Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Financial Are property prices going to drop? V2, The heated debate continues

views
     
SUSjdgobio
post Mar 8 2011, 05:30 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(Iceman74 @ Mar 3 2011, 09:33 PM)
that why freehold have the advantage, not to mention the bank will loan you anytime with freehold title but not leasehold & the appreciation difference between them. There are also the type of owners living condition difference between freehold taman & leasehold taman.
*
You mean like the difference between people livin in Kepong Baru (freehold) 30+ years old house with small congested roads & Lake Edge (leasehold) new classy place? rclxub.gif

Cannot simply say leasehold area worse off than freehold. Many other things to consider. Entire Sunway, Kota Damansara & Tropicana is also leasehold.
SUSjdgobio
post Mar 15 2011, 03:32 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(totila @ Mar 14 2011, 11:44 AM)
hhmm.. from all ur great analysis and theory.. u still haven't answer my question yet..
i repeat it again --> do u mind to share with us where can we get a 220k new developement project? i don't have transport, so not wishing to stay in ululu place. icon_question.gif


Added on March 14, 2011, 11:46 am

funny la u ! hahaha~
*
In Klang Valley - Many new developments <220k in Rawang area. Probably some in Sungai Buloh as well and some in Saujana Putra area. And many existing condos/apartments in Kepong <220k - some near Kepong Sentral KTM station.

The way I see it, you have 2 criterias which you have to modify if you want a property below 220k - new prop & location.
If you're not willing to modify these 2, then increase your budget. We all have to change our expectations when buying a property as our expectations may be unreasonable under the current situation.

Maybe you want to consider getting a transport first before getting a house?
SUSjdgobio
post Mar 17 2011, 10:12 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(totila @ Mar 15 2011, 07:50 PM)
according to the scheme, they provided 100% loan for property 220k to the ppl earning under 3k rite?
if i'm the 1 with the salary under 3k, and i need to BUY a car 1st before i BUY a house, isn't it sound even ridiculous?
i have to pay another extra few hundreds to stay far far away and need to pay extra gas, parking and maybe toll somore?? (dun forget if my salary is under 3K)
and
if i can have higher budget, then what for i need this scheme ?

hahahaha! so we can only go for old old flat in the city?
HALO! IT IS SO DAMN OBVIOUS THE SCHEME DOESN"T MAKE SENSE AT ALL WEY!
*
You are a complainer who lacks the ability to appreciate things. Who told u to buy a car? If you perceive yourself to be poor then ride a bike or basikal would do. If not don't buy a house. I think your lifestyle is too lavish for your pay which is why you are thinking that everyone owes you a living.

If you think this scheme is not for u, then don't go for it. I personally have friends who are very happy with this scheme and plan to use it. If its not suitable for you ... then too bad. Suck it up & move on like a man.
SUSjdgobio
post Mar 17 2011, 04:48 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(totila @ Mar 17 2011, 01:05 PM)
seems like this fella didn't follow a thread and simply post a bird brain reply
The term bird brain really suits you for your comments in this thread.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0179sec    0.79    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 03:36 PM