^how much u get the demb look alike diffuser . the flash output not so harsh.
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V2, gold ring or f/2.8 and bigger !
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V2, gold ring or f/2.8 and bigger !
|
|
Dec 12 2010, 03:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
^how much u get the demb look alike diffuser . the flash output not so harsh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 12 2010, 06:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
QUOTE(Asus @ Dec 12 2010, 06:21 PM) Thanks for the reply..gonna visit nikon @ times square for 2nd time to test out both camera.. ktcy mention before , there is d3100 body for sale too . 1.6k i think , but better get together with 18-55 as the price difference is not much.Just asking..is there any d3100 body only for sale? Most of the ads i saw only sell the one that comes with the kit lens... |
|
|
Dec 13 2010, 12:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
![]() some balloon~ |
|
|
Dec 13 2010, 01:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
|
|
|
Dec 13 2010, 07:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
better video should be d7000 .
|
|
|
Dec 13 2010, 07:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 14 2010, 02:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
|
|
|
Dec 14 2010, 03:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
|
|
|
Dec 14 2010, 10:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
1
![]() 2 ![]() 3 ![]() 4 ![]() 5 ![]() have a look on my pic . C n C please This post has been edited by fcuk90: Dec 14 2010, 10:41 PM |
|
|
Dec 14 2010, 10:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
|
|
|
Dec 15 2010, 02:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
![]() dont always see girl |
|
|
Dec 16 2010, 02:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
|
|
|
Dec 16 2010, 07:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
minimum focus distance should be 18-55 > 18-105. correct me if im wrong
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 20 2010, 06:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
|
|
|
Dec 21 2010, 11:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
QUOTE(adriancs @ Dec 21 2010, 09:17 PM) 1855, 1870, 18105... All of them are sharp lenses, stopped down to f/8 or f/11 will give you critical sharpness. Of course wide open they're a little soft, lower contrast and have some veiling flare. This is where the primes win, at f/5.6, wide open for the zoom is already 3 stops down for the prime. sharp is sharp . but no bokeh lah No cheap zoom will perform very well wide open. Even the expensive f/2.8 zooms have the same limitations wide open, though generally they're optimized to be sharp too wide open. Stop down your zoom in good light and they perform just as well as primes. In low light, pop the strobes or switch to your prime. |
|
|
Dec 25 2010, 11:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
![]() xmas gift |
|
|
Dec 26 2010, 12:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
|
|
|
Dec 26 2010, 12:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
|
|
|
Dec 26 2010, 12:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
|
|
|
Dec 26 2010, 04:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,863 posts Joined: May 2007 From: highbury |
face touch the lcd , oily =='''''
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0239sec
0.89
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 08:36 AM |