lets cogitate this thread and be humble guys. we would be lost on ethics and moral if not for a11/nbc/cnn/mancity/mancini or balotelli...

Wait wait. If he was an MU fan, what makes him hate MU FC and their fans? How to cogitate this?

we need all of available member who are willing to cogitate this together, come guys.. we need to cogitate this cogatation so badly to answer the question above

This post has been edited by choy89: May 4 2011, 10:34 PM

He doesn't hate MUFC. Methinks he just hates arrogant or half past six fans.

And maybe into next season.
Dogs doing well eh?

Forever going at this rate. Vaseline might help tho..

FA charges Ferguson over referee Howard Webb comments

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/13387966.stm

QUOTE

He is unlikely to be banned again but the FA's action is further proof they are determined to implement their Respect Campaign.

Should he be charged in the first place?
If so what kind of punishment you think that is fair should be meted out to him?
Fine?

Since he broke rules,he should be punished.The punishment is only relevant if he doesnt repeat it in the future.

If he doesnt repent,then there's no point meting out punishment.

Of course this applies to other managers as well.No double standards here.

why u open topic like talk about referees then in the end all Manchester united related?

Harry next in line shirley...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/13391532.stm



This post has been edited by SGSuser: May 14 2011, 12:22 AM

y u trying to use broken english to cover your dupe identity?

Remember the adage no player is bigger than the club. Likewise no manager or club should be bigger than the league. Don't you agree?

So to allow a recalcitrant miscreant to walk free is tantamount to him flouting the rules and regulations of the league. In other words double standards. Under new FA regime it appears unlikely.
Fergie has a suspended 2 match touchline ban & a fine. I stand to be corrected.

Let's look at the history and try to understand why SAF make such statement.

In the last 3 league games against Chelsea before our game last week.

- Stamford Bridge 2009/10. The non foul given against Fletcher and from the free kick, Drogba fouled Brown and Terry scores the winning goal.
- Old Trafford 2009/10. Drogba was miles offside still given a goal.
- Stamford Bridge 2010/11. Luiz should have seen red for a second foul. A blatant block on Rooney.

Now, this is a man who breathes football for the last 4 decades, when he sees that those 2 decision last season basically cost Utd the premeir league, I basically understand why he said that.

"Respect are earned" as posted many times in FL, my take, ref do you job well if you want to earn respect.

OT but since the subject of bad English was brought up, "methinks" isn't exactly broken English - http://www.thefreedictionary.com/_/dict.aspx?word=methinks

I use it myself sometimes

This post has been edited by Duke Red: May 14 2011, 08:50 AM

ahh i see, thanks for the info. it sounded like something Spongebob would use

lol and they say cartoons can't be educational

How bout Carlo Ancelotti's pre match conference comments about referees last saturday? So if he can walk free, isn't it double standards, still?

What about macheda's handball at OT 09/10?
What about the unfair penalty by howard webb in spurs game 08/09?
What about rooney's elbow that was supposed to be a red card?

I am sure you can come up with another 10 examples of decisions against united and someone else will come up with another 10 in favour of united.
But that is football.U get some and dont get some.There is a balance.What AF is trying to do is disrupt the balance in his favour.
That is very unfair and shows lack of sportsmanship.For instance,lampard did not get his goal against germany although it crossed the line,but
he got the goal when the ball didnt cross the line against spurs.
This is the balance i am talking about.Hope you get my message.

FA want to show power and didnt realize Howard mistake.

or perhaps to shake off a claim by some managers that FA being too lenient and soft on SAF over the years.