Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Streamyx Streamyx Is Planning Revising Fair Usage Policy, Do you agree or not ? Please Vote Now ?

views
     
Flaming_lion
post Jan 17 2011, 09:26 PM

An Innocent Lion
****
Senior Member
649 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
Pathetic attempt by a GLC... They intent to make little investments but want to make as much cash as they can as a monopoly... Its a real disgusting piece of business... If they could, they'd charge everyone RM 88 a month for not using the internet...

The capping TM has been suggesting shows how poor they have been in planning and strategizing plus how little they care about their subscribers... 60GB for 5Mbps for UniFi and 25GB for 4Mbps and 10GB for 1Mbps is a joke... We are already paying an extremely high price for outdated technology... Its not the public's fault if TM is incompetent in providing proper service...

TM is going on the assumption that if minus piracy, internet users are only going to use the internet for YouTube and Facebook... Goes to show the people in TM are dumb idiots who just refuse to do any market research, or is it perhaps they just don't care since they are a full time monopoly...

Internet evolution is not something you can predict... Just look at how the internet has evolved from Web 1.0 to Web 2.0 and any moment now, we could going to Web 3.0... People now can Skype with HD webcams and people can now stream all sorts of internet podcast and download interactive LEGAL contents... Next stage of the internet development is going to see the growth of Cloud Computing...

Do TM actually take these things into consideration or do they intent to ignore all these things and only do something about it when these things become a norm??? Typical GLC always planning for short-term profits... On what bloody research did TM base on when they came up with these caps??? How do they which is the right amount for each customer??? Why do they go on the assumption that there's a chance that every customer in an area is going to be online at the same to download something???

Just because they failed to plan in providing ports and bandwidth simply because they weren't intelligent enough to plan, doesn't mean they have a right to bluff consumers... I'm leaving TM if they ever implement this cap... They can't even provide 4Mbps in my area despite numerous inquiries but they want me not use the internet while still paying RM 88??? I don't think so!!!
Flaming_lion
post Jan 24 2011, 11:34 PM

An Innocent Lion
****
Senior Member
649 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
QUOTE(bloodlines @ Jan 17 2011, 11:17 PM)
why want use this solution???tm the one should upgrade their service so we(customer) can use more bandwidth..Zzz
*
They will never want to do that... Simply because it would mean that they have to actually manage their cost better (which includes reducing benefits of directors at top) and lesser profits for themselves (funny, for GLC, they are obsessed about earning profits without reinvesting into their services)...

TM has been long conning us... Quite frankly, I'm getting sick of it... Government often compare certain stuff with developed countries but unwilling to compare broadband with other countries... No wonder TM is so far behind with a caveman's thinking...

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0588sec    0.56    8 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 09:16 AM