If not mistaken nadayu 2 1/2 stry selling RM630k n 3 stry selling RM780k, ceiling height is about 11-12 feet for all floors, overall i'll support Nadayu compare to Mutiara Villa.
Investment Nadayu 92, Nadayu 92, anyone buying?
Investment Nadayu 92, Nadayu 92, anyone buying?
|
|
May 25 2012, 04:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
936 posts Joined: May 2012 From: Klang Valley |
If not mistaken nadayu 2 1/2 stry selling RM630k n 3 stry selling RM780k, ceiling height is about 11-12 feet for all floors, overall i'll support Nadayu compare to Mutiara Villa.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 12 2012, 10:44 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
936 posts Joined: May 2012 From: Klang Valley |
QUOTE(twins9 @ May 26 2012, 09:50 AM) 1. price is cheaper compare to MV2. spacious size 3. surrounded by greens (atm) just my POV... Added on June 12, 2012, 10:47 am QUOTE(elf7159 @ Jun 12 2012, 09:33 AM) better go there n take a good look, will feel good... price around RM630k but dont know got increment or not... go there check check n let us know pls... This post has been edited by dino10chels: Jun 12 2012, 10:47 AM |
|
|
Jun 16 2012, 11:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
936 posts Joined: May 2012 From: Klang Valley |
QUOTE(optimus28 @ Jun 16 2012, 11:46 AM) i like G&G too... Added on June 16, 2012, 12:02 pm QUOTE(elf7159 @ Jun 16 2012, 09:39 AM) hi, 2.5 storey type A still available at 634K onwards. may check with the sales gallery directly. I paid my booking fees. However told by the SA only can apply loan thru their own panel bank - Maybank or CIMB. Is it? First time buy new property, so not sure about this. Thanks sifu. surrounding not bad ... This post has been edited by dino10chels: Jun 16 2012, 12:02 PM |
|
|
Jun 16 2012, 12:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
936 posts Joined: May 2012 From: Klang Valley |
|
|
|
Jun 22 2012, 02:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
936 posts Joined: May 2012 From: Klang Valley |
Something big...huge...& incredible.....THE HULK is coming to KAJANG
Just kidding...i guess there will be other new development coming up... u think so? |
|
|
Jun 30 2012, 03:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
936 posts Joined: May 2012 From: Klang Valley |
i can see mtec is advertising K2 like he's the agent for K2
he didnt mentioned the truth that all the high tension cable surrounding K2 or maybe he's K2 die hard fans.... anyhow, if u wanna praise K2 pls go to that forum n not nadayu92 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 3 2012, 10:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
936 posts Joined: May 2012 From: Klang Valley |
QUOTE(Talbac @ Jul 3 2012, 10:33 AM) gosh! can't believe metro Kajang place the international school as buffer to HTC from houses! i heard someone said the road will be widen n a new flyover to skip the train's track ... hope it's real Added on July 3, 2012, 10:42 am Surely the developers already know the future plannings and fully priced the potentials in the selling price already? Since you have already bought, mind to elaborate the details of road infrastructure around that will be the catalyst to price? |
|
|
Jul 3 2012, 12:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
936 posts Joined: May 2012 From: Klang Valley |
[quote=DonnyB,Jul 3 2012, 12:12 PM]
The developers are waiting for Dijaya to come in so the 3 big guns (Dijaya, Nadayu and MKH) can all chip in. Till then, you can only hope Added on July 3, 2012, 12:16 pm[quote=Talbac,Jul 3 2012, 10:33 AM] gosh! can't believe metro Kajang place the international school as buffer to HTC from houses! I dont think that is their intention. Maybe the international school is placed there as it is high on the hills. So the view is better....HTCs!!! [/quote] need to wait for few yrs lo.... |
|
|
Jul 5 2012, 09:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
936 posts Joined: May 2012 From: Klang Valley |
|
|
|
Jul 5 2012, 10:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
936 posts Joined: May 2012 From: Klang Valley |
Mysterious man indeed with insider info! Lcsx bought Kajang2 or Nadayu92?
When do you expect the price to be fully reflected knowing the future improved road connectivity? 2013 perhaps? If too far away then it will be a long wait to cash out. [/quote] I think he bought Nadayu92... but as for the improvement of road connectivity, sure need to wait lo...last time BU or Sunway also need time to improve la, so shouldnt be a problem... |
|
|
Jul 5 2012, 03:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
936 posts Joined: May 2012 From: Klang Valley |
QUOTE(Lcsx @ Jul 5 2012, 03:02 PM) Actually that is absolutely not true. The reason why Nadayu "seems" to be making losses is because they adopted IFRIC 15 ahead of other competitors. For your info, almost all other developers are still retaining the "percentage completion method of revenue computation". Under IFRIC 15 you do not recognized the revenue every quarter only, until fully completed and this will be recognized on a single quarter. To put into comparison with other competitors you can refer to notes 1 of the accounts where they reported RM4.2mil profit for the quarter based on the old computation of "percentage completion method". +1 Balance sheet has RM27mil in cash and "Assets classified as held for sale" which is a piece of prime land for RM149mil. This is for a total of RM176mil in Cash. If you are holding that much cash and people call you risky, then I have no idea what is not risky. So like I have said before, you have to do detailed studies if you really want to know the real picture. Opportunities are there when things are perceived wrongly or/and misspriced. if not mistaken, nadayu still have lots of undevelop landbanks |
|
|
Jul 5 2012, 04:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
936 posts Joined: May 2012 From: Klang Valley |
|
|
|
Jul 6 2012, 09:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
936 posts Joined: May 2012 From: Klang Valley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 11 2012, 02:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
936 posts Joined: May 2012 From: Klang Valley |
more info?
|
|
|
Jul 16 2012, 05:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
936 posts Joined: May 2012 From: Klang Valley |
QUOTE(JPower 1 @ Jul 15 2012, 06:48 PM) Kajang 2 semi-d 40x80'is selling 1.1m with 5% discount wow...then nadayu92 again better than kajang2...Nadayu 92 Kajang semi-d price will only release 2 weeks later Heard Nadayu 92 Kajang phase 1 to handover end of July.... Saw workers touching up defects today.... nadayu LS 40x90 but kajang2 LS 40x80 but price same 1.1mil... |
|
|
Jul 18 2012, 02:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
936 posts Joined: May 2012 From: Klang Valley |
QUOTE(Talbac @ Jul 18 2012, 11:15 AM) What is nadayu's built-up? Nadayu 40X90 semi-d for 1.1million is quite a good price to purchase! metro kajang still can sell ? BU is 4000sf ++ if not mistaken... but have to ask SA to confirmi tot their new launch of semi-d will reach RM1.3mil n above...but they manage to sell below this price |
|
|
Jul 18 2012, 02:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
936 posts Joined: May 2012 From: Klang Valley |
QUOTE(Lcsx @ Jul 18 2012, 02:23 PM) Actually I don't think the price has been finalized yet for the semi-D until next few weeks. But it likely be slightly cheaper than their previous phase as the previous phase semi-D's built ups were very very big. BU is 40xxsf..... slightly smaller than previous phase lo, but still not small ma... Added on July 18, 2012, 2:28 pm The previous phase was 4500+sf. Current phase is probably more regular sized. Maybe 3700++ sf? |
|
|
Jul 18 2012, 02:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
936 posts Joined: May 2012 From: Klang Valley |
|
|
|
Jul 26 2012, 09:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
936 posts Joined: May 2012 From: Klang Valley |
|
|
|
Aug 1 2012, 09:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
936 posts Joined: May 2012 From: Klang Valley |
QUOTE(optimus28 @ Aug 1 2012, 08:19 AM) The clubhouse and facilities are shared among the link house & semi-ds & bungalow.. i think the convertion to link houses is a good idea, either DSLH or superlink will boost up the sales...if im the developer i will change the plan lo What lcsx meant was the semi-ds might be converted to link houses..although i thought all semi-ds have been launched already.. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0405sec
0.12
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 02:21 AM |