300: Rise of an Empire (2014)
I confess.
I have never went on the record to say that I like 300 (2006)...
The issue is the brutality. They made brutality into "art". They beautified the killing scenes and I do not agree with that.
So when they announced they were making "Part Deux"... I was not expecting much...
Just finished watching it and all I can say is, do people even remember The 300 Spartans (1962)?
That movie is 52yo and from a story point of view, still run rings around this movie!!?!
Style over substance ladies and gentlemen. Style over substance!!!
From casting (not sure if Sullivan Stapleton is the best choice for Themistocles), why is Eva Green's character Artemisia even here? And the fact that Queen Gorgo (Lena Headey) led the Spartan retaliation... My goodness, do they even know the source material (eg history)????!? (In Sparta, women are basically a baby factory, full stop...)
History about this matter is pretty straight forward, Athens (which had the best Navy force in Greece) and the rest of Greece met Persia at the sea, forcing the Persian army to try to enter Greece through Thermopylae (Hot Gates) where the Spartan met them.
So having said that, 300 (2006) historically is actually more accurate, whereas this movie...
This is based on the comic Xerxes and surprise surprise, you DON'T see alot of HIM!!!?!
Okay, credit where credit is due, the way the Greeks did sea battle, is actually by the book (eg according to history books), and have to add, apart from that...
I am sorry, I think this is a very poor attempt at a movie and have to add, I actually approached the movie with very low expectation, even then I truly and thoroughly disappointed!!
My Two Sen
This post has been edited by Mov_freak: Jun 28 2014, 12:51 PM
Movies My Movies Review Thread V2, Got a movie to review ? post it here !
Jun 28 2014, 12:48 PM
Quote
0.0876sec
0.75
7 queries
GZIP Disabled