmarc
post Jan 25 2008, 07:28 PM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



QUOTE(GuaRantopia @ Jan 18 2008, 02:36 PM)
Can tell me more about AIDS?? same with STD??? not very clear ...  sad.gif
anyway thank you, I have heard about STD many time and duno what exaxtly about that, at least now I know What it is about..
*
AIDS is a subset of STD. STD is just an overall term to mean diseases that can be transmitted sexually. Examples of common STD are AIDS, Hepatitis B, infections due to chlamydia & N. gonorrhoea and syphilis.

Nowadays, they tend to be termed STI - Sexually transmitted infections. smile.gif
kmarc
post Jul 27 2008, 10:24 AM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



QUOTE(lilac_alex @ Jul 18 2008, 06:02 PM)
i wana ask:

can std cause cervical cancer?

thanks
*
STD per say does not cause cervical cancer. It is the HPV virus that gets transmitted through sexual intercourse that can cause cervical cancer.... wink.gif

QUOTE(biatche @ Jul 27 2008, 07:59 AM)
ok, there any specialist for this? like in usa, there are so many std clinics to do yoru testing.... how about in malaysia?
*
Look for your nearest gynae specialist..... I'm sure there are lots of those at your hometown... wink.gif
kmarc
post Jul 27 2008, 05:37 PM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



QUOTE(biatche @ Jul 27 2008, 11:48 AM)
how come you're sure? can you name me one then since you're so sure?
*
Why so surprise? hmm.gif

Why I'm sure there's a gynae specialist in Miri? Well, that's because there is a general hospital and also some private hospitals/clinics there (in every state, actually)....

Want some names ka? How about Miri Hospital and Columbia Asia........... wink.gif

This post has been edited by kmarc: Jul 27 2008, 05:39 PM
kmarc
post Jul 27 2008, 09:59 PM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



I'm not sure whether it will be "proper" and "full". You have to clarify it with them.... wink.gif

kmarc
post Aug 9 2009, 01:22 PM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



David_lynn,

From what I can conclude, you do know much about HIV and AIDS. However, your idea that modern medical science is a joke and should not be trusted is somewhat appalling. That's what I understand after reading your posts anyway. If you belief that modern science is fake, what methods are you going to use to refute the evidence.... modern science? And if you don't belief in modern science, what do you belief in??? It is your right to belief what you want but I just want to understand this fundamental issue first before we go into any debate.

Modern medical science is not exact science. It is not as simple as black and white or 1,2,3 but unfortunately includes shades of grey. The reason? Man has progress far in terms of medical science but unfortunately, there are still A LOT of things man do not understand.

And I just don't understand your example of H1N1 vaccination and vitamin C..... most laymen are aware about vitamin C and infection. What's your point?


QUOTE(david_lynn @ Aug 9 2009, 10:51 AM)
you think Im scared ?  laugh.gif

and even worst you are asking your lecturer whose knowledge is also based on modern medical science ? (im not sure, maybe he might know something about natural health, that is fine...then he has the story to both side, which should be the way)

as for you, it's ok, you can laugh, comment or write anything you want, cause it is useless to discuss these things with you. Sometimes, you have to EXPERIENCE it, then ONLY you know what Im talking about. This kind of things arent that straight forward as you might think, and Im not saying this to protect myself, but it is indeed the truth. The modern medical science has managed to confuse a lot of people, and blame or equate the natural/alternative healings as a scam or hoax. The first condition to treat s sick/ill person is do not harm the body, yet modern medical science has violated that condition long time ago, this is very obvious in cancer, yet people(without using their brain) keep debating(without seeing the other side's opinion) as if they are preaching the gospel, UNKNOWN that many have died because they DECIDED to go to modern medical science for treatment  wink.gif

again, there's no point to argue with you(or the others), because I know where you are because I used to think like the majority. I really thank God that He opens my eyes of the evil people in this world who are so good at manipulating and lying, masking the marketing plan as the solution of scientific medicine for their own profits. Please, dont go on joking saying this is a conspiracy...LOL, when you cant see it, you just cant. Bear in mind, health is yours not mine, so if anyone of the people sort of threaten me that if there's no evidence, they wont believe...which is fine to me LOL.

As usual, one of my relatives recently just take a shot for the H1N1, and (why am I not surprised ) he was sick, vomit, fever and feel painful. Again, this doesnt happens to everyone, but this clearly indicates to me, something inside the vaccines(which we dont know) is trying to hijack our body system, yet our body is fighting against it, until I gave him Vit C(from natural resources such as beta carotene, ascorbic acid)...then was his condition getting better. He thinks Im losing my mind...but after that incident, now he starts to dig deep into reading unbiased studies, natural food, PH status. As I said over and over in this forum, when people choose not to be open, you just cant see it, all you can think of is scam, hoax, lies....

Oh by the way, do post what your lectucturer says ( not that Im going to change my mind because of your lecturer, because in my life, I have even see an "expert"/"specialist" who says, IM SORRY, I DONT KNOW WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOUR PARENT. I SUGGEST YOU GO TO CONSULT OTHER DOCTOR" ) - you ? nah, you dont have to say what you have seen or study, not worth to mention  wink.gif
*
kmarc
post Aug 9 2009, 07:19 PM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



QUOTE(david_lynn @ Aug 9 2009, 06:07 PM)
hey kmarc,

no problem man, let me just explain our gaps, but i dont assume myself as have a great knowledge BUT everyday is a constant learning process. remember to be always open minded...

However, your idea that modern medical science is a joke and should not be trusted is somewhat appalling >>> if it is for acute or emergency illnesses like fever, cut/burns, labour, it is of course hospitals are the best place to treat such conditions which is very obvious to the eyes. If untreated, it will do more harm than good in SUCH SITUATION.


That would be a contradiction, wouldn't it? Both acute medicine, chronic medicine or whatever branch of medicine goes hand in hand - all have progressed a long way to become what is known as modern medical science. You just can't separately say that acute illnesses are effectively treated by modern science while other illnesses are not! Most treatment options nowadays are based on the same research/study methodology and statistical analysis.

QUOTE
However, in terms of chronic illnesses, like cancer(there's actually various types of cancers, lymphoma, sarcoma...), heart problems, organ dysfuntion, it is best to understand that such conditions happens after years and years of human consumption of unwanted processed foods which contains chemicals we dont even know, and drugs(although have certain functions but it is still chemicals for borh recreational and medicinal), negative human emotions, poor environment and unhealthy lifestyle. So, it is very wrong for people to assume that drugs can be the solution, because drugs intention is to kill the cancer cells BUT it comes with a price, because drugs are artificial things, and our bodies are natural organs, that has biological functions. Therefore there will be side effects. That is why majority of people who goes to ONLY chemotherapies either die or if they survive, the cancer comes back. WHY ? because the drugs dont solve the ROOT CAUSE. It delays the symptoms. However, if one decided to change the lifestyle to eating natural or raw foods(let food be your medicine) and stop all the FEAR MONGERING things, I sincerely believe the cancer cant survive any longer because we have created an unsuitable environment for the cancer cells, and therefore, the cancer cells have to shrink to very very small percentage called as undetectable in the cancer marker test, everyone has cancer cells. Our public's negativity has bring the fall of our own. We need to be as positive as ever... 


I fully agree with you that a healthy lifestyle does reduce illnesses. Here's the example that you gave:
1) Human consumption of unwanted processed foods which contains unknown chemicals
2) Eating natural or raw food

You have to realize that most food nowadays are either processed or treated. How can an average working man find the food that you describe - natural or raw, unprocessed and untreated? Even the vegetables that you eat everyday has chemicals sprayed on them. Unless, of course, you're talking about organic food, which is not readily available and cost more than an average man can afford!!!

3) Negative human emotions

Again, I have no doubt that negative human emotions can be detrimental. However, nobody can 100% control their emotions to make sure they are 100% positive!!! Well, maybe if you're a vulcan.......

4) Poor environment

Malaysia is now shrouded in thick haze. How to avoid?

In the end, what I'm trying to say is that maintaining a healthy lifestyle is crucial for health but there are factors that are unavoidable, however hard you try to avoid it.

As for cancer, know that modern scientist and researchers have not yet fully understood the nature of cancer!!! However, they have come a long way in TRYING to understand it! If cancer was fully understood, then you would have a cure. When something is not well understood, naturally, the drugs or treatment options used to treat the illness would not be very effective.

Another example is the drugs used to treat your common hypertension (high blood pressure). Do you realize that the multitude of drugs used to treat the blood pressure that is high and not address the root cause? The drugs mainly act in reducing the blood pressure. Why so? Because nobody has identified the root cause of the disease!!! If so, does that mean that hypertensive patients don't take their medication?

QUOTE
for HIV=AIDS case, I believe you can actually study my questions that I have posed on another forum, and more importantly, watch the movie(if it is available in Malaysia, which I doubt) called House of Numbers. Then you tell me which part of the science has progress  wink.gif I find it very hard to swallow some things that the modern medical science have decided to CURSE the people diagnosed as positive, and of course the people, out of ignorant, choose to discriminate those people. Each and every year, what profesor Duesberg has said in the 80s has come true...and how the world ridicule what Africa's President Mbeki said, also has come true. The evidence how HIV can cause the fall of the immune system is not being documented. Just go and ponder on the questions I ask, because if you said that THERE ARE STILL MANY THINGS THAT THE HUMAN DONT KNOW, how come the modern medical science can know if THE HIV+ people dont take the medication, they can die in 10 years time ???? there are obviously people who reject the medication lives up to 20 years and still living. WHY DOES THE DEFINITION OF ILLNESSES(for AIDS) KEEPS INCREASING ??? I find it very uncommon for a "virus" can create more illnesses as times progresses. It seems like anything that is unsolved, the modern medical science like to dump it as a "virus" issue.
Regarding HIV/AIDS, do you know that there are still no cure for a viral infection? Why do you have antibiotics for bacterial infection but no effective drug for viral infection? Again, it is because medical science has not progressed that far to understand and combat viral infections.

Again, I ask you. If you do not believe in modern medical science, what do you belief in? I do hope that what you belief in has concrete evidence from whatever research methodology that it came from.

QUOTE
if i were to choose between cancer and HIV=AIDS, cancer is still more dangerous than HIV=AIDS. But more importantly, the drugs is not your saviour. We are only being told by "doctors" that those drugs are the ONLY solution, is it the truth ?
Drugs are NOT the solution. It is one of the available methods to treat a condition based on how much researchers understand it! Again, just to stress that there are many things still NOT understood!

QUOTE
That's what I understand after reading your posts anyway. If you belief that modern science is fake, what methods are you going to use to refute the evidence.... modern science? >>> I dont have to refute at all. This whole mess is "introduce" by your modern medical science, it is them who needs to realize that they are wrong. BUT, I dont see any such sign so far. If this happens, the pharmaceutical companies will have to go bankrupt, and they will do anything to make sure anyone who can affect theor profits be eliminated. Sad, shocking, but you dont see it  cool2.gif
And if you don't belief in modern science, what do you belief in??? >>> it's in my postings, you will find it. I dont believe in drugs.

Modern medical science is not exact science. It is not as simple as black and white or 1,2,3 but unfortunately includes shades of grey. >>> I agree with you. BUT it is the grey area that they propose to the community DRUGS is the only solution, and claiming how people will die in such period of time. Come to think of it, dont you think they make themselves as God ?

And I just don't understand your example of H1N1 vaccination and vitamin C..... most laymen are aware about vitamin C and infection. What's your point? >>> sorry, the sentence might confuse you. What I meant is the we dont really know how far these vaccinations can protect us, however, injecting something foreign to our body isnt a good choice because we dont even know the ingredients used in those vaccines. Sometimes, they may contain mercury, lead or other dangerous things which we dont know, OR even certain types of "virus" that really has been created, we dont know. Vit C is a natural detoxifier, it can neutralize certain dangerous things that is not of benefit to our body. But the Vit C must be taken from natural resources, usually fruits and not chemicals ( yes, it can be easily bought from the pharmacy ) Herbs can also be beneficial to us as well....my point is anything that is from nature they are good for us.

no, I dont want to debate, because it's just no use at all. My friend, go to all the website I have posted and read them, and if you really are interested in vaccinations, HIV, you NEED to read the work of Janine Roberts, in the book Fear Of The Invisible...the investigation she started in 1994, and YES, inside the book there are concrete evidence the person who introduces HIV as the cause of AIDS, might be a big mistake afterall....after 25 years and growing.
*
So, does that mean that there no means to confirm or refute modern science? You state yourself that "This whole mess is "introduced" by your modern medical science, it is them who needs to realize that they are wrong". In order to realize that something is wrong, there has to be "evidence" to show that it is wrong! Nobody would challenge something if it is proven wrong. Classic example, all humans previously thought that the sun revolves around our earth, only to be proved wrong later on that it was earth that revolves around the sun.

In conclusion, what I'm trying to say is that we have come a long way in terms of medical sciences. However, there are still a lot of research to be done before we can fully understand the human body. Scientist do not fully understand the human body and as such, do not have effective drugs to cure many diseases. Modern science has come to a stage where the MANIFESTATION of diseases can be treated but NOT the ROOT CAUSE of diseases. As time goes by, another medical breakthrough occurs, to progress medical science further and better. Who knows, it may take another 1000 years before humans can fully understand their own body. In the meantime, we can only make do with what we have, as we understand it. wink.gif

P/s : Humans are not that gullible. Show clear reproducible evidence to proof something wrong and everybody will believe it.

This post has been edited by kmarc: Aug 9 2009, 07:48 PM
kmarc
post Aug 10 2009, 05:37 PM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



Now, you don't have to get all worked up la. As initially suspected, this is going nowhere so I'll stop here.

I think what you believe in is alternative/complementary medicine? hmm.gif
kmarc
post Aug 11 2009, 01:01 PM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



QUOTE(david_lynn @ Aug 11 2009, 09:02 AM)
yup, alternative/natural medicine...actually, did you know that the food you eat can either be your medicine or kill you ?

modern medical science always thinks they are right in most of the thing, but believe me, they see all the things wrong. They use FEAR to make people feel that there's no other choices, they will die quickly if they dont use modern medical science way and that after using it, patient can expect a partial or full recovery. They always advertise, through ministry of health or the authority that other treatment besides modern medical science are quackery, but they dont aware themselves, it is modern medical science that have lead many people to die(always providing excuses that they have save many lives)....and STILL, many people trust the modern medical science, with all it's SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH...and to declare a simple equation HIV=AIDS=DEATH is very immature of modern medical science.

Alternative medicine/naturopathic is all about holistic treatment, if you have an issue, it involves all your body, not just specific area. and these treatment is not dangerous for your body, because if your body suffers a lot, then your body will signal to you that it's time to end the pain and sufferings, especially when it gets more and more painful, then slowly you dont have energy, and when FEAR grabs you, your soul/spirit will have to leave your body. That is why the modern medical science is not in accordance to the Christian way of healing. It is a sin to torture the wonderful body created by God with chemicals that are dangerous by itself.

I tell you frankly, while many people are expecting a magic formula or bullet, you wont find it. It take years to develop cancer, and yet many expect to take the medication and be healed in 6 months time ?  laugh.gif

all you need to do is change your lifestyle, while treating it with herbs(herbalogy) or nutrition, both are subset under naturopathic medical knowledge. of course there will be some party that decides to cheat people, and that is why herbs and nutritions are much fear off by the public because of this certain bad party experience.
*
You can't make sweeping generalization that modern medical science is so-call "EVIL". There are researchers with genuine intention to solve the mystery of the human body. Granted that there are those who doesn't think that way but they are not the majority.

Again, no researcher/scientist/doctor in his right mind would say that alternative treatments are quackery. However, many alternative treatments do not have any good data to show that it works. Anybody can claim that taking Vitamin C 10,000mg a day can cure cancer but are you going to believe it? I can claim that 3 cancer patients took 10 watermelons a day for 1 year and they were cured. Or somebody know of a person who never had any chronic diseases because he took 1 gallon of honey everyday until he died. Where's the evidence? A few isolated "miracle" doesn't mean that method works. If there are convincingly reproducible evidence that alternative medicine works, do you think the scientific community will ignore it?

Can you give me a few examples of alternative medicine that works but largely ignored by modern medical science? Make sure it is backed by clear reproducible evidence and not heresay or isolated cases.

Again, I have no quarrel with changing your lifestyle and leading a healthy lifestyle. wink.gif



kmarc
post Aug 11 2009, 06:14 PM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



QUOTE(david_lynn @ Aug 11 2009, 02:48 PM)
Im not going to spend more time with you on this anymore, the more I explain, the more excuses will come out. To me, the evidence is in the people who got healed, NOT THE STATISTIC THAT IS BEING SHOWN TO THE PUBLIC THAT SAYS MODERN MEDICAL SCIENCE HAS ACHIEVED ANOTHER MIRACLE DRUG. As I said over and over again, if you or your loved ones dont experience it, you will never understand what Im trying to tell you...because all my important points are inside all my past replies. At this point of time, I doubt you will ever understand it anymore. You, unfortunately have to understand it the hard way, many paid with their own lives.

anyway, since you are in Malaysia, attached is one of websites about alternative medicine :

http://www.natural-health.com.my/content.php?cat=34

remember, this is a real person. after you have read the website, try to screen through all that Ive said..and even then, you might not understand what Ive said....but if you do, that would be the most precious realization you will ever have.
*
It is not a matter of whether I understand or not. What matters is, how can people realize that alternative medicine is good IF it CANNOT reproduce the results of a treatment convincingly? Like I said, isolated cases of "cure" doesn't proof anything. It could have been a random event that happened even without treatment. And if clear reproducible evidence can't be shown, how do you know which treatment is effective and which is not?

Furthermore, your argument that the evidence is in the people who got healed is also "weak". Reason? Modern medicine also had many patients who got healed by modern medical drugs. Do you think if 100 cancer patients were treated with modern medicine, all 100 will die? Of course not. There will be those who survived after treatment. So, if the results are based on patients who got healed, then how do you differentiate and compare alternative medicine to modern medicine in terms of results?

Here's a quote from the website you provided:
QUOTE
Ideally, all healing sciences should be studied & compared, the best and safest of which should be incorporated into the healing arts. It should be independent of the pharmaceutical industries, so as to avoid medical & business politicking. Unfortunately, this is not so & therefore consumers suffer unnecessarily from a greed-based medical system.
I whole-heartedly agree with the statement. Note the word "studied and compared". Tell me how a healing method should be studied and how can it be compared to other treatments? How? Definitely not on hearsay, isolated stories of "cure" and unproven claims!

Don't get me wrong. I have nothing against alternative medicine. In fact, it would be great news if alternative medicine can help human kind. Before that can happen, like what the quote say, all healing sciences should be studied and compared and the best and safest method should be incorporated. wink.gif

This post has been edited by kmarc: Aug 11 2009, 06:15 PM
kmarc
post Aug 12 2009, 02:25 PM

The future is here - Cryptocurrencies!
Group Icon
Elite
14,576 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Sarawak



David_lynn,

First of all, you seem to misunderstand everything I write.

Secondly, where in my reply did I ever shoot you down or discredit alternative medicine? Where?

Thirdly, this is getting nowhere. I was interested in your views on alternative/complementary medicine but the way you reply is sometimes defensive and filled with emotion, hatred and accusations.

Fourthly, with regards to your question on whether I have seen cancer patients treated with chemotherapies, I can tell you that I see cancer patients almost everyday for the past >10 years. Many die but many are still alive (and well!), even after 10 over years. And no, I'm no oncologist.

Lastly, thx for labelling me blind, ignorant, narrow minded and irrational (notice that I didn't ever do that to you, I think) wink.gif. What does that say? hmm.gif

QUOTE(david_lynn @ Aug 12 2009, 09:47 AM)
What matters is, how can people realize that alternative medicine is good IF it CANNOT reproduce the results of a treatment convincingly? >>> hpw you know it cant reproduce results ? HAVE YOU USED IT BEFORE ?

Like I said, isolated cases of "cure" doesn't proof anything >>> why should it be proven to you when you arent ready to believe it ? The proof is in the pudding(provided the medication is by an expert who really knows this treatment), there's no point to proof because if there's 1 point you miss, that is everyone has a different body composition, therefore every solution needs to be one to one basis, unlike allopathic. allopathic is also trial and error, it's just doctors dont say this to you. Usually they will prescribe a drug to you, until at a point of time, it stops working. Then, a more stronger drugs will be prescribed. No matter how much I explain, you still dont get it, that drugs cant cure you, they supress your symptoms so that you dont "see" or "feel" which makes you think everything is ok, but deep down the body, it is starting to grow worst.

Furthermore, your argument that the evidence is in the people who got healed is also "weak". Reason? Modern medicine also had many patients who got healed by modern medical drugs. Do you think if 100 cancer patients were treated with modern medicine, all 100 will die? Of course not. There will be those who survived after treatment. So, if the results are based on patients who got healed, then how do you differentiate and compare alternative medicine to modern medicine in terms of results? >>> How can you do such comparison ? Your comparison is silly, it's like comparing apple with orange. Those that survive usually is because they arent given the high dosage, besides the cancer WILL COME BACK and not to mention all the sufferings a person have to go through. THEY ARE NOT HEALED. Enuff, I dont want to debate with you anymore, as I said before, if you arent aware that many people who believe the chemotherapies died eventually, then Im afraid you are blind. You are the type that are so ignorant that only by showing you CLEARLY in front of you before and after and also documented statistics then will you be convince...but I tell you, just like modern medical science, you dont have common sense. There are so many factors involved in this war on medicine, it is not a straight explanation to you. The public has been covered FEAR until common sense is uncommon anymore...

Don't get me wrong. I have nothing against alternative medicine. In fact, it would be great news if alternative medicine can help human kind. Before that can happen, like what the quote say, all healing sciences should be studied and compared and the best and safest method should be incorporated. wink.gif >>> Whether what your opinion on alternative medicine is none of my business, life is yours anyway. If all the human are like you, study and study and study and do human trial, which takes ages (if you really realized ) then many would have died. China and India people wouldnt survived for thousands and thousand of years if it's not because of the herbs, is there modern medical science their time ? and even with the modern medical science, human lifespan keeps getting shorter. And as stated in the website, when there is a greed in the system, I doubt the system is a good system.

no wonder there are certain people who keep messaging me dont bother with people in here who shoot me down, dont waste my time to keep replying them. Not to be arrogant, but after seeing people with chronic illnesses, and comparing with the results that people being treated in modern medical science, there's no doubt moderrn medical science is a junk science.

kmarc, if you cant rationalize it, you just cant see it, you just cant. The modern medical science is so influential, they have all the money in this world to change your views, to cover failed cases, to cover fatality cases, to create new definition to make people continue to believe what seems to be right, to continue instill fear in people, causing people to discriminate those who are "infected" by the "test" or diagnosis. I know of a doctor(oncologists, cancer expert), she is the best doctor in UK, earning several PHDs, everyone seeks her advise, even UK government. In the end, she quit, burns all her certs...she herself admit that modern medical science CANT cure cancer, they just can only see the patients sufferings, slowly suffering, hair fall down, inject a lot of morphine for the unbearable pain, all the organs slowly start to fail....yet, all she can do is just watch and prescribe drugs...she's a christian by the way. Modern medical science is always give bad news, always without a doubt. and when doctors fail to treat a cancer patient, they start to avoid patient, or either give up hope...

you know kmarc, sometimes I wonder with all the questions you ask, have you really see how a cancer patient treated with chemotherapies look like or suffer ? It seems to me, your world is like a very simple sicentific technologies with evidence-based that can help human kind...stop watching hollywood movies...

Before that can happen, like what the quote say, all healing sciences should be studied and compared and the best and safest method should be incorporated. wink.gif >>> you think modern medical science care about this ? Dont be a fool, if this happens, those who have cancer wont be given chemotherapies or radiation, and those who are "HIV+" wont be given AZT or Nevirapine. It's ironic that this sentence comes out after what you have debated with me...
*

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0202sec    0.58    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 02:11 PM