QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 5 2011, 05:04 AM)
Thanks for your detailed comments.
I'm not in some dilemma because of quality just that I'm a bit tight on my budget and want to get the best with the least of amount possible.
Because generally, canon pro lenses are cheaper but the 70-200 2.8 VR is one of the very few exceptions. Anyway, just wanna find out what makes ppl choose either system when they first started investing in it.
if ur in a tight budget, then i dont think u should worry about the cheaper/more expensive lenses for now wud ya?for most photographers/guy@gal with camera, they'll use their kit lens or wutever lens that is provided with the body first, and soon they'll know wut lens they nid the most. like when u shoot weddings for example, u use ur kitlens and u find out that it doesnt deliver the range ur looking for, so u turn into some other lenses. got wut i mean? or u like to do low lights, should go for primes or the f2.8's. just my opinion. so u wont need to worry about the prices for now. ur on a tight budget so expensive/cheaper lenses are not ur priorities for the moment. those will be in the future. who knows u hit a jackpot or wutever right? I'm not in some dilemma because of quality just that I'm a bit tight on my budget and want to get the best with the least of amount possible.
Because generally, canon pro lenses are cheaper but the 70-200 2.8 VR is one of the very few exceptions. Anyway, just wanna find out what makes ppl choose either system when they first started investing in it.
go with the system u feel best in your hands the most, which one ur more comfortable with. investing in glass will be a whole diff thing
Feb 5 2011, 05:12 AM

Quote







0.0657sec
0.61
7 queries
GZIP Disabled