Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Add Reply RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Streamyx Streamyx Is Planning Revising Fair Usage Policy, Do you agree or not ? Please Vote Now ?

views
     
khtan2000
post Dec 18 2010, 12:57 AM

Lurkerz
******
Senior Member
1,553 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang
dont really think they will leave this FUP out for good regardless what we say, when I signed my contract in 2004, dont even have this FUP crap in it, TM just change as they like.

I vote for limited bandwidth as like it or not FUP probably here to stay, as well ask TM to give a a real bandwidth number so we could manage our downloads with condition that no more throttle p2p or certain sites, no specific ip priority(like mine 60.xx nicest ping, 115cap, 118 uncap, 124 local cant even load sometimes). However the bandwidth must be a realistic value, not like 1 TB a month which beat the purpose of bandwidth limit which most probably TM will reject anyway, or only <60gB as we are already paying premium for such low speed.

100% no to contention ratio like what is happening now, everyone slowed to 256/384 indiscriminately. Even though my speedtest shows that I'm getting 1.5mbps for my 1mbps package, using monitoring software can see that the download speed varies also (like triangle shape, go to max rate then drop back 50KB, then back up)
khtan2000
post Dec 18 2010, 01:15 AM

Lurkerz
******
Senior Member
1,553 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang
QUOTE(vapeace @ Dec 18 2010, 01:02 AM)
this is day light robbery by TM

Due to 10% why the remaining 90% have to bear with them ? Throttle those 10% and leave the 90% alone.. They paying for the same share of pie, just because someone eat more.. does not mean they have to share with the remaining ones. TM is being unreasonable in their FUP

throttle those 10% speed to 512Kbps, not the 90% ones. TM is expecting us to upgrade to Fiber. but fiber rollout is slow and wont even cover entire nation even in 10 years given the rate they are expending. Most user are ADSL due to limited option. Just because most user are ADSL user, TM wished to play god by doing anything they like to whoever they like. This is just unjust in any way possible. Do individual based bandwidth throttling not entire community based throttling.

it true that u have 4mbps speed but it does not mean that you can download over 1TB of data per month. This i have to agree. TM please give clear clarification on how you identify heavy and lite user ? Does mean if i go Youtube everyday i am automatically a heavy user ? Please clear and definite statement on what your perspective of heavy and lite user ?

TM, why are you so persistent in applying FUP on streamyx ADSL user but you still let UNIFI volume cap unlimited ? Arent you being unfair to all of use normal user ? You feed those hungry eater with buffet but you just serve a plate of fried rice to us ADSL user and we have to share the fry rice summore.
*
yes thats why put a bandwidth cap on heavy users, once exceeded throttle to 128k..enough for surfing etc but not enough for downloading. Probably different speed package will have difference bandwidth limit else those subscribing higher packages will complaint on the same limit imposed across all speed packages.

Just tell us the real clarification on the each package bandwidth limit and we will manage it ourselves.
Right now TM is doing the easy way, just cap everyone regardless light or heavy and don't even need to setup bandwidth monitoring for every user.

+streamline all the pricing on the package, right now we got different price for the same speed. Im still paying rm88 since 2004 until now and still on 1mbps rclxub.gif , not entitled to coolunipack or 1malaysia package-reason not a uni student and living in places where house >30k RM - yeah, tmnut staff told me that 1malaysia only for those living below 30K houses.
khtan2000
post Dec 18 2010, 01:25 AM

Lurkerz
******
Senior Member
1,553 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang
TM just want to show off they got the technology ...FTTH sounds good until see the speed offered by them.

Dont even understand why they want to deploy FTTH in the first place while adsl speed not even max out.

ADSL1 up to 8mbps
ADSL2 up to 24mbps

imagine I'm syncing to ADSL2+, but running at 1mbps hahaa doh.gif , don't know why they want to switch to ADSL2+ equipment also since only offer low speed connection
khtan2000
post Dec 19 2010, 12:32 PM

Lurkerz
******
Senior Member
1,553 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang
I dont think limit p2p is really an option, ppl will just simply hop on to vpn and still download their ass off. Look at the p2p throttling, yet ppl still manage to download few hundred MB to terabytes over a month, just simply register VPN and bam, instant full speed 24/7 downloading illegal content. It will just come back to square one. Sniff VPN packet? Dont think it will work over encrypted network and also more work for TMnut, probably will result in screwing stuff up more often and higher ping rate.

For now with their hard cap, I can't even use my company VPN to do my job at home, loading some model files take like few hours :S . rather drive to office to do than to wait. Yesterday go see movie come home still loading somemore (<500mB size) cry.gif

This post has been edited by khtan2000: Dec 19 2010, 12:34 PM
khtan2000
post Dec 23 2010, 03:09 PM

Lurkerz
******
Senior Member
1,553 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang
since so many ppl agree on the "No" to any changes to the current FUP, probably TM will just remain this existing current FUP mode.
« Next Oldest · Networks and Broadband · Next Newest »
 

Add ReplyOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0587sec    0.39    8 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 02:23 AM
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Removal Request
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.