QUOTE(KLsooner @ May 20 2011, 09:41 AM)
It is off topics here. you can open another thread to talk about this or may be it has already been discussed b4.
My advice is to get life insurans instead of MRTA if you do not plan to stay there more than 10 years.
Normally for working couples, you can pay off your first house loan in less than 10 years if you really want to. Take a 15 years loan, pay 10% down, take out EPF saving every 3 years, put in all your bonuses, 7-8 years should be enough. MRTA is a waste.
If you stretch the loan too long, let say 30 years loan, for the first 10 years, 3/4 of your installment goes to interest. You can do the math.
Well this is right and wrong to a certain extent. Yes i thyink MRTA is a waste and if you already have a life insurance (which everybody should), then no point taking MRTA/MLTA.
Housing loans should only be minimised for those who cant manage money well. If ure a smart investor and have excellent financial controls, then getting a max loan period is best. This would free up capital to invest in a subsequent property.
I made a mistake with my 1st property in 2009 when i only took a 15 yr loan. The higher monthly payments will eat into your 'qualification' salary for a subsequent property. Luckily for me i could still go ahead with the 2nd unit without having to refinance the 1st. But ill surely face a problem with the 3rd property. So ill keep my refinancing & EPF option for then.
Taking out EPF too early is a waste when the returns on EPF is more than the amount you're paying for home loan interests at current rates.
This post has been edited by cybermaster98: May 20 2011, 12:27 PM