Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V4, Anticipating D700 replacement !

views
     
PureGeek
post Jan 24 2011, 08:00 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
433 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


wow i know u use d3100, what lens did u use to shoot these sharp bokeh pictures?

This post has been edited by PureGeek: Jan 24 2011, 08:01 PM
PureGeek
post Jan 31 2011, 06:50 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
433 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
hi guys, just found out that one thing point-and-shoot digital camera is better than DSLR is that ...

DSLR totally disabled and cannot be used when the lenses are foggy caused by going to high humid areas after exposing to air-con....just like ur car's windscreen getting foggy when u off the aircon when raining...

once the ur lenses get foggy, its the end for the trip and have to dry it in the dry box for at least 1 day !

and the pain is watching other people with compact digital cam playing around hahah =.=
PureGeek
post Jan 31 2011, 07:59 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
433 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(Everdying @ Jan 31 2011, 06:58 PM)
that why is there is the advice of never taking out your camera immediately when moving from a cold to hot place or vice versa.
same applies for items made of wood like snooker cues or guitars.
leave it in the bag / case for at least 10mins for it to settle down then only take out.

for point n shoot its what you dont see that may kill it, who knows moisture may have formed in the circuit board inside the camera?
*
very good advice to any beginners =)
PureGeek
post Feb 4 2011, 09:44 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
433 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
hi sifus and others,

i have a few questions here

1) do you actually shoot raw when shooting models? or just stick to jpeg

2) whats the post processing software you use and which and where to find a free pp software (downloadable from internet) that is good other than ViewNX?

My contribution to nikon d3100 users... below is a collection of pictures taken at same settings but at different aperture numbers... all taken on tripod

http://www.flickr.com/photos/58860192@N05/...57625958957362/

i think f10 is the sharpess, let me know which f no. looks sharpess to u ya =)


Note that the two oranges were grossly blurred at f5.6 and slowly getting sharper as the f number rises...this is when the depth of focus becomes deeper and more things are in focus... all these are at the expense of slower shutter speeds... at f36, shutter speed was close to 30s! =D

This post has been edited by PureGeek: Feb 4 2011, 09:50 PM
PureGeek
post Feb 4 2011, 10:32 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
433 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Feb 4 2011, 10:15 PM)
1. RAW gives you more flexibility during post processing. I can less worry about white balance and later on can further define what WB I want during PP

2. Can try The Gimp

Meh, f/2.8 also sharp. tongue.gif

*
Thanks for that =)

but I already know what is RAW and what is JPEG and their difference, so just wanna see how many pros like you are really shooting RAW as default mode or JPEG =)

will try the gimp =)

cheers!

This post has been edited by PureGeek: Feb 4 2011, 10:34 PM
PureGeek
post Feb 4 2011, 11:18 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
433 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Feb 4 2011, 10:38 PM)
I don't know, but to me usually if I were to go to that extreme of having f/11 or above, I would usually be shooting landscape photography where I want everything to be in focus, and having said that
I would be shooting outdoors during daytime and if the sunlight is bright enough, it doesn't necessarily need to have a slower shutter speed since there are plenty of light available.

Maybe, if you're shooting during night-time, you would want to use a slower shutter speed, maybe longer to collect more lights. But I rarely shoot at very small apertures during night time outdoors, Can't comment much on this. Small aperture maybe bump ISO? or fire up 150 flashguns at night like Joe McNally? tongue.gif


Added on February 4, 2011, 10:39 pm

I would definitely shoot RAW if I couldn't take control of the lighting condition and when the event venue has very funny light colors all over the place indoors. Something which I cannot avoid whether I love it or hate it. That at least gives me a chance to fix the WB during PP. Again, it's pretty subjective on whether warmer tone is better or cooler tone is better, so I usually just go for Auto WB, and shoot RAW all the way. Especially during weddings, when I really cannot compromise with the shots, so shooting RAW is the way to go!
*
Very well written =D RAW definitely for serious business coz nothing else can be compromised as u cant turn back time to reshoot the scene ya!..

Seldom people will take low apertures (high f number) other than landscape but slightly higher aperture is good for group pictures especially when they are not standing perfectly paralel in-line ! =D

Highest aperture for portrait shots where backgrounds are desired to be blurred...

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0171sec    0.52    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 06:54 AM