May 16 2011, 01:15 AM
QUOTE(lucerne @ May 12 2011, 11:52 AM)
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysi...nd-high-prices/
He said, however, he sympathised with Rehda over “indirect taxation” which came in the form of developers having to build public utility infrastructure which added to the cost of residential property.
“We too have lobbied for such infrastructures to be carried by the respective public-listed utility companies because they are business ventures,” he said.
when msia govt short of $$ (due to corruptions, leaks etc), i think more and more developers need to bear the cost of infrastructures eg bridges, flyover, tunnels, new access roads, road widening (eg rawang by gamuda, guocoland etc ), drainages, lanscaping, subsidy the mrt/lrt land for schools, carpark, garden, masjid/surau etc. At the end the extra costs will pass to the new house buyers. So expect the home price go up more. it is just like the new home buyers subsidy the govt to build all the above infrastructures. (Msia boleh!)
The old home buyers will benefited the most as old days the developers do not need to build so many infrastructures (as the traffic is not busy/complicated etc) and they can now enjoyed the rocketed price rise. eg BU in 80s,90s--no brigde, tunnel, flyovers etc. Now the new house price from SHC, Berjaya, Mammoth, MK etc already include all the above facilities..(all developers need to share the costs). The more developments the more infrastructure needed to cater for the needs of resident (old and new). Unless they stop new launchs which is impossible. Expect to see more flyovers, infrastructure in Damansara (but the govt will not going to foot the bills, it is u..)
so do you expect ALL Malaysian need to pay for the utilities for new developing area ? you want to stay there but all people need to pay with you...government money is people money...He said, however, he sympathised with Rehda over “indirect taxation” which came in the form of developers having to build public utility infrastructure which added to the cost of residential property.
“We too have lobbied for such infrastructures to be carried by the respective public-listed utility companies because they are business ventures,” he said.
when msia govt short of $$ (due to corruptions, leaks etc), i think more and more developers need to bear the cost of infrastructures eg bridges, flyover, tunnels, new access roads, road widening (eg rawang by gamuda, guocoland etc ), drainages, lanscaping, subsidy the mrt/lrt land for schools, carpark, garden, masjid/surau etc. At the end the extra costs will pass to the new house buyers. So expect the home price go up more. it is just like the new home buyers subsidy the govt to build all the above infrastructures. (Msia boleh!)
The old home buyers will benefited the most as old days the developers do not need to build so many infrastructures (as the traffic is not busy/complicated etc) and they can now enjoyed the rocketed price rise. eg BU in 80s,90s--no brigde, tunnel, flyovers etc. Now the new house price from SHC, Berjaya, Mammoth, MK etc already include all the above facilities..(all developers need to share the costs). The more developments the more infrastructure needed to cater for the needs of resident (old and new). Unless they stop new launchs which is impossible. Expect to see more flyovers, infrastructure in Damansara (but the govt will not going to foot the bills, it is u..)
i think current practice is right, you chose that area because you want all the utilities and facilities, so you need to pay for it, let peoples money goes to better education, preventing crimes so our country will be more prosper in the future....
Quote
0.0580sec
0.54
7 queries
GZIP Disabled