Hmm, double standard it seems, but to be safe just bring your receipt. The camera shop i always buy from asked me to keep the receipt just in case
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V5, Anticipating D700 replacement !
|
|
 Feb 27 2011, 01:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
 
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Feb 27 2011, 01:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(razuryza @ Feb 27 2011, 01:11 PM) haha.. not ur lucky day la kot.. but.. so far.. couples time claim warranty, never been asked for the receipt... Maybe   |
|
|
Feb 28 2011, 03:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Feb 28 2011, 02:23 PM) wondering if 50 1.4 AiS is worth for a try? Manual focus is going to be difficult using your D3100 tiny viewfinder   |
|
|
Feb 28 2011, 03:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Feb 28 2011, 03:20 PM) with the AF indicator show whether the object is in focus? really? metering also doesn't work? Ughh.. I wouldn't dare to try then.   |
|
|
Feb 28 2011, 04:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Feb 28 2011, 04:05 PM) photo spam... When did u shot her? I know this girl leh without PP... C&C » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «  , anyway your shots are underexposed to meThis post has been edited by Bliz: Feb 28 2011, 04:07 PM |
|
|
Feb 28 2011, 04:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#46
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Feb 28 2011, 04:18 PM) haha... Needs to be brighter, I don't see any sunlights at all, not a good time for photoshoot ya... she's quite familiar wif those malacca photo kaki... sunday... okok... got it... underexpose means nid brighter...? or more colourful...? ... Try spot metering on her face in conditions like this, then the skin will look much better |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 28 2011, 04:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#47
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Feb 28 2011, 04:28 PM) icic... Don't keep change lens or body, learn to utilise what u have first, from what i see there's still a lot of things to learn ok... "sao dou"... dat time is reali cloudy evening... will take note of dat... btw... i reali duno about d metering things... ani links for me to easi learning... coz read d manual adi stil can't understand...  .. anyway here's the metering tutorial http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials...ra-metering.htm |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 02:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#48
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Mar 1 2011, 02:42 PM) That is your own opinion. You may have tested a bad copy. Even the mighty 24mm f/1.4 is not spared with problems. Any lens for that matter. U pay for the Nikkor So after giving you the links (you can also google out for more if you want), you still conclude that you have not come across anyone to suggest the 10-24 over the 12-24? A higher density sensor will show more flaws of a lens than a lower density sensor. Wrong? Hmmm, I never said my Sigma was the best. I only indicated that the Sigma was the better compromise for me. I take holiday photographs. I don't shoot for a living. I believe you when you say you tested all of the UWAs you listed. If you claim to say something is better than another, please back it up. Show samples. If you can't, look for threads to say that the 10-24 is inferior to the 12-24. Else, it will just remain as hearsay... I tend to agree with that. Nikkor glasses produce better colour and details out of the camera.  , even their DX lenses are not exactly cheap to begin with  |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 03:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#49
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 1 2011, 03:00 PM) But you look at Canon higher MP camera. The noise Actually the 7D noise performance is quite good leh, usable ISO3200 to me  Btw, my 24mm now at Nikon place. Hopefully a new replacement   ... higher MP is useless if u dun print big, always view in front computer talk bout sharpness also useless cos won't see it unless u print big as well |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 03:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#50
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Mar 1 2011, 03:09 PM) change DPI to 300 in photoshop then can talk boh? What's the point viewing on the screen and scream about noise, sharpness and so when u don't even print BIG? |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 03:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#51
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(0168257061 @ Mar 1 2011, 03:18 PM) as a canon user, i think 12-15 is very enough , or we call overkill already. Don't forget higher MP also need bigger storage space and will tax your pc for post processing.... D700/D3 series is just awesome, FF, superb low noise, superb speed only thing is no video( I am not using so doesn't bother me 18mp is toooooooooo large man, shooting RAW is pain in the ass, dont count the 5D2 yet I found out D3 series is a nice class, because its the only Low MP , High FPS , FF camera. Canon doesnt have their class to compete D3. ) |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 03:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#52
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 1 2011, 03:21 PM) D3s got video Can't afford that , don't really need the high ISO performance of it, my D700 is more than enough for the time being |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 04:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#53
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Mar 1 2011, 04:45 PM) wow... Very soft photo, i suspect the slow shutter speed, the skin tone doesn't look right as well d800 looks reali reali gd... maybe direct competitor wif 5d mark iii...? btw... another photo to share... without PP... C&C... » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « BTW, u shot together with terence and jordison? This post has been edited by Bliz: Mar 1 2011, 04:55 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 05:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#54
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Mar 1 2011, 04:59 PM) Yes, it's still relatively new and the button is stiff. So got no choice but to use it more often? Just use it more often will do, mine was hard like brick when I first got it, now it's quite ok already The feedbacks from this rumour are not positive. A little bit far fetched. |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 05:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#55
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Mar 1 2011, 05:14 PM) yes... It's me lar not celciuz, i know jordison and terence, always shot together with jordison nowadaysslightly handshake due to longer shutter... ya... bro celciuz... u were there too...? Added on March 1, 2011, 5:19 pm QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 1 2011, 05:14 PM) I didn't use this anymore, what i do is line up the batteries from front to back, much easier to see whether it's backfocusing or frontfocusingThis post has been edited by Bliz: Mar 1 2011, 05:19 PM |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 05:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#56
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Mar 1 2011, 05:22 PM) icic... In fact lighting is nothing wrong, indoor sure yellowish and low light(weddings especially).. Just need to master flash usage and WB settings then will be ok(talk easy but hard to do, I also still learning next time i wana join u all oso lar... if got call me lar... nid to learn from u all... coz indoor wif low light... all d lights r in yellow colour... sometimes is my hand careless...  )Added on March 1, 2011, 5:47 pm QUOTE(KTCY @ Mar 1 2011, 05:29 PM) Good idea. I need to figure out again whether is my camera problem or the 24mm problems Learn from dpreview forum, they call it "The Battery Test", much easier to figure out FF/BF problem.. Focus chart is hard to test using telephoto, cos I cant even see the fonts clearly when focusing(text too small on A4 Paper, probably need A3 size )This post has been edited by Bliz: Mar 1 2011, 05:47 PM |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 05:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#57
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(kakisemut @ Mar 1 2011, 05:56 PM) yeah... DX users still got a lot of 3rd party lens, the FF 3rd party lens just suck nikon price can kill u...  |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 06:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#58
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(kakisemut @ Mar 1 2011, 05:59 PM) oooo.... This is the dumbest thing I ever heard but FF user dont hv to buy 3rd party lens... the hv lot of money.. go straight for Nikon lens...  ... Does this means that all those driving imported cars must fill in Ron97 instead of Ron95 because they are "rich"? |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 06:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#59
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Mar 1 2011, 06:06 PM) Brings back memories... This thing cost like RM200++?? Nowadays, you have this; » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by Bliz: Mar 1 2011, 06:15 PM |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 06:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#60
|
|
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka
|
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Mar 1 2011, 06:33 PM) That's only around 3% of the 24mm f/1.4 price. No thanx, battery test is better and easier for me  |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0254sec
 0.76
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 12:56 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.