QUOTE(kailc @ Jan 12 2011, 11:03 AM)
Poor that buyer... sure "Salty Plus Spade" when he saw the price now...ASIA MEDIA GROUP , // Not a China based kompeni //
ASIA MEDIA GROUP , // Not a China based kompeni //
|
|
Jan 12 2011, 11:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
28,187 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Underworld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 19 2011, 11:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
28,187 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Underworld |
|
|
|
Jan 19 2011, 11:30 AM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
28,187 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Underworld |
QUOTE(JinXXX @ Jan 19 2011, 11:28 AM) Hard to say..1.)MEGB - Drop way below IPO.. Can top up? You judge at your own. 2.) Focus Point - Drop below IPO also... I think it needs sometime to generate back the public confidence.. (Just my 2 cents) |
|
|
May 1 2011, 03:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
28,187 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Underworld |
|
|
|
May 3 2011, 07:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
28,187 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Underworld |
|
|
|
May 4 2011, 11:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
28,187 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Underworld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 4 2011, 11:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
28,187 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Underworld |
QUOTE(t5t @ May 4 2011, 11:37 PM) If you think it is good, then it is good.. Either way, if you think is bad, it is bad.. HahaNo good or bad.. Make sure you know what you are doing, who you are following, and what you are following, and can you follow it (Able to take it up, must know how to put it down at any cost) Yes, i did buy some.. Buying in stages. ABP 0.24 Cheers |
|
|
May 5 2011, 09:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
28,187 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Underworld |
|
|
|
May 6 2011, 10:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
28,187 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Underworld |
|
|
|
May 6 2011, 04:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
28,187 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Underworld |
QUOTE(ngaisteve1 @ May 6 2011, 04:25 PM) Ya after some observation, I realize that average down is not advisable n risky...i got the same advice from the 'guru' during attic workshop ... Depends on how you play the game.those guru encourage average up and not average down.. You bought at 0.30.. Goes down to 0.20.. If you average, you can run away at 0.25. Stock will run affected by fundamental + technical. Even if it goes down, it will get some spike up again between the road.. That is why got fibonacci retracement/extension.. When stock rebound in down trend, averaging helps you to run away without loss, less loss, small profit... Best advice here is... Don't shoot all in one time.. Keep a 33% - 33% - 33% rule.. |
|
|
May 6 2011, 05:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
28,187 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Underworld |
QUOTE(normaron @ May 6 2011, 05:13 PM) Since here is AMedia, then use AMedia as example.You are ready to pump 10k into Amedia. So divide to 3 parts, each part 3.3k Example Pump 3.3k at a price.. 0.24 (You get A number of shares) Price goes down to 0.22, pump 3.3k at this price (You get B number of shares, total is A+B) Price goes down to 0.2.. Pump again 3.3k at this price (You get C number of shares, total is A+B+C) Numbers of shares A < B < C Maybe you might want to do Fibonacci calculation to help justify when to inject 1st time, 2nd time, 3rd time... Or whatever tools you got. Just my 2 lousy cents only. When you do this.. Make sure you know the company in and out, and is confident with them at least for the next coming few years, and also confident with their upcoming performances as well. If the company is not worth to do this kind of action, just cut the loss and take your fund else where. This post has been edited by Bonescythe: May 6 2011, 05:34 PM |
|
|
May 6 2011, 07:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
28,187 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Underworld |
QUOTE(SKY 1809 @ May 6 2011, 05:59 PM) I think it is best for investors to choose what they feel comfortable with 1) average up 2) Average down 3) no average. Yes, it back to the investor risk appetite.Investing also associates with risks and comfort level. Some people may project Forex as a safer investment ( in term of risk management ) than to buy Amedia, and if you agree and comfortable with, then can go ahead. If not you just walk away. Just my view. P/S : Using JCY as a model is odeli very biased as our forumers warned of excess supplies of JCY long time ago in our forum. Averaging down is out of the question. But strategy is really really important. Trading without a strategy will be very dangerous. Diversified does not only means diversified through other counter, it can be diversifying in other entry prices to get a better average. |
|
|
May 6 2011, 07:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
28,187 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Underworld |
In fact, real true blue chip does not really need any strategy. Like Amway, it will only go up and up slow and steady.. Haha
Blue chip only need a big lump sum of $$$, and also very good and strong holding power on it. Then tada, you win the match... Red chip/growing stocks is the stock that really need much skills, strategy, news and rumors on its trading. |
|
|
|
|
|
May 6 2011, 10:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
28,187 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Underworld |
QUOTE(cherroy @ May 6 2011, 10:05 PM) First of all, I am not familiar with Amedia. Different stock, different risk already...But for me, averaging down or up is just your mind playing on your own only. First buy 0.30 Second buy 0.20 Some said you average cost is 0.25. some said sell at 0.25 then breakeven. To me, First buy and second buy are independent to each other. Sell at 0.25, means 0.20 make 0.05, and 0.30 make a loss of 0.05. So total breakeven. It is same you bought A stock at 0.30 at 0.30, then go to buy B stock at 0.20. Little difference, the difference is you are at 2 front of price movement instead of 1. If A and B stock also 0.25, you also breakeven. What important is your total fund/total portfolio is making money or not. My 2 cents. Same stock, averaging down the same thing.. and can bail it out when go up a bit |
|
|
May 6 2011, 10:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
28,187 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Underworld |
QUOTE(SKY 1809 @ May 6 2011, 10:21 PM) I think I have a diff opinion on DCA, though not specific to Amedia :- This is a very good strategy as well.Under the Asset Allocation model , the neutral point is 50% cash and 50% share. 1) If share price is towards more undervalued , then reduce the cash balance and buy more shares 2) If share price is towards overvalued , then reduce the shareholding level, and keep more cash. It is just one of the simplified version, and some in the West are using computers to generate a more complex fund. As the share price moves, the risk level changes ( assuming company performance is on target ). As I say, one has to be comfortable with, and with some understanding. Pre set levels could be fine tuned to client's comfort or age level. I see some logic to it when I learn it through a seminar. May not applicable to others. But to have this kind of strategy, one must have at least a good amount of cash specifically allocated for shares trading only. A handsome 10k at least in my opinion for a small investment style. The crucial part of this strategy is, is the company "Undervalued, or Overvalued", as these 2 are the deciding factors for the decision making model. Again, it will goes down to the fundamental parts of the company, directions and goals of the corporate and also investor self research that will justify the answer towards the decision making. In my opinion, it will be applicable towards established market player, or blue chips. Nice strategy in my opinion. |
|
|
May 6 2011, 11:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
28,187 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Underworld |
QUOTE(SKY 1809 @ May 6 2011, 10:54 PM) It is just a basic structure, each to fine tune to own comfort level. When stock price is higher, risk definitely will grow gradually. It will boil down to the influence of the news and the background of the company to sustain this market value of the company. Strong news will definitely give a strong boost to the prices, and will spark a strong upward trend for the counter.Generally there is a consensus that higher price of a stock ( movement ) is always higher risk unless PE or other valuations to sustain it. High volume counter is good counter.. Means more movement, more fluctuation, more volatility, more chances to earn from highs and lows, and also more risk. Low volume counter.. slow growth, less goreng will happen, less fluctuation, less volatility, less movement.. When get trap, hard to come out.. (My experience at least) |
|
|
May 10 2011, 10:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
28,187 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Underworld |
|
|
|
May 10 2011, 12:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
28,187 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Underworld |
|
|
|
May 11 2011, 12:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
28,187 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Underworld |
Persevere
|
|
|
May 11 2011, 09:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
28,187 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Underworld |
|
| Change to: | 0.0316sec
0.49
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 10:36 PM |