im surprised to see that people prefer exynos compared to tegra2..

but the powerVR sgx540 in SGS is only clocked to 200mhz while the one in optimus 3d is also sgx540 is clocked to 300+-Mhz.. 90mil triangile is the full max score that 540 can do but for the case in SGS, it does not and goes to around 57fps only..

Samsung claimed everything based on technical but it is not practiced and goes well in real life ... SGX540 should be able to go up to 80FPS maybe if its full performed but not for the case in SGS.. Same thing bout Exynos, MALI in exynos is maxed out to 120mil triangle but in the real situation, ULV GeForce in Tegra2 beats Exynos in some benchmark.. but still, optimus 3D beats all three with SGX540 which is SGS is using almost a year ago..

---

Added on February 17, 2011, 4:03 pmSamsung was butthurt seeing all this so it decided to go for Tegra2 and also to compensate low stock of Exynos..

source :

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4182/samsung...one-the-gti9103
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4179/ti-omap...timus-3d-tested

This post has been edited by pluginbaby: Feb 17 2011, 04:03 PM

samsung will try hard to make SGS2 sells more compared to SGS or even to be on par with it.. to meet up with demand, they might gonna release two versions of it.. the non SAMOLEDplus would still be selling hotcakes despite what.. some people would just buy and sellers would hide some crucial fasts about the phone to sell those phones..

im guessing that it wont be as good as both of those, but still qualcomm chips have been stable so far.. as it is an intergrated SOC, everything is stable even for wifi and GPS.. only some simple software fixes is needed incase its problematic for certain phone model.. thats the advantage of snapdragons

orion are expected to go 120mil triangle p/s - but who knows what samsung did as it loses to SGX540 in benchmarking of the optimus 3D
sgx540 in optimus 3d (300mhz in optimus 3D with updated drivers, the previous in SGS is 200mhz with older driver) is 90mil triangle p/s
ulv geforce in tegra2 is around 85-90mil triangle p/s
adreno220 is 80mil triangle p/s

it now depends on how phone manufacturers make the phone work out to be well.. a powerful hardware needs a great software to make it a good daily driver... adreno series are always a step back but even SE goes for Adreno205 and promises 70fps in their games (adreno205 is somehow around 45mil triangle p/s)

This post has been edited by pluginbaby: Feb 17 2011, 11:00 PM

true.. SE is confident since they will be releasing game titles which is optimized for adreno205.. it will surely run on any higher

true indeed.. eventhought it was the powerVR SGX540 in SGS is clocked lower, it still goes hardcore.. im guessing that cortex A8 cant utilize max clock of SGX540.. that might be the reason why the dual cortex A9 with dual memory in Optimus 3D is able to sorta max out the ultimate power of SGX540.. even iPhone5 is rumored to be using either 540 or 545(which is sorta a slightly enhanced version of 540 but still a lot similarities)..

In terms of CPU n GPU processing, every SOCS have their own abilities.. Samsung is not losing anything from using Tegra2.. users will have a wider option to choose which SOC they wish for.. but the abilities of Tegra2 and Exynos(orion) are quite similar in a way.. both win in different benchmarks resulting sorta a tie overall.. Snapdragons are late, they r not that bad but they are playing catching up with the others while other manufacturers will go forward a step ahead compared to qualcomm

SGS2 VS Optimus 3D and Optimus 2X = three different SOCs which will be very interesting.. both will pawn each other but im guessing the overall score would be a tie between these three.. Optimus 2X might be losing a point since it aint got no extra attractions while Optimus3D has dualmemory n 3D cam n SGS2 has the super amoled plus