QUOTE(zstan @ Feb 6 2011, 07:50 PM)
Wow I got an angpau which is good enough for me to buy a 35mm f1.8 with some change for a cheap filter. Hmmm tempting. @@
@ahpingko
No offense but your new water mark not nice laa.
thx for comment..i will change it..

..coz i see quite nice ma..but i can try to make another watermark..
QUOTE(fansoption @ Feb 6 2011, 08:59 PM)
i want aim for 35mm F1.8 hehe
i want too...how much ah?...got minolta one??
QUOTE(Newbieeeeee @ Feb 6 2011, 09:16 PM)
a580.

Added on February 6, 2011, 9:17 pmhmm.. just take a few steps back with the 50mm.. about the same lah.

why people buy 135mm f2.8 ahh?

it is not the same at all..if same, who gonna buy 35mm and that 135mm...lol..
QUOTE(albnok @ Feb 6 2011, 09:30 PM)
Newbieeeeee:
Taking a few steps back will give you a different perspective and angle of view.
Far objects will be bigger in scale to near objects.
However if you go close (whether with tele or wide), far objects will appear smaller compared to near objects.
So no, stepping back is not the same thing.albnok so damn right..

my sifu!
This post has been edited by ahpingko: Feb 6 2011, 09:39 PM