Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Streamyx Streamyx Capping International Connections v2, TM confirms cap will remain

views
     
Hornet
post Dec 8 2010, 12:35 AM

What?
*******
Senior Member
4,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Malacca, Malaysia, Earth


QUOTE(Tentris @ Dec 8 2010, 12:26 AM)
its a coincidence.

please do not subscribe to these conspiracy theories.

tm is a bit dumb, but they are not evil.

*
On the contrary, Tm isn't dumb, but they are evil, just like any other corporate out there.

The only difference is there isn't enough competition to keep tmnet in check.


Hornet
post Dec 8 2010, 01:00 AM

What?
*******
Senior Member
4,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Malacca, Malaysia, Earth


QUOTE(Tentris @ Dec 8 2010, 12:37 AM)
When we're angry or upset, we tend to exaggerate things.

Evil is a very serious thing. It doesn't apply here over something as benign as internet connections.

*
Yeah, how serious can it be. We just lose money paying for things we don't get

I gotta love your rose tinted glasses
Hornet
post Dec 8 2010, 11:44 AM

What?
*******
Senior Member
4,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Malacca, Malaysia, Earth


QUOTE(wongpeter @ Dec 8 2010, 11:15 AM)
yes.
someone told me, ooh i better say 'rumour has it that'.... (otherwise I kena sue for libel) that there may be a humongus announcement from TM the 1st quarter of 2011. it could make heavy users cry but light users will be ecstatic.

internet is not just speed it is also data. capping is speed, quota is data so better be prepared .....
*
Why would light user be ecstatic? They are going to reduce the price?

Otherwise, no difference right
Hornet
post Dec 8 2010, 11:52 AM

What?
*******
Senior Member
4,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Malacca, Malaysia, Earth


QUOTE(joeboto @ Dec 8 2010, 11:49 AM)
if thats how tmnet wanna play, they should reduce the 1mbps price to rm20 with quota 20gb. after quota, cap speed to 512k (or 384k while at it). else, unifi.
*
Unifi is not a viable alternative, its hardly available at more than a quarter of Malaysia locations
Hornet
post Dec 8 2010, 12:08 PM

What?
*******
Senior Member
4,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Malacca, Malaysia, Earth


QUOTE(Tentris @ Dec 8 2010, 12:03 PM)
This is exactly what i've been fight for, not the amounts you mentioned, but the principle is correct.

Pay as you use is the future.
*
Gotta love how you fight for the benefit of tmnet, basically asking tmnet to charge its users more than it already does at the moment
Hornet
post Dec 8 2010, 12:23 PM

What?
*******
Senior Member
4,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Malacca, Malaysia, Earth


QUOTE(Tentris @ Dec 8 2010, 12:13 PM)
Lol. Tell me what is wrong with paying more if you use more? Same like electricity and water. Use more, pay more.

If you use less, then you pay less.
*
I have a problem of you fighting for the benefits of tmnet rather than the consumers. You keep saying heavy users should pay more, but you never said that light users should be paying significantly lesser than what they are paying at the moment.

Your idea basically give TMnet the opportunity to gain more income with no real benefits to the user. It allows them to abuse the system and yes they will, because there is no competition. Does anyone else have a problem with this? Because I do, as a consumer. I'm sick of paying money to them when I get shit like this in return.

Your idea is only viable if there is competition, right now there isn't any. TMnet is going to have us all bent over and take them from behind if they ever implement a quota, mark my words.



BTW, those you mention involved an amount of cost in generating them per unit, whether is burning coal, other natural resources, or water treatment facilities. The more we generate them, the more cost it involves as you need to build the facility, hire people and so on. Its hardly the same as the bandwidth which we already have, its there.

Tmnet has been moaning about not enough bandwidth at peak times.
Hornet
post Dec 8 2010, 02:06 PM

What?
*******
Senior Member
4,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Malacca, Malaysia, Earth


QUOTE(mushichai @ Dec 8 2010, 01:59 PM)
LOL, Joseph Salang Gandum is like Sarah Palin, he only choose to answer the convenience questions and avoid the real questions

Go Guan Eng! Give em hell
Hornet
post Dec 8 2010, 09:11 PM

What?
*******
Senior Member
4,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Malacca, Malaysia, Earth


QUOTE(wongpeter @ Dec 8 2010, 07:04 PM)
For those who have been following this thread, the first time this usage of 'defending TM' and 'brainwashed by TM' started was when someone came in to volunteer some information as to what was actually happening. Prior to that almost everyone was clueless as to the actual situation. I am not saying we should be grateful to anyone for volunteering pertinent info but I fail too understand how someone trying to help out got demonized instead. I can clearly see the herd mentality at work here, someone bandies a slogan, a catchphrase like 'TM Defender' and the followers mindlessly jump on the bandwagon.  biggrin.gif  Here's a good slogan, 'Malaysia Boleh'. If you say it enough times you would have brainwashed yourself into thinking its the gospel truth and the same goes for 'TM Defender'! laugh.gif
*
I have nothing wrong with him sharing info

But I have a problem with him saying Tmnet is no evil, we must pay more as we use and all that load of BS which basically translate to giving TMnet more money. None of his suggestion has any hint of being beneficial to us consumers. His suggestions only makes the consumer more vulnerable to further exploit by tmnet, as if their current mistreatment of their customers is not bad enough.

He needs to take off his rose tinted glasses.
Hornet
post Dec 8 2010, 10:02 PM

What?
*******
Senior Member
4,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Malacca, Malaysia, Earth


QUOTE(wongpeter @ Dec 8 2010, 09:49 PM)
It is your prerogative not to agree with him or anyone else for that matter. Since you say you have a problem with his suggestion of "we must pay more as we use and all that load of BS which basically translate to giving TMnet more money" then isn't the onus on you to come up with a better suggestion? It was just a suggestion after all. Take it or leave it. Why criticize it without even trying to offer any alternative solutions?

If your suggestions are viable I am sure it will receive the full support of all the users here and if it is not then I am sure there will be others here to shoot you down just as you have shot down others with this excuse of the 'rose tinted glasses'.
*
So just because we are not posting any suggestion, it means we cannot point out all the flaws in it? Right

I would have simply disagree had he not parade himself like a crusader for consumers. That's what gets me. He keep saying he's fighting for something good when there is nothing good in whatever he's fighting for. He claims its the future, which is another fallacy. Look at other countries that actually provide high speed broadband with great service, that is the future. Not giving TMnet more ammo to abuse its customers.

And also his naive take that tmnet is no evil. Right. Every corporate only thinks for themself, they wants to maximize profit. To say tmnet is no evil is naive bordering on silly. The only difference is, tmnet has no proper competition, and this is what happens when there's no one to keep them honest.

This is where he needs to take off his rose tinted glasses. TMnet is screwing its customer over and again, its ignorant to say they are all good.

There is no suggestion that Tmnet will entertain as they wants to protect their interest. Its not that hard to see. Any possible solution involves competition. There is a reason why Intel had to ensure AMD stays around, why Microsoft cannot kill off Apple and had to bail them out when they were failing.

Our problem here goes beyond tmnet greed. Tmnet will always be greedy, lets not give them more ways to screw us consumers over
Hornet
post Dec 9 2010, 12:55 AM

What?
*******
Senior Member
4,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Malacca, Malaysia, Earth


QUOTE(wongpeter @ Dec 8 2010, 10:29 PM)
"So just because we are not posting any suggestion, it means we cannot point out all the flaws in it? Right"
- My exact words were: Why criticize it without even trying to offer any alternative solutions?
I did not say you cannot point out the flaws in it, right?


"...had he not parade himself like a crusader for consumers."
- I think that's your personal opinion, not something that everyone here may agree with. Right?

"Look at other countries that actually provide high speed broadband with great service, that is the future."
- Yes that's the future but pray tell which country are you comparing with Malaysia? S. Korea? Japan? Singapore? You want to compare Malaysia with those countries? Talk about rose tinted glasses! Maybe you have been overseas for too long and have lost touch with the reality of local politics or you are really being naive here.

"Any possible solution involves competition."
- You are talking about TM, right? You know TM is a monopoly, right? So what is this competition you are talking about? A hypothetical situation? Or do you have some ideas on how to bring about real competition to Malaysia's ISP industry?

"Tmnet will always be greedy,"
- I am 100% in agreement.

"lets not give them more ways to screw us consumers over"
- Here's the $64 question - HOW?
*
lol, semantics
Fine, clearly we have to agree to disagree

In order to progress, we have to look at whats done right in other successful country. Many times our politician has compared us to country like Indonesia and Thailand. Do you think such comparison will do us any good? Sure, we are already ahead of them in many ways. It is those successful country that we need to emulate. Don't tell you think its ok to compare Malaysia to other worse country. What good will that do... and try not to use that cliche when it doesn't it fit.

I'm not saying we must become like Japan or SKorea overnight, but right now, our politician is not even trying to. There are many examples I can present to you that reflects the kind of mindset our government have that is hindering our progress, but I have no wish to spend my year end holiday in ISA laugh.gif


Our government has been protecting many local companies. This is something I do not agree with. No one said the government should bring in competition with taxpayers money, I think free market is the way. But don't restrict others. I believe just as recent, there's a news where they did not grant some license because the government doesn't want them to compete with local companies. To me, this is full of sh*t. We should grant them the license, let them compete with our local company any maybe we wouldn't even need to have this discussion.


Without competiton, having bandwidth quota allows tmnet to set very low quota and we can't do anything. Will you be happy with 5GB monthly quota for RM88. I don't know, but I don't, and that's to me is just ridiculous.

Of course if you have another different limit you think is ridiculous, its still the same. The question is what's stopping TMnet from setting a ridiculously low quota? Nothing, and thats the dangerous part. That's what worries me. Our problem comes from the fact that we do not have any competition, and we may get even more problem, from the same cause.


But anyway, as I said, we have to just agree to disagree
I'm just sharing my opinion here, not trying to convert you, lol

This post has been edited by Hornet: Dec 9 2010, 12:57 AM
Hornet
post Dec 9 2010, 02:47 PM

What?
*******
Senior Member
4,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Malacca, Malaysia, Earth


QUOTE(Kevin813 @ Dec 9 2010, 01:53 PM)
Yeah... We're currently falling in the group of so-called developing countries and yet u get to c news everyday about bobo things...

Banning facebook? Such a developing action... Are u as developed country as china yet before trying to do something so "developing"?

Malaysia seems to suffer from the lack of basic fundamentals... They always like to compare with other countries on being better?

But they seem to get the wrong side of it... Building a new 100 storey tower just to get more fame? What's the use of being famous for a tower that's not really beneficial to us people of Malaysia?

Aren't the funds better spent on the SERIOUSLY-NEEDS-MASSIVE-OVERHAULING-AND-REVAMPING public transport infrastructure or any other places?

Singapore, China, Japan, South Korea, these few countries have several things in common, they all have both established internet connection speeds and public transport infrastructure.

Look at them, mind learning doing the rudimentary things before going on more lavish, advanced or blatantly spendthrift matters?

2020 visions seems really blur to me... Time to get LASIK-ed... =X
*
Agreed notworthy.gif
This is why I mentioned that we should look at those countries and try to emulate them. Not compare ourself to other backwards country

I think Dr Mahathir in his prime, could probably achieved 2020 had he continue to be our leader, and remained in his prime. Of course he gets old and thats not possible. But he was a leader that had a vision and knows how Malaysian really needs to be competitive instead of being under the government shell all the time... our current government now is full of p***ies
Hornet
post Dec 9 2010, 06:18 PM

What?
*******
Senior Member
4,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Malacca, Malaysia, Earth


QUOTE(nwk @ Dec 9 2010, 05:48 PM)
If vpn server is in malaysia then it will bypass cap.
*
True
But I've tried searching around lyn here, but I can't find any VPN that are hosted in Malaysia sweat.gif

Is it more expensive to host in Malaysia? Wonder why no one do it hmm.gif
Hornet
post Dec 9 2010, 06:36 PM

What?
*******
Senior Member
4,251 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Malacca, Malaysia, Earth


QUOTE(wongpeter @ Dec 9 2010, 06:26 PM)
at this point in time it is just conjecture those ppl who say if vpn server is in malaysia then it will bypass cap. cant be proven cos haven't found this local vpn server yet.


Added on December 9, 2010, 6:29 pm
i am quite sure that TM with their hardware deep packet inspection technology will be able to cap/throttle even vpn servers hosted locally. any network experts in here that can shed some light?
*
Well, actually I was thinking about those high speed service for large enterprise. Unless TMnet is also throttling those enterprise service unsure.gif

3 Pages < 1 2 3Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0461sec    0.73    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 10:56 PM