Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Portable Players Cube C30 mp3 music player FAN CLUB, Powerful and affordable? BBE ROCKS !!!!!

views
     
ClieOS
post Feb 15 2011, 10:18 PM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


QUOTE(tunertoobe @ Feb 15 2011, 02:12 PM)
The Rocoo A(Gumstick equivalent) seems to be hiding their specs.
*
Just to be clear, Rocoo-A uses a totally different hardware compared to C30 or Gumstick. Rocoo-A is Rockchip Nano based while C30 / Gumstick is Sigmatel based.

QUOTE(windboy @ Feb 15 2011, 02:53 PM)
GUmstick has much pushing power compare with Cube C30, which i would say is comparable.
*
Older version of Gumstick actually sound louder because of the old firmware it used. New generation of Gumstick sounds softer because the max volume is limited to lower distortion during EQ - thus newer Gumstick is about as loud as C30 is going to be (the volume limiting already applies to it as well)


QUOTE(beederbest @ Feb 15 2011, 03:01 PM)
But for ClieOS, he eventually leave the burn in job for gumstick and take c30 btween the 2 as the portable player. I guess that really  means something.
*
Also to clear things up, SQ wise the two are on par. I simply choose C30 because its has BBE.

ClieOS
post Feb 16 2011, 02:21 AM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


QUOTE(wongpeter @ Feb 15 2011, 10:41 PM)
Not owning a gumstick I am curious if the EQ settings on it is as interesting as the BBE on the C30?
*
EQ on Gumstick is pretty basic. You get the typical rock /pop / etc kind of EQ and a simple User EQ, that's all.
ClieOS
post Mar 31 2011, 01:14 AM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


Gumstick on older firmware can output higher volume. On the newer firmware, it is actually about the same as C30. The volume on both Gumstick and C30 on newer firmware are lowered to minimize distortion, acrounding to Cube.
ClieOS
post Apr 2 2011, 10:04 AM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


QUOTE(wongpeter @ Apr 1 2011, 09:17 PM)
the only thing it can't play is 24 bit/96 KHz.
16 bit/44100 hz is NOT a problem.
correct me if I'm wrong but I thought FLAC only goes up to 655,350 Hz.
what is this 500++,600++,700++ kbps flac files you are talking about?

Maybe what you need is a RM3500 Hifiman 801 and not a RM170 Cube C30.
Come to think of it I'm not sure if the Hifiman 801 can handle 24 bit/96 KHz.
*
HM801's DAC can handle 24/192. However this really isn't what Hz is about. Sampling rate doesn't equal to frequency response. Even the best desktop player that do 24/192 still cuts off at around ~22kHz at output. For most commercial music, there is no very obvious benefit to go to 24bits or beyond 44kHz because they are mastered at 16/44. Transcoding those music to 24/96 doesn't make it better than it already is.
ClieOS
post Apr 3 2011, 04:26 PM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


The hanging on Bye Bye is a curious one - I got hit a few times on early days with C30 on v007.020, then somehow it becomes very stable without any reason. I have updated to v007.021 for two weeks now and haven't have any problem so far. My Gumstick (which is on a very old firmware) on the other never hang since I got it last year.
ClieOS
post Dec 18 2011, 01:32 PM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


I have had X19HD for a while now. It isn't an upgrade for C30 so save your money for something else.
ClieOS
post Dec 19 2011, 10:52 AM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


QUOTE(tunertoobe @ Dec 18 2011, 04:16 PM)
Is it a good "side-grade" to a.....say, T51?
Mine is dying on me...well at least half of it. The left side channel is acting up.  laugh.gif  I think it's the HO port.
When it dies, the bass performance will be sorely missed.  sleep.gif
*
Side-grade? more like a significant downgrade actually. Even C30 is not quite as good as T51 and C30 is better than X19HD in most areas, except perhaps bass boost since X19HD has hardware bass boost. I was personally hoping X19HD could be better than C30 but I am quite disappointed. If you can get X19HD under US$30 than it is still a decent deal. But if I have the choice between C30 and X19HD, I'll pick C30 every times. To sum it up, there is nothing particularly special or great about X19HD.
ClieOS
post Dec 19 2011, 11:08 PM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


QUOTE(tunertoobe @ Dec 19 2011, 05:39 PM)
BTW how much bass boost does the X19HD give? May be handy for my SR60i......and Atrio (just kidding  laugh.gif  )
*
It isn't head shaking by any mean but it is textureful, which reminds me a little bit of how ZO does its bass boost because it only boosts the sub-bass and not the mid-bass.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0302sec    0.56    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 09:23 PM