Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Investment banking/Corporate finance

views
     
TSconfused*88*
post Nov 23 2010, 12:54 PM, updated 15y ago

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
Dear all,

I have been reading this section for quite a while and I believe there's a few experienced people in the investment banking scene.

I have just graduated and is searching for a career. My dream is to join a bulge bracket (BB) investment bank (IB) in the future, perhaps either in Singapore or Hong Kong. (preferably Corporate Finance (CF) or Investment Banking division)

Thus, I am asking a few questions in relation to which career path to take right now.

1. There are a few feasible opportunities:
A) Local IB
B) Local Big 4 CF advisory
C) SG Big 4 Auditing

2. What is the difference between IB and big 4 CF?

3. Which are the Tier 1 IBs in Malaysia?

p.s. I do not wish to go through rotations as I'm quite certain that I'm interested in CF.

Thanks in advance and I really appreciate any positive input. thumbup.gif
bucharestophere
post Nov 23 2010, 01:06 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
99 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
-deleted-

This post has been edited by bucharestophere: Jan 6 2011, 12:10 PM
TSconfused*88*
post Nov 23 2010, 01:14 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(bucharestophere @ Nov 23 2010, 01:06 PM)
To have a better understanding of your current position, what are your qualifications? University? Did
Any internships?
*
I graduated from an Australian University (Bachelors).

I also did an internship at a Msian IB.

This post has been edited by confused*88*: Dec 22 2010, 05:15 PM
kelvin_tan
post Nov 23 2010, 02:03 PM

Passion for Pipping!
*******
Senior Member
3,141 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


@confused88
i think its best you state out your major? you could be majoring in IT, which has little relevance to finance / accounting
TSconfused*88*
post Nov 23 2010, 02:11 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(kelvin_tan @ Nov 23 2010, 02:03 PM)
@confused88
i think its best you state out your major? you could be majoring in IT, which has little relevance to finance / accounting
*
I graduated with a Accounting/Banking & Finance double major.
Vengeance_Mad
post Nov 23 2010, 05:59 PM

Aston-ishing
*****
Senior Member
797 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(confused*88* @ Nov 23 2010, 12:54 PM)
Dear all,

I have been reading this section for quite a while and I believe there's a few experienced people in the investment banking scene.

I have just graduated and is searching for a career. My dream is to join a bulge bracket (BB) investment bank (IB) in the future, perhaps either in Singapore or Hong Kong. (preferably Corporate Finance (CF) or Investment Banking division)

Thus, I am asking a few questions in relation to which career path to take right now.

1. There are a few feasible opportunities:
A) Local IB
B) Local Big 4 CF advisory
C) SG Big 4 Auditing

2. What is the difference between IB and big 4 CF?

3. Which are the Tier 1 IBs in Malaysia?

p.s. I do not wish to go through rotations as I'm quite certain that I'm interested in CF.

Thanks in advance and I really appreciate any positive input.  thumbup.gif
*
I have almost the same aim as you.
Will be hoping you could get useful advise as I will be tapping them too.
Good luck to both of us. drool.gif
Sesshoumaru
post Nov 23 2010, 08:09 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,190 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(confused*88* @ Nov 23 2010, 12:54 PM)
Dear all,

I have been reading this section for quite a while and I believe there's a few experienced people in the investment banking scene.

I have just graduated and is searching for a career. My dream is to join a bulge bracket (BB) investment bank (IB) in the future, perhaps either in Singapore or Hong Kong. (preferably Corporate Finance (CF) or Investment Banking division)

Thus, I am asking a few questions in relation to which career path to take right now.

1. There are a few feasible opportunities:
A) Local IB
B) Local Big 4 CF advisory
C) SG Big 4 Auditing

2. What is the difference between IB and big 4 CF?

3. Which are the Tier 1 IBs in Malaysia?

p.s. I do not wish to go through rotations as I'm quite certain that I'm interested in CF.

Thanks in advance and I really appreciate any positive input.  thumbup.gif
*
2. An investment bank can include raising capital in their deals as they have a license to do so. Big 4 doesn't have that; usually taking on smaller clients which the banks do not want and only provide advisory services.

3. The major local anchor banks investment banking arm include CIMB, Maybank, RHB and AmBank. CIMB tops the list in the league tables. Foreign banks do not have much of an investment banking presence here, mostly limited to research or stockbroking.
gloomberg
post Nov 23 2010, 09:41 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


U had an internship, and yet u don't know what is going on? Doubt u'll get far. I'm in it, but wouldn't offer any advise. Having an internship without knowing what's the next plan already revealed what a failure u r
Topace111
post Nov 23 2010, 10:46 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,102 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
QUOTE(confused*88* @ Nov 23 2010, 12:54 PM)
Dear all,

I have been reading this section for quite a while and I believe there's a few experienced people in the investment banking scene.

I have just graduated and is searching for a career. My dream is to join a bulge bracket (BB) investment bank (IB) in the future, perhaps either in Singapore or Hong Kong. (preferably Corporate Finance (CF) or Investment Banking division)

Thus, I am asking a few questions in relation to which career path to take right now.

1. There are a few feasible opportunities:
A) Local IB
B) Local Big 4 CF advisory
C) SG Big 4 Auditing

2. What is the difference between IB and big 4 CF?

3. Which are the Tier 1 IBs in Malaysia?

p.s. I do not wish to go through rotations as I'm quite certain that I'm interested in CF.

Thanks in advance and I really appreciate any positive input.  thumbup.gif
*
Do you consider CFA ?
Aloong
post Nov 23 2010, 11:00 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(confused*88* @ Nov 23 2010, 12:54 PM)
Dear all,

I have been reading this section for quite a while and I believe there's a few experienced people in the investment banking scene.

I have just graduated and is searching for a career. My dream is to join a bulge bracket (BB) investment bank (IB) in the future, perhaps either in Singapore or Hong Kong. (preferably Corporate Finance (CF) or Investment Banking division)

Thus, I am asking a few questions in relation to which career path to take right now.

1. There are a few feasible opportunities:
A) Local IB
B) Local Big 4 CF advisory
C) SG Big 4 Auditing

2. What is the difference between IB and big 4 CF?

3. Which are the Tier 1 IBs in Malaysia?

p.s. I do not wish to go through rotations as I'm quite certain that I'm interested in CF.

Thanks in advance and I really appreciate any positive input.  thumbup.gif
*
I doubt that you're certain about ur interest in CF.
If ur so certain u won't even ask those question above.
U've an intern and ur so determined, yet u dun know who's the Tier1 players? No.1 attitude requirement for CF is being resourceful and dun ask stupid question until u've research all avenues. I wouldn't be so harsh, if u didn't boast about ur determination in CF.

2. All of the 3 options u've stated will only give u 5% chance of getting into BB IB in SG or HK (note: i din't say 0%). The higher chance way is to get Masters from world top 5 university, such as Harvard, University of Chicago, etc etc (do ur research, i dun hav the time).

For ur Q2, do ur own research. Google it and search thru 10 pages at least.

Lastly, by CF itself is very vauge, as CF work in local IB, foriegn IB and Big4is very diff. Go figure. Hence, again, i doubt ur determination.

gloomberg
post Nov 24 2010, 12:03 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(Aloong @ Nov 23 2010, 11:00 PM)
I doubt that you're certain about ur interest in CF.
If ur so certain u won't even ask those question above.
U've an intern and ur so determined, yet u dun know who's the Tier1 players? No.1 attitude requirement for CF is being resourceful and dun ask stupid question until u've research all avenues. I wouldn't be so harsh, if u didn't boast about ur determination in CF.

2. All of the 3 options u've stated will only give u 5% chance of getting into BB IB in SG or HK (note: i din't say 0%). The higher chance way is to get Masters from world top 5 university, such as Harvard, University of Chicago, etc etc (do ur research, i dun hav the time).

For ur Q2, do ur own research. Google it and search thru 10 pages at least.

Lastly, by CF itself is very vauge, as CF work in local IB, foriegn IB and Big4is very diff. Go figure. Hence, again, i doubt ur determination.
*
and also, for huge MNC, they have their own CFs. U wan to get in? Yea, maybe those small time ones, where the deals don't get into their hand. And that time, TS's dream of getting huge bonuses will be tarnished.
kelvin_tan
post Nov 24 2010, 12:42 AM

Passion for Pipping!
*******
Senior Member
3,141 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


@gloomberg
arent you new towards the working force itself? From other threads I think you jsut started working right? (well at least in IB).

No doubt TS didnt do much research etc on the field he/she is trying to enter but, well, no reason to act arrogantly / cocky right? I believe this is a thread seeking advice / guidance, not a bashing one.

Most ppl in IB seem to act that way but not sure why.
Vengeance_Mad
post Nov 24 2010, 10:23 AM

Aston-ishing
*****
Senior Member
797 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(Topace111 @ Nov 23 2010, 10:46 PM)
Do you consider CFA ?
*
Chartered Financial Analyst?
fino_abama
post Nov 24 2010, 10:56 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
520 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(Vengeance_Mad @ Nov 24 2010, 10:23 AM)
Chartered Financial Analyst?
*
Yes, I think Topace111 was asking confused*88* to consider getting the CFA designation.

confused*88*, if you graduated from a big brand university in Australia, then try applying to the IBs in Singapore first. If you can't, then try CIMB or Maybank Investment Bank.
kinwing
post Nov 24 2010, 02:30 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(confused*88* @ Nov 23 2010, 01:14 PM)
I graduated from an Australian University (Bachelors) with High Distinction average.

I also did an internship at the IB department of a big local IB.
*
Hi confused*88*,

Refer to your statement "...did an internship at the IB deparment of a big local IB". So the "local" should means in Australia as I assume. So I'm just wondering why don't the "local" IB comfirm you as a permenant staff once you completed your internship if you are performing well? Even so, you still can look for other IB in Australia instead of coming back to Malaysia to look for CF job?
kinwing
post Nov 24 2010, 02:40 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(fino_abama @ Nov 24 2010, 10:56 AM)
Yes, I think Topace111 was asking confused*88* to consider getting the CFA designation.

confused*88*, if you graduated from a big brand university in Australia, then try applying to the IBs in Singapore first. If you can't, then try CIMB or Maybank Investment Bank.
*
Nowadays even the experienced one not easy to look for CF jobs in Singapore before the election (Singapore). Of course if TS did a lot of corporate exercises during his internship in the "big local IB" of which could brush up his CV a little bit nicer, who knows he got a chance to get an interview from SG's IBs? Anyway, i think TS should apply CF job from IBs in KL to gain more experience and exposure first.

BTW, getting CFA is not a pre-requisite to work in CF though it would be an advantage. Instead passing SC licensing exam is a must for those who plan to work in CF from IBs as a long term career.
TSconfused*88*
post Nov 24 2010, 05:53 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(Topace111 @ Nov 23 2010, 10:46 PM)
Do you consider CFA ?
*
Yeah I've signed up for the June 2011 examinations already.

QUOTE(Aloong @ Nov 23 2010, 11:00 PM)
I doubt that you're certain about ur interest in CF.
If ur so certain u won't even ask those question above.
U've an intern and ur so determined, yet u dun know who's the Tier1 players? No.1 attitude requirement for CF is being resourceful and dun ask stupid question until u've research all avenues. I wouldn't be so harsh, if u didn't boast about ur determination in CF.

2. All of the 3 options u've stated will only give u 5% chance of getting into BB IB in SG or HK (note: i din't say 0%). The higher chance way is to get Masters from world top 5 university, such as Harvard, University of Chicago, etc etc (do ur research, i dun hav the time).

For ur Q2, do ur own research. Google it and search thru 10 pages at least.

Lastly, by CF itself is very vauge, as CF work in local IB, foriegn IB and Big4is very diff. Go figure. Hence, again, i doubt ur determination.
*
Thanks for the advice.

From my experience, I'd say I'm quite certain about that but I'm sure there's more for me to find out in the field. So I didn't say I'm 100% sure.

I'm not planning to do a Masters right now, but that is a viable plan in the future.

I will find out more about the things that u've noted. Thanks.



QUOTE(fino_abama @ Nov 24 2010, 10:56 AM)
Yes, I think Topace111 was asking confused*88* to consider getting the CFA designation.

confused*88*, if you graduated from a big brand university in Australia, then try applying to the IBs in Singapore first. If you can't, then try CIMB or Maybank Investment Bank.
*
Thanks for the reply.

FYI, I graduated from Monash. I'd say its not too reputable but its OK.

I have already applied for the graduate positions but I'm not expecting much from it. Hence, I'm seeking advice as to which career is a better step stone to a BB IB.

I dont want to be rotated but if thats the best step stone I might consider that path. Any advice on that?


QUOTE(kinwing @ Nov 24 2010, 02:30 PM)
Hi confused*88*,

Refer to your statement "...did an internship at the IB deparment of a big local IB". So the "local" should means in Australia as I assume. So I'm just wondering why don't the "local" IB comfirm you as a permenant staff once you completed your internship if you are performing well? Even so, you still can look for other IB in Australia instead of coming back to Malaysia to look for CF job?
*
I did intern at a MY IB. I'm already back in MY but I didn't want to go through rotations so I'm still considering other options.


QUOTE(kinwing @ Nov 24 2010, 02:40 PM)
Nowadays even the experienced one not easy to look for CF jobs in Singapore before the election (Singapore). Of course if TS did a lot of corporate exercises during his internship in the "big local IB" of which could brush up his CV a little bit nicer, who knows he got a chance to get an interview from SG's IBs? Anyway, i think TS should apply CF job from IBs in KL to gain more experience and exposure first.

BTW, getting CFA is not a pre-requisite to work in CF though it would be an advantage. Instead passing SC licensing exam is a must for those who plan to work in CF from IBs as a long term career.
*
Of the three that I've listed, which experience is more creditable if I were to apply for BB IB in the future?

Thanks a lot for your reply.
keelim
post Nov 24 2010, 06:01 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
941 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: ^^Heaven^^


Don’t be misguided by the forum for real. Ignore posts from the interval of 7am to 2am (+1) - Generally. Opportunity cost for IB-ers to post at this forum is just too high - Generally.
For BB/Tier-1 Corporate Finance, forget about the qualifications needed besides your Degree. Leverage on the internship. Your best cut to being an Analyst in CF is probably from internship/job placement in the campus, unless you’re some private banker’s client’s - children. If you fail this stage, go to Plan B or Plan C, or Plan D.
Plan B entails a reputable B-school. As you are aware of, you probably will be in your late 20s to early 30s. Getting an MBA will open doors to interviews at campus.
Plan C covers Big 4 CF. Generally the experience is quite similar except for capital market experiences and size of the deals in the pipeline.
Plan D involves being a specialist in your industry. This master of trade is demanded by the IBs.
Either Plan A,B, C, D, or E….CF requires you to be ‘smoky’. In the sense, never answer “I Don’t Know” and smoke all the way, of course with substance.

Vengeance_Mad
post Nov 24 2010, 09:53 PM

Aston-ishing
*****
Senior Member
797 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(kinwing @ Nov 24 2010, 02:40 PM)
Nowadays even the experienced one not easy to look for CF jobs in Singapore before the election (Singapore). Of course if TS did a lot of corporate exercises during his internship in the "big local IB" of which could brush up his CV a little bit nicer, who knows he got a chance to get an interview from SG's IBs? Anyway, i think TS should apply CF job from IBs in KL to gain more experience and exposure first.

BTW, getting CFA is not a pre-requisite to work in CF though it would be an advantage. Instead passing SC licensing exam is a must for those who plan to work in CF from IBs as a long term career.
*
Wats sc licensing may I ask? rclxub.gif
gloomberg
post Nov 24 2010, 09:55 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


First of all, what is ur motivation behind getting into an IB? Money? Glory? Just make sure u have what it takes, i.e. relentless stamina, working late till 4-5am(when there's project, and this is frequent for big IB), adept to analyzing business, living in solitude, tough mentally and physically, great communication and client servicing skills, pro in excel, and one thing u realize when u're in it, unrealistic business valuation (cuz it all depends on ur client's satisfaction to get the deal done).

@kelvin_tan, lol, im new, but i ask around. and look around. there maybe claim that they are an IBer albeit they're not, but it's really up to u guys to judge what is plausible or not.

I've met many freshies, but a lot of them are super stuck up although they knew nothing. literally nothing. nil. well, if this is the attitude when they meet their clients, keep it up. Yea, glorified job, but there's a price to pay for it. In the end of the day, what matters most is not just your technical skills, but also your ability to maintain good relationship with clients (so that they continue doing business with u?), although many people didn't know that their clients can be next to them when they least expect it.


Added on November 24, 2010, 9:56 pm
QUOTE(Vengeance_Mad @ Nov 24 2010, 09:53 PM)
Wats sc licensing may I ask?  rclxub.gif
*
Module 12 & 19, go check the website la...

This post has been edited by gloomberg: Nov 24 2010, 09:56 PM
fino_abama
post Nov 24 2010, 10:53 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
520 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(confused*88* @ Nov 24 2010, 05:53 PM)

FYI, I graduated from Monash. I'd say its not too reputable but its OK.

I have already applied for the graduate positions but I'm not expecting much from it. Hence, I'm seeking advice as to which career is a better step stone to a BB IB.

I dont want to be rotated but if thats the best step stone I might consider that path. Any advice on that?
I did intern at a MY IB. I'm already back in MY but I didn't want to go through rotations so I'm still considering other options.
Of the three that I've listed, which experience is more creditable if I were to apply for BB IB in the future?

Thanks a lot for your reply.
*
Monash is a good enough university. No harm trying to apply though. From time to time, try to furnish your resume/CV to make it more attractive to HRs.

As long as you get a chance to work in an IB, it's okay if you get rotated between departments. The most important thing is being able to show to your future bosses your interest and capability in CF. Networking is very important in this case.

Good luck.
kinwing
post Nov 24 2010, 11:50 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(confused*88* @ Nov 24 2010, 05:53 PM)
Yeah I've signed up for the June 2011 examinations already.
Thanks for the advice.

From my experience, I'd say I'm quite certain about that but I'm sure there's more for me to find out in the field. So I didn't say I'm 100% sure.

I'm not planning to do a Masters right now, but that is a viable plan in the future.

I will find out more about the things that u've noted. Thanks.
Thanks for the reply.

FYI, I graduated from Monash. I'd say its not too reputable but its OK.

I have already applied for the graduate positions but I'm not expecting much from it. Hence, I'm seeking advice as to which career is a better step stone to a BB IB.

I dont want to be rotated but if thats the best step stone I might consider that path. Any advice on that?
I did intern at a MY IB. I'm already back in MY but I didn't want to go through rotations so I'm still considering other options.
Of the three that I've listed, which experience is more creditable if I were to apply for BB IB in the future?

Thanks a lot for your reply.
*
Read from your reply and know you did intern at MY, but you said you don't know which IBs are the top tier in MY? Not going to mention which are the top tier IBs in MY since someone could have mentioned in the previous thread, so you have to stop whinning rclxub.gif and go verify those information or google search.

Btw, IMHO it would be recommended to go for CF division of IBs, of course it would be best if you can join the best local IB.

I got another question is that since you have gone through your internship in a local IB, you should have come to know someone from another IB or work in the same industry? It could be indeed easier for you to get a CF job via connection and reference.

Share you my experience that I did an internship in a local IB before. I was attached to the CF division. I was confirmed by the bank once the internship completed, though I left the bank and join an application engineer firm later. Four years later I bored with the engineer job and finished the CFA study, I back to work in CF via through peer reference. As I still keep in touch with my ex-CF colleagues, and a lot of them are promoted to be AM, AVP or even VP and they are spread all over different IBs or commercial sector (CF is a "small" world), and with their reference I only went through for 1st interview to show face and get the job offers.

This post has been edited by kinwing: Nov 25 2010, 12:01 AM
TSconfused*88*
post Nov 25 2010, 12:49 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(keelim @ Nov 24 2010, 06:01 PM)
Don’t be misguided by the forum for real. Ignore posts from the interval of 7am to 2am (+1) - Generally. Opportunity cost for IB-ers to post at this forum is just too high - Generally.
For BB/Tier-1 Corporate Finance, forget about the qualifications needed besides your Degree. Leverage on the internship. Your best cut to being an Analyst in CF is probably from internship/job placement in the campus, unless you’re some private banker’s client’s - children. If you fail this stage, go to Plan B or Plan C, or Plan D.
Plan B entails a reputable B-school. As you are aware of, you probably will be in your late 20s to early 30s. Getting an MBA will open doors to interviews at campus.
Plan C covers Big 4 CF. Generally the experience is quite similar except for capital market experiences and size of the deals in the pipeline.
Plan D involves being a specialist in your industry. This master of trade is demanded by the IBs.
Either Plan A,B, C, D, or E….CF requires you to be ‘smoky’. In the sense, never answer “I Don’t  Know” and smoke all the way, of course with substance.
*
Some good advice there. Thanks.

Anyway I'm fresh from uni, so I'm still in my early 20s. =)

I guess I'll try plan B in the future after getting a few years experience.

Mind explaining more about plan A? I've applied for BB but I'm not putting much hope on it.

Is MY Tier 1 IB experience better than Big 4 CF or the other way round? Which is more credible for BB IB?

QUOTE(gloomberg @ Nov 24 2010, 09:55 PM)
First of all, what is ur motivation behind getting into an IB? Money? Glory? Just make sure u have what it takes, i.e. relentless stamina, working late till 4-5am(when there's project, and this is frequent for big IB), adept to analyzing business, living in solitude, tough mentally and physically, great communication and client servicing skills, pro in excel, and one thing u realize when u're in it, unrealistic business valuation (cuz it all depends on ur client's satisfaction to get the deal done).

I've met many freshies, but a lot of them are super stuck up although they knew nothing. literally nothing. nil. well, if this is the attitude when they meet their clients, keep it up. Yea, glorified job, but there's a price to pay for it. In the end of the day, what matters most is not just your technical skills, but also your ability to maintain good relationship with clients (so that they continue doing business with u?), although many people didn't know that their clients can be next to them when they least expect it.
I'm really interested in the area and I enjoyed my internship very much. I like the challenges put upon me and I find value in that. Well, the money really is a plus for more motivation in this case, I wouldn't deny that.

I'm sure I'm capable of performing at this area and I also realise that I have to polish my communication skills but that can be trained as I get more experience.


QUOTE(fino_abama @ Nov 24 2010, 10:53 PM)
Monash is a good enough university. No harm trying to apply though. From time to time, try to furnish your resume/CV to make it more attractive to HRs.

As long as you get a chance to work in an IB, it's okay if you get rotated between departments. The most important thing is being able to show to your future bosses your interest and capability in CF. Networking is very important in this case.

Good luck.
*
Yeah I've applied for graduate positions but the competition is really intense. It's good if I'm able to land it but I wouldn't be sad if I couldn't.

I'm afraid to be rotated into the commercial banking side of the business. LOL. I have a basic understanding of their hiring practice so I think I'll go for the alternative route. That's if I decided to join them down the road.

Anyway, from ur advice, u reckon local IB is better than Big 4 CF experience? Thanks.

QUOTE(kinwing @ Nov 24 2010, 11:50 PM)
Read from your reply and know you did intern at MY, but you said you don't know which IBs are the top tier in MY? Not going to mention which are the top tier IBs in MY since someone could have mentioned in the previous thread, so you have to stop whinning rclxub.gif and go verify those information or google search.

Btw, IMHO it would be recommended to go for CF division of IBs, of course it would be best if you can join the best local IB.

I got another question is that since you have gone through your internship in a local IB, you should have come to know someone from another IB or work in the same industry? It could be indeed easier for you to get a CF job via connection and reference.

Share you my experience that I did an internship in a local IB before. I was attached to the CF division. I was confirmed by the bank once the internship completed, though I left the bank and join an application engineer firm later. Four years later I bored with the engineer job and finished the CFA study, I back to work in CF via through peer reference. As I still keep in touch with my ex-CF colleagues, and a lot of them are promoted to be AM, AVP or even VP and they are spread all over different IBs or commercial sector (CF is a "small" world), and with their reference I only went through for 1st interview to show face and get the job offers.
*
U reckon local IB is better than Big 4 CF experience?

Maybe we're talking about different company here or maybe they have changed their system. Before this I heard it's possible for a fresh graduate to join as an executive but I think they've changed their policies. Fresh graduates must now go through the MT program and be rotated. That's from what I understood. Correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks.
Aloong
post Nov 25 2010, 06:46 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(kelvin_tan @ Nov 24 2010, 12:42 AM)
@gloomberg
arent you new towards the working force itself? From other threads I think you jsut started working right? (well at least in IB).

No doubt TS didnt do much research etc on the field he/she is trying to enter but, well, no reason to act arrogantly / cocky right? I believe this is a thread seeking advice / guidance, not a bashing one.

Most ppl in IB seem to act that way but not sure why.
*
Harsh?
Wait till they really do CF, and they'll know wat is harsh


Added on November 25, 2010, 6:57 am
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Nov 24 2010, 09:55 PM)
First of all, what is ur motivation behind getting into an IB? Money? Glory? Just make sure u have what it takes, i.e. relentless stamina, working late till 4-5am(when there's project, and this is frequent for big IB), adept to analyzing business, living in solitude, tough mentally and physically, great communication and client servicing skills, pro in excel, and one thing u realize when u're in it, unrealistic business valuation (cuz it all depends on ur client's satisfaction to get the deal done).

@kelvin_tan, lol, im new, but i ask around. and look around. there maybe claim that they are an IBer albeit they're not, but it's really up to u guys to judge what is plausible or not.

I've met many freshies, but a lot of them are super stuck up although they knew nothing. literally nothing. nil. well, if this is the attitude when they meet their clients, keep it up. Yea, glorified job, but there's a price to pay for it. In the end of the day, what matters most is not just your technical skills, but also your ability to maintain good relationship with clients (so that they continue doing business with u?), although many people didn't know that their clients can be next to them when they least expect it.


Added on November 24, 2010, 9:56 pm

Module 12 & 19, go check the website la...
*
My fren is complaining his juniors always complain of always given menial task, but wen given more important tasks, they dun do it properly and won't put in the hours. resulting in the seniors put in even mre hours than he have to initially.
juniors, especially those very determined ones, are very big headed, They are so determined about the word CF, but yet doesnt know the real day to day work. and when they dun seem to do what they are expecting(or imagining), they lose interest.


This post has been edited by Aloong: Nov 25 2010, 06:57 AM
Vengeance_Mad
post Nov 25 2010, 11:33 AM

Aston-ishing
*****
Senior Member
797 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(confused*88* @ Nov 24 2010, 05:53 PM)
Yeah I've signed up for the June 2011 examinations already.
Thanks for the advice.
Bro, where do you sign up for this program ?

VR9099
post Nov 25 2010, 01:16 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
28 posts

Joined: Apr 2008


QUOTE(Vengeance_Mad @ Nov 25 2010, 11:33 AM)
Bro, where do you sign up for this program ?
*
Google.

This post has been edited by VR9099: Apr 30 2011, 12:49 AM
nokia2003
post Nov 25 2010, 02:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,786 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: VIC - The Place To Be


QUOTE(VR9099 @ Nov 25 2010, 01:16 PM)
if you wish to take CFA yet you dont even know where, how and when to sign up, good luck to you. Bright future awaits you.
*
the sarcasm is strong in this thread, in general! laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif
kinwing
post Nov 25 2010, 02:26 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(VR9099 @ Nov 25 2010, 01:16 PM)
if you wish to take CFA yet you dont even know where, how and when to sign up, good luck to you. Bright future awaits you.
*
There is google search instead of whining around to wait others to spoon feed. Even normal jobs, not to mention the work in the CF field, require staffs to take the initiative to take the effort to learn. While people are working, it is not always qualification, but attitude in work to gain the relevant experience is more important.
Vengeance_Mad
post Nov 25 2010, 05:24 PM

Aston-ishing
*****
Senior Member
797 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(VR9099 @ Nov 25 2010, 01:16 PM)
if you wish to take CFA yet you dont even know where, how and when to sign up, good luck to you. Bright future awaits you.
*
QUOTE(kinwing @ Nov 25 2010, 02:26 PM)
There is google search instead of whining around to wait others to spoon feed. Even normal jobs, not to mention the work in the CF field, require staffs to take the initiative to take the effort to learn. While people are working, it is not always qualification, but attitude in work to gain the relevant experience is more important.
*
Thank you.
I asked because I do not want to get it wrong.
I checked in www.cfainstitute.org but it seems like its not for local.
And I can't find a malaysian 1 except for the www.cfamalaysia.org which will also redirect me to the 1st website.

Anyway, if u don't want or can't answer me, or if it's too hard for you to help, then don't say anything.
Why bother to answer so sarcasticly?
You gain or lost anything if I'm spoonfed?

tommy141184
post Nov 25 2010, 06:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
153 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


I got an interview for corporate finance with a local IB, I heard that there will be an essay and a something like financial statement analysis test, anyone here has this experience before? Normally what sort of essay questions they will ask, and the financial statement analysis is like?? any example as I couldn't find from internet.
prancingHORSE
post Nov 25 2010, 07:29 PM

I’m too awake for this to be a nightmare!
Group Icon
Elite
2,442 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: pJ



QUOTE(tommy141184 @ Nov 25 2010, 06:53 PM)
I got an interview for corporate finance with a local IB, I heard that there will be an essay and a something like financial statement analysis test, anyone here has this experience before? Normally what sort of essay questions they will ask, and the financial statement analysis is like?? any example as I couldn't find from internet.
*
OT:
Which IB specifically?
TSconfused*88*
post Nov 25 2010, 08:22 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(Vengeance_Mad @ Nov 25 2010, 05:24 PM)
Thank you.
I asked because I do not want to get it wrong.
I checked in www.cfainstitute.org but it seems like its not for local.
And I can't find a malaysian 1 except for the www.cfamalaysia.org which will also redirect me to the 1st website.

Anyway, if u don't want or can't answer me, or if it's too hard for you to help, then don't say anything.
Why bother to answer so sarcasticly?
You gain or lost anything if I'm spoonfed?
*
I registered at www.cfainstitute.org. I'm not 100% certain but I don't think you can register through any other way. You can register for the exam and choose the venue that you prefer, they have exams all over the world.

For Level 1, there's June and December exams. Registration and exam fee is around US$1000 and it gets more expensive closer to exam dates.

Cheers.
tommy141184
post Nov 25 2010, 08:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
153 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


QUOTE(prancingHORSE @ Nov 25 2010, 08:29 PM)
OT:
Which IB specifically?
*
Alliance Invest
keelim
post Nov 25 2010, 09:26 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
941 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: ^^Heaven^^


QUOTE(confused*88* @ Nov 25 2010, 12:49 AM)
Some good advice there. Thanks.

Anyway I'm fresh from uni, so I'm still in my early 20s. =)

I guess I'll try plan B in the future after getting a few years experience.

Mind explaining more about plan A? I've applied for BB but I'm not putting much hope on it.

Is MY Tier 1 IB experience better than Big 4 CF or the other way round? Which is more credible for BB IB?

*
The good thing about Plan B is it allows you to self-assess your ability before splurging considerable amount of money for B-School enrollment. This is via GMAT program. FYI, avg GMAT score for Harvard (Top-B School) is 730 in 2009. Tier 1 IB mostly recruits from Top B-school, hence if you cant get an enrollment, drop the dream. Passion sometimes need to be assessed with ability before the reality struck hard.

The problem with Plan A is competition. This is the stage where IBs recruit interns/analyst. This is simply through their graduate's program advertised globally or campus recruitment (for top tiers Degree). Again, if you are the typical Joes on the street, this is the most possible option with a degree.

My take is any Tier 1 IB guys can do Big 4 CF job but not vice versa. The exposure and responsibilities are very different. If you have a choice, it would be a clear cut in my opinion. Unfortunately, I dont think Tier 1 IB will hire someone in the early 20s especially in the front office. If I were a client, I wont be convinced looking at a young chap pitching or doing investment valuation at my mega project. Big 4 may be a better bet, and I believe they hire young blood.


Added on November 25, 2010, 9:32 pm
QUOTE(tommy141184 @ Nov 25 2010, 06:53 PM)
I got an interview for corporate finance with a local IB, I heard that there will be an essay and a something like financial statement analysis test, anyone here has this experience before? Normally what sort of essay questions they will ask, and the financial statement analysis is like?? any example as I couldn't find from internet.
*
Corporate Finance entails lots of legal document reading, pitching and writing vignettes. Therefore, what's the best way to assess than to ask the interviewees to write an essay, which I opined to be a case study essay.

Know your financial statements. Double accounting treatment and ratios. Google up the most common ratios and why they are used. For eg. EV/EBITDA. Why EV and why EBITDA? If you are interviewing for a specialist sector, know the sector hard. Airlines will be looking at RPK, RASK, CASK. Power generation looking at EV/KWh and etc. Remember CF guys are Jack of all trades, master of none! Back-of-the-envolope DCF, comparable multiples, transaction multiples for the start. Good Luck!

This post has been edited by keelim: Nov 25 2010, 09:42 PM
gloomberg
post Nov 25 2010, 10:10 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(keelim @ Nov 25 2010, 09:26 PM)
The good thing about Plan B is it allows you to self-assess your ability before splurging considerable amount of money for B-School enrollment. This is via GMAT program. FYI, avg GMAT score for Harvard (Top-B School) is 730 in 2009. Tier 1 IB mostly recruits from Top B-school, hence if you cant get an enrollment, drop the dream. Passion sometimes need to be assessed with ability before the reality struck hard.

The problem with Plan A is competition. This is the stage where IBs recruit interns/analyst. This is simply through their graduate's program advertised globally or campus recruitment (for top tiers Degree).  Again, if you are the typical Joes on the street, this is the most possible option with a degree.

My take is any Tier 1 IB guys can do Big 4 CF job but not vice versa. The exposure and responsibilities are very different. If you have a choice, it would be a clear cut in my opinion. Unfortunately, I dont think Tier 1 IB will hire someone in the early 20s especially in the front office. If I were a client, I wont be convinced looking at a young chap pitching or doing investment valuation at my mega project. Big 4 may be a better bet, and I believe they hire young blood.


Added on November 25, 2010, 9:32 pm

Corporate Finance entails lots of legal document reading, pitching and writing vignettes. Therefore, what's the best way to assess than to ask the interviewees to write an essay, which I opined to be a case study essay.

Know your financial statements. Double accounting treatment and ratios. Google up the most common ratios and why they are used. For eg. EV/EBITDA. Why EV and why EBITDA? If you are interviewing for a specialist sector, know the sector hard. Airlines will be looking at RPK, RASK, CASK. Power generation looking at EV/KWh and etc. Remember CF guys are Jack of all trades, master of none! Back-of-the-envolope DCF, comparable multiples, transaction multiples for the start. Good Luck!
*
legal stuff... tons of them @,@... which is why corporate lawyer like andre & kadir or wong & partners (under baker and mckenzie) are earning tons of money (but of course they work their a$$ off too). Technical skills can be trained, cuz there's a limit to what a person can do, unless u get into a very quant finance field, i.e. derivatives, fixed income analysis (and it's not just maths and statistical modelling, it's way beyond that).

But what i think is that if we get into a CF of a small IB, we wouldn't necessarily learn a lot, especially if ur leader is a lousy one, and continuously failing to secure any deals. In the banking industry however, take heed that CF people are often labelled as a very serious bunch of people. Sleep late, wake up early. But bonus is beyond ur wildest imagination, but well, u're gonna risk threatening ur life being there, especially at CIMB. And actually, the life of being an equity analyst is quite similar, u reach office at 7am, go back 12am, lots of coffee, ur colleagues are ur family, etc. depends what u seek for in life.

Who does no one consider debt capital market? It's an equally challenging field, maybe not as CF, but the exposure is quite huge, and gonna expand even more with islamic finance. Getting straight into CF would bring u no benefit, cuz it's better if u have experience in certain areas of expertise, for say property&construction, power generation, agriculture, etc etc. then u have sth to bring to the table if u have a great business sense in valuation of a certain project. Best of all, if u have overseas projects, and if u have a blackberry that connects to ur office email, i wish u good luck.
Aloong
post Nov 25 2010, 11:39 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(tommy141184 @ Nov 25 2010, 08:45 PM)
Alliance Invest
*
CF?
didnt expect they're hiring. i tot they went into hibernation
kinwing
post Nov 25 2010, 11:58 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Vengeance_Mad @ Nov 25 2010, 05:24 PM)
Thank you.
I asked because I do not want to get it wrong.
I checked in www.cfainstitute.org but it seems like its not for local.
And I can't find a malaysian 1 except for the www.cfamalaysia.org which will also redirect me to the 1st website.

Anyway, if u don't want or can't answer me, or if it's too hard for you to help, then don't say anything.
Why bother to answer so sarcasticly?
You gain or lost anything if I'm spoonfed?
*
Vengeance_Mad,

I quite like the quote from dreamer101:"If you cannot stand the heat, please stay away from the kitchen". So we are here trying to wake you up by giving you some hints how would the real IB world be but you take it too personally to think we are bashing you.

If your have never come through some harsh critics from bosses like "Why you are here? You should go home and sleep and give me your salary since your work is suck like a primary student's work, as I'm checking your work till like I'm doing your job!?". Or have you ever been thrown to the face with your draft and being screamed at "I don't want to see this rubbish, get out from my sight!" and have no idea of this kind of hardship, then be happy, as we sarcastism is a small fried.

BTW, you are on the way of getting the CFA registration by bumbing into the www.cfainstitute.org webpage, do read more thoroughly you would then find the account registration session for the CFA registration. Whereby the www.cfamalaysia.org is only for those who are or want to be CFA members and this webpage is not CFA candidates.
kinwing
post Nov 26 2010, 12:28 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(tommy141184 @ Nov 25 2010, 06:53 PM)
I got an interview for corporate finance with a local IB, I heard that there will be an essay and a something like financial statement analysis test, anyone here has this experience before? Normally what sort of essay questions they will ask, and the financial statement analysis is like?? any example as I couldn't find from internet.
*
You might be requested an essay like "What would be the Malaysian's economy is the next decade, what would be the problem the economy is going to encounter and what is the solution?" or "To discuss the most recent corporate governance issue".

Or you would be provided a company's financial statement, and this company could be in making gains or losses for years. So base on the statement, you would suggest which following corporate exercises:-
1) Bonus Issue
2) Right Issue
3) Capital Reduction
3) Share Split
4) Share Consolidation
5) Acquisition
and etc.
And you are required to justify the selection the corporate exercise and show the proforma statement for taking the exercise.
underpressure
post Nov 26 2010, 12:33 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
378 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
I think its great to see your determination to go straight into CF. But you shouldn't get too fix minded and close other opportunies when you're unable to get into CF.

A career from commercial/corporate banking not a bad place to start if you want to go into CF. As these days you see banks offering a wide of services. I met a corporate relationship manager was working very closely with his treasury and DCM team.

Anyway just my 2 cent
gloomberg
post Nov 26 2010, 08:53 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(underpressure @ Nov 26 2010, 12:33 AM)
I think its great to see your determination to go straight into CF. But you shouldn't get too fix minded and close other opportunies when you're unable to get into CF.

A career from commercial/corporate banking not a bad place to start if you want to go into CF. As these days you see banks offering a wide of services. I met a corporate relationship manager was working very closely with his treasury and DCM team.

Anyway just my 2 cent
*
u just need to know the right people to get u in... unless u're real lucky, like one of my pretty super lenglui friend who managed to get in, but left after barely a month there lol.
kinwing
post Nov 26 2010, 09:02 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(gloomberg @ Nov 26 2010, 08:53 AM)
u just need to know the right people to get u in... unless u're real lucky, like one of my pretty super lenglui friend who managed to get in, but left after barely a month there lol.
*
Hi gloomberg

May I know why your lenglui friend left ah hmm.gif ?
keelim
post Nov 26 2010, 09:39 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
941 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: ^^Heaven^^


QUOTE(gloomberg @ Nov 26 2010, 08:53 AM)
u just need to know the right people to get u in... unless u're real lucky, like one of my pretty super lenglui friend who managed to get in, but left after barely a month there lol.
*
The sane mind of a pretty lady should be marrying a banker not becoming a banker.
Vengeance_Mad
post Nov 26 2010, 10:14 AM

Aston-ishing
*****
Senior Member
797 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(kinwing @ Nov 25 2010, 11:58 PM)
Vengeance_Mad,

I quite like the quote from dreamer101:"If you cannot stand the heat, please stay away from the kitchen". So we are here trying to wake you up by giving you some hints how would the real IB world be but you take it too personally to think we are bashing you.

If your have never come through some harsh critics from bosses like "Why you are here? You should go home and sleep and give me your salary since your work is suck like a primary student's work, as I'm checking your work till like I'm doing your job!?". Or have you ever been thrown to the face with your draft and being screamed at "I don't want to see this rubbish, get out from my sight!" and have no idea of this kind of hardship, then be happy, as we sarcastism is a small fried.

BTW, you are on the way of getting the CFA registration by bumbing into the www.cfainstitute.org webpage, do read more thoroughly you would then find the account registration session for the CFA registration. Whereby the www.cfamalaysia.org is only for those who are or want to be CFA members and this webpage is not CFA candidates.
*
Got it.
I understand.
I just don't like to be judged so vaguely.

QUOTE(gloomberg @ Nov 26 2010, 08:53 AM)
u just need to know the right people to get u in... unless u're real lucky, like one of my pretty super lenglui friend who managed to get in, but left after barely a month there lol.
*
OT: May I know ur super lenglui friend ?

This post has been edited by Vengeance_Mad: Nov 26 2010, 10:15 AM
Zennix
post Nov 26 2010, 01:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
245 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
Hi all Experts

may i know how much salary should be expected by those fresh graduate with Bachelor Degree qualification who wish to venture into CF world?

is that working in CF world most of the time should work over midnight 12am or where 12am sharp can go back home is considered early already?

i heard from one shareholder of PLC during AGM time, he shocked me that a person who holds CFA charter work in investment banking line can earn such high amount up to RM30k monthly. He is the one who earns such huge amount and able to get early retirement (coz he is now only age middle 40s and keep roaming around to attend AGM of PLC..to eat free buffet lunch and get door gift as well..haha)

so dear all experts...is that my above statement true..???

This post has been edited by Zennix: Nov 26 2010, 01:45 PM
prancingHORSE
post Nov 26 2010, 04:50 PM

I’m too awake for this to be a nightmare!
Group Icon
Elite
2,442 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: pJ



QUOTE(Zennix @ Nov 26 2010, 01:45 PM)
Hi all Experts

may i know how much salary should be expected by those fresh graduate with Bachelor Degree qualification who wish to venture into CF world?

is that working in CF world most of the time should work over midnight 12am or where 12am sharp can go back home is considered early already?

i heard from one shareholder of PLC during AGM time, he shocked me that a person who holds CFA charter work in investment banking line can earn such high amount up to RM30k monthly. He is the one who earns such huge amount and able to get early retirement (coz he is now only age middle 40s and keep roaming around to attend AGM of PLC..to eat free buffet lunch and get door gift as well..haha)

so dear all experts...is that my above statement true..???
*
I'm no expert.

Generalizing never yields an accurate hypothesis.
My bet is that apart from being a CFA charterholder, that fortunate block would tell you many more factors that contributed towards his early retirement if you ever get the chance to meet him.

This post has been edited by prancingHORSE: Nov 26 2010, 04:50 PM
Knight_2008
post Nov 26 2010, 08:18 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(Zennix @ Nov 26 2010, 01:45 PM)
Hi all Experts

may i know how much salary should be expected by those fresh graduate with Bachelor Degree qualification who wish to venture into CF world?

is that working in CF world most of the time should work over midnight 12am or where 12am sharp can go back home is considered early already?

i heard from one shareholder of PLC during AGM time, he shocked me that a person who holds CFA charter work in investment banking line can earn such high amount up to RM30k monthly. He is the one who earns such huge amount and able to get early retirement (coz he is now only age middle 40s and keep roaming around to attend AGM of PLC..to eat free buffet lunch and get door gift as well..haha)

so dear all experts...is that my above statement true..???
*
a friend of mine had told before investment banking do make lots of bucks.. however, he said 10 percent of the people make 90 percent of money in this field.. he told me he has a few frens who reach the position of head of research at age 31-34 and retire at around 35-36 with money enough for their lifetime..but sad to say, quite many of are not suited to this line either dropped out very fast or stay on but did not get to go far..
underpressure
post Nov 26 2010, 08:52 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
378 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
Totally true, as long as you're the 10% chances are you will be earning big bucks regardless which industry you are in. On average CF may earn more than others but they are other opportunies that bring you to the same destination. Providing you are good at what you do

blue_winter
post Nov 26 2010, 09:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


CF world is still very vague to me...i hope some of the experts here can help me clarify my doubts without bashing me...hehe...what position can a fresh grad hold if he/she were to venture into IBs? Analyst? And what does the job scope involve? what are the criterias that one needs to have to excel in this field?
Aloong
post Nov 26 2010, 09:52 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Nov 26 2010, 08:53 AM)
u just need to know the right people to get u in... unless u're real lucky, like one of my pretty super lenglui friend who managed to get in, but left after barely a month there lol.
*
Good example of ppl who think CF is glamorous, its about investment, about stock market, making huge money. then left after realising daily job is not what they expected.


Added on November 26, 2010, 10:00 pm
QUOTE(blue_winter @ Nov 26 2010, 09:15 PM)
CF world is still very vague to me...i hope some of the experts here can help me clarify my doubts without bashing me...hehe...what position can a fresh grad hold if he/she were to venture into IBs? Analyst? And what does the job scope involve? what are the criterias that one needs to have to excel in this field?
*
Diff bank diff names. but for sure the lowest position. hence ur title will suck, hence watever it is doesn't matter rite?
anyway, u will have clerks lower position than u. fyi: secreteries is higher position than clerk, so make sure u know the diff, altho they seem to be doin the same stuff.

job scope, will be photocopy, binding, typing without typo error, good grammer, obedient, make sure u do 100%, dun even think of being smart and give better ideas. just keep quiet and do as ur told. rmbr ur the most junior, u get to speak or "contribute", once u've proven u can do the basics.

This post has been edited by Aloong: Nov 26 2010, 10:00 PM
blue_winter
post Nov 26 2010, 10:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


Does it help if we have some experience in audit/tax? Will we be still in the same position as fresh grads? Btw, how high is the salary? more thn 3k? and wat is so pressure about the job? izit the deadline or....?
Knight_2008
post Nov 26 2010, 10:15 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(blue_winter @ Nov 26 2010, 10:05 PM)
Does it help if we have some experience in audit/tax? Will we be still in the same position as fresh grads? Btw, how high is the salary? more thn 3k? and wat is so pressure about the job? izit the deadline or....?
*
dunno about Malaysia..but i heard that in US the starting pay of an analyst for those graduated from Wharton is about 60-70k USD with the top tier graduate analyst getting up to 100k bonus in their first year..

i heard my fren telling me that CIMB pay 2.8k though with 9 months bonus a few years back..
blue_winter
post Nov 26 2010, 10:24 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


9 months bonus? wow...is tat even possible?
Knight_2008
post Nov 26 2010, 10:28 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
the IB ppl worked damn hard...i heard their working hours is like 7am to 7pm on good day..bad day can past midnight
blue_winter
post Nov 26 2010, 10:32 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


do they have certain peak periods like audit? or juz peak all throughout the year?
gloomberg
post Nov 27 2010, 12:53 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


Assumptions/stories u guys heard are partially true. I don't know many banks, but I only know some (I'm still new in the market). For me, if i wanna know about pay, i'll directly ask somehow who is actually working at that particular bank itself, for say the HR, if they are willing to tell. If not, ask somehow who has a close friend there, which is hard as well. So best of all, get yourself an interview, and ask when u get the offer, but seriously, it's highly unlikely that they would hire a freshie for their CF, but for research houses it's quite common.

There is an exception though, cause I knew this guy from Maybank Investment who got into a department which is CF related, called origination - he said it's sth to do with writing a pitchbook (to get a deal). If there are pro here who could kindly explain what is origination, it would be deeply appreciated. He's freshie, and got confirmed after 6 months via the Maybank Apprenticeship Program. U guys could try it out.

the lenglui friend i has just switched to a different department at a different IB LOL (i got an offer at that diff IB, but rejected it). Words like 'dark','crazy','nonsense' are associated with CF, at least for her company. Ermm, what I can say is that it's very demanding, and the ppl there would expect u to be able to deal with a whole load of sh1t while u're there. Working hours during the project can be into the wee hours of the morning, and in the weekends as well. there is no such thing as peak season, cuz if u're in those huge IB, really, it's always peak season if deals are always pouring in, especially during this time of global economic recovery. U will notice the trend once u're in the market.

In the end, it all depends on what u want in life.

Please don't think CF is about stock market guys, although i have no idea myself what it was until i was working. It's similar, as in the valuation part and they have to keep up to date with the regulatory news that governs the area they are covering (taxation, sovereignty,political,etc). When some corporates want to do M&A,IPO,Privatization,ECM they'll ask those IB for help with an astounding fee. There's definitely A LOT of legal stuff in CF that is dealt here, which is why corporate lawyers are earning soooo much.

All in all, pay is good, bonus can be >12 months, especially for this year, and there's so many types of bonuses... (individual performance, company performance, contractual) but u are risking ur health and ultimately fertility.

If u really want money, go study actuarial science overseas, and dun come back malaysia. or study chemical engineering or some sort of engineering and hopefully land urself in an oil&gas company. really, there are better ways to earn money. For example, being an insurance agent. A manager from Great Eastern claims to have earned a steady 40k per month, having a lot of downlines. I mean, seriously, who doesn't want to be rich? to use a Mont Blanc pen, Salvatore Ferragamo tie, or even an Armani suit. Ah the glorified world of investment bankers... But always remember there are better ways... don't hop in just for the fame, it's just not worth it... unless u loved to be adored by people, and u have the hunger to be praised and complimented all the time...

Smart ada 2 jenis, satu street smart, another book smart. If u're street smart, u can actually earn more (entrepreneur), but of course it's a tougher road, but what is this world is free from potential risks? If u work for ppl, u risk being fired, although the probability is low.
Aloong
post Nov 27 2010, 01:02 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
Origination (normally called Invt banking dept) = 70% marketing skills + 30% structuring skills with executioners's help
Execution (normally called CF dept) = 90% execution + 10% structuring to assist originaters

Unfortunately, there is no 100% structuring job/role, as wat most ppl thot they would do.
jimmyttl
post Nov 27 2010, 09:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
81 posts

Joined: Dec 2005


QUOTE(Aloong @ Nov 27 2010, 01:02 PM)
Origination (normally called Invt banking dept) = 70% marketing skills + 30% structuring skills with executioners's help
Execution (normally called CF dept) = 90% execution + 10% structuring to assist originaters

Unfortunately, there is no 100% structuring job/role, as wat most ppl thot they would do.
*
you call that marketing skill? I call it reverse valuation ROFL
you don't value the company of your client, or target co. if it's a M&A deal, client will tell you the perceived value of his firm and it's up to you to find reasons to support his valuation and get the deal done. DCF? Comparable ratios you learnt in Uni? go chuck it into the dustbin. LOL

the ugly fact is, people in IBK has better bonus relative to the efforts put in by their more hardworking brethren from the execution side. after all IB is still about sales/deal, if you get the deal, you're the MAN.

Think of execution team as the machine operator on the manufacturing floor while IBK as the thick face salesman peddling their wares.
blue_winter
post Nov 27 2010, 09:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


so basically wat does the job involve? mostly preparing reports? meaning we have to have good research skills? how bout calculation n ratios?
gloomberg
post Nov 27 2010, 09:29 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(jimmyttl @ Nov 27 2010, 09:18 PM)
you call that marketing skill? I call it reverse valuation ROFL
you don't value the company of your client, or target co. if it's a M&A deal, client will tell you the perceived value of his firm and it's up to you to find reasons to support his valuation and get the deal done. DCF? Comparable ratios you learnt in Uni? go chuck it into the dustbin. LOL

the ugly fact is, people in IBK has better bonus relative to the efforts put in by their more hardworking brethren from the execution side. after all IB is still about sales/deal, if you get the deal, you're the MAN.

Think of execution team as the machine operator on the manufacturing floor while IBK as the thick face salesman peddling their wares.
*
like what i've mentioned before. it's a 'dark' world there, and obviously if u wanna get the deal done, u have got to satisfy the clients. anything is else is irrelevant.
SUSalaskanbunny
post Nov 27 2010, 09:50 PM

Foodie
*******
Senior Member
4,283 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
From: Vietnam

you dont expect much info from msians.... not too many of these in msia... come to sg, and you will see a whole new world..
TSconfused*88*
post Nov 28 2010, 12:47 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(alaskanbunny @ Nov 27 2010, 09:50 PM)
you dont expect much info from msians.... not too many of these in msia... come to sg, and you will see a whole new world..
*
Mind telling more about the investment banking scene in Singapore?

Thanks.
gloomberg
post Nov 28 2010, 03:11 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(alaskanbunny @ Nov 27 2010, 09:50 PM)
you dont expect much info from msians.... not too many of these in msia... come to sg, and you will see a whole new world..
*
Very, u sounded like an expert in this field. mind telling about them in singapore?
SUSalaskanbunny
post Nov 28 2010, 06:01 PM

Foodie
*******
Senior Member
4,283 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
From: Vietnam

QUOTE(confused*88* @ Nov 28 2010, 12:47 PM)
Mind telling more about the investment banking scene in Singapore?

Thanks.
*
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Nov 28 2010, 03:11 PM)
Very, u sounded like an expert in this field. mind telling about them in singapore?
*
actually term investment bank is very vague.... each bank is diff, must look at how they divide their divisions...

some have prop trading, some brokerage, some long term investment, some in house hedge fund, some financial services.... all diff.. unlike msia, just retail banking and minor corp banking

just look at these banks.

bank of american - meriyll lynch
bnp paribas
barclays capital
citigroup
credit suisse
deusthe bank
goldman sachs
hsbc
jp morgan chase
morgan stanley
nomura
rbs
ubs
societe generale
standard chartered

all in sg, some even make sg their asia pacific hq

btw, i am not working in a bank...
gloomberg
post Nov 28 2010, 09:01 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(alaskanbunny @ Nov 28 2010, 06:01 PM)
actually term investment bank is very vague.... each bank is diff, must look at how they divide their divisions...

some have prop trading, some brokerage, some long term investment, some in house hedge fund, some financial services.... all diff.. unlike msia, just retail banking and minor corp banking

just look at these banks.

bank of american - meriyll lynch
bnp paribas
barclays capital
citigroup
credit suisse
deusthe bank
goldman sachs
hsbc
jp morgan chase
morgan stanley
nomura
rbs
ubs
societe generale
standard chartered

all in sg, some even make sg their asia pacific hq

btw, i am not working in a bank...
*
u certainly love to talk sh1t right? u think malaysia is small? can't blame u since u're not in an IB. So, don't talk male chicken if u know nothing. most of the names u've mentioned are in malaysia, in case u've never met them.
kelvin_tan
post Nov 28 2010, 09:07 PM

Passion for Pipping!
*******
Senior Member
3,141 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


@gloomberg
lols look like someone inflated cause they are in IB?
Yes I agree that most of the banks listed are here in malaysia BUT most of them are not a fully fledge bank in malaysia. Some of them are only representative offices or taking a minor role in IB / treasury dealing.
SUSalaskanbunny
post Nov 28 2010, 09:25 PM

Foodie
*******
Senior Member
4,283 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
From: Vietnam

QUOTE(gloomberg @ Nov 28 2010, 09:01 PM)
u certainly love to talk sh1t right? u think malaysia is small? can't blame u since u're not in an IB. So, don't talk male chicken if u know nothing. most of the names u've mentioned are in malaysia, in case u've never met them.
*
just sharing what i know... no need to period doh.gif u can share too..

having an office with a name doesnt mean anything... look at the volume of business they have in msia...

like proton in england or aus... just because they managed to sell a few cars there doesnt mean they are a player

that's why you have to look at what kind of division they have in msia... prod trading? brokerage?
feynman
post Nov 29 2010, 05:20 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
4,781 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
The relevant question here is do they hire locally? Presence doesn't mean a thing if you can't get hired in Malaysia, in effect, they are not here at all.
Aloong
post Nov 29 2010, 07:36 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(alaskanbunny @ Nov 28 2010, 09:25 PM)
just sharing what i know... no need to period  doh.gif  u can share too..

having an office with a name doesnt mean anything... look at the volume of business they have in msia...

like proton in england or aus... just because they managed to sell a few cars there doesnt mean they are a player

that's why you have to look at what kind of division they have in msia... prod trading? brokerage?
*
One thing u are totally wrong is bank in msia dun just do retail bank and minor corp bank. Msia have prop trading, hedge fund, brokerage, and a lot others.
The only diff between foreign bankers is they have larger balance sheet and better brand names. In terms of coming out with practicle fund raising solutions for clients, they still have to ride on local banks who knows better.

gloomberg
post Nov 29 2010, 08:29 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(feynman @ Nov 29 2010, 05:20 AM)
The relevant question here is do they hire locally? Presence doesn't mean a thing if you can't get hired in Malaysia, in effect, they are not here at all.
*
They do hire local, as in malaysian, but usually they are from overseas. For eg, at UBS, most of them are from Stanford, LSE, Oxford, etc etc...
sembilan
post Nov 29 2010, 12:20 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
644 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
^experience counts as well. A guy i worked with on a project just got headhunted by one of them banks. IB is not all that people, it's just a lot of smoke and mirrors thrown into it.
feynman
post Nov 29 2010, 04:01 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
4,781 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Nov 29 2010, 08:29 AM)
They do hire local, as in malaysian, but usually they are from overseas. For eg, at UBS, most of them are from Stanford, LSE, Oxford, etc etc...
*
Hiring locals and hiring locally are different things. Go figure it out first.

The questions remains that if they hire locally. Something which I think they do not.....unless you are sourced from contacts.
entryman
post Nov 29 2010, 05:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,179 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


They only hire experienced professionals I believe. Malaysia's market is kinda small, they don't really need fresh grads..

For example, http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSSGE67U0AG20100831 Country head is Malaysian, and head of equity and debt is also Malaysian.

This post has been edited by entryman: Nov 29 2010, 05:25 PM
gloomberg
post Nov 29 2010, 10:03 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


Errr.... I'm referring to foreign IBs? Obviously they hire malaysians... =,= but usually from top class unis.
entryman
post Nov 29 2010, 10:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,179 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


Of course it's anyone's playing ground in foreign jobs that recruit fresh grads from an international talent pool.

Feynman was questioning about these foreign IBs hiring here in Malaysia itself. They most likely do not have fresh entry level jobs here, at least not in CIB or CF.

Anyway Macha mind sharing your experiences? Like.. what division & what size of bank.. and your route to entry.. etc?

This post has been edited by entryman: Nov 29 2010, 10:40 PM
Aloong
post Nov 29 2010, 10:32 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Nov 29 2010, 10:03 PM)
Errr.... I'm referring to foreign IBs? Obviously they hire malaysians... =,= but usually from top class unis.
*
no offence, but u guys are stating the obvious. of course they hire experiences ppl and ppl from good uni.
anyway, the reason 'these foreign IB', like merrillynch, jp, (im not talking bout those OCBC, DBS, Stanchart, hsbc, etc) still nid locals Ibankers are because of networks and contacts. knowledge, skills, experience is given.
Bear in mind for very good local deals, not easy for foriegn IB to penetrate, cos political factors is in place. Having Big money just aint good enuf.At the same time a lot of these foreign monies are pouring in. Huge supply. So they nid ppl who can cakap sama bahasa, so to speak, whileof course knows his stuff as well.
Of course that's the reason they invest here in the first place rite? for local big attractive deals to invest in.

This post has been edited by Aloong: Nov 29 2010, 10:34 PM
LightningFist
post Nov 29 2010, 10:52 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
The foreign banks do hire locally.
Look at Jobstreet Malaysia and you will find Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, RBS and others with job ads every once in a while.
Credit Suisse, JP Morgan Chase, Barclays, and BNP Paribas don't have much.
Obviously Citi, HSBC, and Standard Chartered have bigger operations here and hire more than the rest.


entryman
post Nov 29 2010, 11:06 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,179 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(LightningFist @ Nov 29 2010, 10:52 PM)
The foreign banks do hire locally.
Look at Jobstreet Malaysia and you will find Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, RBS and others with job ads every once in a while.
Credit Suisse, JP Morgan Chase, Barclays, and BNP Paribas don't have much.
Obviously Citi, HSBC, and Standard Chartered have bigger operations here and hire more than the rest.
*
You sure these are for Fresh Grad positions??


Added on November 29, 2010, 11:09 pmAnd in addition to that, hiring into the IB or CF division too?

This post has been edited by entryman: Nov 29 2010, 11:09 PM
gloomberg
post Nov 29 2010, 11:14 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


Easiest way to get there? Get into some powderful uni, or start from local big big IB. Like CIMB. It's really easy these days to get into local IBs, provided there are openings. But don't kena con by those mgmt trainees, ask properly whether they provide opportunities for u to get into IB, cuz most of them are for Commercial Banking.
entryman
post Nov 29 2010, 11:19 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,179 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


And your story macha?

This post has been edited by entryman: Nov 29 2010, 11:21 PM
SUSalaskanbunny
post Nov 29 2010, 11:26 PM

Foodie
*******
Senior Member
4,283 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
From: Vietnam

QUOTE(Aloong @ Nov 29 2010, 07:36 AM)
One thing u are totally wrong is bank in msia dun just do retail bank and minor corp bank. Msia have prop trading, hedge fund, brokerage, and a lot others.
The only diff between foreign bankers is they have larger balance sheet and better brand names. In terms of coming out with practicle fund raising solutions for clients, they still have to ride on local banks who knows better.
*
what's the volume... not much...

anyway feel free to cont discussion, would like to learn a thing or two...
underpressure
post Nov 29 2010, 11:35 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
378 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
Wow this place sure is getting a bit heated up...

I would have agree with alaskanbunny on this. While Malaysia market IS NOT small, but its neither as big or develop like our nearest neighbour, Singapore. But hey this is a forum, every one free to give their opinion whether they agree or disagree. So bear with me if I start talking nonsense while I attempt to deliver my humble opinion.

The amount of deals by volume and size done in Singapore is way off the chart if you compare Malaysia with them. The deals that are done in Singapore are complex while being highly effective. I once foolishly attempted to structure a deal in Malaysia thinking I could pull it off. Boy was I wrong, ended up flying to Singapore because Malaysia lacks the liquidity and support to do it. Goes to show the limitation of Malaysia.

As for getting into these IB? If you are centre of attention, with thousands of application applying and you're paying the same price. Won't you want to hire the best of the best? If you graduated from those top uni like Ivy or OxBridge, you're already been filtered and labelled as the top 10%. For a firm looking to hire the top 10% won't you agree it makes your job a lot easier (and less risky) when you can trust the uni to already do one level of filtering?

BUT not coming from a top uni isn't end of the world for you. The journey to get in just a bit harder and you know to prove yourself better and louder! My cousin is a living proof of that statement. 5 years in Malaysia hop over to HK. Oh I forgot he earns a lot too.

Anyway just my mindless babbling.
Aloong
post Nov 30 2010, 09:40 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(alaskanbunny @ Nov 29 2010, 11:26 PM)
what's the volume... not much...

anyway feel free to cont discussion, would like to learn a thing or two...
*
agree. volume not much as SG.
its a fact SG is much more advance than Msia. again, it's juststating the obvious.

If u wana learn to specilised, SG the place.
But if u wana be a bankers who knows a bit of evrything, Msia would be better.
its a matter of preference.

But surgeons make better money than ER staff, u know wat i mean?


Added on November 30, 2010, 9:50 pm
QUOTE(underpressure @ Nov 29 2010, 11:35 PM)
Wow this place sure is getting a bit heated up...

I would have agree with alaskanbunny on this. While Malaysia market IS NOT small, but its neither as big or develop like our nearest neighbour, Singapore. But hey this is a forum, every one free to give their opinion whether they agree or disagree. So bear with me if I start talking nonsense while I attempt to deliver my humble opinion.

The amount of deals by volume and size done in Singapore is way off the chart if you compare Malaysia with them. The deals that are done in Singapore are complex while being highly effective. I once foolishly attempted to structure a deal in Malaysia thinking I could pull it off. Boy was I wrong, ended up flying to Singapore because Malaysia lacks the liquidity and support to do it. Goes to show the limitation of Malaysia.

As for getting into these IB? If you are centre of attention, with thousands of application applying and you're paying the same price. Won't you want to hire the best of the best? If you graduated from those top uni like Ivy or OxBridge, you're already been filtered and labelled as the top 10%. For a firm looking to hire the top 10% won't you agree it makes your job a lot easier (and less risky) when you can trust the uni to already do one level of filtering?

BUT not coming from a top uni isn't end of the world for you. The journey to get in just a bit harder and you know to prove yourself better and louder! My cousin is a living proof of that statement. 5 years in Malaysia hop over to HK. Oh I forgot he earns a lot too.

Anyway just my mindless babbling.
*
Agree. malaysia is less develop.
Its about educating the investors.
once investors are educated, they will be wlling to understand and buy into more complex investment opportunities, hence liquidity will rise to match ur complex selling point.

However, on the flip side, thank goodness, Msia is NOT that sophisticated, if not we would have that subprime bonds from US fishing for investors in msia, and we'll be doomed, rite?

One thing (my opinion) about bankers is that no matter how complex/sophiticated/advance a structure is, it must be fundamentally viable and make sense to investors.At the end of the day, being complex means u r incompetent in structuring ur product to be understandable/crystal clear for investors to be convinced.

Do u blame the student or teacher, if majority (>50%) failed in the exam? my 2 cents...

This post has been edited by Aloong: Nov 30 2010, 09:50 PM
gloomberg
post Nov 30 2010, 09:59 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(underpressure @ Nov 29 2010, 11:35 PM)
Wow this place sure is getting a bit heated up...

I would have agree with alaskanbunny on this. While Malaysia market IS NOT small, but its neither as big or develop like our nearest neighbour, Singapore. But hey this is a forum, every one free to give their opinion whether they agree or disagree. So bear with me if I start talking nonsense while I attempt to deliver my humble opinion.

The amount of deals by volume and size done in Singapore is way off the chart if you compare Malaysia with them. The deals that are done in Singapore are complex while being highly effective. I once foolishly attempted to structure a deal in Malaysia thinking I could pull it off. Boy was I wrong, ended up flying to Singapore because Malaysia lacks the liquidity and support to do it. Goes to show the limitation of Malaysia.

As for getting into these IB? If you are centre of attention, with thousands of application applying and you're paying the same price. Won't you want to hire the best of the best? If you graduated from those top uni like Ivy or OxBridge, you're already been filtered and labelled as the top 10%. For a firm looking to hire the top 10% won't you agree it makes your job a lot easier (and less risky) when you can trust the uni to already do one level of filtering?

BUT not coming from a top uni isn't end of the world for you. The journey to get in just a bit harder and you know to prove yourself better and louder! My cousin is a living proof of that statement. 5 years in Malaysia hop over to HK. Oh I forgot he earns a lot too.

Anyway just my mindless babbling.
*
agreeable, it's never to late to accomplish things. still, however small malaysia might be, however underdeveloped, it's still our country. Always proud to be a malaysian, while at the same time accepting the fact that singapore fin mkt is indeed much bigga and betta than us. so? if we keep on with the attitude of undermining our own ppl and country, what have we become? of course im only referring to the fin inst here only ya, not talking about some other crap we are having which im not at all proud.

btw, just for u guys punye info, JP Morgan at singapore offers SGD5.6k for back office jobs. Heard this from a dude that just came back from the fruitful land.
anderson2009
post Nov 30 2010, 10:14 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
111 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


hahahaa chill lah, aint that u guys can prove anything. prove la payslip/bank balance? dare?
Knight_2008
post Nov 30 2010, 10:15 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Nov 30 2010, 09:59 PM)
agreeable, it's never to late to accomplish things. still, however small malaysia might be, however underdeveloped, it's still our country. Always proud to be a malaysian, while at the same time accepting the fact that singapore fin mkt is indeed much bigga and betta than us. so? if we keep on with the attitude of undermining our own ppl and country, what have we become? of course im only referring to the fin inst here only ya, not talking about some other crap we are having which im not at all proud.

btw, just for u guys punye info, JP Morgan at singapore offers SGD5.6k for back office jobs. Heard this from a dude that just came back from the fruitful land.
*
5.6k?? fresh grad salary?
LightningFist
post Nov 30 2010, 10:23 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009

QUOTE(entryman @ Nov 29 2010, 11:06 PM)
You sure these are for Fresh Grad positions??


Added on November 29, 2010, 11:09 pmAnd in addition to that, hiring into the IB or CF division too?
*
I didn't say they were hiring fresh graduates.
Certainly not all of them are.
Some of them definitely do - job ads show that.
gloomberg
post Nov 30 2010, 10:24 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Nov 30 2010, 10:15 PM)
5.6k?? fresh grad salary?
*
yes, but of course, they only hire top students. cuz ppl usually progress from back office to middle to front office punye. Trading department.

here, u will never get such pay. convert also kalah liao.
Knight_2008
post Nov 30 2010, 10:48 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Nov 30 2010, 10:24 PM)
yes, but of course, they only hire top students. cuz ppl usually progress from back office to middle to front office punye. Trading department.

here, u will never get such pay. convert also kalah liao.
*
no need convert also lose ady...best can get here is RM 4K... one to one also cannot.. btw, wanna ask something.. when you say top student, only those from oxbridge and ivy league? what if you're damn good at your uni(among the best) but it's not ivy league?


This post has been edited by Knight_2008: Nov 30 2010, 10:48 PM
gloomberg
post Nov 30 2010, 11:03 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Nov 30 2010, 10:48 PM)
no need convert also lose ady...best can get here is RM 4K... one to one also cannot.. btw, wanna ask something.. when you say top student, only those from oxbridge and ivy league? what if you're damn good at your uni(among the best) but it's not ivy league?
*
no la NUS also got, depends on how u present urself, and qualification. no need those ivy league or oxford/cambridge. seriously, i've never studied there, so i wouldn't know their sg std in education, but it's ranked quite high
Knight_2008
post Nov 30 2010, 11:12 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Nov 30 2010, 11:03 PM)
no la NUS also got, depends on how u present urself, and qualification. no need those ivy league or oxford/cambridge. seriously, i've never studied there, so i wouldn't know their sg std in education, but it's ranked quite high
*
lol..wanna ask something.. If I only got ACCA any chance of suceeding to even get a interview?
gloomberg
post Nov 30 2010, 11:22 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Nov 30 2010, 11:12 PM)
lol..wanna ask something.. If I only got ACCA any chance of suceeding to even get a interview?
*
depends la... ur question is so subjective... what field u're trying to get into?
Knight_2008
post Nov 30 2010, 11:24 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Nov 30 2010, 11:22 PM)
depends la... ur question is so subjective... what field u're trying to get into?
*
investment bank, corporate finance or research analyst also I'm happy or basically any other investment related job in IB also I'm very happy...any chance for an ACCA?
gloomberg
post Nov 30 2010, 11:33 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Nov 30 2010, 11:24 PM)
investment bank, corporate finance or research analyst also I'm happy or basically any other investment related job in IB also I'm very happy...any chance for an ACCA?
*
as what ppl have mentioned b4, they take anything, as long as u have a real solid foundation in whatever u're studying, meaning u're a good student. pre-req. qualification itself is irrelevant if it can't be justified well with ur knowledge u've gained from that years of exam taking.

if u're fresh, join a mgmt associate prog, there are tons out there. SC, Bursa, any banks. Getting in directly is real tough, unless u're a real good student, top or whatever. For eg, there's a dude that got into Macquarie Securities fresh. or Maybank Apprenticeship, those are direct too. A lot la actually...
Knight_2008
post Nov 30 2010, 11:34 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Nov 30 2010, 11:33 PM)
as what ppl have mentioned b4, they take anything, as long as u have a real solid foundation in whatever u're studying, meaning u're a good student. pre-req. qualification itself is irrelevant if it can't be justified well with ur knowledge u've gained from that years of exam taking.

if u're fresh, join a mgmt associate prog, there are tons out there. SC, Bursa, any banks. Getting in directly is real tough, unless u're a real good student, top or whatever. For eg, there's a dude that got into Macquarie Securities fresh. or Maybank Apprenticeship, those are direct too. A lot la actually...
*
thanks for the advice smile.gif
tohff7
post Dec 1 2010, 04:31 AM

FF7 GOAT
******
Senior Member
1,581 posts

Joined: Mar 2008


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Nov 30 2010, 11:24 PM)
investment bank, corporate finance or research analyst also I'm happy or basically any other investment related job in IB also I'm very happy...any chance for an ACCA?
*
actually this just shows that u don't have a clear goal on what you want to do in the investment field. I really need to lol-ed at this "Any other investment related job in IB also I'm very happy".

No offense. Just remind me of a particular person that i know of. Ex-auditor, have CFA Level 2, and "being an analyst is a dream job". But if you ask him about any news related to the financial market or economy, he has no clue at all. So much for being "a dream job" but don't even bother to read the business or finance news section of daily newspapers at least
Knight_2008
post Dec 1 2010, 09:11 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(tohff7 @ Dec 1 2010, 04:31 AM)
actually this just shows that u don't have a clear goal on what you want to do in the investment field. I really need to lol-ed at this "Any other investment related job in IB also I'm very happy".

No offense. Just remind me of a particular person that i know of. Ex-auditor, have CFA Level 2, and "being an analyst is a dream job". But if you ask him about any news related to the financial market or economy, he has no clue at all. So much for being "a dream job" but don't even bother to read the business or finance news section of daily newspapers at least
*
lol....wanna become an analyst but don read business news? i thought that is like the thing everyone had to do in the morning especially for those in business line?

btw..i do like to read about business news.. it's just that I'm alright with working in any department in IB because I know in life, not everything can according to plan..If one does not change according to a situation, one is mostly likely failed..this type of people who do not react according to changes in the environment are what we called those having the problem of strategic drift..

Nevertheless, what I meant is that I'm okay with corporate finance, research house, debt origination or I said anything finance and investment related as I know I am inexperienced chap who may not all the department in IB..

Don't generalise the next time u saw someone post something like this..LOL..

kinwing
post Dec 1 2010, 10:06 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(tohff7 @ Dec 1 2010, 04:31 AM)
actually this just shows that u don't have a clear goal on what you want to do in the investment field. I really need to lol-ed at this "Any other investment related job in IB also I'm very happy".

No offense. Just remind me of a particular person that i know of. Ex-auditor, have CFA Level 2, and "being an analyst is a dream job". But if you ask him about any news related to the financial market or economy, he has no clue at all. So much for being "a dream job" but don't even bother to read the business or finance news section of daily newspapers at least
*
I had met a fellow through my friend. The fellow completed his CFA III and he wanted to be a fund manager. So I asked him what was his way on analysing stocks, and that fellow told me he personally did not invest any stock because he was afraid of investment risk. LOL, I was then laugh all the way because a stock analyst do not like to invest rclxms.gif

A typical nerd to get through the academic study without knowing how to apply it. Getting a cert cannot guarantee a good job, without having the passion to the job you are doing then you will not go far doh.gif .

This post has been edited by kinwing: Dec 1 2010, 10:07 AM
Knight_2008
post Dec 1 2010, 10:18 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(kinwing @ Dec 1 2010, 10:06 AM)
I had met a fellow through my friend. The fellow completed his CFA III and he wanted to be a fund manager. So I asked him what was his way on analysing stocks, and that fellow told me he personally did not invest any stock because he was afraid of investment risk. LOL, I was then laugh all the way because a stock analyst do not like to invest rclxms.gif

A typical nerd to get through the academic study without knowing how to apply it. Getting a cert cannot guarantee a good job, without having the passion to the job you are doing then you will not go far doh.gif .
*
haha.. either that or he quite smart.. become fund manager and invest using other people money...if the investment is successful, he got bonus etc.. if not, it's the investors who lost..
Quasi-Suave
post Dec 1 2010, 12:49 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
322 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


For the avoidance of doubt, let me start of by saying that I'm an ex IB-er, with years of experience, a post graduate degree, a specialist credit qualification and a SC advisory license.

Now let me clear the air. Investment Banking jobs (CF, DCM etc) may SOUND glamorous, but it's actually countless hours of thankless back breaking, mind numbing work.

The money CAN be good (salary plus bonus) but when you think of the hours you put in (including weekends)...well one man's meat is another man's poison.

If I could sum up the traits needed to SURVIVE as an IB-er it would be the following:-

1) Passion - If you have no affinity for numbers, not hungry to know who, what, when, why and how about business, then forget it. You'll fail.
2) Research - You need to be always curious. Self learn. Ask questions. And remember the answers. Seniors/clients have little time nor patience to
teach you.
3) Social skills - Includes confidence, good language ability, manners, grooming - You need to look and sound polished, nor mutter, fumble and fidget when speaking or being spoken to.

Natural intelligence is compulsory. In my department, all are second uppers and above. Those holding professional degrees would usually have CFAs or MBAs (with 3.3/4.0 above) to complement their basic degree.

Now some of you may think IB work is like the movie Wall Street (Part 1 or 2). Sorry to burst your bubble, but it's not. If wall street is more your cup of tea, then join the Treasury or Financial Markets of banks. Be a trader.

On the most part, being an IB-er involves reading, writing and attending meetings and presentations. If you don't have the stamina to sit thru an 8 hour due diligence meeting, rush across town for a presentation when the material was just only completed minutes before or work late nights and weekends, then I humbly suggest you FORGET about having a career in IB.

Some IB-ers in the forum are harsh. But that is how it is. It's a cut throat business. Do your homework guys. And ask questions intelligently. Refer my trait #2.

Gotta go. Con-call in 5.
Zennix
post Dec 1 2010, 03:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
245 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(Quasi-Suave @ Dec 1 2010, 12:49 PM)
For the avoidance of doubt, let me start of by saying that I'm an ex IB-er, with years of experience, a post graduate degree, a specialist credit qualification and a SC advisory license.

Now let me clear the air. Investment Banking jobs (CF, DCM etc) may SOUND glamorous, but it's actually countless hours of thankless back breaking, mind numbing work.

The money CAN be good (salary plus bonus) but when you think of the hours you put in (including weekends)...well one man's meat is another man's poison.

If I could sum up the traits needed to SURVIVE as an IB-er it would be the following:-

1) Passion - If you have no affinity for numbers, not hungry to know who, what, when, why and how about business, then forget it. You'll fail.
2) Research - You need to be always curious. Self learn. Ask questions. And remember the answers. Seniors/clients have little time nor patience to
teach you.
3) Social skills - Includes confidence, good language ability, manners, grooming - You need to look and sound polished, nor mutter, fumble and fidget when speaking or being spoken to.

Natural intelligence is compulsory. In my department, all are second uppers and above. Those holding professional degrees would usually have CFAs or MBAs (with 3.3/4.0 above) to complement their basic degree.

Now some of you may think IB work is like the movie Wall Street (Part 1 or 2). Sorry to burst your bubble, but it's not. If wall street is more your cup of tea, then join the Treasury or Financial Markets of banks. Be a trader.

On the most part, being an IB-er involves reading, writing and attending meetings and presentations. If you don't have the stamina to sit thru an 8 hour due diligence meeting, rush across town for a presentation when the material was just only completed minutes before or work late nights and weekends, then I humbly suggest you FORGET about having a career in IB.

Some IB-ers in the forum are harsh. But that is how it is. It's a cut throat business. Do your homework guys. And ask questions intelligently. Refer my trait #2.

Gotta go. Con-call in 5.
*
Since u left the IB world, may i know now r u still working? as? or enjoying ur early retirement? brows.gif

This post has been edited by Zennix: Dec 1 2010, 03:35 PM
Quasi-Suave
post Dec 1 2010, 05:28 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
322 posts

Joined: Mar 2005


I'm too young to retire. Now in Financial Markets, assessing investments. No more long hours but with better pay. =)
gloomberg
post Dec 1 2010, 06:24 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(Quasi-Suave @ Dec 1 2010, 12:49 PM)
For the avoidance of doubt, let me start of by saying that I'm an ex IB-er, with years of experience, a post graduate degree, a specialist credit qualification and a SC advisory license.

Now let me clear the air. Investment Banking jobs (CF, DCM etc) may SOUND glamorous, but it's actually countless hours of thankless back breaking, mind numbing work.

The money CAN be good (salary plus bonus) but when you think of the hours you put in (including weekends)...well one man's meat is another man's poison.

If I could sum up the traits needed to SURVIVE as an IB-er it would be the following:-

1) Passion - If you have no affinity for numbers, not hungry to know who, what, when, why and how about business, then forget it. You'll fail.
2) Research - You need to be always curious. Self learn. Ask questions. And remember the answers. Seniors/clients have little time nor patience to
teach you.
3) Social skills - Includes confidence, good language ability, manners, grooming - You need to look and sound polished, nor mutter, fumble and fidget when speaking or being spoken to.

Natural intelligence is compulsory. In my department, all are second uppers and above. Those holding professional degrees would usually have CFAs or MBAs (with 3.3/4.0 above) to complement their basic degree.

Now some of you may think IB work is like the movie Wall Street (Part 1 or 2). Sorry to burst your bubble, but it's not. If wall street is more your cup of tea, then join the Treasury or Financial Markets of banks. Be a trader.

On the most part, being an IB-er involves reading, writing and attending meetings and presentations. If you don't have the stamina to sit thru an 8 hour due diligence meeting, rush across town for a presentation when the material was just only completed minutes before or work late nights and weekends, then I humbly suggest you FORGET about having a career in IB.

Some IB-ers in the forum are harsh. But that is how it is. It's a cut throat business. Do your homework guys. And ask questions intelligently. Refer my trait #2.

Gotta go. Con-call in 5.
*
Wow, that sounds so much like me! =)
Hopefully I can continue being like that for the next n years
Aloong
post Dec 2 2010, 07:00 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(tohff7 @ Dec 1 2010, 04:31 AM)
actually this just shows that u don't have a clear goal on what you want to do in the investment field. I really need to lol-ed at this "Any other investment related job in IB also I'm very happy".

No offense. Just remind me of a particular person that i know of. Ex-auditor, have CFA Level 2, and "being an analyst is a dream job". But if you ask him about any news related to the financial market or economy, he has no clue at all. So much for being "a dream job" but don't even bother to read the business or finance news section of daily newspapers at least
*
Maybe he kiasu just dun wan to share leh.


Added on December 2, 2010, 7:02 am
QUOTE(kinwing @ Dec 1 2010, 10:06 AM)
I had met a fellow through my friend. The fellow completed his CFA III and he wanted to be a fund manager. So I asked him what was his way on analysing stocks, and that fellow told me he personally did not invest any stock because he was afraid of investment risk. LOL, I was then laugh all the way because a stock analyst do not like to invest rclxms.gif

A typical nerd to get through the academic study without knowing how to apply it. Getting a cert cannot guarantee a good job, without having the passion to the job you are doing then you will not go far doh.gif .
*
FYI, Fund manager notnecessary stock. Maybe he prefers bonds (one lot 5m, how to invest?).


This post has been edited by Aloong: Dec 2 2010, 07:02 AM
gloomberg
post Dec 2 2010, 08:55 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(Aloong @ Dec 2 2010, 07:00 AM)
Maybe he kiasu just dun wan to share leh.


Added on December 2, 2010, 7:02 am

FYI, Fund manager notnecessary stock. Maybe he prefers bonds (one lot 5m, how to invest?).
*
ape bond, itu fixed income edi la. lu pergi mana. totally different field, and much more quantitative.
sembilan
post Dec 2 2010, 09:09 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
644 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
did anyone mentioned due diligence meeting?????? and i'm sure you have sit through verification meeting, that thing is nasty.
Aloong
post Dec 2 2010, 08:16 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Dec 2 2010, 08:55 AM)
ape bond, itu fixed income edi la. lu pergi mana. totally different field, and much more quantitative.
*
glooberg, u read betul betul lar.
i was replying to somebody's post, do ur homework.

fixed income is not totally diff field, it's part of IB, in fact more important part than CF. too much to explain, u got to go figure urself.
Quantitative?? my god, i give up here lar.
if i explain i can write a book!!
gloomberg
post Dec 2 2010, 11:37 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(Aloong @ Dec 2 2010, 08:16 PM)
glooberg, u read betul betul lar.
i was replying to somebody's post, do ur homework.

fixed income is not totally diff field, it's part of IB, in  fact more important part than CF. too much to explain, u got to go figure urself.
Quantitative?? my god, i give up here lar.
if i explain i can write a book!!
*
ermmm... ok. Let me call up a banker and ask him to tell u? LOL.
Ever heard of PIMCO? Never said u're wrong, but just mentioning that fixed income investment deals more with bonds that do fund managers. And yes, fixed income is highly quant, much more than equity, just for ur knowledge. Strategies include carry, curves, rolldown, etc etc.

more important than CF, hmmm... fixed income is investment wo, why relate to CF? If CF seek for funding expertise, they will go to DCM ppl and ask their opinion. Ok, i scare u liao, name also aloong. U are correct in every sense possible
jimmyttl
post Dec 2 2010, 11:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
81 posts

Joined: Dec 2005


QUOTE(gloomberg @ Dec 2 2010, 11:37 PM)
ermmm... ok. Let me call up a banker and ask him to tell u? LOL.
Ever heard of PIMCO? Never said u're wrong, but just mentioning that fixed income investment deals more with bonds that do fund managers. And yes, fixed income is highly quant, much more than equity, just for ur knowledge. Strategies include carry, curves, rolldown, etc etc.

more important than CF, hmmm... fixed income is investment wo, why relate to CF? If CF seek for funding expertise, they will go to DCM ppl and ask their opinion. Ok, i scare u liao, name also aloong. U are correct in every sense possible
*
=) somebody got offended pretty hard eh. IB freshie with the know it all attitude.

My fav quote:-

"Winning an argument on the Internet is like winning a contest at the Special Olympics you may have won but who did you beat?"

Regards,

A mere spectator in the paralympic game. ROFL
gloomberg
post Dec 3 2010, 08:39 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(jimmyttl @ Dec 2 2010, 11:56 PM)
=) somebody got offended pretty hard eh. IB freshie with the know it all attitude.

My fav quote:-

"Winning an argument on the Internet is like winning a contest at the Special Olympics you may have won but who did you beat?"

Regards,

A mere spectator in the paralympic game. ROFL
*
no la, where got know it all. Just commenting only la bro, if i know it all, u know how long more the comments would be? =p
see my other nonsense post if u don't believe. Haihzz... U know being in the financial mkts, once u missed one day of news and report, u'll actually miss a lot! Being updated daily is very essential... hard to find holidays which is why /k/ is a great place to chui sui.
Knight_2008
post Dec 3 2010, 10:20 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Dec 3 2010, 08:39 AM)
no la, where got know it all. Just commenting only la bro, if i know it all, u know how long more the comments would be? =p
see my other nonsense post if u don't believe. Haihzz... U know being in the financial mkts, once u missed one day of news and report, u'll actually miss a lot! Being updated daily is very essential... hard to find holidays which is why /k/ is a great place to chui sui.
*
erm..sorry for sounding noob.. but can i ask what u meant by in financial markets and what u meant by assessing it? is it just researching about it or you are trader who will deal in derivatives and forex as a treasury tools for bank?
Xeraph
post Dec 3 2010, 11:49 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
122 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


QUOTE(Quasi-Suave @ Dec 1 2010, 03:49 PM)
For the avoidance of doubt, let me start of by saying that I'm an ex IB-er, with years of experience, a post graduate degree, a specialist credit qualification and a SC advisory license.

Now let me clear the air. Investment Banking jobs (CF, DCM etc) may SOUND glamorous, but it's actually countless hours of thankless back breaking, mind numbing work.

The money CAN be good (salary plus bonus) but when you think of the hours you put in (including weekends)...well one man's meat is another man's poison.

If I could sum up the traits needed to SURVIVE as an IB-er it would be the following:-

1) Passion - If you have no affinity for numbers, not hungry to know who, what, when, why and how about business, then forget it. You'll fail.
2) Research - You need to be always curious. Self learn. Ask questions. And remember the answers. Seniors/clients have little time nor patience to
teach you.
3) Social skills - Includes confidence, good language ability, manners, grooming - You need to look and sound polished, nor mutter, fumble and fidget when speaking or being spoken to.

Natural intelligence is compulsory. In my department, all are second uppers and above. Those holding professional degrees would usually have CFAs or MBAs (with 3.3/4.0 above) to complement their basic degree.

Now some of you may think IB work is like the movie Wall Street (Part 1 or 2). Sorry to burst your bubble, but it's not. If wall street is more your cup of tea, then join the Treasury or Financial Markets of banks. Be a trader.

On the most part, being an IB-er involves reading, writing and attending meetings and presentations. If you don't have the stamina to sit thru an 8 hour due diligence meeting, rush across town for a presentation when the material was just only completed minutes before or work late nights and weekends, then I humbly suggest you FORGET about having a career in IB.

Some IB-ers in the forum are harsh. But that is how it is. It's a cut throat business. Do your homework guys. And ask questions intelligently. Refer my trait #2.

Gotta go. Con-call in 5.
*
So far the best answer I've seen.
Liked the part on wall street.

I dont know why is it such that one <insert name> needs to be cocky in this field.
The fact of the matter is that we are all still in Malaysia.
If so damn good, already out of here (generally speaking).

Btw, not personally investing in stocks does not mean that the person is not suitable to be a fund manager.
I know a person who has vast experience and does not invest in the market at all.

Also, education background prob gives you a boost into the industry. Maybe you'd start a little late (eg hang around in audit for 2 years) but its the person's own character and attitude that brings him to his destination. My colleague sitting next to me (which I highly respect) comes from UTAR.
kelvin_tan
post Dec 3 2010, 12:15 PM

Passion for Pipping!
*******
Senior Member
3,141 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


@jimmyttl
Their arguements are productive and informative at the very least. Both have brought up valid points. Its not about winning the arguement (well not for other forumers that are hoping to pick a thing or two from the information divulged).
pentel
post Dec 3 2010, 01:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
59 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
QUOTE(sembilan @ Dec 2 2010, 09:09 AM)
did anyone mentioned due diligence meeting?????? and i'm sure you have sit through verification meeting, that thing is nasty.
*
yeah, page by page, line by line. but the worst part is done by the lawyers. lol....
Maximillian88
post Dec 3 2010, 02:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
52 posts

Joined: May 2010
As Jim Raynor from Starcraft 2(wonder if IB-ers do have time to even know what game this is) says, "No-one likes a smart a**"
xuzen
post Dec 3 2010, 03:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,436 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


I've followed IB/CF thread. There are couple more... and each time I see a massive loads Oestrogens fight in these threads. (meaning lots of cat fights, b**** slapping etc).

Are IB'er/CF'er mainly made up of PrimaDonnas?

Xuzen puts on Flame Retardant suit. Come, flame me...

Xuzen

This post has been edited by xuzen: Dec 3 2010, 03:10 PM
kinwing
post Dec 3 2010, 03:11 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Xeraph @ Dec 3 2010, 11:49 AM)
So far the best answer I've seen.
Liked the part on wall street.

I dont know why is it such that one <insert name> needs to be cocky in this field.
The fact of the matter is that we are all still in Malaysia.
If so damn good, already out of here (generally speaking).

Btw, not personally investing in stocks does not mean that the person is not suitable to be a fund manager.
I know a person who has vast experience and does not invest in the market at all.

Also, education background prob gives you a boost into the industry. Maybe you'd start a little late (eg hang around in audit for 2 years) but its the person's own character and attitude that brings him to his destination. My colleague sitting next to me (which I highly respect) comes from UTAR.
*
Knowing a person with vast experience but no invest record show us no hints where he is experience of? Experience of what? Experience of nerding?

Just like a case that an insurance agent trying to hard sell the insurance product but he himself not buying insurance, how pursuasive is this? I have no confidence to the so-called "experienced investment expert" who do not invest. Nowadays the word "experience" is abused way out to the roof. My 2 cents.


Added on December 3, 2010, 3:22 pm
QUOTE(pentel @ Dec 3 2010, 01:40 PM)
yeah, page by page, line by line. but the worst part is done by the lawyers. lol....
*
Those SPA agreements lah or salient terms will kill you with full of jargon. And reading some techinal report such as land valuer report, external expertist reports are not as easy as reading financial reports from auditors. Anyway, this is all execution jobs, maybe origination section would be fun and I'm still exploring brows.gif .

This post has been edited by kinwing: Dec 3 2010, 03:22 PM
Xeraph
post Dec 3 2010, 03:32 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
122 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


QUOTE(kinwing @ Dec 3 2010, 06:11 PM)
Knowing a person with vast experience but no invest record show us no hints where he is experience of? Experience of what? Experience of nerding?

Just like a case that an insurance agent trying to hard sell the insurance product but he himself not buying insurance, how pursuasive is this? I have no confidence to the so-called "experienced investment expert" who do not invest. Nowadays the word "experience" is abused way out to the roof. My 2 cents.
wow wow wow..... no need for that sarcasm.
There are some people (to your surprise) who work not mainly for the money but for the interest/passion/challenge of it.

Btw, are you working in the industry? If yes, then I'm very sure your should know of rules and guidelines concerning practices of personal trading. I'm not saying one totally cannot trade on a personal basis, but rather there are limitations.

oh, and FYI experience?
i think the portfolio size would speak for itself. ~RM1.5b
kinwing
post Dec 3 2010, 03:46 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Xeraph @ Dec 3 2010, 03:32 PM)
wow wow wow..... no need for that sarcasm.
There are some people (to your surprise) who work not mainly for the money but for the interest/passion/challenge of it.

Btw, are you working in the industry? If yes, then I'm very sure your should know of rules and guidelines concerning practices of personal trading. I'm not saying one totally cannot trade on a personal basis, but rather there are limitations.

oh, and FYI experience?
i think the portfolio size would speak for itself. ~RM1.5b
*
It is not an issue about working for money or interst. It's the issue that a person who studied so hard to achieve an investment professional, but he personally does not invest because he is afraid of investment risk, and he wanted to manage fund for others, and this was the fellow I met as I mentioned in the previous thread. Just like a person who get his driving licence, but he is afraid of car accident so he does not drive, and he advises other people how do drive, do you think we should take his advice?

I'm not going to make an argument here, just let other forumers to judge.

This post has been edited by kinwing: Dec 3 2010, 03:47 PM
moody5
post Dec 3 2010, 04:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
296 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(Xeraph @ Dec 3 2010, 03:32 PM)

Btw, are you working in the industry? If yes, then I'm very sure your should know of rules and guidelines concerning practices of personal trading. I'm not saying one totally cannot trade on a personal basis, but rather there are limitations.

*
thumbup.gif Agreed

Ex MD of me used to trade commodities futures/options for the company (from BMD to CBOT, NYMEX and ICE), making hell lot of money for the company, he was prohibited to trade commodities for his own account until he left the company.


Xeraph
post Dec 3 2010, 04:06 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
122 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


QUOTE(kinwing @ Dec 3 2010, 06:46 PM)
It is not an issue about working for money or interst. It's the issue that a person who studied so hard to achieve an investment professional, but he personally does not invest because he is afraid of investment risk, and he wanted to manage fund for others, and this was the fellow I met as I mentioned in the previous thread. Just like a person who get his driving licence, but he is afraid of car accident so he does not drive, and he advises other people how do drive, do you think we should take his advice?

I'm not going to make an argument here, just let other forumers to judge.
*
biggrin.gif At such boring market, i'll layan you abit lar.

1. Did I mention that the person I was referring to does not invest for himself WITH the reason that he is afraid of investment risk?

2. He is near 50 years old now. Look back 30 years ago, is the industry big? did everyone talk about fund management back then? Asian Financial Crisis was only 12 years back. I doubt he "studied hard to achieve an investment profession"

Anyway, I replied earlier to your post because you question "Knowing a person with vast experience but no invest record show us no hints where he is experience of? Experience of what? Experience of nerding?"

Are you saying that a person with vast experience must invest in his own account for you to actually "see" the record?
Or rather you want ppl going around boasting how much they make on the personal account then only you would consider him/her a good fund manager?
kinwing
post Dec 3 2010, 04:51 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Xeraph @ Dec 3 2010, 04:06 PM)
biggrin.gif At such boring market, i'll layan you abit lar.

1. Did I mention that the person I was referring to does not invest for himself WITH the reason that he is afraid of investment risk?

2. He is near 50 years old now. Look back 30 years ago, is the industry big? did everyone talk about fund management back then? Asian Financial Crisis was only 12 years back. I doubt he "studied hard to achieve an investment profession"

Anyway, I replied earlier to your post because you question "Knowing a person with vast experience but no invest record show us no hints where he is experience of? Experience of what? Experience of nerding?"

Are you saying that a person with vast experience must invest in his own account for you to actually "see" the record?
Or rather you want ppl going around boasting how much they make on the personal account then only you would consider him/her a good fund manager?
*
In your previous thread, you did mention "I know a person who has vast experience and does not invest in the market at all", so base on this sentence what extra information we can get? Vast experience = vast "Investment" experience!? A person who does not invest at all claims he has vast investment experience? What kind of logic is that?

It might be your old friend could have gone through the investment process that why he is so rich now he does not need to invest anymore, but at least he did invest before so he can claim he has the vast "investment" experience, but even with this kind of further information is not found in the said sentence so I have to make an assumption that your friend have experience of "nerding", not investment.

When we met a stranger who claim he is experienced but he personally does not have any investment record to prove, so to anyone who can think logically that how are we going to trust him? Yes it could be your old friend is a genius and telling the truth, but should we risk our money since we have 50% chance to meet a so-called invest expert although he has no 'investment record'? How about the other 50% chance we dump our money into the sea if we being cheated by a con man?

So you are basically promoting investors to give away their hard earn money to those who can talk cock like Mardof? You want twist the point it's up to you, logic will tell it's not safe to let someone who is not well-proven to manage our hard-earn money.

BTW, working in the investment industry does not mean we can't make any investment "at all", we disclose the investment position to the compliance department or to the investors whom we provide investment advisory service to. Whether we invested RM10K or RM1.5 billion in the market it is still considered as investment, which is better than your version of investment expert who does not invest "at all".


Added on December 3, 2010, 5:14 pmWhen I met the fellow who claimed he has the CFA cert but with no investment experience because he is afraid of investment risk, I realised that this fellow has no passion in investment, and the only aim he wanted to be a fund manager is because of money.

So how good can he perform and how well the integrity of a money-minded fund manager when he is managing the fund?

This post has been edited by kinwing: Dec 3 2010, 05:14 PM
Aloong
post Dec 3 2010, 07:13 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Dec 2 2010, 11:37 PM)
ermmm... ok. Let me call up a banker and ask him to tell u? LOL.
Ever heard of PIMCO? Never said u're wrong, but just mentioning that fixed income investment deals more with bonds that do fund managers. And yes, fixed income is highly quant, much more than equity, just for ur knowledge. Strategies include carry, curves, rolldown, etc etc.

more important than CF, hmmm... fixed income is investment wo, why relate to CF? If CF seek for funding expertise, they will go to DCM ppl and ask their opinion. Ok, i scare u liao, name also aloong. U are correct in every sense possible
*
Not arguing, but just felt the urge to clarify and share, since i've got some xtra time here.

A guy/girl was saying somethin like he knws some body who's a fund manager, but dun invest in stock.
SO i've replied fund manager can divide into stock or bonds/FI, which he might b in bonds, hence he's not experience in stock lor.

2ndly just for summary of Invt Bank dept:

I will exclude the stockbroking and tresury/financial markets/monet markets dept (which is the most $ making dept, and arguably at some IBs support the CF/DCM/IB's salary!!).

Ok, nextlet's talk about a typical straightfwd simple IB structure, which consist of CF (executioner for public equity), DCM (executioner for bonds/FI), IB (marketers for CF and DCM). Then u have ECM oso (who does the selldown of public equity), not sure if i left out any other ,main depts. Private equity? structured finance? etc etc? let's not talk about it. too confusing, even for me.

Now the depts above are sell side.

Fund manager are in fact one of the buy side.

Hence, when we talk about bonds, it's a product that IB, DCM, Fund Manager, etc will look at and analyse. IB/DCm sell, FM buy. If no buyers, IB/DCm ask client issue bond for what? Some body must buy, and give the issuance proceeds to the company mah.
Sounds easy rite?

About quantitative, wat gloomberg was saying is correct, partially tho. Fund managers for bonds besides looking at duration, yields, curves, etc.. they also need to look at qualitative (in fact as much as wat equity fund manager look at as well, when they invest in equity that was executed by the sell side CF guys))
These FI fun mgr nid to assess (i mean their subordinates lar, not literally them lar) the viability of business risk, economic / industry analisis, mgmt's reputation/experiences (most importantly connections), financial statememnts, financial projections,etc -> which they call it technical analysis. For those who say they just see rating agency report enuf lar, i will say can u still trust rating agencies after wat happened to Lehman Bonds?

ok. i'll stop there. hope u guys understand my writing and languiance, typos etc, no time to chk grammer, comprehension, sentence structure, etc. Let the CF guys do that ...hahaha...

Hope u enjoy my simplisistic scenario sharing. just tried summarised a big and more complicated pic.
gloomberg
post Dec 3 2010, 11:55 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


Aiyo... too much chui sui ing... well, if u guys are IBer, we are bound to me each other sooner or later, but just make sure nobody knows who we are at lowyat, if in the case you are real. Fund manager or whatever, is a job that requires constant monitoring, well, not for those top shots that get the clients but for those analysts. I'm still new, and fresh from the oven, so I wouldn't know who's good or a bad investor, i only see ur fund return.

Personally, I would feel that buying a business would be better than any investment medium out there, be it equity or fixed income, but it's just too expensive, unless we are that good in identifying good businesses that would expand into a successful one, then sell them off.

Experience or not, I'm pretty much sure u'll all agree that we work to earn a living so, in the end of the day, what matters most is whose pocket is heavier, don't u guys agree?

This post has been edited by gloomberg: Dec 4 2010, 09:07 AM
thefridge
post Dec 4 2010, 12:06 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
155 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(Aloong @ Nov 25 2010, 06:46 AM)
Harsh?
Wait till they really do CF, and they'll know wat is harsh


Added on November 25, 2010, 6:57 am

My fren is complaining his juniors always complain of always given menial task, but wen given more important tasks, they dun do it properly and won't put in the hours. resulting in the seniors put in even mre hours than he have to initially.
juniors, especially those very determined ones, are very big headed, They are so determined about the word CF, but yet doesnt know the real day to day work. and when they dun seem to do what they are expecting(or imagining), they lose interest.
*
haha..how i agree with u...life is tough!! sighh
Xeraph
post Dec 4 2010, 11:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
122 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


QUOTE(kinwing @ Dec 3 2010, 07:51 PM)
In your previous thread, you did mention "I know a person who has vast experience and does not invest in the market at all", so base on this sentence what extra information we can get? Vast experience = vast "Investment" experience!? A person who does not invest at all claims he has vast investment experience? What kind of logic is that?

It might be your old friend could have gone through the investment process that why he is so rich now he does not need to invest anymore, but at least he did invest before so he can claim he has the vast "investment" experience, but even with this kind of further information is not found in the said sentence so I have to make an assumption that your friend have experience of "nerding", not investment.

When we met a stranger who claim he is experienced but he personally does not have any investment record to prove, so to anyone who can think logically that how are we going to trust him? Yes it could be your old friend is a genius and telling the truth, but should we risk our money since we have 50% chance to meet a so-called invest expert although he has no 'investment record'? How about the other 50% chance we dump our money into the sea if we being cheated by a con man?

So you are basically promoting investors to give away their hard earn money to those who can talk cock like Mardof? You want twist the point it's up to you, logic will tell it's not safe to let someone who is not well-proven to manage our hard-earn money.

BTW, working in the investment industry does not mean we can't make any investment "at all", we disclose the investment position to the compliance department or to the investors whom we provide investment advisory service to. Whether we invested RM10K or RM1.5 billion in the market it is still considered as investment, which is better than your version of investment expert who does not invest "at all".


Added on December 3, 2010, 5:14 pmWhen I met the fellow who claimed he has the CFA cert but with no investment experience because he is afraid of investment risk, I realised that this fellow has no passion in investment, and the only aim he wanted to be a fund manager is because of money.

So how good can he perform and how well the integrity of a money-minded fund manager when he is managing the fund?
*
Sigh, such emotional response.
rclxms.gif Anyway, I think I know whats your problem
It seems you have issues trying to understand a statement, OR actually you just look through sentences, not read them.

Now if you could kindly refer to post #111, you would notice that the posting is split into a few parts. In this case, its 4.
In the 3rd part/paragraph, its written as such......

QUOTE(Xeraph @ Dec 3 2010, 02:49 PM)

Btw, not personally investing in stocks does not mean that the person is not suitable to be a fund manager.
I know a person who has vast experience and does not invest in the market at all.

*
I think it would be clear enough that as these 2 sentences are together, one would read that I am referring to a fund manager. If he's a fund manager, how is it that he doesnt invest (for the company) at all?

I don't even know why would you bring Mardoff into the picture, and talking about cheating ppl's money. hahaha
So you ask, if we meet a stranger (lets put it as fund manager in case you get confused) that claims he has alot of experience, how do we believe him as he has no personal (I assume you are referring to personal account) record to prove?
Seriously, I don't know how to answer you cause its just too funny the way you think.
Like I said before, do you expect a so called experienced fund manager to go around boasting that he has made TONS OF MONEY on his PERSONAL ACCOUNT so that you would invest with him? doh.gif

Ok, now on the compliance part. PLEASE SHOW ME (note, I dont edit posts like you do) if I ever said we cant make investments AT ALL? All I said was, there are limitations, right?
Now I dont know what firm you are in cause if you were in a big firm, the firm would have lots of portfolio. And with so many portfolios, there would be lots of stocks in there, yes? and I assume you (acting for your personal front) would also only buy those stocks if they are good, right? (Takkan lah you buy crap stocks for either you or your company managed fund)
Now, at my place, blackout period is 2 weeks so if theres any, read ANY trades at all on that stock by the company, we cant touch them personally for 2 weeks before and after a trade. Taking into account the process of submitting the application, which lets say is another week. That makes it 3 weeks in total to wait before we can trade the stock. then, WHAT IF in this 3 weeks the company trades that stock, you wait another 3 weeks? LOLZ. good for you.

kinwing
post Dec 4 2010, 03:07 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Xeraph @ Dec 4 2010, 11:16 AM)
Sigh, such emotional response.
rclxms.gif Anyway, I think I know whats your problem
It seems you have issues trying to understand a statement, OR actually you just look through sentences, not read them.

Now if you could kindly refer to post #111, you would notice that the posting is split into a few parts. In this case, its 4.
In the 3rd part/paragraph, its written as such......
I think it would be clear enough that as these 2 sentences are together, one would read that I am referring to a fund manager. If he's a fund manager, how is it that he doesnt invest (for the company) at all?

I don't even know why would you bring Mardoff into the picture, and talking about cheating ppl's money. hahaha
So you ask, if we meet a stranger (lets put it as fund manager in case you get confused) that claims he has alot of experience, how do we believe him as he has no personal (I assume you are referring to personal account) record to prove?
Seriously, I don't know how to answer you cause its just too funny the way you think.
Like I said before, do you expect a so called experienced fund manager to go around boasting that he has made TONS OF MONEY on his PERSONAL ACCOUNT so that you would invest with him?  doh.gif

Ok, now on the compliance part. PLEASE SHOW ME (note, I dont edit posts like you do) if I ever said we cant make investments AT ALL? All I said was, there are limitations, right?
Now I dont know what firm you are in cause if you were in a big firm, the firm would have lots of portfolio. And with so many portfolios, there would be lots of stocks in there, yes? and I assume you (acting for your personal front) would also only buy those stocks if they are good, right? (Takkan lah you buy crap stocks for either you or your company managed fund)
Now, at my place, blackout period is 2 weeks so if theres any, read ANY trades at all on that stock by the company, we cant touch them personally for 2 weeks before and after a trade. Taking into account the process of submitting the application, which lets say is another week. That makes it 3 weeks in total to wait before we can trade the stock. then, WHAT IF in this 3 weeks the company trades that stock, you wait another 3 weeks? LOLZ. good for you.
*
I'm referring to the case that the fellow who personally not invest at all due to investment risk aversion, so how are we going to believe that when he becomes fund manager he would manage our money well? If I'm hiring a fund manager wannabie who personally does not invest at all before, he won't be hired as a fund manager to begin with, then there would no such excuse that the fund's trade restriction to stop him invest personally. I emphasize again, if a person does not investment at all before, he should not be a fund manager to begin with.

If the fellow who does not invest personally due to risk aversion, what makes him to assume he can safeguard the investors' best interest? Why suddenly he feels comfortable to manage other people's money but not his own money? Is it because others' money is not his money, so he can gamble away the other people's money without affecting him? I can say investors sometimes are too kind to those substandrd fund managers as we are selling a call option for their fee performance. So it is kind of head you win tail we lose. Fund managers could even take excessive risks to get themselves compensate with higher return, so if they are lucky enough they gain a huge fees though they only perform with low risk adjusted returns. How about when things gone bust and funds are making losses, those fund managers are not requested to compensate a sen?

Yes, at least I have some performance track record to refer to how good a fund manager could be, I have lesser chance to come across being cheated by pretended-to-be-genuine-fund-managers, whereby there is one doesn't agree because he prefers to give away his money to omeone who drops from the sky with no track record at all, so who has the greater possibilities to loss the money? The answer is obvious.

And IMHO, the trade restriction or so-called blackout period should not be the excuse not to invest personally if one is a long term investor. And now someone try to justify the aysmmetric treatment being rewarded to fund managers without aligning their interests with the investors' return by giving excuses like fund managers are not allowed to trade personally. So invetors be aware!

(Note: I edit the previous posts because I was trying to fix some typo errors. I did not change any content in the previous thread unless you can prove it)
gloomberg
post Dec 4 2010, 05:57 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


Woohoo! Battle of the bulge. Guys, just let go our egoism and go to KLIMS and see something that will make us feel good.
Knight_2008
post Dec 4 2010, 07:26 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE
I'm referring to the case that the fellow who personally not invest at all due to investment risk aversion, so how are we going to believe that when he becomes fund manager he would manage our money well? If I'm hiring a fund manager wannabie who personally does not invest at all before, he won't be hired as a fund manager to begin with, then there would no such excuse that the fund's trade restriction to stop him invest personally. I emphasize again, if a person does not investment at all before, he should not be a fund manager to begin with.

If the fellow who does not invest personally due to risk aversion, what makes him to assume he can safeguard the investors' best interest? Why suddenly he feels comfortable to manage other people's money but not his own money? Is it because others' money is not his money, so he can gamble away the other people's money without affecting him? I can say investors sometimes are too kind to those substandrd fund managers as we are selling a call option for their fee performance. So it is kind of head you win tail we lose. Fund managers could even take excessive risks to get themselves compensate with higher return, so if they are lucky enough they gain a huge fees though they only perform with low risk adjusted returns. How about when things gone bust and funds are making losses, those fund managers are not requested to compensate a sen?

Yes, at least I have some performance track record to refer to how good a fund manager could be, I have lesser chance to come across being cheated by pretended-to-be-genuine-fund-managers, whereby there is one doesn't agree because he prefers to give away his money to omeone who drops from the sky with no track record at all, so who has the greater possibilities to loss the money? The answer is obvious.

And IMHO, the trade restriction or so-called blackout period should not be the excuse not to invest personally if one is a long term investor. And now someone try to justify the aysmmetric treatment being rewarded to fund managers without aligning their interests with the investors' return by giving excuses like fund managers are not allowed to trade personally. So invetors be aware!


I just feel that some fund managers don invest themselves due to the trouble involved..It's just not worth the effort..

By managing a fund properly, they can even rake in astronomical figures as I am made to understand that some fund manager's bonus are tied to a percentage of the returns above certain performance index measure.. Managing funds of billions can get him much more than what he can get by investing his own personal millions.. Assuming the fund manager's personal asset of 10 million, 4-5 million may be tied to house 1-2 million to car leaving another 3 million for investing... He might not wanna invest everything in shares and might wanna keep some money for liquidity purposes leaving 1-2 million for shares...Even if he gets a sky high return of 25 percent, this will only mean 500k as compared to his potential bonus of millions..

Furthermore, he had the hassle of complying with so many procedures in order to invest personally. My friend told me his uncle nearly went to jail for conflict of interest and criminal breach of trust as a fund manager due to overlooking some dumb procedures. Furthermore, imagine you had to sell the shares although very promising due to liquidity purposes which your fund bought for their strong fundamentals, what would this signal to the investors?

Btw, if u said that fund manager who don't invest are either incompetent or fraudster; are you implying the same for independent research house and independent securities brokerage firm ? How can you generalised about all fund managers who don invest?
tohff7
post Dec 4 2010, 11:49 PM

FF7 GOAT
******
Senior Member
1,581 posts

Joined: Mar 2008


Chill lar everyone.

You know, it just started with some comment sthat ' a person INSPIRING or WANT to be a fund manager, but does not invest into the market himself or herself'

which i think is different from "A fund manager who does not invest on his/her own" <--- current debate.

Anyway, at the very least, don;t you guys agree that a fund manager should at least put some of his/her net worth into the fund he/she manage?

Just my 2 cents
mikro
post Dec 5 2010, 12:16 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
486 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: Subang Jaya


fund manager is not so much on IB if i not mistaken hmm.gif

When we talk about IB we think about underwriting shares, IPOs and corporate advise. hmm.gif


Please correct me if I am wrong.

This post has been edited by mikro: Dec 5 2010, 12:19 AM
GodL!ke
post Dec 5 2010, 12:49 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Jul 2010


jz wana share with those who wana join IB bcoz of wana know 2 get big money from investing o trading of shares, i think lotz ppl have wrong concept on working in IB s i meet & ask lotz of fresh grad b4. yes, mayb u can learn some investment o trading skill if u work in some departments like stockbroking, research, proprietary trading, fund management, institution equities, etc, anyway, you still nid 2 follow the ethics & rules working in IBs, and i believe this is wat ppl said the 'limitation'.(o mayb u can find other alternative)
i started my IB career in equities & futures broking, noe y? bcoz watched too many chinese hong kong dramas last time, especially the 'dai si doi': chao gu piu, chao kei foh, bou chong, zham chong, haha...afta i joined oni i realize that was not exactly the job i wanted, anyway, i've learned lots during my time in equities & futures broking. thx 2 all my sifus.
regarding 2 the fund manager issue, yes, he may not has his own personal investment experience, as long as got company hiring him. but if u ask me whether i am willing 2 invest in his fund, there will be another story. as spoken in the previous posts, due 2 investment risk (if i'm not misunderstood), he nv invest his money in the market, it shows that he is not confident either on the market o himself. if he has no confidence, how ppl feel confident on him? jz like previous post, someone ask ppl buy insurance but himself nv buy any of insurance, haha...i dun think he can outperform the fund he manage, even outperform also can consider s 'lucky'. i still remember my current boss questions when interview me: will you invest in the market if u hv money? what is your investment strategy if i let u 2 manage 100 million fund now?
Aloong
post Dec 5 2010, 01:13 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(tohff7 @ Dec 4 2010, 11:49 PM)

Anyway, at the very least, don;t you guys agree that a fund manager should at least put some of his/her net worth into the fund he/she manage?

Just my 2 cents
*
I have to disagree.
Firstly, like someone put it, it's just not practicle (tho not impossible) for this FM to invest, due to compliance/regulation/legal restrictions, be it those set by SC, BNM and chances are this FM is a member/candidate of CFA, hence CFA code of ethics need to be considered as well. Well of course he/she can use "nominees", but u know wat that means.

2ndly, i personally think professional and personal matters shd be separated. If I interview somebody, and the candidate boatsed that he likes to invest in shares i'll be pretty worried about independance and fair dealings issue. If i get interviewed and being ask that question, i would say i dun invest personally, because i want to devote all my time/skills/knowledge/experience/analysis for the best interest of my clients, and my personal interest is secondary..U may call that BS, but that's a safer choice.

My real worry is i've notice ppl out there and in this forum, thinks FM/IBers in the industry "must" invest shares. I think it's very wrong.
If u buy the same shares as u invest for ur client (for FM) or on the client ur handling (for IBs) that is not independent. Not sure u still rmbr ur ethics "u must maintain ur independance or seen to be independent" . If not why would these "professionals" have to go thru the route of using theirparents/sibling/wife/frens name to invest? If they dun think its wrong why dun jx use their own name, and tell the whole world?

Just my 2 cents as well.
kinwing
post Dec 5 2010, 02:08 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Aloong @ Dec 5 2010, 01:13 AM)
I have to disagree.
Firstly, like someone put it, it's just not practicle (tho not impossible) for this FM to invest, due to compliance/regulation/legal restrictions, be it those set by SC, BNM and chances are this FM is a member/candidate of CFA, hence CFA code of ethics need to be considered as well. Well of course he/she can use "nominees", but u know wat that means.

2ndly, i personally think professional and personal matters shd be separated. If I interview somebody, and the candidate boatsed that he likes to invest in shares i'll be pretty worried about independance and fair dealings issue. If i get interviewed and being ask that question, i would say i dun invest personally, because i want to devote all my time/skills/knowledge/experience/analysis for the best interest of my clients, and my personal interest is secondary..U may call that BS, but that's a safer choice.

My real worry is i've notice ppl out there and in this forum, thinks FM/IBers in the industry "must" invest shares. I think it's very wrong.
If u buy the same shares as u invest for ur client (for FM) or on the client ur handling (for IBs) that is not independent. Not sure u still rmbr ur ethics "u must maintain ur independance or seen to be independent" . If not why would these "professionals" have to go thru the route of using theirparents/sibling/wife/frens name to invest? If they dun think its wrong why dun jx use their own name, and tell the whole world?

Just my 2 cents as well.
*
Here we come again. Just for the sake to rebuke my points without thinking logically.

For your information, CFA or SC or BNM or any other authorities do not prohibit fund managers/investment & financial consultants from possessing own portfolios. Please show me any laws/rules/guidelines that prohibit the fund managers/investment & financial consultants should not possess any kind of investment at all.

Having own personal portfolio would not stop the fund managers from being integrity. Or I put this way that if someone claims he has not owned any personal portfolio so he could act integrityly to manage the other people's fund, how sure we know he does not secretly hire a proxy to invest for him and split the profit 50-50? Is this fund-manager-has-no-personal-investment-in-disguise an intergity man? From this point, we should know whether one has portfolio or not would not stop him from being integrity.

Warren Buffet, one of the most intergrity and respected fund managers in the world, has his own personal portfolio other than managing for Berkshire's holding. If anyone think he is more morally higher than Buffet because the one thinks he has no personal portfolio to begin with, then go ahead to troll!

My arguement consist of two points:-
1) If one does not have any investment experience at all because he purposely avoid from engaging any investment activites in order to show his integrity so he could increase the chance of becoming a fund manager, how logic is this statement? How well can we trust the inexperienced manager can deliver a good return?

Imagine a situation of interviewing a fund manager wannabie with no investment experience:-
Hiring Manager: "Do you have your own investment portfolio?"

Fund Manager Wannabie: "Sorry Sir, I don't invest at all because I'm afraid of investment risk."
(Quite obvious that in the real world most fund manager wannabies, won't tell in this way if one does not have the related experience, so basically those wannabies lie in the beginning, so how much integrity he has? OK, now we back to the case that the wannabie tell the truth.)

Hiring Manager: "I don't see the point that when you come for this position but you do not have investment experience at all, then how well you can manage others' people money?"

Fund Manager wannabie: "Sir, I can learn the investment experience from the 1st day I manage the fund (LOL, I would laugh all my way if I was the Hiring Manager). Look, my don't have any personal portfolio so I show my integrity which worth a sen more than the investment experience."

Hiring Manager: "So you want me to pay you with others' people money (the fees paid by the fund) in order to teach you how to invest?"

Fund Manager wannabie: "Yes Sir, I mean that."

Hiring Manager: "...(what a laugh stock!?)..."

IMHO, this fund manager wannabie is either bull shitting or he is too naive!


2) If one inexperienced fund managers manage a fund and luckily he makes good returns and he learns the relevant experience along the way, it is good for everyone. However, we know that garbage in garbage out, so it is more likely an inexperienced fund manager will deliver unsatisfied returns or even losses, and these inexperienced fund managers would not compensate a sen. And a lot of the cases the fund still charge fes base on NAV, not base on performance. It is what I called head you win tail we lose! The investors have already being unfairly treated by paying the asymetric return to the fund, why they should adding more cost and risk to train an inexperienced fund managers whose interest are not align to the benefit of the invetors?


So investors be aware! When ones tell you how integrity they are in order to gain your trust, most probably they are the most corrupted from the interior. I recall a chinese pharase "猪八戒照镜,里外不是人" aka english translate as "When the pigsy looks a mirror, it shows unhuman-like within and without". Apply this phrase in this issue here, when one tells you he is moral and integrity, most likely he is not.

This post has been edited by kinwing: Dec 5 2010, 02:21 PM
Knight_2008
post Dec 5 2010, 05:40 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE
Here we come again. Just for the sake to rebuke my points without thinking logically.

For your information, CFA or SC or BNM or any other authorities do not prohibit fund managers/investment & financial consultants from possessing own portfolios. Please show me any laws/rules/guidelines that prohibit the fund managers/investment & financial consultants should not possess any kind of investment at all.

Having own personal portfolio would not stop the fund managers from being integrity. Or I put this way that if someone claims he has not owned any personal portfolio so he could act integrityly to manage the other people's fund, how sure we know he does not secretly hire a proxy to invest for him and split the profit 50-50? Is this fund-manager-has-no-personal-investment-in-disguise an intergity man? From this point, we should know whether one has portfolio or not would not stop him from being integrity.

Warren Buffet, one of the most intergrity and respected fund managers in the world, has his own personal portfolio other than managing for Berkshire's holding. If anyone think he is more morally higher than Buffet because the one thinks he has no personal portfolio to begin with, then go ahead to troll!


Nevertheless, there will be still some independence issues.. I would rather my fund manager invest in the fund which he manages than having a separate portfolio of investments tongue.gif

Btw, i think u meant Warren Buffet invest in berkshire and then he use Berkshire to invests in others and not having a separate investment portfolio.. He almost got nailed the last time he has separate investment vehicles and that is the reason why eh restructured all his investments under Berkshire..
kinwing
post Dec 5 2010, 06:03 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Dec 5 2010, 05:40 PM)
Nevertheless, there will be still some independence issues.. I would rather my fund manager invest in the fund which he manages than having a separate portfolio of investments tongue.gif

Btw, i think u meant Warren Buffet invest in berkshire and then he use Berkshire to invests in others and not having a separate investment portfolio.. He almost got nailed the last time he has separate investment vehicles and that is the reason why eh restructured all his investments under Berkshire..
*
Not to mention Buffet he has concentrated 95% of his personal wealth in Berkshire Hartaway so he aligns his interest with the interest of the shareholders of the said company, he also allocates 5% of his personal wealth in another portfolio. Refer to the link below to check with Buffet's proportion of personal wealth for your attention:-

http://stockmarketadvantage.blogspot.com/2...k-holdings.html

http://moneywatch.bnet.com/retirement-plan...dend-picks/508/

So I'm not sure on what source you get to know Buffet restructed "all" his investments under Berkshire? Btw, I don't really know which incident caused Buffet almost got nailed by having separate investment vehicles, please show any link that related to that incident?
Knight_2008
post Dec 5 2010, 06:13 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(kinwing @ Dec 5 2010, 06:03 PM)
Not to mention Buffet he has concentrated 95% of his personal wealth in Berkshire Hartaway so he aligns his interest with the interest of the shareholders of the said company, he also allocates 5% of his personal wealth in another portfolio. Refer to the link below to check with Buffet's proportion of personal wealth for your attention:-

http://stockmarketadvantage.blogspot.com/2...k-holdings.html

http://moneywatch.bnet.com/retirement-plan...dend-picks/508/

So I'm not sure on what source you get to know Buffet restructed "all" his investments under Berkshire? Btw, I don't really know which incident caused Buffet almost got nailed by having separate investment vehicles, please show any link that related to that incident?
*
In 1974. SEC began investing Buffett on the charges if manipulating stock price of Wesco and conflict of interest from his investment activities in Berkshire Hathaway.Diversified Retail and Blue Chip Stamps each with different stakeholders smile.gif It's from a book though, not online
kinwing
post Dec 5 2010, 06:39 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Dec 5 2010, 06:13 PM)
In 1974. SEC began investing Buffett on the charges if manipulating stock price of Wesco and conflict of interest from his investment activities in Berkshire Hathaway.Diversified Retail and Blue Chip Stamps each with different stakeholders smile.gif It's from a book though, not online
*
Oya I almost forget the Blue Chips case. It was one of the few cases that Buffet being accused. The other cases are Solomon Brother and AIG. I can't recall the detail of Blue Chips case, need to check it out again before giving any conclusion.

Back to my question that would anyone hire a fund manager who does not have any investment experience at all to manage your fund? As I said, the answer is obvious. It is just up to you to read my opinion and to make your own decision.
Knight_2008
post Dec 5 2010, 07:29 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(kinwing @ Dec 5 2010, 06:39 PM)
Oya I almost forget the Blue Chips case. It was one of the few cases that Buffet being accused. The other cases are Solomon Brother and AIG. I can't recall the detail of Blue Chips case, need to check it out again before giving any conclusion.

Back to my question that would anyone hire a fund manager who does not have any investment experience at all to manage your fund? As I said, the answer is obvious. It is just up to you to read my opinion and to make your own decision.
*
I agree with you. But not investing in their own separate portfolio does not equal to no investing experience.

Imagine this scenario, someone who has work his way up from analyst up to fund manager level with sterling performance. However, he do not put aside his money in stock but in property or just use it all... This does not mean he is a lousy fund manager. One does not have to be operated in order to be a good surgeon smile.gif
Vengeance_Mad
post Dec 5 2010, 09:34 PM

Aston-ishing
*****
Senior Member
797 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Dec 5 2010, 07:29 PM)
I agree with you. But not investing in their own separate portfolio does not equal to no investing experience.

Imagine this scenario, someone who has work his way up from analyst up to fund manager level with sterling performance. However, he do not put aside his money in stock but in property or just use it all... This does not mean he is a lousy fund manager. One does not have to be operated in order to be a good surgeon smile.gif
*
Incompatible analogy.







gloomberg
post Dec 5 2010, 10:51 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(Vengeance_Mad @ Dec 5 2010, 09:34 PM)
Incompatible analogy.
*
Incomprehensible...
tohff7
post Dec 6 2010, 01:20 AM

FF7 GOAT
******
Senior Member
1,581 posts

Joined: Mar 2008


QUOTE(Aloong @ Dec 5 2010, 01:13 AM)
I have to disagree.
Firstly, like someone put it, it's just not practicle (tho not impossible) for this FM to invest, due to compliance/regulation/legal restrictions, be it those set by SC, BNM and chances are this FM is a member/candidate of CFA, hence CFA code of ethics need to be considered as well. Well of course he/she can use "nominees", but u know wat that means.

2ndly, i personally think professional and personal matters shd be separated. If I interview somebody, and the candidate boatsed that he likes to invest in shares i'll be pretty worried about independance and fair dealings issue. If i get interviewed and being ask that question, i would say i dun invest personally, because i want to devote all my time/skills/knowledge/experience/analysis for the best interest of my clients, and my personal interest is secondary..U may call that BS, but that's a safer choice.

My real worry is i've notice ppl out there and in this forum, thinks FM/IBers in the industry "must" invest shares. I think it's very wrong.
If u buy the same shares as u invest for ur client (for FM) or on the client ur handling (for IBs) that is not independent. Not sure u still rmbr ur ethics "u must maintain ur independance or seen to be independent" . If not why would these "professionals" have to go thru the route of using theirparents/sibling/wife/frens name to invest? If they dun think its wrong why dun jx use their own name, and tell the whole world?

Just my 2 cents as well.
*
Taiko, don't misunderstood my statement lar. i said "At the VERY LEAST, the fund manager should put some of his/her net worth into the fund he/she manages."

I am not even saying about SEPARATE portfolio.

Just my 1+1 cents.
Aloong
post Dec 6 2010, 07:00 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(kinwing @ Dec 5 2010, 02:08 PM)
Here we come again. Just for the sake to rebuke my points without thinking logically.

For your information, CFA or SC or BNM or any other authorities do not prohibit fund managers/investment & financial consultants from possessing own portfolios. Please show me any laws/rules/guidelines that prohibit the fund managers/investment & financial consultants should not possess any kind of investment at all.

Having own personal portfolio would not stop the fund managers from being integrity. Or I put this way that if someone claims he has not owned any personal portfolio so he could act integrityly to manage the other people's fund, how sure we know he does not secretly hire a proxy to invest for him and split the profit 50-50? Is this fund-manager-has-no-personal-investment-in-disguise an intergity man? From this point, we should know whether one has portfolio or not would not stop him from being integrity.

Warren Buffet, one of the most intergrity and respected fund managers in the world, has his own personal portfolio other than managing for Berkshire's holding. If anyone think he is more morally higher than Buffet because the one thinks he has no personal portfolio to begin with, then go ahead to troll!

My arguement consist of two points:-
1) If one does not have any investment experience at all because he purposely avoid from engaging any investment activites in order to show his integrity so he could increase the chance of becoming a fund manager, how logic is this statement? How well can we trust the inexperienced manager can deliver a good return?

Imagine a situation of interviewing a fund manager wannabie with no investment experience:-
Hiring Manager: "Do you have your own investment portfolio?"

Fund Manager Wannabie: "Sorry Sir, I don't invest at all because I'm afraid of investment risk."
(Quite obvious that in the real world most fund manager wannabies, won't tell in this way if one does not have the related experience, so basically those wannabies lie in the beginning, so how much integrity he has? OK, now we back to the case that the wannabie tell the truth.)

Hiring Manager: "I don't see the point that when you come for this position but you do not have investment experience at all, then how well you can manage others' people money?"

Fund Manager wannabie: "Sir, I can learn the investment experience from the 1st day I manage the fund (LOL, I would laugh all my way if I was the Hiring Manager). Look, my don't have any personal portfolio so I show my integrity which worth a sen more than the investment experience."

Hiring Manager: "So you want me to pay you with others' people money (the fees paid by the fund) in order to teach you how to invest?"

Fund Manager wannabie: "Yes Sir, I mean that."

Hiring Manager: "...(what a laugh stock!?)..."

IMHO, this fund manager wannabie is either bull shitting or he is too naive!
2) If one inexperienced fund managers manage a fund and luckily he makes good returns and he learns the relevant experience along the way, it is good for everyone. However, we know that garbage in garbage out, so it is more likely an inexperienced fund manager will deliver unsatisfied returns or even losses, and these inexperienced fund managers would not compensate a sen. And a lot of the cases the fund still charge fes base on NAV, not base on performance. It is what I called head you win tail we lose! The investors have already being unfairly treated by paying the asymetric return to the fund, why they should adding more cost and risk to train an inexperienced fund managers whose interest are not align to the benefit of the invetors?
So investors be aware! When ones tell you how integrity they are in order to gain your trust, most probably they are the most corrupted from the interior. I recall a chinese pharase "猪八戒照镜,里外不是人" aka english translate as "When the pigsy looks a mirror, it shows unhuman-like within and without". Apply this phrase in this issue here, when one tells you he is moral and integrity, most likely he is not.
*
Yup, same here, rebuking my statement without reading properly.
Firstly i wasnt even replying to your quote previously, but now i am.
Second i said impracticle, not impossible.

Frankly speaking, i dunno whether berkshire split 50/50 fairly, does he has integrity, does he has independence?
I dunno, cos i dun work there, i duno him personally, i duno check his accounts, internal control, etc.

ABout the scenario, i stil prefer separating personal and working life. I can be a very bad daddy, but i still can be a very good teacher to my students.I can be very quiet at work, but Im very loud at home. I just dun beliv in assuming the same.


Added on December 6, 2010, 7:03 am
QUOTE(tohff7 @ Dec 6 2010, 01:20 AM)
Taiko, don't misunderstood my statement lar. i said "At the VERY LEAST, the fund manager should put some of his/her net worth into the fund he/she manages."

I am not even saying about SEPARATE portfolio.

Just my 1+1 cents.
*
Ok, i may have, i but I still dun agree about the "AT THE VERY LEAST".

This post has been edited by Aloong: Dec 6 2010, 07:03 AM
Xeraph
post Dec 6 2010, 11:03 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
122 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


QUOTE(kinwing @ Dec 4 2010, 06:07 PM)
I'm referring to the case that the fellow who personally not invest at all due to investment risk aversion, so how are we going to believe that when he becomes fund manager he would manage our money well? If I'm hiring a fund manager wannabie who personally does not invest at all before, he won't be hired as a fund manager to begin with, then there would no such excuse that the fund's trade restriction to stop him invest personally. I emphasize again, if a person does not investment at all before, he should not be a fund manager to begin with.

If the fellow who does not invest personally due to risk aversion, what makes him to assume he can safeguard the investors' best interest? Why suddenly he feels comfortable to manage other people's money but not his own money? Is it because others' money is not his money, so he can gamble away the other people's money without affecting him? I can say investors sometimes are too kind to those substandrd fund managers as we are selling a call option for their fee performance. So it is kind of head you win tail we lose. Fund managers could even take excessive risks to get themselves compensate with higher return, so if they are lucky enough they gain a huge fees though they only perform with low risk adjusted returns. How about when things gone bust and funds are making losses, those fund managers are not requested to compensate a sen?

Yes, at least I have some performance track record to refer to how good a fund manager could be, I have lesser chance to come across being cheated by pretended-to-be-genuine-fund-managers, whereby there is one doesn't agree because he prefers to give away his money to omeone who drops from the sky with no track record at all, so who has the greater possibilities to loss the money? The answer is obvious.

And IMHO, the trade restriction or so-called  blackout period should not be the excuse not to invest personally if one is a long term investor. And now someone try to justify the aysmmetric treatment being rewarded to fund managers without aligning their interests with the investors' return by giving excuses like fund managers are not allowed to trade personally. So invetors be aware!

(Note: I edit the previous posts because I was trying to fix some typo errors. I did not change any content in the previous thread unless you can prove it)
*
I'm not sure if you realize its 2 different things we are talking about.
1. A person who does not invest BECAUSE he is risk averse SHOULD NOT be made fund manager.
2. A fund manager who does not invest FOR himself.

If you read all my postings so far, I've NEVER mentioned even once in regards to your thoughts whether a risk averse person should be a fund manager. All I've commented so far is that there are EXISTING fund managers out there who DO NOT have personal trading.
TWO VERY DIFFERENT THINGS.... you see?
Who the hell employs a non experienced person to be a fund manager anyway?
Fund managers are usually nurtured as analyst FIRST before getting to be a fund manager.

Anyway, since you want to talk about "point 1" I'll play along.
Being risk averse does not mean one has ABSOLUTELY ZERO RISK TOLERENCE. It just means that he prefers much lesser risk.
Do you know the investment mandates of traditional insurance companies? they need not take excessive risk because they only need to fulfill a certain minimal percentage return.
Same goes to a dividend fund, stocks are limited to those that MUST give annual dividend (with 3 years historical record), must be a large cap stock, has strong balance sheet, low beta, etc etc....... these funds takes very minimal risk.
THAT IS WHY YOU NORMALLY HAVE DIFFERENT TYPES OF PORTFOLIO TO CATER FOR DIFFERENT PPL. Besides putting fund managers on the chopping board, the investors themselves have to know the difference between these different funds to start with. How can you expect to get "better-than-index-returns" if you buy into a dividend fund. Likewise, you don't expect to get low beta stocks to be in an aggressive fund, do you? Geezzz......

Do you also know that trade restrictions NOT ONLY APPLIES to fund managers BUT analysts as well?
Take this scenario,
A person graduates from uni, gets into a fund management firm starting as an analyst. So even starting out as an analyst he is restricted to invest. 3 years later, he is promoted to be a fund manager, slowly learning to manage funds. And after 5 years, he does well for the funds he manages.
In this 8 years he doesnt invest in stocks for himself because of the many limitations (I'm not gonna waste time explaining to you again) imposed.
Can you say he is not experienced because he does not invest himself then?

Note: Edit or not your errors are still there.


Added on December 6, 2010, 11:20 am
QUOTE(kinwing @ Dec 5 2010, 05:08 PM)
Here we come again. Just for the sake to rebuke my points without thinking logically.

For your information, CFA or SC or BNM or any other authorities do not prohibit fund managers/investment & financial consultants from possessing own portfolios. Please show me any laws/rules/guidelines that prohibit the fund managers/investment & financial consultants should not possess any kind of investment at all.

*
Here we GO again.
You say others rebuke your points without thinking logically, but aren't you doing it in your reply to Aloong?

QUOTE(Aloong @ Dec 5 2010, 04:13 AM)
I have to disagree.
Firstly, like someone put it, it's just not practicle (tho not impossible) for this FM to invest, due to compliance/regulation/legal restrictions, be it those set by SC, BNM and chances are this FM is a member/candidate of CFA, hence CFA code of ethics need to be considered as well. Well of course he/she can use "nominees", but u know wat that means.

*
I bolded for you just in case you didnt read what Aloong mentioned clearly.

This post has been edited by Xeraph: Dec 6 2010, 11:29 AM
Vengeance_Mad
post Dec 6 2010, 11:37 AM

Aston-ishing
*****
Senior Member
797 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Dec 5 2010, 07:29 PM)
I agree with you. But not investing in their own separate portfolio does not equal to no investing experience.

Imagine this scenario, someone who has work his way up from analyst up to fund manager level with sterling performance. However, he do not put aside his money in stock but in property or just use it all... This does not mean he is a lousy fund manager. One does not have to be operated in order to be a good surgeon smile.gif
*
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Dec 5 2010, 10:51 PM)
Incomprehensible...
*
(One does not have to be operated in order to be a good surgeon) - this analogy is used wrongly.

In actual, One cannot be a good surgeon if he have not operate before.
Which meant, One cannot be a good investor if he have not invest before.


Aloong
post Dec 6 2010, 01:48 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
SInce somebody mentioned about surgeon, i thot of a good examply.
It's not advisable for the surgoen to operate their close family, as sometime they tend to be emotional, and may affect the operation procedures.

Same as FM. The FM may take excess risk or too low risk, not in line with his internal policy or policy for that particlar fund. Because once his own money is inside the fund, his emotion may overtake his logical decision. To avoid this situation, I think it's a good bank policy to disallow FM to invest in the same fund they manage. If something happen compliance ppl mayb use this point to attack the FM's wrong investment decision, and question whether he took excessive risk, since his money is inside too.

My last 2 cents on FM, and sorry to take this thread too far off from the first post.

kinwing
post Dec 6 2010, 05:44 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


So now the one said "impractical but not impossible". So what stop you from doing thing that is "not impossible"? It is always the laziness whining around with excuses to blame things become too difficult to be carried out. Whereby the one still prefer separating personal and working life, it is your choice and I'm here giving different opinions. IMO, if I am one of the investors of a fund, I would prefer to hire a fund manager who has the enthusiasm/passion in investment and he treats the managing of portfolios (be it personal or official one) as a whole-life career and hobby instead of getting a fund manager who only treats managing portfolios as a job and he will only work well when he gets paid well.

Yes I do know there is 2 different topic as stated below:-
1. A person who does not invest BECAUSE he is risk averse SHOULD NOT be made fund manager.
2. A fund manager who does not invest FOR himself.

(i) At first when one gave the statement of "Btw, not personally investing in stocks does not mean that the person is not suitable to be a fund manager." come right after my statement of "So I asked him what was his way on analysing stocks, and that fellow told me he personally did not invest any stock because he was afraid of investment risk.". Since the one's statement did not refer to which case it was trying to argue with and so far I am the only one who started mentioning about the issue of a fund manager wannabie in this thread, so I assumed the one was referring to my case and thus I gave more opinions on that issue. After I gave more opinions, then the one twistting further into issues like "A fund manager who does not invest FOR himself" at another post.

(ii) Further with the argument of analysts or fund managers are restricted to trade is not a good excuse not to trade at all. Please read carefully, "restricted to trade" does not mean "prohibited to trade at all cost". "Restricted to trade" could be referring to restriction on certain stocks or restricted to trade within certain period ('black-out period'), but you are still allowed to trade other stocks in the 'permission list' or trade stocks after the black-out period, so what stop you from doing so?

For example, an analyst researches "Stock A" and recommended it to investors. The analyst is barred from trading that particular "Stock A" within certain period. So after the black-out period the analyst can still assume to buy "Stock A". Some might argue that after the black-out period, the price of "Stock A" could have run sky high and thus it is not practical for the analyst to buy "Stock A" anymore. How about if the market is not rational, and a lot of the time investors do not react to the recommendation made by the analayst, and the analyst still has faith to what he recommended and thus he can still buy "Stock A" at a reasonable price even after the black-out period. Now what stop the analyst from investing "Stock A" after black-out period? Furthermore, there are thousand of stocks in the market, and the analyst or his company might not be able to cover all stocks, so what stop the analyst to invest in other stocks that are not covered by the company?

The same apply to fund managers. For example a fund manager is managing a fund which mandate is to invest small cap stocks. The fund manager somehow decided not to trade any small cap stocks even after giving a fair chance for the fund to trade first before his personal trading in order to "maintain his independence or seen to be independent". I'm fine with that the fund manager’s good intention want to be "independent" (but not the pretended one) not to buy small cap stocks, but not to the extreme to avoid all other stocks aka not invest at all. The fund managers can still trade other stocks such as big cap stocks that are not related from the fund they are managing or they can even invest in other asset classes. So what stop the fund managers from investing personally?

(iii) And the one who thinks "FM may take excess risk or too low risk, not in line with his internal policy or policy for that particular fund. Because once his own money is inside the fund, his emotion may overtake his logical decision" and I beg to differ from this statement. Because once his own money is inside the fund, the fund manager would exercise more diligently instead of acting emotionally or recklessly. My argument is that when the fund manager does not align his interest with the fund holders' interest, it's more likely he would take more risk because he can make tons of fee charges if he is lucky to grow the NAV bigger in size, but when the outcome turns out badly and he is not required to compensate the losses. This is what I mentioned about the call option of paying asymmetric fees to fund managers.

(iv) Now we back to the other argument regarding a fund manager wannabie who has no investment experience. If there is a case that a hiring manager is interviewing 2 experienced analysts. Both analysts have strong investment research skill except one does not invest at all and the other one is well understood with the market microstructure as he did trade/invest before. So which analyst has a higher chance of being promoted to fund manager? A person who can think logically will know the answer.

Instead of gaining the relevant experience during the three or four years of work from the research field before being promoted to be fund manager, the analyst has a choice to make initiative effort to gain relevant investment experience but he decides to take his own sweet time by giving a lame excuse that he want to be a potential candidate with "independence and integrity" and hopes at the end he would be offered by a nice firm with high pay salary to work as a fund manager?

Hey fund manager wannabie, what makes you to pretend to be one with "independence and integrity" when you are not a fund manager yet? How about the worst case happens that you would never have a chance to be a fund manager to begin with so you will not invest forever because you are not a fund manager? It is a common sense that when one works harder and equips himself well hence he gets more chances. But nowadays common sense becomes so uncommon that when one has a choice to work harder but he chooses not to do so, and end up with peanuts.

(Note: Those who read my opinions will judge by themselves instead of being told by someone here what is right or wrong. Grow up! We are no longer at the stage of primary school being manipulated to assume there are standard answers of right and wrong. As I mentioned that when a "pigsy" told you what is "right", most probably it is not.)

This post has been edited by kinwing: Dec 6 2010, 06:05 PM
kinwing
post Dec 6 2010, 05:50 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Vengeance_Mad @ Dec 6 2010, 11:37 AM)
(One does not have to be operated in order to be a good surgeon) - this analogy is used wrongly.

In actual, One cannot be a good surgeon if he have not operate before.
Which meant, One cannot be a good investor if he have not invest before.
*
Apparently this statement "One does not have to be operated in order to be a good surgeon" is posted for the sake to rebuke my opinion of "One needs to invest before becoming a good manager", so it is not well organised in a logical sense and other forumers questioned the logic of this statement. Then the one twist and switch the topic to "It's not advisable for the surgoen to operate their close family, as sometime they tend to be emotional, and may affect the operation procedures". Don't twist and switch to another topic like a troll before explain the logic of the "One does not have to be operated in order to be a good surgeon".

And the case of comparing surgeon with fund manager are like comparing an apple with an orange. According to that kind of logic as a surgoen should not operate their close family, then a car driver should not fetch his/her family in the same car because the car driver's skill is downgraded whenever he/she is driving along with his/her family!?

This post has been edited by kinwing: Dec 6 2010, 05:50 PM
LightningFist
post Dec 6 2010, 06:20 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
I'd like to pose a question to all the 'experts' out there.

I'd appreciate any answers, positive or negative.

Is a back office job at an investment bank in an entry level support role a good start for a student who has yet to begin his/her undergraduate degree?

Thank you.
Knight_2008
post Dec 6 2010, 08:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(kinwing @ Dec 6 2010, 05:50 PM)
Apparently this statement "One does not have to be operated in order to be a good surgeon" is posted for the sake to rebuke my opinion of "One needs to invest before becoming a good manager", so it is not well organised in a logical sense and other forumers questioned the logic of this statement. Then the one twist and switch the topic to "It's not advisable for the surgoen to operate their close family, as sometime they tend to be emotional, and may affect the operation procedures". Don't twist and switch to another topic like a troll before explain the logic of  the "One does not have to be operated in order to be a good surgeon".

And the case of comparing surgeon with fund manager are like comparing an apple with an orange. According to that kind of logic as a surgoen should not operate their close family, then a car driver should not fetch his/her family in the same car because the car driver's skill is downgraded whenever he/she is driving along with his/her family!?
*
lol..sorry for my analogy.. I just meant that a fund manager need to have investment experience;ie. climb form analyst with proven track record..but it's not important that he invests using his personal money smile.gif

btw, ur statements make u sound so emotional.. u lost a lot of money in trust funds?
Xeraph
post Dec 6 2010, 10:24 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
122 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


Apart from the fact that it is sometimes irritating cause I dont get what you are trying to say, I actually find this "discussion" quite interesting as it kinda provoke some thoughts.

Anyway I LOLed at the statement below.

QUOTE(kinwing @ Dec 6 2010, 08:44 PM)
For example, an analyst researches "Stock A" and recommended it to investors. The analyst is barred from trading that particular "Stock A" within certain period. So after the black-out period the analyst can still assume to buy "Stock A". Some might argue that after the black-out period, the price of "Stock A" could have run sky high and thus it is not practical for the analyst to buy "Stock A" anymore. How about if the market is not rational, and a lot of the time investors do not react to the recommendation made by the analayst, and the analyst still has faith to what he recommended and thus he can still buy "Stock A" at a reasonable price even after the black-out period. Now what stop the analyst from investing "Stock A" after black-out period? Furthermore, there are thousand of stocks in the market, and the analyst or his company might not be able to cover all stocks, so what stop the analyst to invest in other stocks that are not covered by the company?

The same apply to fund managers. For example a fund manager is managing a fund which mandate is to invest small cap stocks. The fund manager somehow decided not to trade any small cap stocks even after giving a fair chance for the fund to trade first before his personal trading in order to "maintain his independence or seen to be independent". I'm fine with that the fund manager’s good intention want to be "independent" (but not the pretended one) not to buy small cap stocks, but not to the extreme to avoid all other stocks aka not invest at all. The fund managers can still trade other stocks such as big cap stocks that are not related from the fund they are managing or they can even invest in other asset classes. So what stop the fund managers from investing personally?

*
Need to tell you how many times? Again and again the same thing.
Look, the restrictions not only apply to the funds a FM manages. It involves ALL funds in the company. So your point that FM can invest in big cap stocks although he manages small cap stocks is still restricted.
As I've said before, 2 weeks black out and 1 week for approval, gives a total of 3 weeks.
If your co is big (...bigger than likes of MIDF?), you would have at least say.... 10 funds. Each fund managed by different fund managers so lets say Fund 1 buys KNM, and you want to buy. OK, nvm.... you wait 2 weeks then. For all you know, suddenly Fund 2 wants to buy also, so you wait another 2 weeks. Then again before the 2 weeks passed, Fund 1 wants to realize profit and sells the stock. You wait another 2 weeks.
Simple question, how many weeks does that now come up to? And I've only mentioned 2 Funds, what about Fund 3-10?

Before we proceed any further in regards to the issue whether potential FMs should have in anyway invest in the stock market personally which gives them an edge over one who doesn't (did I get the statement right? Just making sure here....), I want to ask you, kinwing, a question.
Is there any difference between managing a stock for yourself and managing a fund in a company.
YES or NO? Pls state your reason for whichever answer you chose.

This post has been edited by Xeraph: Dec 6 2010, 11:00 PM
gloomberg
post Dec 6 2010, 11:52 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


U guys are making pointless arguments la... what are u guys trying to prove here oh? ...

Whether or not a person who manages a fund well manages another fund of his own well is a highly subjective topic. The topic of investment itself is highly subjective.

Me being a practical person, managing a fund well grants me huge bonuses, thus less incentive to actually work that hard to manage my other fund. I might as well just buy houses and rent them away, or put into them into FD. Or if that guy has that much of time, he could manage another of his personal portfolio, but obviously restriction applies. If I have that much of a bonus, I wouldn't be bothered to manage another fund.

Back to the pointless argument, it is really high subjective la... Those who worked in the investment field would know that there is a limitation of capacity for individual investors, which is why there is mutual fund or any investment funds catered for high net worth clients, am i not right? The area of which they are investing is a whole different level. Aihhzzz... Why is there a need to argue? retail vs institutional, the style also lain, mana boleh compare. It really on ur risk profile. We haven't even got into hedge funds yet. That's a whole different platform with varying degrees of risk profile
Knight_2008
post Dec 7 2010, 12:21 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Dec 6 2010, 11:52 PM)
U guys are making pointless arguments la... what are u guys trying to prove here oh? ...

Whether or not a person who manages a fund well manages another fund of his own well is a highly subjective topic. The topic of investment itself is highly subjective.

Me being a practical person, managing a fund well grants me huge bonuses, thus less incentive to actually work that hard to manage my other fund. I might as well just buy houses and rent them away, or put into them into FD. Or if that guy has that much of time, he could manage another of his personal portfolio, but obviously restriction applies. If I have that much of a bonus, I wouldn't be bothered to manage another fund.

Back to the pointless argument, it is really high subjective la... Those who worked in the investment field would know that there is a limitation of capacity for individual investors, which is why there is mutual fund or any investment funds catered for high net worth clients, am i not right? The area of which they are investing is a whole different level. Aihhzzz... Why is there a need to argue? retail vs institutional, the style also lain, mana boleh compare. It really on ur risk profile. We haven't even got into hedge funds yet. That's a whole different platform with varying degrees of risk profile
*
haha...true smile.gif btw, can I ask something? working in asset management division(buy side analyst) or research house for securities brokerage firm(sell side analyst), which one will have a higher bonus potential assuming both belongs to a same bank?
gloomberg
post Dec 7 2010, 10:11 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Dec 7 2010, 12:21 AM)
haha...true smile.gif btw, can I ask something? working in asset management division(buy side analyst) or research house for securities brokerage firm(sell side analyst), which one will have a higher bonus potential assuming both belongs to a same bank?
*
ini tak perlu cakap. of cuz asset management lor. no need to guess ma, cuz many ppl wants to get into as buy-side all of the time, and usually they'll stay put there for quite some time. I think they charge a mgmt fee for the gain u get lor. So say u give them RM1Bill, then they got a return of 10% for u, they will take 1% from the return, so 0.1% x 1,000,000,000 = 1 million. Woot! So if they say AuM is 10 Bill, and they gain for say 10%, then they get 10 Mill lor for the team. The return they use is weighted average return, based on the products u chose. Correct me if im wrong, i haven't got there yet.

Research analyst only does, ya, research only. They do recommendations, but for the public, and sometimes, it seems that every research house would say the same thing about a certain reaction to news. For example, the new ETP. OK, what stock will boom, yea, construction, then they will say look out for those. Or MRCB/IJM + UEM/Sunrise + Sunway City/Sunway Holdings... then they will say pretty similar crap, like whether or not it will add value or create synergy, and then say it depends on what la... Pretty much it's their opinion. Any dude can come up and say something about it. But research houses is the common training ground before stepping elsewhere la i would say.

RHB Research, CIMB Research, AmResearch, OSK, Nomura, Citi, MS, GS, to name a few. Usually local research houses will of course focus on local market, depending on who covers the particular stock. The report i got from foreign research houses are usually economic reports lo, usually regional. Very little coverage done on our bourse. wat to do, here so small.
the snowball
post Dec 7 2010, 11:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Dec 7 2010, 12:21 AM)
haha...true smile.gif btw, can I ask something? working in asset management division(buy side analyst) or research house for securities brokerage firm(sell side analyst), which one will have a higher bonus potential assuming both belongs to a same bank?
*
If I am not mistaken, normally, sell-side pays better.But, sell-side I think the working time sometimes can be quite long if you are rushing out a report during earnings season or you need to go early for the pre-market report and briefing. Sell side, sometimes, you need to write some BS. It depends what you want to do in your life I guess, but, sell-side analyst definitely get paid better and have a higher profile.

Asset management itself is a fantastic business to have, very much scalable. If given a chance to own any division of Public Bank, I would have choose Public Mutual. It is the most scalable part of all their division, hence, a lot of operating leverage. If it get spin off in an IPO, I think it would fetch some real premium as it is a super cash generator. But, asset management is good only if you own the fund you run, for e.g. ppl like David Einhorn or even our local Tan Teng Boo. Take ICapital for instance, it has around US$300mil under management, not a lot, but, still, if you take a 2% management fee, it is already US$6mil. Add in performance fees and stuff, you prety much get the idea on how profitable it is and the business is scalable, thats the great part about it. However,if you are an analyst, sell side normally pay better than buy side.
kinwing
post Dec 7 2010, 11:45 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Dec 6 2010, 08:14 PM)
lol..sorry for my analogy.. I just meant that a fund manager need to have investment experience;ie. climb form analyst with proven track record..but it's not important that he invests using his personal money smile.gif

btw, ur statements make u sound so emotional.. u lost a lot of money in trust funds?
*
Few years ago I was a naive investor. I didn't know how to calculate, I put in RM3,000 in a unit trust fund and I make few hundred losses. So I learnt my lesson and mistake and move on. From that experience, I know something wrong in the fund management industries.

Of course, I don't hate fund managers. Indeed my ultimate goal is to be fund manager so I can manage others' people and grow their wealth. My feeling of becoming an ethical and integrity fund managers getting strong when I read from the news that a lot old folks lost their entire life savings because the Lehman Brother's mini bond gone bust.

This post has been edited by kinwing: Dec 7 2010, 02:45 PM
kinwing
post Dec 7 2010, 11:56 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


1) I have long ago wanted to point out an unethical issue of a fund managing company ("FMC") that consisting of different funds which are highly identical to each other and buying same stocks at different time.

Let me give you a simple example. A FMC has 3 funds (the name of the 3 funds are A, B and C) and each of the funds is setup with different mandate and objectives. Somehow, these funds are going buy a same share but at different time, let assume the share is KNM. This is what Xeraph decribed different funds from the same company buying the same share at different time will make the fund managers ("FM") to wait so long for the black-out period so it's not practical (I call it as a "deadlock") for them to invest personally.

I refer to an extraction from a blogger, SNOWBALL, who has previously stated that "When it comes to portfolio allocation decision, which fund should have the right to buy first? Unless they employ different trader to do the deal for different funds(which is unlikely since they have same FM for different funds), there bound to be a conflict when deciding who get the first bite of the cherry."
http://goodstockbadstock.blogspot.com/2010...e-fundsthe.html

Don't you see that those FMCs trigger conflict of interest in the beginning, so the FMCs not only unethical and they also cause a deadlock that makes the FMs unable to invest personally. The conflict of interest issue is especially daunting when the same FM managing the 3 funds. So which fund should buy the share 1st? If Fund A buy KNM first and Fund C buy KNM at the last, so Fund C is supporting the share price of KNM for the benefit of Fund A. How about another case that when Fund A is making huge tons of profit from KNM and it wants to sell and realise the profit, and at the same time Fund B wants to invest KNM, so Fund A is taking the advantage of Fund B by selling KNM at high price to Fund B!? So the issue now is why certain FMCs want to setup so many funds with almost similar or identical portfolios, and these funds transact (either buy or sell) the similar shares at different time. I'm surprised Xeraph uses this unethical practice of the FMCs as an excuse of creating the deadlock for FMs to stop them from investing personally. The FMCs should cover their axx 1st before asking the FMs not to invest personally.

2) Why your vision is so short-sighted like a tunnel? Your are unable to break the deadlock caused by the FMCs does not mean we have to follow your way. Think out of the box and don't act like a frog that lived in a shallow well.

Instead of cry-babying to complain that the FM is unable to invest personally because of the deadlock, instead of sitting and putting your money in FD, why don't you diverisfy to invest at a bigger regional market? How about the Asian Market and the World Market? Unless the FMC is so huge in size that it engaged every shares from every corner of the world. With this kind of giant fund aka the market, the FMs don't even need to think about investing because they would be squeezed out, but this is a fiction anyway.

Having said that, other than buying international stocks or even other asset classes still consider as an investment, how about buy the index fund or your own FMC's funds, so you do not give view on particular stocks and save yourself from black-out period or conflict of interests? So what stop the FMs from investing personally?

3) Investing personally is another way of diversifying from the risk that put your wealth solely relying on the income from the job. Indeed, the deadlock creating by the FMCs could be an unexpected intention that stop the FMs to accumulate identical portfolios to the FMCs so the FMs diversify further from the risk when if FMCs gone bust. Just imagine if the portfolios of the FMCs are making huge losses and subsequently these FMCs are in trouble, and FMs could lose their jobs, but with the personal portfolios on hand and some more these personal portfolios are not highly correlated to the portfolios of the FMCs, then the FMs would still comfortable to keep their living with the back up of personal portfolios.

4) Regarding the question of "Is there any difference between managing a stock for yourself and managing a fund in a company.", for your information I'm just a dwarf who works in CF from a small bank , so I don't know as much differences as what the FMs do, but IMO that differences should not stop the FMs from managing their own personal portfolios. My investment strategy is straight forward irregard how big the portfolio size, I just wanna make thing simple and I'm a long term value investor, I either buy low sell high (it's different from buy high sell higher) or I buy in low risk with high return (it is my opinion, you don't have to agree with me and I don't want to drag into another argument).

I understand there are differences in between small fund and huge fund and I might not be able to know what exactly are the differences as I'm only managing own portofolio. But IMHO I believe there are some common issues for managing individual portfolio (which is normally a small size fund) and a public fund in a company (which is normally a much bigger in size). So rather than sitting with our own sweet time without doing anything, we take the initiative to gain practical investment experience by managing our own piggy fund 1st in order to know the common issues. Should we make mistakes and losses, we take the responsibility because it is our own fund and we would not repeat the same mistakes again because we learn the lesson with our own money. For FMs who have some moral sense, they would rather to pay the lesson to learn the common issues with their own money and not ask the fund holders to assume losses to pay for the FMs mistakes.

Since my personal fund is small at the beginning, so I have less to lose and hence I just pay a small price to gain an invaluable experience, though this experience could be a very small part related to a bigger fund in a company but. Having said that, I at least work out something and get myself well equip before landing to a FMC and manage others' people money.

You could say I'm either too idealistic or too naive on this issue, but I have a good intention to begin with.

5) I refer to gloomberg's statement "...If I have that much of a bonus, I wouldn't be bothered to manage another fund..." and I want to put in some of my opinions.

I can understand the logic if one has enough money from the job he does not need to invest anymore. But what is enough? It is highly subjective as what gloomberg mentioned. From my pov, what stop one from making more money? It is no harm for the FMs to personally invest with their fat bonuses to grow more wealthier, and they can decide whatever they want to do with the wealth such as allocate the wealth (aka donate) to those who need it.

If the FMs are so satisfied with their bonuses to make them feel so rich then why they still want to continue manage funds for other people, they should just retire and enjoy their huge bonuses? Or the FMs just want to work for fun, but since they feel they are so rich then why they keep receiving salary and bonuses from the funds? Since fund managers think they are so rich till they don't need to invest in order to be more richer, then they should manage the public fund FOC (or just go for RM1 contract will do). Then I will salute these FMs are genuinely working for fun. My 2 cents.


This is my last post regarding the FM issue in this thread. I feel sorry of being out of topic. Next post would be back to the topic of IB/CF.

This post has been edited by kinwing: Dec 7 2010, 01:47 PM
gloomberg
post Dec 7 2010, 01:43 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


Try to picture this situation:
U work, get ur salary, what u lose? The concept here is trade-off (similar to law of conservation of energy), to gain sth, sth else have to be given up or sacrificed of u would put it that way. For example, u spend time at work, but can't spend time doing sth else u like - with family, enjoy time out with friends, etc. U have to use energy and effort, thus once it's depleted, u can't really use it for sth else. U have to use some form of intelligence, and pure concentration at work, thus u can't really focus too much on other stuff. And sometimes, ur health would be compromised, if u've just forgotten that we are human instead of robot.

Hence, by working, we are actually utilizing our time, energy (replenishable), intelligence/concentration, and whatever that may apply. In a way, these are forms of investment. If we place this into a simplistic NPV model, our time/energy/concentration=opex, intelligence=R&D(sunken cost), cost of education=capex at t=0. Of course im talking in the context of being a FM, which explains the cost of education. In this model, everything can be replaceable except 1 thing, time. We only have 24 hours a day, 144 hours a week and 536 hours per 4 weeks. We only have so much time to be spent on.

Well, if u're that flexible in terms of working, then it would be good. How do we do that? Place that money somewhere and let it work for u. Perhaps, they have that much of a remuneration to be placed elsewhere he thinks is able to maximize his cash at hand, according to his own experience. So, where do u think the main CF comes from? Obviously is from work. DO u think he would spend time managing his own personal fund? Highly unlikely. Unless he found a business model that might work for him, and can earn him more money, or he's about to retire, so now he has time to manage his own personal portfolio.

This also depends on how much he has in his pocket. If he has RM10 Million, he can just place it in a fund that earns him an ample 5% return every year. that's 500k per year. it'a win-win situation, why would he not spend time doing his job earning his job earning for say 120k per year + 500K from his personal portfolio. If he's about to retire, i think he has the choice not to do his job, if his main intention of working in an investment firm is due to gaining wealth and not passion in investing. But he might continue work there, if there is a huge enough incentive to actually work again (which would mean he doesn't get to spend time with family, assuming he has one).

However(there's always a but), if he feels that he doesn't earn enough, then most probably he would opt to manage another of his own portfolio, and to reduce the occurrence of heart attack, he might just opt to invest in real estate or any investment that has low downside and high upside (especially now when the market is booming). Maybe he's waiting for an opportunity? Who knows man.

There's really an endless amount of scenarios that could be generated here la... if u study CF u'll know... The key to is identify the most plausible one, and the probability of it happening.

Personally, if i have that much of a wealth accumulated already, I wouldn't be bothered to be an aggressive investor la... Where's the time for urself? I don't wanna end up being single without enjoying the companionship of a child and a wife.
kinwing
post Dec 7 2010, 01:58 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(gloomberg @ Dec 7 2010, 01:43 PM)
...I don't wanna end up being single without enjoying the companionship of a child and a wife.
*
So gloomberg, looks like you have married already loh brows.gif .

I get what is you opinion and I have mine. Anyway, not going to write more on this or else there would be another debate how much wealth is enough laugh.gif .
Xeraph
post Dec 7 2010, 03:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
122 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


Is not that we are having pointless arguments here, its just normal discussion to clear some confusion off the air.
Good for those reading anyway to know opinions of people from different divisions of IB.

To those that ask who gets better pay, sell or buy, it is sell. You're looking at 50% or more.

QUOTE(kinwing @ Dec 7 2010, 02:45 PM)
Few years ago I was a naive investor. I didn't know how to calculate, I put in RM3,000 in a unit trust fund and I make few hundred losses. So I learnt my lesson and mistake and move on. From that experience, I know something wrong in the fund management industries.

Of course, I don't hate fund managers. Indeed my ultimate goal is to be fund manager so I can manage others' people and grow their wealth. My feeling of becoming an ethical and integrity fund managers when I read from the news that a lot old folks lost their entire life savings because the Lehman Brother's mini bond gone bust.
*
How can you generalize the fund management industry that way? You lose money and then you come to a conclusion that something is wrong in the fund management industry.
Which fund was it that you bought into if I may ask? Did you see what was in the portfolio? What were the targets of the fund?


QUOTE(kinwing @ Dec 7 2010, 02:56 PM)
1) I have long ago wanted to point out an unethical issue of a fund managing company ("FMC") that consisting of different funds which are highly identical to each other and buying same stocks at different time.

Let me give you a simple example. A FMC has 3 funds (the name of the 3 funds are A, B and C) and each of the funds is setup with different mandate and objectives. Somehow, these funds are going buy a same share but at different time, let assume the share is KNM. This is what Xeraph decribed different funds from the same company buying the same share at different time will make the fund managers ("FM") to wait so long for the black-out period so it's not practical (I call it as a "deadlock") for them to invest personally.

I refer to an extraction from a blogger, SNOWBALL, who has previously stated that "When it comes to portfolio allocation decision, which fund should have the right to buy first? Unless they employ different trader to do the deal for different funds(which is unlikely since they have same FM for different funds), there bound to be a conflict when deciding who get the first bite of the cherry."
http://goodstockbadstock.blogspot.com/2010...e-fundsthe.html

Don't you see that those FMCs trigger conflict of interest in the beginning, so the FMCs not only unethical and they also cause a deadlock that makes the FMs unable to invest personally. The conflict of interest issue is especially daunting when the same FM managing the 3 funds. So which fund should buy the share 1st? If Fund A buy KNM first and Fund C buy KNM at the last, so Fund C is supporting the share price of KNM for the benefit of Fund A. How about another case that when Fund A is making huge tons of profit from KNM and it wants to sell and realise the profit, and at the same time Fund B wants to invest KNM, so Fund A is taking the advantage of Fund B by selling KNM at high price to Fund B!? So the issue now is why certain FMCs want to setup so many funds with almost similar or identical portfolios, and these funds transact (either buy or sell) the similar shares at different time.

*
I hope that you do not further embarass yourself by simple barking if you are not even in the industry and claiming fund management houses are unethical. If you do not know, then ask nicely.

Let me tell you how it works.
In the case where the different funds need to buy the stocks at the same time, the dealer would take the total quantity and buy it as one order. The stock will then be allocated proportionately to each fund if the order is not completed. Price of the stock will be the same.

What on earth are you saying that Fund A is taking advantage of Fund B by selling at a higher price to the latter? Different funds are set up at different periods, and in the case of institutional funds, the mandates are different as some require absolute return.... thus FM has to realize profit for the client. Fund A may have entered in KNM some time back and has now see that he should realize the profit as it has provided a high return. On the other hand, the other FM of fund B thinks that KNM has prospect and wants to buy the stock. I'm not even talking about portfolio balancing yet. There are times when you are forced to sell because you have exceeded the maximum allowable portfolio weightings.

QUOTE(kinwing @ Dec 7 2010, 02:56 PM)

I'm surprised Xeraph uses this unethical practice of the FMCs as an excuse of creating the deadlock for FMs to stop them from investing personally. The FMCs should cover their axx 1st before asking the FMs not to invest personally.

*
I questioned the fact that you are a chartered holder as you've never come to understand what Ethics has thought you so far. A person should always put benefits of the clients then the company before himself. Are you working for the firm or are you working for yourself?

QUOTE(kinwing @ Dec 7 2010, 02:56 PM)

Regarding the question of "Is there any difference between managing a stock for yourself and managing a fund in a company.", for your information I'm just a dwarf who works in CF from a small bank , so I don't know as much differences as what the FMs do, but IMO that differences should not stop the FMs from managing their own personal portfolios. My investment strategy is straight forward irregard how big the portfolio size, I just wanna make thing simple and I'm a long term value investor, I either buy low sell high (it's different from buy high sell higher) or I buy in low risk with high return (it is my opinion, you don't have to agree with me and I don't want to drag into another argument).

I understand there are differences in between small fund and huge fund and I might not be able to know what exactly are the differences as I'm only managing own portofolio. But IMHO I believe there are some common issues for managing individual portfolio (which is normally a small size fund) and a public fund in a company (which is normally a much bigger in size). So rather than sitting with our own sweet time without doing anything, we take the initiative to gain practical investment experience by managing our own piggy fund 1st in order to know the common issues. Should we make mistakes and losses, we take the responsibility because it is our own fund and we would not repeat the same mistakes again because we learn the lesson with our own money. For FMs who have some moral sense, they would rather to pay the lesson to learn the common issues with their own money and not ask the fund holders to assume losses to pay for the FMs mistakes.

*
Let me share something with you.
Few years back, I was at this interview and I was asked, Do you invest in stocks youself.
I'm glad that I said no, as I was then hired and am still with that company. And the FM I talked about (not investing himself) was the interviewer.
After i joined the company, I asked him why was it that he asked such a question. He told me, its because of emotions.
Managing your own fund and a co. fund is totally different because of emotions that come into play. You may construct strict rules for your own fund but believe me, you will somehow break the rules because when it involves your own money, greed and emotions kicks in (Just like the example of a doctor not operating his relative). I hope you do realize we are humans after all.


gloomberg
post Dec 7 2010, 03:52 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(Xeraph @ Dec 7 2010, 03:39 PM)
Let me share something with you.
Few years back, I was at this interview and I was asked, Do you invest in stocks youself.
I'm glad that I said no, as I was then hired and am still with that company. And the FM I talked about (not investing himself) was the interviewer.
After i joined the company, I asked him why was it that he asked such a question. He told me, its because of emotions.
Managing your own fund and a co. fund is totally different because of emotions that come into play. You may construct strict rules for your own fund but believe me, you will somehow break the rules because when it involves your own money, greed and emotions kicks in (Just like the example of a doctor not operating his relative). I hope you do realize we are humans after all.
*
which is why there's technical analysis lor. Keynesian theory of animal spirit, in that the market doesn't just move in a quantitative manner, but also guided by lots of emotion, and the strongest one, GREED. and that GREED fuels volatility. yes, u wonder why there is so much analysis revolves around volatility, since ppl are generally lazy to study the core fundamental or the mechanism of how things work and change over time

QUOTE(kinwing @ Dec 7 2010, 01:58 PM)
So gloomberg, looks like you have married already loh brows.gif .

I get what is you opinion and I have mine. Anyway, not going to write more on this or else there would be another debate how much wealth is enough laugh.gif .
*
I'm still single la, and very much available. whistling.gif
but it's just that i see a lot of working professionals that ended up single, cuz the main goal in life is no other than $$$. I spoke to this dude from CF who is 47 yo, but single, but blardy freaking rich lor. some married but the office is like their first home, real home is second home.
Knight_2008
post Dec 7 2010, 09:02 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
btw kinwing, I don agree with you that a fund manager who have no need of money should manage it foc.. this will distort the market in that other talented fund manager will be put out of business unless there have a substantially higher returns which is more than their salary...

look at Africa nowadays, part of the reasons their agriculture production comes to a halt is due to the free food send by the western nation to them.. Few decades ago when the famine starts to become worse and affect their food production, US and other nation decided to send food for free to the african nations..this resulted in the a glut there putting the local farmers out of business..This is turn lead to lack of investments in biotechnology which further resulted in deterioration of food production capacity which resulted in endless cycle there.. This show sometimes things with good intention does not always result in good outcome..

Anyway, the reason US and European send food to Africa is because the western economies are experiencing glut due to the government subsidies for their farmers in that government undertake to buy the wheat at floor price in order to support the high wheat price..This leads to the farmer producing non-stop beyond the requirements of the nation..
pokeat
post Dec 12 2010, 02:19 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
438 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Goblintown


Its so funny looking these guys arguing for the fund manager debate biggrin.gif Oh anyway, I'm just finished my foundation/pre-u study can I join any of the internship/summer program ? I waiting for my degree starts, mostly I'll go to IB, but now I still figuring what CF, DCF, DCM are. True, at first, tot IB was like trading shares, now more to like M&A, deal, trade and sales smile.gif

Do IBs in Malaysia use the title'Analyst' ? or some other ?


Added on December 12, 2010, 2:19 amI'm ready for the boomblame !

This post has been edited by pokeat: Dec 12 2010, 02:19 AM
gloomberg
post Dec 12 2010, 11:52 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(pokeat @ Dec 12 2010, 02:19 AM)
Its so funny looking these guys arguing for the fund manager debate biggrin.gif Oh anyway, I'm just finished my foundation/pre-u study can I join any of the internship/summer program ? I waiting for my degree starts, mostly I'll go to IB, but now I still figuring what CF, DCF, DCM are. True, at first, tot IB was like trading shares, now more to like M&A, deal, trade and sales smile.gif

Do IBs in Malaysia use the title'Analyst' ? or some other ?


Added on December 12, 2010, 2:19 amI'm ready for the boomblame !
*
u need to be at least 2 years at uni, or junior level my friend, unless u have some contacts there lo. How good is ur excel? can u create a whole FCF analysis worksheet from scratch if u're given info on them? just ask the banks la, no harm.
Aloong
post Dec 12 2010, 12:19 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(pokeat @ Dec 12 2010, 02:19 AM)
Its so funny looking these guys arguing for the fund manager debate biggrin.gif Oh anyway, I'm just finished my foundation/pre-u study can I join any of the internship/summer program ? I waiting for my degree starts, mostly I'll go to IB, but now I still figuring what CF, DCF, DCM are. True, at first, tot IB was like trading shares, now more to like M&A, deal, trade and sales smile.gif

Do IBs in Malaysia use the title'Analyst' ? or some other ?


Added on December 12, 2010, 2:19 amI'm ready for the boomblame !
*
SO u jx finix pre-u and waiting for degree huh?
i dun think u can get "analyst " title. anyway to answer ur question, on title is NO. in malaysia there's a lot diff types of title, such as analyst, executive, assistant, associate, all might have exectly same level and salarydepending on banks.

since u stillpre-u i suggest jx go for work exposure in investment bank in general, regardless of dept. cos u really have nothing to lose (except few months time) and yet banks have to pay u allowances to learn. tats pretty cool rite? if HR do ask u wat u prefer u just say front office lor. i doubt u get to learn much, lets hope u get a complicated photocopy machine, at least u learn something from there..seriously.
pokeat
post Dec 12 2010, 01:05 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
438 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Goblintown


U mean learn from a copier machine ? I heard it will get stuck always during the start n end of a deal cos lotsa slides have to printout, is tat wat u meant ? biggrin.gif will update u guys muahahaha
gloomberg
post Dec 12 2010, 01:29 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(Aloong @ Dec 12 2010, 12:19 PM)
SO u jx finix pre-u and waiting for degree huh?
i dun think u can get "analyst " title. anyway to answer ur question, on title is NO. in malaysia there's a lot diff types of title, such as analyst, executive, assistant, associate, all might have exectly same level and salarydepending on banks.

since u stillpre-u i suggest jx go for work exposure in investment bank in general, regardless of dept. cos u really have nothing to lose (except few months time) and yet banks have to pay u allowances to learn. tats pretty cool rite? if HR do ask u wat u prefer u just say front office lor. i doubt u get to learn much, lets hope u get a complicated photocopy machine, at least u learn something from there..seriously.
*
ini true story mang... no joke... ask the rest of the interns LOL
tohff7
post Dec 13 2010, 09:49 AM

FF7 GOAT
******
Senior Member
1,581 posts

Joined: Mar 2008


and learn how to operate the binding machine.
kinwing
post Dec 13 2010, 07:16 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(tohff7 @ Dec 13 2010, 09:49 AM)
and learn how to operate the binding machine.
*
Newbie might also need to know where is Bursa or SC just in case the despatch officers are not around, and newbie normally being asked to be a despatch boy when rush for urgent submission. Know who to contact and submit to when you at Bursa/SC...happy.gif!! sweat.gif
Aloong
post Dec 13 2010, 10:40 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
actually even managers send the submission.
if a piece of paper just flew away in the mid of the road, the junior will thnk jx a piece of paper no one will find out. even if find out, they would not know it disappear during my despatch whistling.gif . serve them right for trusting me and ask me to be a despatch boy!!can't care less!! muahahahaha..... brows.gif

tohff7
post Dec 14 2010, 01:20 AM

FF7 GOAT
******
Senior Member
1,581 posts

Joined: Mar 2008


and learn how to make coffee and tea.

well, just kidding.
gloomberg
post Dec 14 2010, 09:40 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(Aloong @ Dec 13 2010, 10:40 PM)
actually even managers send the submission.
if a piece of paper just flew away in the mid of the road, the junior will thnk jx a piece of paper no one will find out. even if find out, they would not know it disappear during my despatch whistling.gif . serve them right for trusting me and ask me to be a despatch boy!!can't care less!! muahahahaha..... brows.gif
*
my company got too many drivers and despatch, so they all drive me there to submit documents HAHA
mercedez, alphard, bmw, u name it they have it
entryman
post Dec 20 2010, 09:17 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,179 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(gloomberg @ Dec 14 2010, 09:40 AM)
my company got too many drivers and despatch, so they all drive me there to submit documents HAHA
mercedez, alphard, bmw, u name it they have it
*
Wah gloomberg nice to arrive in style everytime eh. rolleyes.gif

By the way, I've got something to ask all sifus here.

Applications to OSK IB Internships just opened.

The advert title is Internship Programme - OSK Investment Bank Berhad.

Didn't mention which division, not even IB, or PWM, etc.

And even if by luck or by request it happens to be their IB division, I probably won't want to venture in groups such as Islamic Banking / Private Banking (as categorised under IB on their website). Although yes these may be fast growing areas.

And in the job advert:

QUOTE
The OSK Investment Bank Internship programme provides opportunities for interns to gain practical work experience and enhance their skills, knowledge, competencies and employability in the job market. As part of the internship programme, you will be exposed to various processes and activities through on-the-job training in selected work areas within our Group of Companies. As an intern, you will be engaged to work for 2 to 6 months assisting in general administration and reporting functions


See highlighted text in red. Worthwhile to apply?

My applications toa majority of the BBs in their regional offices (SG/HK/CN) have not been answered to yet. However, also received about 30% rejection emails already. Also applied to a world renowned boutique with a branch in Malaysia, I guess you should know who (no reply from them yet).

All these were done through proper job application process to their 2011 internship openings. All the job titles were well defined, you get to choose from various divisions (e.g. IB, S&T, Research, Fixed Income, etc.), and of course, a clear cut title - Investment Banking Division (IBD), Summer Analyst.

Can recommend any other firms in Malaysia to apply to? Can't seem to find any that provide internships specifically in IBD. Probably send unsolicited emails (CV and Cover Letter attached) to the Recruitment email, seeking IBD-Summer Annalyst position?

Regards

This post has been edited by entryman: Dec 20 2010, 09:56 AM
Aloong
post Dec 21 2010, 09:23 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(entryman @ Dec 20 2010, 09:17 AM)
Wah gloomberg nice to arrive in style everytime eh.  rolleyes.gif

By the way, I've got something to ask all sifus here.

Applications to OSK IB Internships just opened.

The advert title is Internship Programme  - OSK Investment Bank Berhad.

Didn't mention which division, not even IB, or PWM, etc.

And even if by luck or by request it happens to be their IB division, I probably won't want to venture in groups such as Islamic Banking / Private Banking (as categorised under IB on their website). Although yes these may be fast growing areas.

And in the job advert:
See highlighted text in red. Worthwhile to apply?

My applications toa majority of the BBs in their regional offices (SG/HK/CN) have not been answered to yet. However, also received about 30% rejection emails already. Also applied to a world renowned boutique with a branch in Malaysia, I guess you should know who (no reply from them yet).

All these were done through proper job application process to their 2011 internship openings. All the job titles were well defined, you get to choose from various divisions (e.g. IB, S&T, Research, Fixed Income, etc.), and of course, a clear cut title - Investment Banking Division (IBD), Summer Analyst.

Can recommend any other firms in Malaysia to apply to? Can't seem to find any that provide internships specifically in IBD. Probably send unsolicited emails (CV and Cover Letter attached) to the Recruitment email, seeking IBD-Summer Annalyst position?

Regards
*
Beggers can't be choosers mah.
Actually it's just an internship lar, no choice thattime justtake it lor, rather than sit at home mah.
evrybody knows trainees/interns just do photocopying so whichever dept no diff. no diff even if ur in bigger/famous banks.
most impt is attitude and patience. Dun look at the first few yrs so big, it's nothing, it's just ur general working experience and learn how to be adult, learn how to interact w serious ppl and how to b responsible.




entryman
post Dec 22 2010, 10:40 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,179 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Aloong @ Dec 21 2010, 09:23 PM)
Beggers can't be choosers mah.
Actually it's just an internship lar, no choice thattime justtake it lor, rather than sit at home mah.
evrybody knows trainees/interns just do photocopying so whichever dept no diff. no diff even if ur in bigger/famous banks.
most impt is attitude and patience. Dun look at the first few yrs so big, it's nothing, it's just ur general working experience and learn how to be adult, learn how to interact w serious ppl and how to b responsible.
*
Hmm, from reading intern experiences online, most internships at IBs in the US (specifically BB) will require you to work a lot with spreadsheets (preferable), or pitching (not so preferable). And the least preferred one: admin work, if you're not trusted/liked by the analysts.

So based on what you've just said, I believe the "photocopying taking up the bulk of your experience" scenario applies to Asia as a whole? Meaning it's also the same if you're in a BB branch in Asia? And based on what you said, I guess it's a confirmed yes if I'm talking about Malaysian IBs.... yawn.gif

Well, I've been to a few internships and I never had to do any photocopying, lucky me sweat.gif

So you're recommending I just enter and take the photocopying job in a bank like OSK?
Not sure how it would help me, since I'll have nothing to talk about the role in future interviews. Considering I have some slightly solid stuff to talk that came from my previous internships (non-finance), could this role dilute my "net worth"?

Interviewer:"Hmm.., so tell me, what did you do during the internship at OSK?" rclxub.gif photocopying, and perhaps not even in the IB division.

Anyway, besides the internship, does the same scene apply to first year analysts at local IBs? I'm trying to weigh the options between (i) applying to local IB analyst roles as fresh graduate, or (ii) going for a pre-experience masters in finance at a prestigious biz school and apply to BBs as fresh graduate.

One of the decision factors is also whether I'm getting into a good internship programme or not. In the event that I don't get into any of the regional BB branches that I've applied to, and no good internship programmes are available in Malaysia, I'll probably just stay home and study for the GMAT which is a prerequisite to the masters in finance. Therefore if you can confirm, all internships in Malaysian IBs will only be focused on photocopying 99% of the time, then I guess that's one question eliminated.

What are your views/comments? Don't need to be modest biggrin.gif.

This post has been edited by entryman: Dec 22 2010, 12:58 PM
ArSe-SeNG
post Dec 22 2010, 01:32 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: Oct 2009


Just my two cents.

If you meet people who are really professional in their work conduct, I dont think you will ever face the problem of doing photocopying only. I think what you need to do is to gain their trust that you can do much more than photocopying.

And it does not do justice to say that interns do photocopying 99% of the time, to the employers and to the interns themself. I previously worked with an intern who helped out on marketing materials. It just depends where you interned at I guess.
TSconfused*88*
post Dec 22 2010, 05:12 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
I strongly disagree with the view that interns do photocopying 99% of the time. During my intern, I don't recall doing any photocopy work.
I'm pretty happy with what I did and learnt during my intern at a local Msian IB. Sometimes u can even contribute in discussions. Take note that I joined during a relatively quiet period.
I guess it depends on your attitude and your seniors' willingness to hand down work or teach you.
entryman
post Dec 22 2010, 06:33 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,179 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


Thanks to the both of you. Appreciate your viewpoints. Therefore I guess it's more of a place & time, rather than industry.

So the only way to confirm this is during the interview when they brief about the role? What if I find that (during the briefing) it's not what I want? How does one go about this? Sorry, never had a real interview before, for all my internships I knew what I would be going to do.

confused*88* do you mind sharing your internship experience?
which firm, which department, and what exactly did you do?
would like to know more.

This post has been edited by entryman: Dec 22 2010, 08:00 PM
Knight_2008
post Dec 22 2010, 06:36 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(confused*88* @ Dec 22 2010, 05:12 PM)
I strongly disagree with the view that interns do photocopying 99% of the time. During my intern, I don't recall doing any photocopy work.
I'm pretty happy with what I did and learnt during my intern at a local Msian IB. Sometimes u can even contribute in discussions. Take note that I joined during a relatively quiet period.
I guess it depends on your attitude and your seniors' willingness to hand down work or teach you.
*
sorry to interrupt; but may I ask which IB u went? would u think is it more interestig to work in CIMB IB or OSK?
Aloong
post Dec 23 2010, 09:14 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
ok, 99% photocopying is a bit exagerating and maybe not photcopying, but wat i meant is admin and mundane work.
Very low chances intern will get to do some value adding work, cos they dun have work experiences.

if the senior are free, then u may be lucky can give u some "important" work and guide u precisely.
Otherwise if they are busy (where hiugh chances they are), why give u do some important work, have to guide u, coirrect u, monitor, etc which takes about 2hrs of my time, while i do it takes 1 hr only. unless u convince ur senior u know how to do, u can complete it real fast and prove to them.

It's about taking chances on u.

i dun think it's industry or foreign or local.
its whether its busy environment/stress level + of course type of senior.

So stil, back to "beggers can't be chooser" let take wat u have. of course if u have foreign bank offering u, take it. if not osk beter than nothing.
entryman
post Dec 24 2010, 12:38 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,179 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


QUOTE(Aloong @ Dec 23 2010, 09:14 PM)
ok, 99% photocopying is a bit exagerating and maybe not photcopying, but wat i meant is admin and mundane work.
Very low chances intern will get to do some value adding work, cos they dun have work experiences.

if the senior are free, then u may be lucky can give u some "important" work and guide u precisely.
Otherwise if they are busy (where hiugh chances they are), why give u do some important work, have to guide u, coirrect u, monitor, etc which takes about 2hrs of my time, while i do it takes 1 hr only. unless u convince ur senior u know how to do, u can complete it real fast and prove to them.

It's about taking chances on u.

i dun think it's industry or foreign or local.
its whether its busy environment/stress level + of course type of senior.

So stil, back to "beggers can't be chooser" let take wat u have. of course if u have foreign bank offering u, take it. if not osk beter than nothing.
*
Hmm, so what's best to leverage the internship?

Should I be learning up some important spreadsheet models and excel shortcuts before I attend any internship?

Asking because I read in a popular premium IB internship guide that you don't need to do that at all. Because when you enter, they're going to teach you what you need to know, and even after they teach you, they won't expect you to know much of anything. Therefore that coincides with what you mentioned about not being able to work on the actual work, i.e. the analysts won't give me any work.

So based on the above, it's pretty much a waste of time learning up stuff first. Might as well relax, prepare your clothing, look good, and perhaps do some networking. Also what was recommended was that I could learn some ppt and excel presentation skills, which would be much more worthwhile than learning spreadsheets and models.

What do you think? Back to the question of how best to leverage the internship.
Princess90
post Jan 27 2011, 11:48 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
289 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


I am also interested in the IB career. Just want to ask, if I start off in Big 4 Accounting firm then jump to IB, is it possible?
And is it better to do audit or tax before trying to get into IB?


Thanks.
kinwing
post Jan 28 2011, 05:35 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Princess90 @ Jan 27 2011, 11:48 AM)
I am also interested in the IB career. Just want to ask, if I start off in Big 4 Accounting firm then jump to IB, is it possible?
And is it better to do audit or tax before trying to get into IB?
Thanks.
*
What department of IB you want to work for? If you want to work as a remisier or a HR-exec in an IB, no point to start in Big 4.

This post has been edited by kinwing: Jan 28 2011, 05:35 PM
Aloong
post Jan 28 2011, 08:22 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(Princess90 @ Jan 27 2011, 11:48 AM)
I am also interested in the IB career. Just want to ask, if I start off in Big 4 Accounting firm then jump to IB, is it possible?
And is it better to do audit or tax before trying to get into IB?
Thanks.
*
Start off at big4 then go to IB. Definitely possible, but not necessarynowadays. If ur good and lucky u may land directly in IB without goin thru the big4 route.

To go into IB audit higher chance than tax.

Im assuming u dun mean goin into HR or remisier of an IB,like above mentioned.

Knight_2008
post Jan 28 2011, 08:52 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(Aloong @ Jan 28 2011, 08:22 PM)
Start off at big4 then go to IB. Definitely possible, but not necessarynowadays. If ur good and lucky u may land directly in IB without goin thru the big4 route.

To go into IB audit higher chance than tax.

Im assuming u dun mean goin into HR or remisier of an IB,like above mentioned.
*
if I wanna be an analyst, should directly go to local IB or go through the big 4 route first? (assuming my intention is to work in a IB in financial powerhouse like singapore or HK)
Aloong
post Jan 29 2011, 08:32 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Jan 28 2011, 08:52 PM)
if I wanna be an analyst, should directly go to local IB or go through the big 4 route first? (assuming my intention is to work in a IB in financial powerhouse like singapore or HK)
*
No nid to think so complicated.
Simple,

If im employing a senior analyst from HK/SG/Msia and i got 2 candidate:
1) 6yrs experience as analyst from msia
2) 3yrs audit + 3yrs analyst msia

I will definitelt choose (1)

Of course this assume all other things are the same, like studies, attitude, etc etc
Knight_2008
post Jan 29 2011, 11:42 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
thanks smile.gif
gloomberg
post Jan 30 2011, 01:55 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


analyst usually refers to???? those in the research house... r u sure that's what u wanna do???? One of the toughest places to get in is as an analyst in those top brokerage house (RHB,CIMB,OSK,Hwang DBS). An ordinary or the lowest post in IB is usually called an associate, not sure what u guys are referring to...
Knight_2008
post Jan 30 2011, 02:10 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Jan 30 2011, 01:55 AM)
analyst usually refers to???? those in the research house... r u sure that's what u wanna do???? One of the toughest places to get in is as an analyst in those top brokerage house (RHB,CIMB,OSK,Hwang DBS). An ordinary or the lowest post in IB is usually called an associate, not sure what u guys are referring to...
*
i think associate is higher rank than analyst
HawkreiN
post Jan 30 2011, 11:10 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
344 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(Aloong @ Jan 29 2011, 08:32 PM)
No nid to think so complicated.
Simple,

If im employing a senior analyst from HK/SG/Msia and i got 2 candidate:
1) 6yrs experience as analyst from msia
2) 3yrs audit + 3yrs analyst msia

I will definitelt choose (1)

Of course this assume all other things are the same, like studies, attitude, etc etc
*
So how would one get the analyst experience as a fresh grad? I am assuming that it is preferred to apply to local tier 1 directly for the position of analyst rather than through the Management Trainee programs?
gloomberg
post Jan 30 2011, 01:31 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Jan 30 2011, 02:10 AM)
i think associate is higher rank than analyst
*
it varies all across different IBs for ur info. at OSK, entry is called associate, at ASEAM, it's analyst. It's a very broad designation.

I have no idea what analyst u guys are referring to because usually it would refer to those ppl who writes for research houses, well, at least at my area.

so u if u have any queries, try speaking to someone who is already in the line, try attending conferences, seminars, etc. don't speak as if u really know it. but well, it's up to u to decide whether im pulling ur leg or not.


Added on January 30, 2011, 1:43 pm
QUOTE(HawkreiN @ Jan 30 2011, 11:10 AM)
So how would one get the analyst experience as a fresh grad? I am assuming that it is preferred to apply to local tier 1 directly for the position of analyst rather than through the Management Trainee programs?
*
applying via mgmt trainee would be better la, it gives u an all-rounded experience, in addition to all the invaluable trainings u'll get. Getting directly as an analyst would do u no good, as u have no prior experience and that u have nothing (knowledge,experience,mentality) to back u up when u're working in a firm. Just remember that this is WORK, and at IBs, they expect u to know everything before u go in, else figure out ur own solution. In instances where u have totally no idea how to act on a task + nobody is willing to help(it's common at IBs, it's competitive), what would u do if u know NO ONE from similar industry or somewhat closely related industry to help? CRY? No ma right?

Well, of course u'll constantly have meet new acquaintances along the way, but are u forming alliances at the same time? Yes? No? this is all I can say for now. U'll understand as u strive to move along the corporate ladder. Ciaoz and good luck. Just know what u want before u make up ur mind

This post has been edited by gloomberg: Jan 30 2011, 01:43 PM
Knight_2008
post Jan 30 2011, 03:43 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Jan 30 2011, 01:31 PM)
it varies all across different IBs for ur info. at OSK, entry is called associate, at ASEAM, it's analyst. It's a very broad designation.

I have no idea what analyst u guys are referring to because usually it would refer to those ppl who writes for research houses, well, at least at my area.

so u if u have any queries, try speaking to someone who is already in the line, try attending conferences, seminars, etc. don't speak as if u really know it. but well, it's up to u to decide whether im pulling ur leg or not.


Added on January 30, 2011, 1:43 pm

applying via mgmt trainee would be better la, it gives u an all-rounded experience, in addition to all the invaluable trainings u'll get. Getting directly as an analyst would do u no good, as u have no prior experience and that u have nothing (knowledge,experience,mentality) to back u up when u're working in a firm. Just remember that this is WORK, and at IBs, they expect u to know everything before u go in, else figure out ur own solution. In instances where u have totally no idea how to act on a task + nobody is willing to help(it's common at IBs, it's competitive), what would u do if u know NO ONE from similar industry or somewhat closely related industry to help? CRY? No ma right?

Well, of course u'll constantly have meet new acquaintances along the way, but are u forming alliances at the same time? Yes? No? this is all I can say for now. U'll understand as u strive to move along the corporate ladder. Ciaoz and good luck. Just know what u want before u make up ur mind
*
from what my friend told me (not sure correct or not), associate and analyst can both be entry position i think. if u enter with a bachelor degree, then u enter as analyst. if u got a mba or postgrad, then u enter as associate. i always tot everyone in IB is called by these title sweat.gif . just the department varies like research house, corporate finance, ecm, dcm etc

anyhow, the one i wish to enter is research department and corporate finance. any advice on how to get into these departments?
gloomberg
post Jan 30 2011, 05:06 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Jan 30 2011, 03:43 PM)
from what my friend told me (not sure correct or not), associate and analyst can both be entry position i think. if u enter with a bachelor degree, then u enter as analyst. if u got a mba or postgrad, then u enter as associate. i always tot everyone in IB is called by these title sweat.gif . just the department varies like research house, corporate finance, ecm, dcm etc

anyhow, the one i wish to enter is research department and corporate finance. any advice on how to get into these departments?
*
two departments that are very high in demand (by employees). CF = $ + multiple bonuses. Research = u really need to have some sort of industrial experience, unless of course u have excellent academic result cuz well its research so they require ppl who are highly analytical and aptitude. Pay wise, not too bad, and it depends on how good is ur recommendation. For example, in CIMB, their head is someone by the name Terence Wong and whenever that dude launches a coverage on certain company or providing a buy recommendation on a certain stock, most of the time it will go up (This is what speculators/dealers told me). When the price of that particular stock increases for the next, for say 6-10 months, then WOOT! Apa lagi, u naik pangkat (like Morningstar) cuz u're always chasing to provide good recommendations and at the same time knowing the industry well enough to identify market trends and when it will perform best or worst. If your predictions is bagus, u'll have ur followers, and that takes time, which is why they prefer someone from the industry itself.

Not necessarily from the Acct (audit) or Fin track though, Engineering (oil&gas, power generation, construction) would do, or if you're from FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods), Retail, etc, it will do as well. Well, as the name suggests, Research, u are actually doing in-depth analysis substantiated with solid assumptions/facts/opinions backed by data/experience. Pre-req: Excellent writing skills, someone who has wide network coverage (helps at job), and has passion to provide good recommendation and not just scribbling on the MS Word.

CF, hmmmmmmmm.... Manyak susah oh....if u get in as freshie i congratulate u lar, but u'll have a hard time there. Learning curve is steep, and it's NOT just about NUMBERS. Compliance, law, rules/regulations is an important aspect, cuz u're actually designing an agreement to allow corp to get IPO, acquire, privatize, raise debt, etc and ultimately ensuring that u get what they want. Itu dipanggil origination, sangat tedious, u work relentlessly as ur clients shoot u for every single small crap u do.

Unless of course u wanna go to CF departments of some small IBs like Public, Affin, etc. Then u stand a better chance, cuz well, i dun think they will or can hire ppl that has experience in this field (if you can't deals like AmInvest, CIMB, RHB, Morgan Stanley, why bother hiring capable ppl?).

Well, I'm giving u the realistic side of the story, the rest is up to u to decide. Consequently, u are the one who will carve the path in your life, and if u think that nothing can stop u from achieving what u want, then go ahead, but take heed that there is no turning back, or u'll regret for the rest of ur life.
Knight_2008
post Jan 30 2011, 05:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Jan 30 2011, 05:06 PM)
two departments that are very high in demand (by employees). CF = $ + multiple bonuses. Research = u really need to have some sort of industrial experience, unless of course u have excellent academic result cuz well its research so they require ppl who are highly analytical and aptitude. Pay wise, not too bad, and it depends on how good is ur recommendation. For example, in CIMB, their head is someone by the name Terence Wong and whenever that dude launches a coverage on certain company or providing a buy recommendation on a certain stock, most of the time it will go up (This is what speculators/dealers told me). When the price of that particular stock increases for the next, for say 6-10 months, then WOOT! Apa lagi, u naik pangkat (like Morningstar) cuz u're always chasing to provide good recommendations and at the same time knowing the industry well enough to identify market trends and when it will perform best or worst. If your predictions is bagus, u'll have ur followers, and that takes time, which is why they prefer someone from the industry itself.

Not necessarily from the Acct (audit) or Fin track though, Engineering (oil&gas, power generation, construction) would do, or if you're from FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods), Retail, etc, it will do as well. Well, as the name suggests, Research, u are actually doing in-depth analysis substantiated with solid assumptions/facts/opinions backed by data/experience. Pre-req: Excellent writing skills, someone who has wide network coverage (helps at job), and has passion to provide good recommendation and not just scribbling on the MS Word.

CF, hmmmmmmmm.... Manyak susah oh....if u get in as freshie i congratulate u lar, but u'll have a hard time there. Learning curve is steep, and it's NOT just about NUMBERS. Compliance, law, rules/regulations is an important aspect, cuz u're actually designing an agreement to allow corp to get IPO, acquire, privatize, raise debt, etc and ultimately ensuring that u get what they want. Itu dipanggil origination, sangat tedious, u work relentlessly as ur clients shoot u for every single small crap u do.

Unless of course u wanna go to CF departments of some small IBs like Public, Affin, etc. Then u stand a better chance, cuz well, i dun think they will or can hire ppl that has experience in this field (if you can't deals like AmInvest, CIMB, RHB, Morgan Stanley, why bother hiring capable ppl?).

Well, I'm giving u the realistic side of the story, the rest is up to u to decide. Consequently, u are the one who will carve the path in your life, and if u think that nothing can stop u from achieving what u want, then go ahead, but take heed that there is no turning back, or u'll regret for the rest of ur life.
*
thanks for the advice. but apart from the steep learning curve, what is the possible scenario that may make me regret for the rest of my life? just want to know the downside to this path. thanks smile.gif
tohff7
post Jan 30 2011, 09:36 PM

FF7 GOAT
******
Senior Member
1,581 posts

Joined: Mar 2008


QUOTE(gloomberg @ Jan 30 2011, 05:06 PM)
two departments that are very high in demand (by employees). CF = $ + multiple bonuses. Research = u really need to have some sort of industrial experience, unless of course u have excellent academic result cuz well its research so they require ppl who are highly analytical and aptitude. Pay wise, not too bad, and it depends on how good is ur recommendation. For example, in CIMB, their head is someone by the name Terence Wong and whenever that dude launches a coverage on certain company or providing a buy recommendation on a certain stock, most of the time it will go up (This is what speculators/dealers told me). When the price of that particular stock increases for the next, for say 6-10 months, then WOOT! Apa lagi, u naik pangkat (like Morningstar) cuz u're always chasing to provide good recommendations and at the same time knowing the industry well enough to identify market trends and when it will perform best or worst. If your predictions is bagus, u'll have ur followers, and that takes time, which is why they prefer someone from the industry itself.
*
CIMB got their own prop desk. And not all stocks are written by the head. Even if the report is his name, it could done by his analyst who just don't have SC license yet.
Princess90
post Jan 30 2011, 10:59 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
289 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(kinwing @ Jan 28 2011, 05:35 PM)
What department of IB you want to work for? If you want to work as a remisier or a HR-exec in an IB, no point to start in Big 4.
*
No. I am not. Aiming to work in Corporate Finance or Equity Market.
Hoping to start off in IB as analyst then associate and slowly move my way up.


Added on January 30, 2011, 11:03 pm
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Jan 30 2011, 01:31 PM)
it varies all across different IBs for ur info. at OSK, entry is called associate, at ASEAM, it's analyst. It's a very broad designation.

I have no idea what analyst u guys are referring to because usually it would refer to those ppl who writes for research houses, well, at least at my area.

so u if u have any queries, try speaking to someone who is already in the line, try attending conferences, seminars, etc. don't speak as if u really know it. but well, it's up to u to decide whether im pulling ur leg or not.


Added on January 30, 2011, 1:43 pm

applying via mgmt trainee would be better la, it gives u an all-rounded experience, in addition to all the invaluable trainings u'll get. Getting directly as an analyst would do u no good, as u have no prior experience and that u have nothing (knowledge,experience,mentality) to back u up when u're working in a firm. Just remember that this is WORK, and at IBs, they expect u to know everything before u go in, else figure out ur own solution. In instances where u have totally no idea how to act on a task + nobody is willing to help(it's common at IBs, it's competitive), what would u do if u know NO ONE from similar industry or somewhat closely related industry to help? CRY? No ma right?

Well, of course u'll constantly have meet new acquaintances along the way, but are u forming alliances at the same time? Yes? No? this is all I can say for now. U'll understand as u strive to move along the corporate ladder. Ciaoz and good luck. Just know what u want before u make up ur mind
*
But I thought if go through management trainee, chances are you will end up in commercial banking?
Or it is still possible to end up in IB?


Added on January 30, 2011, 11:16 pm
QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Jan 30 2011, 02:10 AM)
i think associate is higher rank than analyst
*
Entering as an associate requires a masters/CFA.
Analyst only requires a Bachelor degree.
Higher rank or not, I am not too sure.

Hopefully we get some IBers to post here for more info smile.gif

This post has been edited by Princess90: Jan 30 2011, 11:29 PM
Aloong
post Jan 31 2011, 12:30 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(Princess90 @ Jan 30 2011, 10:59 PM)
No. I am not. Aiming to work in Corporate Finance or Equity Market.
Hoping to start off in IB as analyst then associate and slowly move my way up.


Added on January 30, 2011, 11:03 pm

But I thought if go through management trainee, chances are you will end up in commercial banking?
Or it is still possible to end up in IB?


Added on January 30, 2011, 11:16 pm

Entering as an associate requires a masters/CFA.
Analyst only requires a Bachelor degree.
Higher rank or not, I am not too sure.

Hopefully we get some IBers to post here for more info smile.gif
*
Analyst or associate, it doesn't really matter.
since u freshie, if they give u one of it over another, whichever isit, does it affect ur decision to take it iurely because of the title name. doesn't matter, ur just freshie.

watever explanation u reciv up there/google/any other reading, is good enuf to give u a feel.
but it will only give u 10% of the pic. the best way to know about the jobis to do it.

So lets not worry, still young go in and bang ur head, make the wrong decisions, and learn from it.
just join whichever u feel u like. after experience, think about it further. life is long that 2-3yrs of of work is no big deal. what ever u do will not go to waste.
if u think u wana be CF/research just go for it directly, provided u can get in lar. no nid to go thru audit, engineering, fmcg, etc.


Princess90
post Jan 31 2011, 09:16 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
289 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(Aloong @ Jan 31 2011, 12:30 AM)
Analyst or associate, it doesn't really matter.
since u freshie, if they give u one of it over another, whichever isit, does it affect ur decision to take it iurely because of the title name. doesn't matter, ur just freshie.

watever explanation u reciv up there/google/any other reading, is good enuf to give u a feel.
but it will only give u 10% of the pic. the best way to know about the jobis to do it.

So lets not worry, still young go in and bang ur head, make the wrong decisions, and learn from it.
just join whichever u feel u like. after experience, think about it further. life is long that 2-3yrs of of work is no big deal. what ever u do will not go to waste.
if u think u wana be  CF/research just go for it directly, provided u can get in lar. no nid to go thru audit, engineering, fmcg, etc.
*
Its not that we don't want to get into it directly. Who doesn't? But chances of getting in directly is slim. Therefore, we need other ways to get in.

Thanks for your advice and it does not affect me what post it is as long as it gets me started in IB.

I am just asking for ways to get into IB here since most people get in due to networking and not just purely bt good results and those extra activities.

Thank you.
Aloong
post Jan 31 2011, 11:45 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(Princess90 @ Jan 31 2011, 09:16 AM)
Its not that we don't want to get into it directly. Who doesn't? But chances of getting in directly is slim. Therefore, we need other ways to get in.

Thanks for your advice and it does not affect me what post it is as long as it gets me started in IB.

I am just asking for ways to get into IB here since most people get in due to networking and not just purely bt good results and those extra activities.

Thank you.
*
wat i know is, there are freshies go in as graudate trainee / mgmt trainee, in investment bank like like rhb, kfh, public, alliance,
that would be the first choice to go in.
if cannot get then only try big4 lor.


Princess90
post Jan 31 2011, 01:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
289 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(Aloong @ Jan 31 2011, 11:45 AM)
wat i know is, there are freshies go in as graudate trainee / mgmt trainee, in investment bank like like rhb, kfh, public, alliance, 
that would be the first choice to go in.
if cannot get then only try big4 lor.
*
Thanks for the info smile.gif
Knight_2008
post Jan 31 2011, 02:54 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Jan 30 2011, 05:06 PM)
two departments that are very high in demand (by employees). CF = $ + multiple bonuses. Research = u really need to have some sort of industrial experience, unless of course u have excellent academic result cuz well its research so they require ppl who are highly analytical and aptitude. Pay wise, not too bad, and it depends on how good is ur recommendation. For example, in CIMB, their head is someone by the name Terence Wong and whenever that dude launches a coverage on certain company or providing a buy recommendation on a certain stock, most of the time it will go up (This is what speculators/dealers told me). When the price of that particular stock increases for the next, for say 6-10 months, then WOOT! Apa lagi, u naik pangkat (like Morningstar) cuz u're always chasing to provide good recommendations and at the same time knowing the industry well enough to identify market trends and when it will perform best or worst. If your predictions is bagus, u'll have ur followers, and that takes time, which is why they prefer someone from the industry itself.

Not necessarily from the Acct (audit) or Fin track though, Engineering (oil&gas, power generation, construction) would do, or if you're from FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods), Retail, etc, it will do as well. Well, as the name suggests, Research, u are actually doing in-depth analysis substantiated with solid assumptions/facts/opinions backed by data/experience. Pre-req: Excellent writing skills, someone who has wide network coverage (helps at job), and has passion to provide good recommendation and not just scribbling on the MS Word.

CF, hmmmmmmmm.... Manyak susah oh....if u get in as freshie i congratulate u lar, but u'll have a hard time there. Learning curve is steep, and it's NOT just about NUMBERS. Compliance, law, rules/regulations is an important aspect, cuz u're actually designing an agreement to allow corp to get IPO, acquire, privatize, raise debt, etc and ultimately ensuring that u get what they want. Itu dipanggil origination, sangat tedious, u work relentlessly as ur clients shoot u for every single small crap u do.

Unless of course u wanna go to CF departments of some small IBs like Public, Affin, etc. Then u stand a better chance, cuz well, i dun think they will or can hire ppl that has experience in this field (if you can't deals like AmInvest, CIMB, RHB, Morgan Stanley, why bother hiring capable ppl?).

Well, I'm giving u the realistic side of the story, the rest is up to u to decide. Consequently, u are the one who will carve the path in your life, and if u think that nothing can stop u from achieving what u want, then go ahead, but take heed that there is no turning back, or u'll regret for the rest of ur life.
*
if i got into research department of Khazanah, would the working experience there be transferable to working in big IB/ foreign IB?

Princess90
post Jan 31 2011, 03:10 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
289 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Jan 31 2011, 02:54 PM)
if i got into research department of Khazanah, would the working experience there be transferable to working in big IB/ foreign IB?
*
OMG. U got into Khazanah?
Knight_2008
post Jan 31 2011, 03:35 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(Princess90 @ Jan 31 2011, 03:10 PM)
OMG. U got into Khazanah?
*
nola..still got long time till graduation ...i just asking only...maybe try to apply in the futurecause i heard some of high school seniors got into it

anyway, do u think it the experience there will be useful?
Frankmiller92
post Jan 31 2011, 04:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
113 posts

Joined: May 2010


Hello, I am currently a student and I want to seek some advice from some of you professionals. Do you need to be a MATHEMMATICAL genius to work in corporate finance or in an investment bank? thx coz maths is my achillies heel.
jasperng
post Jan 31 2011, 07:20 PM

- Eminent Leader -
******
Senior Member
1,264 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia



Hi, What are the top IB and CF companies in Msia ? also do you think sg companies in this industry will hire freshers form msia O_O ?
Knight_2008
post Jan 31 2011, 07:22 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(jasperng @ Jan 31 2011, 07:20 PM)
Hi, What are the top IB and CF companies in Msia ? also do you think sg companies in this industry will hire freshers form msia O_O ?
*
i also want to know about this. can any people from the industry care to elaborate?
gloomberg
post Jan 31 2011, 11:35 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


i got a colleague who got into Khazanah. He's from CF. Well, if u wanna know more, go ask the ppl from the field itself lor... aiyoyo... keep guessing and see where u'll end up at. That's my next destination, if things is in my favor.

No need to be maths genius, cuz if u are, i suggest actuarial science or physics. Top cf companies, banyak, all those big conglomerate lor, mana lagi. Apply those companies lor.

As what I've mentioned before, if u all dun mind, apply for small small IB lor, sure no prob. the interview process is a breeze for me, i came late for all four stages, but got offer (affin mgmt trainee). but im at another company though.


Knight_2008
post Jan 31 2011, 11:57 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Jan 31 2011, 11:35 PM)
i got a colleague who got into Khazanah. He's from CF. Well, if u wanna know more, go ask the ppl from the field itself lor... aiyoyo... keep guessing and see where u'll end up at. That's my next destination, if things is in my favor.

No need to be maths genius, cuz if u are, i suggest actuarial science or physics. Top cf companies, banyak, all those big conglomerate lor, mana lagi. Apply those companies lor.

As what I've mentioned before, if u all dun mind, apply for small small IB lor, sure no prob. the interview process is a breeze for me, i came late for all four stages, but got offer (affin mgmt trainee). but im at another company though.
*
icic..so is asset management firm like khazanah and icap a good training ground for research? cause ppl told me sell side research much more intense..
gloomberg
post Feb 1 2011, 12:16 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Jan 31 2011, 11:57 PM)
icic..so is asset management firm like khazanah and icap a good training ground for research? cause ppl told me sell side research much more intense..
*
those brokerage one is research lor... wrote so long dunno for wat...
khazanah has an investment team as big as 100ppl, wat do u expect? not really asset management la, they have no clients, since they are the client. they just buy buy buy, GLC, apa lagi, semua bagus punye sapu. Syed Mokhtar, powderful man. The latest MMC one is under him lor, Gamuda JV with MMC just cuz they have the $$$ (funding). read more man, then u'll know more.

Icap itu apa? Tan Teng Boo wan is it? He's a joker lar, they are a lot of good investors out there in malaysia, it's just that they don't show off that much. thought his own firm so grand lol, jaguh kampung.

just study hard at school, and u'll reap the benefits later.
Knight_2008
post Feb 1 2011, 12:18 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
haha..thanks for the advice smile.gif butwhat do u imply with khazanah having 100+ ppl in investment research dept? do u mean good or bad as a training ground?

This post has been edited by Knight_2008: Feb 1 2011, 12:19 AM
azazeal0627
post Feb 1 2011, 12:29 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
69 posts

Joined: Mar 2010


i really like doing CF... never get the opportunity to venture into CF area.. currently im working with asset management as investment analyst.. wonder.. is it viable for analyst to jump into CF.. any bright advice?
Knight_2008
post Feb 1 2011, 12:31 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(azazeal0627 @ Feb 1 2011, 12:29 AM)
i really like doing CF... never get the opportunity to venture into CF area.. currently im working with asset management as investment analyst.. wonder.. is it viable for analyst to jump into CF.. any bright advice?
*
wow..which firm? is working in asset management firm a starting point or training ground?
azazeal0627
post Feb 1 2011, 12:43 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
69 posts

Joined: Mar 2010


im manulife asset mgt.. a small firm only.. im actually a freshie.. im doing credit analysis.. still learning ma..
gloomberg
post Feb 1 2011, 09:24 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Feb 1 2011, 12:18 AM)
haha..thanks for the advice smile.gif butwhat do u imply with khazanah having 100+ ppl in investment research dept? do u mean good or bad as a training ground?
*
haha, what i would think is that, if u have no prior experience, plz dun get into huge firms as that as the competition would be super intense. Imagine so many ppl doing the same thing although they are placed with a different portfolio. Mampuih, remember during ur high school time? Competing for no.1? If u managed to survive high school, and college, and it should be fine for u. It's definitely not sth for the faint-hearted.

100+ppl cuz their asset base is besar! i mean, RM75B man, obviously they need a huge team. I think for starters, it really depends on ur asset mgmt firm also, cuz every organization have very very different culture and working attitude. PIMCO, Blackstone, ini besar besar punye firm, have a very huge team as well. Credit la, economist la, fixed income la, quantitative la, derivatives la, macam2 pun ada, and of course take note they are very specialized in what they are doing. Doing what they do best, so to speak. But, if you can't see the overall picture of what's going on around u, it'll be quite hard to proceed once u are specialized too much.

So what I would suggest is that although doing a job that isn't specialized at the beginning (usually pay lower), u'll gain the benefits later. At least that's my plan. Others may have different opinion. and im still young <23 years old.
Knight_2008
post Feb 1 2011, 11:07 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Feb 1 2011, 09:24 AM)
haha, what i would think is that, if u have no prior experience, plz dun get into huge firms as that as the competition would be super intense. Imagine so many ppl doing the same thing although they are placed with a different portfolio. Mampuih, remember during ur high school time? Competing for no.1? If u managed to survive high school, and college, and it should be fine for u. It's definitely not sth for the faint-hearted.

100+ppl cuz their asset base is besar! i mean, RM75B man, obviously they need a huge team. I think for starters, it really depends on ur asset mgmt firm also, cuz every organization have very very different culture and working attitude. PIMCO, Blackstone, ini besar besar punye firm, have a very huge team as well. Credit la, economist la, fixed income la, quantitative la, derivatives la, macam2 pun ada, and of course take note they are very specialized in what they are doing. Doing what they do best, so to speak. But, if you can't see the overall picture of what's going on around u, it'll be quite hard to proceed once u are specialized too much.

So what I would suggest is that although doing a job that isn't specialized at the beginning (usually pay lower), u'll gain the benefits later. At least that's my plan. Others may have different opinion. and im still young <23 years old.
*
noted. Thanks for your advice. really appreciated it smile.gif
azazeal0627
post Feb 1 2011, 12:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
69 posts

Joined: Mar 2010


can anyone give me some advice regarding my question earlier?

kelvin_tan
post Feb 2 2011, 08:19 AM

Passion for Pipping!
*******
Senior Member
3,141 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


@gloomberg
Hahahah.. you got into affin management trainee NOT BY SHEER LUCK smile.gif

There's always a reason why someone gets a specific position ESPECIALLY IB / Treasury. They will not hire any tom d!ck and harry in these 2 positions as it involves huge amounts of money.

Let the public know ur education credentials and it wont seem like such a surprise anymore.

Also, the manner that you carry yourself is positively unique which may potray a very good image to your prospective employers. Probably the 2 points I mentioned contributed deerly to you being able to secure a position in IB / Treasury.


Added on February 2, 2011, 8:22 am@azazeal
I believe the experience you get in manulife will only contribute minorly to your ability to secure a position in the IB's. Banks vs Insurance comps are different.

However don't let that dishearten you. Fresh graduates are able to secure positions in CF I don't see why a person that has some experience should fail (unless you aim for a senior position, in which case you will fail).

I would suggest do your homework in order to increase your chances of employment. If not mistaken there are 2 or 3 papers that needs to be passed in order to work in CF.

What modules are those again? Anyone can help enlighten azazeal?

This post has been edited by kelvin_tan: Feb 2 2011, 08:22 AM
Knight_2008
post Feb 2 2011, 10:26 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(kelvin_tan @ Feb 2 2011, 08:19 AM)
@gloomberg
Hahahah.. you got into affin management trainee NOT BY SHEER LUCK smile.gif

There's always a reason why someone gets a specific position ESPECIALLY IB  / Treasury. They will not hire any tom d!ck and harry in these 2 positions as it involves huge amounts of money.

Let the public know ur education credentials and it wont seem like such a surprise anymore.

Also, the manner that you carry yourself is positively unique which may potray a very good image to your prospective employers. Probably the 2 points I mentioned contributed deerly to you being able to secure a position in IB / Treasury.
treasury deals with how to utilised the bank's money when there is excess liquidity and how to get money when there are not enough liquidity right?

would the job be like a trader as u get to think of way to best utilised the banks money by buying different short term securities? Anyway, which department usually have a higher bonuses? treasury or research?
kelvin_tan
post Feb 2 2011, 10:34 AM

Passion for Pipping!
*******
Senior Member
3,141 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


@knight_2008
I wouldnt know bonus for research dept. Treasury can get 18 months (CIMB).
Knight_2008
post Feb 2 2011, 10:36 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(kelvin_tan @ Feb 2 2011, 10:34 AM)
@knight_2008
I wouldnt know bonus for research dept. Treasury can get 18 months (CIMB).
*
wow..very nice smile.gif
siaolang
post Feb 2 2011, 12:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
130 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
QUOTE(azazeal0627 @ Jan 31 2011, 10:29 AM)
i really like doing CF... never get the opportunity to venture into CF area.. currently im working with asset management as investment analyst.. wonder.. is it viable for analyst to jump into CF.. any bright advice?
*
asset management is the buy side lah...i believe CF ya referring to is CF department in a investment bank. generally, IB is the sell side.

CF in different IB may have structured differently. works for starters include drafting prospectuses and bursa announcement, doing due diligence.....more to do with "words" rather than "number crunching" though it might involve some calculation but it's very minimal. working hours will be damned long (until 2-3 am during peak season).

so the works might be very different from what ya doing in AM loh. depends on what you actually like.







kinwing
post Feb 2 2011, 01:20 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur



Added on February 2, 2011, 8:22 am@azazeal
...I would suggest do your homework in order to increase your chances of employment. If not mistaken there are 2 or 3 papers that needs to be passed in order to work in CF.

What modules are those again? Anyone can help enlighten azazeal?
*

[/quote]

Modules 12 and 19.

This post has been edited by kinwing: Feb 2 2011, 01:21 PM
Aloong
post Feb 2 2011, 05:30 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
484 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Jan 31 2011, 02:54 PM)
if i got into research department of Khazanah, would the working experience there be transferable to working in big IB/ foreign IB?
*
yes.


Added on February 2, 2011, 5:31 pm
QUOTE(Frankmiller92 @ Jan 31 2011, 04:58 PM)
Hello, I am currently a student and I want to seek some advice from some of you professionals. Do you need to be a MATHEMMATICAL genius to work in corporate finance or in an investment bank? thx coz maths is my achillies heel.
*
No


Added on February 2, 2011, 5:34 pm
QUOTE(jasperng @ Jan 31 2011, 07:20 PM)
Hi, What are the top IB and CF companies in Msia ? also do you think sg companies in this industry will hire freshers form msia O_O ?
*
CIMB. Not impossible

This post has been edited by Aloong: Feb 2 2011, 05:34 PM
azazeal0627
post Feb 2 2011, 11:03 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
69 posts

Joined: Mar 2010


sioalang, thanks 4 ur opinion.. yup im an buy side analyst.. well i guess, now its kinda impossible to move to corp fin.. just stick to analyst.. analyst at sell side can huge bonus is it?? just asking.. hehe..
gloomberg
post Feb 3 2011, 09:20 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
510 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


There is always an opportunity to step into CF... depends which firm you are entering la... Difficulty of course depends on the size of the firm itself. Go read on the latest deals like the one of Petronas PetroChem, and try to find out how exactly they priced the IPO, that's one part quantitative part of CF. Paling penting ape? Cash Flow. How to forecast? A lot of variables, have to choose and make the most appropriate assumptions, and it's very hard, considering the volatility of the crude oil price, and other "shock factor" that are practically unpredictable with no strict or clear cut ruling in the oil and gas industry. Plus, liaising with so many parties is tough too, and reaching and agreement with another IB like Morgan Stanley, who is also the lead dealer (they are doing most of the foreign marketing part).

Not an easy job, but u're paid well in the end. I guess that is everyone's intention, and i will assume it is. Don't tell me the main purpose of going to uni is not to earn money.

Sell side analyst has their own way of earning their own bonus out, u should know what i mean. Think of it, they are already familiar with the market, so apa lagi? Remember there is always more than a way to earn a high paying job la, it's not just in CF that u will get one. =,= mentality orang malaysia?


groggy
post Feb 3 2011, 09:52 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
187 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(gloomberg @ Feb 3 2011, 09:20 AM)
There is always an opportunity to step into CF... depends which firm you are entering la... Difficulty of course depends on the size of the firm itself. Go read on the latest deals like the one of Petronas PetroChem, and try to find out how exactly they priced the IPO, that's one part quantitative part of CF. Paling penting ape? Cash Flow. How to forecast? A lot of variables, have to choose and make the most appropriate assumptions, and it's very hard, considering the volatility of the crude oil price, and other "shock factor" that are practically unpredictable with no strict or clear cut ruling in the oil and gas industry. Plus, liaising with so many parties is tough too, and reaching and agreement with another IB like Morgan Stanley, who is also the lead dealer (they are doing most of the foreign marketing part).

Not an easy job, but u're paid well in the end. I guess that is everyone's intention, and i will assume it is. Don't tell me the main  purpose of going to uni is not to earn money.

Sell side analyst has their own way of earning their own bonus out, u should know what i mean. Think of it, they are already familiar with the market, so apa lagi? Remember there is always more than a way to earn a high paying job la, it's not just in CF that u will get one. =,= mentality orang malaysia?
*
Normally, in a decent year, how many month bonus for ppl working in CF? How about sell side analyst? or buy side ones?
azazeal0627
post Feb 3 2011, 12:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
69 posts

Joined: Mar 2010


gloomberg,
i guess u have ur point.. somehow i think when you changing field u need to start right back from below.. its the risk that one have to take in changing field la..
and i admit i entered investment industry due to its good payment..
Nomad_mercenary
post Feb 16 2011, 06:35 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(azazeal0627 @ Feb 3 2011, 01:56 PM)
gloomberg,
i guess u have ur point.. somehow i think when you changing field u need to start right back from below.. its the risk that one have to take in changing field la..
and i admit i entered investment industry due to its good payment..
*
True, especially if you're from Audit trying to switch to Investment Banking.
Even after 4/5/6/7 years in Audit (even overseas; in London nonetheless), CIMB will offer RM5,500 for an Executive position within CF.

My recommendation: Eat humble pie and re-learn. If you think you're the bomb, prove it in your work + network your way around, progression should come naturally for you.

After all, you are the bomb.

happy.gif
eclipsed
post Feb 18 2011, 08:36 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
43 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
I am thinking of pursuing a career in CF in first a local IB then hopefully a large international IB.

I am wondering if my current path of education is along the right track. Currently, I am taking a course in Monash Sunway in Bachelor of Business and Commerce (Major in Acccounting and Banking & Finance). Would this degree enable me to enter the ranks of a tier 1 local IB upon my graduation (assuming I maintain a CGPA of 3.5++) ?

Also, after graduation, do I require a CFA before entering an IB?
kelvin_tan
post Feb 18 2011, 08:44 PM

Passion for Pipping!
*******
Senior Member
3,141 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


@eclipsed
getting a job in ANY COMPANY is more than just your paper qualifications. Your paper qualifications MAY ENHANCE your chances of SECURING AN INTERVIEW but it DOES NOT GUARANTEE the job.

Securing the job depends on YOU and you alone.
eclipsed
post Feb 18 2011, 09:17 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
43 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
Yes, I understand, but I mean assuming I will do fine in the interview, will the degree be sufficient to secure it? I have heard that they may look for only the top 20 unis in the world etc...so I am wondering Monash can lead me in that direction as well.
tommy141184
post Feb 19 2011, 12:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
153 posts

Joined: Jun 2006


QUOTE(Aloong @ Nov 27 2010, 02:02 PM)
Origination (normally called Invt banking dept) = 70% marketing skills + 30% structuring skills with executioners's help
Execution (normally called CF dept) = 90% execution + 10% structuring to assist originaters

Unfortunately, there is no 100% structuring job/role, as wat most ppl thot they would do.
*
What is paid range for a overseas master grad with one year working exeprience in broking firm in CF? let's say if started from execution?
prancingHORSE
post Feb 19 2011, 01:26 PM

I’m too awake for this to be a nightmare!
Group Icon
Elite
2,442 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: pJ



QUOTE(eclipsed @ Feb 18 2011, 09:17 PM)
Yes, I understand, but I mean assuming I will do fine in the interview, will the degree be sufficient to secure it? I have heard that they may look for only the top 20 unis in the world etc...so I am wondering Monash can lead me in that direction as well.
*
Your thought process is incorrect.
What you look like on paper will determine whether your application will be picked by HR for their interview, and then whether HR is convinced enough to think a recruiter would want to talk to you.
You don't go through average interviews and then the recruiter goes "oh this guy is from Monash, ok he's in!".
From interviews onwards what you look like on paper is good enough to give you a chance to talk to the recruiter, from hereon much depends on you as a person and less of what you are on paper.
themiserable
post Feb 19 2011, 06:07 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
31 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


Can Year 1 undergrad student go to intern during sem break ? If my grades are good, i'm pretty sure i can get intern in cimb ib smile.gif
tohff7
post Feb 20 2011, 04:23 AM

FF7 GOAT
******
Senior Member
1,581 posts

Joined: Mar 2008


Don't think so.

Despite very good grade, the subjects and stuff you learn in Year 1 is pretty basic. So it's not like an advantage.
kinwing
post Feb 20 2011, 11:48 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(tohff7 @ Feb 20 2011, 04:23 AM)
Don't think so.

Despite very good grade, the subjects and stuff you learn in Year 1 is pretty basic. So it's not like an advantage.
*
Looks like some one is very confident. Anyway, no harm to try after Year 1 from Uni anyway but make sure you know how to use photocopy and fax machines.

This post has been edited by kinwing: Feb 20 2011, 11:49 AM
Knight_2008
post Feb 20 2011, 12:13 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(themiserable @ Feb 19 2011, 06:07 PM)
Can Year 1 undergrad student go to intern during sem break ? If my grades are good, i'm pretty sure i can get intern in cimb ib smile.gif
*
just go for it. You will learn how to apply the things you have learnt
HotRod
post Feb 20 2011, 12:21 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
Does anyone knows how much does freshies get paid for cf in the Big 4 investment banks (CIMB, maybank, RHB and AMbank) ?

Coz as far as i know, Tier2 and Tier3 investment banks are only paying around 2.4 - 2.7k for freshies.
kinwing
post Feb 20 2011, 12:32 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(HotRod @ Feb 20 2011, 12:21 PM)
Does anyone knows how much does freshies get paid for cf in the Big 4 investment banks (CIMB, maybank, RHB and AMbank) ?

Coz as far as i know, Tier2 and Tier3 investment banks are only paying around 2.4 - 2.7k for freshies.
*
Should be around that price range from 2.4k to 2.8k for those tier1. I used to 1st start work with one of the tier1 banks after fresh graduate with a pay of 2.7k 7 years ago. Not sure if that amount has been increased or not.
highlander124
post Feb 21 2011, 03:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
112 posts

Joined: Apr 2008


Freshies should start at RM3k+
Nomad_mercenary
post Feb 21 2011, 05:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
For career-switchers, is it advisable to move into Tier 2/3 @ AVP level then try for Tier 1 or should I just aim for Tier 1 Exec level?

Would like to know whether there is a stigma faced when you join Tier 2/3 IBs.
themiserable
post Feb 21 2011, 06:01 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
31 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(kinwing @ Feb 20 2011, 11:48 AM)
Looks like some one is very confident. Anyway, no harm to try after Year 1 from Uni anyway but make sure you know how to use photocopy and fax machines.
*
Yea, I don't mind any post but do they put any intern(maid) at front office ? Not confident, just that I know some guy working over there smile.gif
0u33n13
post Feb 21 2011, 07:22 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
Well, I am not from this field, just drop by , but i did heard of how many unpleasant word to listen from the people in this field. Wow....stress industry indeed...
blink.gif
Nomad_mercenary
post Feb 21 2011, 08:24 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
Don't take it personally; tight deadlines, multiple clients, incompetent superiors/juniors/other ppl you have to deal with, you need to vent once in a while, it's understandable.

Although you have to remember, the person you swore at could be a potential client someday.....
highlander124
post Mar 3 2011, 09:54 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
112 posts

Joined: Apr 2008


QUOTE(Nomad_mercenary @ Feb 21 2011, 07:24 PM)
Don't take it personally; tight deadlines, multiple clients, incompetent superiors/juniors/other ppl you have to deal with, you need to vent once in a while, it's understandable.

Although you have to remember, the person you swore at could be a potential client someday.....
*
Very true. Swearing at people now may just turn out to be the person you be pitching in the future. Best is keep good repo with regardless of what.

IB job is also very PR intensive in nature especially in Malaysia. Its a lot about who you know at times and not what you know.
Princess90
post Mar 3 2011, 12:04 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
289 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(tohff7 @ Feb 20 2011, 04:23 AM)
Don't think so.

Despite very good grade, the subjects and stuff you learn in Year 1 is pretty basic. So it's not like an advantage.
*
this is very true. Year 1 subjects are very very basic.
No harm tring though but I realize big companies usually take in students from year 2 onwards.
Seldom take in Year 1 students.
P.I.M.P
post Mar 3 2011, 11:23 PM

Jai Ho
*****
Senior Member
719 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: U.S.A


Anyone working as CIMB financial consultant or relationship manager? I wanna go into investment banking in time to come. But I'm thinking of working as financial consultant / relationship manager first. Then slowly work my way up the IB ladder.
Knight_2008
post Mar 3 2011, 11:58 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
relationship manager is private banking right? i think it's a different path as compared to IB
P.I.M.P
post Mar 4 2011, 12:06 AM

Jai Ho
*****
Senior Member
719 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: U.S.A


QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Mar 3 2011, 11:58 PM)
relationship manager is private banking right? i think it's a different  path as compared to IB
*
I think so. Gain few yrs exp in private banking, later on can move to other role within the bank also.
azazeal0627
post Jul 13 2011, 07:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
69 posts

Joined: Mar 2010


i quite understand the harshness working in IB under corp finance.. is it the same case if just a normal comp?

mercury8400
post Jul 14 2011, 02:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,703 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(azazeal0627 @ Feb 2 2011, 11:03 PM)
sioalang, thanks 4 ur opinion.. yup im an buy side analyst.. well i guess, now its kinda impossible to move to corp fin.. just stick to analyst.. analyst at sell side can huge bonus is it?? just asking.. hehe..
*
But i think buy side more fun i.e. you have the choice to buy or the choice not to buy....
Sell side - you only sell. cannot chose not to sell....


Added on July 14, 2011, 2:31 pm
QUOTE(Frankmiller92 @ Jan 31 2011, 04:58 PM)
Hello, I am currently a student and I want to seek some advice from some of you professionals. Do you need to be a MATHEMMATICAL genius to work in corporate finance or in an investment bank? thx coz maths is my achillies heel.
*
No you do not need to be a genius although it helps, but if yr not comfy with maths then might as well forget about CF

This post has been edited by mercury8400: Jul 14 2011, 02:31 PM
keelim
post Jul 14 2011, 02:56 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
941 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: ^^Heaven^^


Who are you kidding with that statement - “buy side is more fun”. No buy side with a sane mind would hire someone w/o sell-side experience. There may be some exceptions, but rule of thumb is a No No. And another big NO to say buy side is “more fun”. Being a trustee is never fun! Investors remember failures vividly than successes.

If English is your Achilles heel, then you’ll be a shoe-in. Maths is complementary. You don’t need rocket science maths in CF. In fact, I have never come across an integration/differentiation signs in all the internal/external presentation slides.
mercury8400
post Jul 14 2011, 04:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,703 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(keelim @ Jul 14 2011, 02:56 PM)
Who are you kidding with that statement - “buy side is more fun”. No buy side with a sane mind would hire someone w/o sell-side experience. There may be some exceptions, but rule of thumb is a No No. And another big NO to say buy side is “more fun”. Being a trustee is never fun! Investors remember failures vividly than successes.

*
Investors also remembers those that made them richer! It works both ways. WHat i'm generally saying "fun" is that you have an option to chose whether to buy or not to buy. Whether you make money or not solely depends on yrself and market. But at least you have a choice. Sell side, no choice, just sell.
keelim
post Jul 14 2011, 05:18 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
941 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: ^^Heaven^^


I have to disagree. Institutional investors and financial-savvy individual investors do not invest on the pretext of making them ‘rich’. This may be too simplistic from a financial standpoint. Not all mandates from investors are “make me rich”.

Do you think you have a lot of options in the buy-side? I can honestly tell you, no. Buy side investment charter are very clearly stated:- word by word the Do’s’ and Dont’s’. This charter clearly outlines the country/sector/industry/types/sizes of the investment you may pursue and within a dateline to generate/protect a specific return/capital.

It’s not cheap to maintain a group of analysts in the buy side. The principal cannot operate as a cost-centre for too long. Performance measurement alone will punish the principal dearly to generate the same return if it was to be left to operate as a cost centre for too long.

And again, sell side is not always about hard selling. The roles played by sell side are much more than that. Risk management/hedging/fund-raising to name a few. This is by no means a small/mid could do independently. Sell side provides a win-win situation in this regard for all the parties involved. It’s a cyclical and symbiotic relationship. The yin-yang dynamism of buy & sell. Having said that, essentially business is all about offering services or products. It may be more meaningful to say sell side operates as a market-maker.

mercury8400
post Jul 14 2011, 07:15 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,703 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(keelim @ Jul 14 2011, 05:18 PM)
I have to disagree. Institutional investors and financial-savvy individual investors do not invest on the pretext of making them ‘rich’. This may be too simplistic from a financial standpoint. Not all mandates from investors are “make me rich”.

Do you think you have a lot of options in the buy-side? I can honestly tell you, no. Buy side investment charter are very clearly stated:- word by word the Do’s’ and Dont’s’. This charter clearly outlines the country/sector/industry/types/sizes of the investment you may pursue and within a dateline to generate/protect a specific return/capital.

It’s not cheap to maintain a group of analysts in the buy side. The principal cannot operate as a cost-centre for too long. Performance measurement alone will punish the principal dearly to generate the same return if it was to be left to operate as a cost centre for too long.

And again, sell side is not always about hard selling. The roles played by sell side are much more than that. Risk management/hedging/fund-raising to name a few. This is by no means a small/mid could do independently. Sell side provides a win-win situation in this regard for all the parties involved. It’s a cyclical and symbiotic relationship. The yin-yang dynamism of buy & sell. Having said that, essentially business is all about offering services or products. It may be more meaningful to say sell side operates as a market-maker.
*
Noted.
i still think buy side is more fun. Then again what's fun for me may not be fun for you.
ComingBackSoon
post Jul 14 2011, 08:51 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
787 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
QUOTE(mercury8400 @ Jul 14 2011, 08:37 AM)
Investors also remembers those that made them richer! It works both ways. WHat i'm generally saying "fun" is that you have an option to chose whether to buy or not to buy. Whether you make money or not solely depends on yrself and market. But at least you have a choice. Sell side, no choice, just sell.
*
If you've try trading before, you'll realize the pain in losing an amount is far greater than the pleasure/satisfaction in making the same amount of profit.
mercury8400
post Jul 15 2011, 03:52 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,703 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(ComingBackSoon @ Jul 14 2011, 08:51 PM)
If you've try trading before, you'll realize the pain in losing an amount is far greater than the pleasure/satisfaction in making the same amount of profit.
*
If you've done trading before you'll also realise the joy of getting big, fat, juicy bonuses in 1 good year is far,far greatr than all pain in the previous year. wink.gif
prancingHORSE
post Jul 16 2011, 01:15 AM

I’m too awake for this to be a nightmare!
Group Icon
Elite
2,442 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: pJ



QUOTE(mercury8400 @ Jul 15 2011, 03:52 PM)
If you've done trading before you'll also realise the joy of getting big, fat, juicy bonuses in 1 good year is far,far greatr than all pain in the previous year. wink.gif
*
I think he meant trading your own money and assuming capital risk.
Going -50% the first two years and making +200% the third year. You're still -25% and losing money.
mercury8400
post Jul 16 2011, 01:18 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,703 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(prancingHORSE @ Jul 16 2011, 01:15 AM)
I think he meant trading your own money and assuming capital risk.
Going -50% the first two years and making +200% the third year.  You're still -25% and losing money.
*
LOL I tot he said being a trader in a Financial Institution....
too_old_for_this2
post Aug 22 2011, 02:10 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
Confused88,

If you are still following this trail, let me give you a concrete example.. These days LinkedIn is an amazing tool to just get a handle on how other actually progress in their professional career.. just Google for one 'Adrian Seow Goldman Sachs'.

Apparently he is a ex Manager at CIMB Investment Bank who just joined GS as Analyst. From Linked In, he started in CIMB IB as trainee and all-in probably spent 4 - 5 years there. And BTW he graduated BEng & MEng in E&E from Cambridge.

This is just to give you a favour of the competitions you are facing - lets forget the fresh graduate path as these would be the source of the bulk of the BB's analyst supply pool.

This is a top performing CF fella graduated from Cambridge with few years working experience at the top local IB but only joining GS as an analyst.

In terms of career path - if you are sure you want to get to a BB CF - the best bet is to take a job/ path that can help you increase your chance of getting admitted to a top school mba like Harvard / wharton/ chicago.

Perhaps you can consider taking a year off doing non-profit or join army => these non-conventional paths typically are the easiest to break into top mba program. There are lots of website and resources on how to get into top mba so I wont repeat them here.

But, at the risk of sounding snobbish - please let me be frank, with a Monash degree and that you are not starting off your career in any of the foreign BB (I think there do are few selected Monash getting into foreign BB at the onset of their career from time to time), the only viable chance to ultimately get into a BB especially in Sg/ HK is via a top-notch MBA.

This is just how the game is... but the good news is you are still young and there should still be time to get your career back on track to achieve what you set to achieve!


Added on August 22, 2011, 3:11 amJust a bit of ranting and sharing of my personal experience which I hope may be helpful to some of the forumers ==

BTW I didnt know that I wanted to get into banking when I did my undergraduate at Melb U (I did a Economics/ Law double degree with a First Cls Hons), so you all are definitely in a much better position than i started out..

Incidentally, at the introduction of a family friend, I started my career at a local boutique as an intern in early 2000s.

that's probably the best career move that could ever happen to me cos it opened up my eyes to a completely new world that I never know of before.

I came back to serve a close to some 3 years term as Analyst and was given opportunities to actually co-lead some of the transactions - given the relatively small size of the firm. further as it's a small firm, we cannot compete on distribution/ platform but more on the merits of the ideas . so I was involved in few award-winning deals (not just by sheer size but was more chosen because of its innovativeness). I also did my cfa then..

My starting salary as a full time position was RM1800 or RM2200 - I cant really recall now but was steadily increased to close to RM5k by the time I left. Bonus was pretty good - I think my worst ever was a 9 months .

Then I did my Master at Oxford - of course in 2006/7 it was then the best moment ever for banking.. Jobs were fairly easy to find..

I then joined a foreign mid-market private equity house as an Associate (we still have cUSD2billion funds for deploy).. my starting paid was close to USD10k per month - and for whatever reason I recalled only paying like 5 or 10% tax in Singapore - it is supposed to normalise to 15% after 3 years), and my bonus was in double-digit. so, yes it's one hell lots of money for me - considering i was still in my mid-late 20s then.

But my firm was adversely affected and in fact, it didnt survive the financial crisis... it was eventually liquidated in 2009..

Since 2009 I went through a turbulent period, i must confess. And now I am with a family-office doing small scale start up ventures in Malaysia...

Some of you may wonder why didn't I look up for another banking job?

Frankly, I still very much love banking, and I enjoy the challenges especially in bringing a transaction eventually to closure. But on personal front, I got married in 2009 and we decided to settle in KL. So Singapore was not a choice. The foreign IB were not hiring in KL at that time at all so I have to learn a tough reason on to be realistic on my pay-scale which for a while was hard to swallow..

None was willing to offer anything more than RM 12k (for VP position) which I find quite difficult to raise a middle-class family in KL (can anyone recommend a good gated-and-guarded housing in KL that cost less than RM1m?!)

Secondly, at my age and stage of career, I am focusing more on building up my own ''equity''. its always easier to negotiate with family offices or smaller establishment on what we term in Private Equity, Carried Interest or a form or profit sharing.

plus, I also know I am not that good to be in such 'more-favourable' negotiating table as compared to says if employed by a top foreign BB as I lack all the pedigree to be truly a star (Eton or some US private private schools etc - then Harvard magna cum laude plus the Olympic medalist => this is no joke, GS Asia was run by a pair of Canadian twin brothers who won the rowing medal in Olympic; neither do I have a billionaire family like our Dato' Justin Leong)

Cant complaint - I have my fair share of luck.. I guess such is life! I hope that some of our investments would turn into a multi-baggers so I can accumulate enough capital to move to the next stage of my career/ life -)

This post has been edited by too_old_for_this2: Aug 22 2011, 03:11 AM
kinwing
post Aug 22 2011, 10:31 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(too_old_for_this2 @ Aug 22 2011, 02:10 AM)
Confused88,

If you are still following this trail, let me give you a concrete example.. These days LinkedIn is an amazing tool to just get a handle on how other actually progress in their professional career.. just Google for one 'Adrian Seow Goldman Sachs'.

Apparently he is a ex Manager at CIMB Investment Bank who just joined GS as Analyst. From Linked In, he started in CIMB IB as trainee and all-in probably spent 4 - 5 years there. And BTW he graduated BEng & MEng in E&E from Cambridge.

This is just to give you a favour of the competitions you are facing - lets forget the fresh graduate path as these would be the source of the bulk of the BB's analyst supply pool.

This is a top performing CF fella graduated from Cambridge with few years working experience at the top local IB but only joining GS as an analyst.

In terms of career path - if you are sure you want to get to a BB CF - the best bet is to take a job/ path that can help you increase your chance of getting admitted to a top school mba like Harvard / wharton/ chicago.

Perhaps you can consider taking a year off doing non-profit or join army => these non-conventional paths typically are the easiest to break into top mba program. There are lots of website and resources on how to get into top mba so I wont repeat them here.

But, at the risk of sounding snobbish - please let me be frank, with a Monash degree and that you are not starting off your career in any of the foreign BB (I think there do are few selected Monash getting into foreign BB at the onset of their career from time to time), the only viable chance to ultimately get into a BB especially in Sg/ HK is via a top-notch MBA.

This is just how the game is... but the good news is you are still young and there should still be time to get your career back on track to achieve what you set to achieve!


Added on August 22, 2011, 3:11 amJust a bit of ranting and sharing of my personal experience which I hope may be helpful to some of the forumers ==

BTW I didnt know that I wanted to get into banking when I did my undergraduate at Melb U (I did a Economics/ Law double degree with a First Cls Hons), so you all are definitely in a much better position than i started out..

Incidentally, at the introduction of a family friend, I started my career at a local boutique as an intern in early 2000s.

that's probably the best career move that could ever happen to me cos it opened up my eyes to a completely new world that I never know of before.

I came back to serve a close to some 3 years term as Analyst and was given opportunities to actually co-lead some of the transactions - given the relatively small size of the firm. further as it's a small firm, we cannot compete on distribution/ platform but more on the merits of the ideas . so I was involved in few award-winning deals (not just by sheer size but was more chosen because of its innovativeness). I also did my cfa then..

My starting salary as a full time position was RM1800 or RM2200 - I cant really recall now but was steadily increased to close to RM5k by the time I left. Bonus was pretty good - I think my worst ever was a 9 months .

Then I did my Master at Oxford - of course  in 2006/7 it was then the best moment ever for banking.. Jobs were fairly easy to find..

I then joined a foreign mid-market private equity house as an Associate (we still have cUSD2billion funds for deploy).. my starting paid was close to USD10k per month - and for whatever reason I recalled only paying like 5 or 10% tax in Singapore - it is supposed to normalise to 15% after 3 years), and my bonus was in double-digit. so, yes it's one hell lots of money for me - considering i was still in my mid-late 20s then.

But my firm was adversely affected and in fact, it didnt survive the financial crisis... it was eventually liquidated in 2009..

Since 2009 I went through a turbulent period, i must confess. And now I am with a family-office doing small scale start up ventures in Malaysia...

Some of you may wonder why didn't I look up for another banking job? 

Frankly, I still very much love banking, and I enjoy the challenges especially in bringing a transaction eventually to closure. But on personal front, I got married in 2009 and we decided to settle in KL. So Singapore was not a choice. The foreign IB were not hiring in KL at that time at all so I have to learn a tough reason on to be realistic on my pay-scale which for a while was hard to swallow..

None was willing to offer anything more than RM 12k (for VP position) which I find quite difficult to raise a middle-class family in KL (can anyone recommend a good gated-and-guarded housing in KL that cost less than RM1m?!)

Secondly, at my age and stage of career, I am focusing more on building up my own ''equity''. its always easier to negotiate with family offices or smaller establishment on what we term in Private Equity, Carried Interest or a form or profit sharing. 

plus, I also know I am not that good to be in such 'more-favourable' negotiating table as compared to says if employed by a top foreign BB as I lack all the pedigree to be truly a star (Eton or some US private private schools etc - then Harvard magna cum laude plus the Olympic medalist => this is no joke, GS Asia was run by a pair of Canadian twin brothers who won the rowing medal in Olympic; neither do I have a billionaire family like our Dato' Justin Leong)

Cant complaint - I have my fair share of luck.. I guess such is life! I hope that some of our investments would turn into a multi-baggers so I can accumulate enough capital to move to the next stage of my career/ life -)
*
I am wondering why you decided to settle in KL if you have the skill and experience in IB, not to mention the safety/security/political issue in Malaysia, but at least the monetary is much more rewarding (as you had been offered around only RM12K for VP position in KL) and better education for your children if you stay in overseas. Maybe you want to take care your parents who are still staying in Malaysia, then Singapore could be a primary choice and travelling back to home town would not be an issue, just take a budget flight will reach you home less than 2 hours.
Maverick2011
post Aug 22 2011, 12:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
83 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
Many ppl aspire to get into IB/CF kind of work presumably because of high pay mainly, so my question is, what kind of pay are we talking about? I am not talking about freshie's pay. How about people with 10-15 year experience in IB maybe as

1) Corporate F/Investment Banking - Head of Department
2) Sell side analyst - Senior Analyst/Head of Research
3) Treasury/Money Market/Forex - Senior or Head of Dealing

Who earn the most GENERALLY? what kind of salaries are we talking about? I think it may not be easy for even people in the industry to know the exact amount but any close estimate will be good enough.

Since money is a big incentive in this industry, I am sure many would like to know what are the "end results" wink.gif

This post has been edited by Maverick2011: Aug 22 2011, 12:06 PM
too_old_for_this2
post Aug 22 2011, 07:04 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
The sg job market was hit really badly during the crisis and I pretty much found a lot of my own friends and other peers in same situation as me.. In fact, some have not even found a job since 2009. I would argue it has not really recovered ever since - unless you are covering Indonesia .. KL market on the other hand is relatively more stable (I guess that probably is due to the lower cost base than anything else).. Cant say I am really a reluctant returner but begger cant be choosers so I have to make the most out of it.. it's sth that I am actively pursuing now.. been in touch with few headhunters but market is still very luke-warm.

To Maverick2011, I dont have your answer to your exact question but as usual, I can try to pinpoint some data point (I try to limit data point to local banks)

1)CF - Head of Department. A typical MD level at says CIMB (they call it Team Director or sth) would be raking in something close to RM40 - 50k p. mth as based. bonus would be anywhere from 12 mths to 36 mths. Head of CF would probably rake in 80k per mth but you are not likely to get there with just 15 yrs experience, unless the odder batch steps down. These days, I were made to understand even if a 10 years Director can make close to 30k at cimb. at the same time, Maybank under TZ has greatly revamped its senior troop comp to be on par or even more competitive than cimb.

2) Sell Side Analyst . A typical Head of Research would probably raking in RM30k+ but bonus usually wont be more than 12 mths. I stand to be corrected here as I dont have that much analyst friends.

3) Head of Dealing. This is really hard to gauge cos I heard that one CIMB Head of Treasury actually made a lot more money than Jay Razak (sth like RM15+ million in a good year). On the other hand, one senior dealer at Ambank that I know of made some RM30k per mth whereas another guy at OSK only make 15+k. This fluctuates hugely but my guess is that this CIMB fella is probably more or an outlier than anything.

In summary, IB head > Analyst > Head of Dealing on average.

This is the trend at foreign IB as well .

There are quite a few top gun Malaysian just for sharing:-

Check out the Richard Ong brothers (both spent years at GS, and one is a multi-billionaire running his own pe fund in China; the other now the Chief Investment Officer at Temasek / GIC). They are probably the top percentile-representative of the IB career path. And then there's Kendall Court's Chris and a few more..

Then there is this Penang fella Cheah of Value Partners, ex Morgan Greenfell Analyst Head who then founded one of the largest hedge funds in asia with >usd5b AUM (just fees alone he would be pocketing some USD50m per year). He would probably the top % representative of the Analyst career path. -and if you never hear of him, google it. his story would be a true source of inspration (he has to drop off high sch at 15/ 16 and work as rubber tapper in some kinda of sob story)

I cant thk of anyone who made as much money or as high profile as Head of Dealing. but if you mean Trader, there is one Malaysian ex-Citi prop trader based in NYC - his firm is called Kamunting Capital or sth like that - again with ten of billions AUM..

So sky is indeed the limit.

No doubt everyone has a burning desire for big money but what make you stand out from the other guys to really excel in the industry (and how to get in if you are not in yet)?

This is the question I ask myself every day!!
Maverick2011
post Aug 22 2011, 10:35 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
83 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(too_old_for_this2 @ Aug 22 2011, 07:04 PM)
The sg job market was hit really badly during the crisis and I pretty much found a lot of my own friends and other peers in same situation as me..  In fact, some have not even found a job since 2009. I would argue it has not really recovered ever since - unless you are covering Indonesia ..  KL market on the other hand is relatively more stable (I guess that probably is due to the lower cost base than anything else).. Cant say I am really a reluctant returner but begger cant be choosers so I have to make the most out of it.. it's sth that I am actively pursuing now.. been in touch with few headhunters but market is still very luke-warm.

To Maverick2011, I dont have your answer to your exact question but as usual, I can try to pinpoint some data point (I try to limit data point to local banks)

1)CF - Head of Department. A typical MD level at says CIMB (they call it Team Director or sth) would be raking in something close to RM40 - 50k p. mth as based. bonus would be anywhere from 12 mths to 36 mths.  Head of CF would probably rake in 80k per mth but you are not likely to get there with just 15 yrs experience, unless the odder batch steps down. These days, I were made to understand even if a 10 years Director can make close to 30k at cimb. at the same time, Maybank under TZ has greatly revamped its senior troop comp to be on par or even more competitive than cimb.

2) Sell Side Analyst . A typical Head of Research would probably raking in RM30k+ but bonus usually wont be more than 12 mths. I stand to be corrected here as I dont have that much analyst friends.

3) Head of Dealing. This is really hard to gauge cos I heard that one CIMB Head of Treasury actually made a lot more money than Jay Razak (sth like RM15+ million in a good year). On the other hand, one senior dealer at Ambank that I know of made some RM30k per mth whereas another guy at OSK only make 15+k. This fluctuates hugely but my guess is that this CIMB fella is probably more or an outlier than anything.

In summary, IB head > Analyst > Head of Dealing on average.

This is the trend at foreign IB as well .

There are quite a few top gun Malaysian just for sharing:-

Check out the Richard Ong brothers (both spent years at GS, and one is a multi-billionaire running his own pe fund in China; the other now the Chief Investment Officer at Temasek / GIC). They are probably the top percentile-representative of the IB career path. And then there's Kendall Court's Chris and a few more..

Then there is this Penang fella Cheah of Value Partners, ex Morgan Greenfell Analyst Head who then founded one of the largest hedge funds in asia with >usd5b AUM (just fees alone he would be pocketing some USD50m per year).  He would probably the top % representative of the Analyst career path. -and if you never hear of him, google it. his story would be a true source of inspration (he has to drop off high sch at 15/ 16 and work as rubber tapper in some kinda of sob story)

I cant thk of anyone who made as much money  or as high profile as Head of Dealing. but if you mean Trader, there is one Malaysian ex-Citi prop trader based in NYC - his firm is called Kamunting Capital or sth like that - again with ten of billions AUM..

So sky is indeed the limit.

No doubt everyone has a burning desire for big money but what make you stand out from the other guys to really excel in the industry (and how to get in if you are not in yet)?

This is the question I ask myself every day!!
*
thanks so much for input! very interesting!
douchebag2
post Aug 23 2011, 01:35 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
57 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
Guys not being a ****, but take what Gloomberg and Aloong say with a pinch of salt, 50% of what they say are shit.

Quasi what his name and Keelim are pretty legit.

OP, you still want your question answered PM me.

You guys are way underestimating what we bankers make.


Added on August 23, 2011, 2:12 amAnd since I have the time, why not I add to this topic.
Important Points to note:

(i) Will I be able to move from Back Office ===> Middle Office ===> Front Office?
Nope.

(ii) Will I be able to move from Audit/Hawker/Treasure Hunter to Investment Banking?
Yup, back/middle office roles. Front Office? Nope.

(iii) I can't speak, write properly English, will I be able to be an investment banker?
Nope, not even the secretary.

(iv) I come from University of Ali Baba (outside the top 30 in the world) would I be able to break into Investment Banking?
Yup, back/middle office unless you're the top 1% of your cohort.

(v) I got the ACCA, CFA, MBA, and even a PhD would I be able to break into investment banking?
We would probably call you in just to laugh at your in your face. But yes, you do get notice and hey, maybe when we are laughing you could charm us with your String Theorm or Pecking Order.

(vi) How much do a fresh graduate investment banker earn?
More than you can imagine (talking about the bulge brackets, I don't know about the lower-tiers), probably top 5% of all workers in Malaysia.

(vii) What should I do? I come from University of Ali Baba, have shit grades, no relevant experience, or family connections, how do I break-in.
Seriously, find something else, its just the cold hard truth. You have better chance of winning the lawn bowling, shooting, & horse racing multi-bet.

Fact is, it's a very credential base industry. I'm not talking about trading, I'm talking about PE, M&A and the likes.

This post has been edited by douchebag2: Aug 23 2011, 02:12 AM
kinwing
post Aug 23 2011, 07:53 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


Looks like douchebag2 has burst someones' bubble laugh.gif But it's the truth that you need to be the one who can perform to get that kind of high pay.
Knight_2008
post Aug 23 2011, 04:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(douchebag2 @ Aug 23 2011, 01:35 AM)
Guys not being a ****, but take what Gloomberg and Aloong say with a pinch of salt, 50% of what they say are shit.

Quasi what his name and Keelim are pretty legit.

OP, you still want your question answered PM me.

You guys are way underestimating what we bankers make.


Added on August 23, 2011, 2:12 amAnd since I have the time, why not I add to this topic.
Important Points to note:

(i) Will I be able to move from Back Office ===> Middle Office ===> Front Office?
Nope.

(ii) Will I be able to move from Audit/Hawker/Treasure Hunter to Investment Banking?
Yup, back/middle office roles. Front Office? Nope.

(iii) I can't speak, write properly English, will I be able to be an investment banker?
Nope, not even the secretary.

(iv) I come from University of Ali Baba (outside the top 30 in the world) would I be able to break into Investment Banking?
Yup, back/middle office unless you're the top 1% of your cohort.

(v) I got the ACCA, CFA, MBA, and even a PhD would I be able to break into investment banking?
We would probably call you in just to laugh at your in your face. But yes, you do get notice and hey, maybe when we are laughing you could charm us with your String Theorm or Pecking Order.

(vi) How much do a fresh graduate investment banker earn?
More than you can imagine (talking about the bulge brackets, I don't know about the lower-tiers), probably top 5% of all workers in Malaysia.

(vii) What should I do? I come from University of Ali Baba, have shit grades, no relevant experience, or family connections, how do I break-in.
Seriously, find something else, its just the cold hard truth. You have better chance of winning the lawn bowling, shooting, & horse racing multi-bet.

Fact is, it's a very credential base industry. I'm not talking about trading, I'm talking about PE, M&A and the likes.
*
thanks for the insight. but what about from consultancy or advisory to front office of an IB?
douchebag2
post Aug 23 2011, 10:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
57 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
Okay guys no more PMs, it was just meant for OP. There are too many overlapping questions, so I will dedicate this week in answering any IB related questions you have. Who knows when I'll be back so ask away.

Ground Rules:
(1) Don't ask me to review your resume
Do I look like a recruiter to you? Get off your lazy ass and search on google and you'll find a million and one ways to write your freaking resume.

(1b) But what if I pay you?
No thank you, I would like to not use any brain work during my downtime.

(2) Call me out, ask me to prove xyz.
Look, you either take what I say as the gospel truth or gtfo, I'm not here to compare penis size.

Background
Malaysian, working in one of the financial hubs of Asia (think Hong Kong, Singapore, and Shanghai). The only time I have worked in Malaysia is during my internship with one of the bulge brackets. Please note its only been 4 years since I started work, so I'm more geared towards answering questions from freshies or those with a couple of years of experience under their belt. If you've worked for 10 - 15 years, I'm afraid I am in no position to give you any advice. That said, I can tell you generally how it's like in the industry.

Questions
(1) Can I break in from Consulting to front office IB?
Yes. Definitely if you're from Mckinsey, Bain, Boston ("MBB"). You'll have a harder time if you're not from the MBB. AT Kearney, Monitor, Booz, and Deloitte Consulting are pretty legit, but it'll definitely be harder. To add to that, the longer you're in consulting, the harder it is for you to move into sell-side IB.

But hey, if you're a consultant why not jump straight into Private Equity ("PE"), that is a pretty common trend. Notably Companies that higher Consultants - Bain PE (sister company of Bain).


Knight_2008
post Sep 18 2011, 05:48 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
i've been offered a position in a boutique cf firm. would having a boutique (ie. small firm) on my resume affect my chances to get into the cf dept in a large Ib or Pirvate equity in the future?

do the size of the deal you worked on really matter or it is the different type of deals you work on that matters?
mariochuah
post Sep 19 2011, 12:24 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
201 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
Seriously, don't envy abt their salary. U know how much responsibility n commitment they paid in order to achieve this salary ??

Don't just day dream that alll ppl work in ib is rich.
Be realistic. Study hard n read more journal n financial research la. There are no short cut in ib.


mercury8400
post Sep 19 2011, 08:29 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,703 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(douchebag2 @ Aug 23 2011, 01:35 AM)

(vii) What should I do? I come from University of Ali Baba, have shit grades, no relevant experience, or family connections, how do I break-in.
Seriously, find something else, its just the cold hard truth. You have better chance of winning the lawn bowling, shooting, & horse racing multi-bet.

Fact is, it's a very credential base industry. I'm not talking about trading, I'm talking about PE, M&A and the likes.
*
No, not really. What you should do is get jiggy with all the dato' and tan sri's. Once you have the relevant contacts (strong ones, something like a personal bff) and have their no on speed dial, ask them to drop a few good words for you when they meet up with these IBankers. Guarantee get the job! Connection is king!
kinwing
post Sep 19 2011, 12:01 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(mercury8400 @ Sep 19 2011, 08:29 AM)
No,  not really. What you should do is get jiggy with all the dato' and tan sri's. Once you have the relevant contacts (strong ones, something like a personal bff) and have their no on speed dial, ask them to drop a few good words for you when they meet up with these IBankers. Guarantee get the job! Connection is king!
*
If you got connection, why bother to work in IBs? Might as well get the AP faster make $ lah whistling.gif
Jacky Phang
post Sep 19 2011, 05:54 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
Since I have gave up joining an investment bank, I never experienced those hours and environment.

My friend is 29 now and still making only 5k+ a month from some “tier-3” local investment bank. I wonder if the one at CIMB or Maybank IB gets much more money compared to my friend, who joined IB at 26.

If he is 29 and making only that much, many engineer would have made 7k by 29, summore shorter hours, can go clubbing everyday.

So, my question are
(1) why everyone wants to join IB?
(2) Izzit that good and that much money there?
(3) when will the local bank CF people sees their sharp increment?
(4) What is the stagnant point?

For those who want to guess who my fren is, pls PM me, just in case he sees his own name here.

TQ.

douchebag2
post Sep 29 2011, 01:34 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
57 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
Knight_2008 Posted Sep 18 2011, 05:48 PM

i've been offered a position in a boutique cf firm. would having a boutique (ie. small firm) on my resume affect my chances to get into the cf dept in a large Ib or Pirvate equity in the future?
do the size of the deal you worked on really matter or it is the different type of deals you work on that matters?


Depends, if we are talking about analyst or associate levels its fine. Yes a big deal does stand out, but what really counts is which part/role did you play in the whole transaction? I rather hire a guy who did the model and ran all scenarios in a US$50 million deal vis-a-vis a guy who just did the due dilligence room on a US$1 billion dollar. But if we are talking about director-level, I have no visibility what-so-ever.





mercury8400 Posted Sep 19 2011, 08:29 AM

No, not really. What you should do is get jiggy with all the dato' and tan sri's. Once you have the relevant contacts (strong ones, something like a personal bff) and have their no on speed dial, ask them to drop a few good words for you when they meet up with these IBankers. Guarantee get the job! Connection is king!

Yeah if you have that kind of connections no doubt about it. I think few years back Goldman Sachs hired the personal assitant to George Bush even though the dude was a college-drop out. But hey, how many of us got those kind of connections? If you do, good for you, might as well start a business or something.


Jacky Phang Posted Sep 19 2011, 05:54 PM
Since I have gave up joining an investment bank, I never experienced those hours and environment.

My friend is 29 now and still making only 5k+ a month from some “tier-3” local investment bank. I wonder if the one at CIMB or Maybank IB gets much more money compared to my friend, who joined IB at 26.

If he is 29 and making only that much, many engineer would have made 7k by 29, summore shorter hours, can go clubbing everyday.

So, my question are
(1) why everyone wants to join IB?
(2) Izzit that good and that much money there?
(3) when will the local bank CF people sees their sharp increment?
(4) What is the stagnant point?

For those who want to guess who my fren is, pls PM me, just in case he sees his own name here.

TQ.


First of, please don't benchmark against Third-tier. Thrid tier to me is like PwC Corporate Finance. Your friend is probably working in some mom and pop shop.

(1) Personally for me, it is the only job out there which (other than consulting) gabe me C-level exposure right out of University. It allowed me to build an amazing network at such a young age. Money and prestige was not my concern at that time.

(2) My total compensation for my first year right out of University was c.US$100k. Go figure.

(3) When they decide to remove all protectionism. I expect a wave of consolidation. But fact is, Malaysia is NOT a financial hub and if local banks can get away with paying cheap, why would they see the need to increase their compensation?

(4) You got to clarify question 4 my friend.


This post has been edited by douchebag2: Sep 29 2011, 01:57 AM
ThanatosSwiftfire
post Sep 29 2011, 10:31 AM

Irregular
*******
Senior Member
2,787 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


@douchebag2,

Just a question, do you have a rough estimate of how many people are there in PE/IB/CF? I'm just trying to get a feel of the employee size of this 'niche' field.
How big (no of employee) is the PE/IB/CF depts in the big bulge brackets?
kaiserwulf
post Sep 29 2011, 11:00 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,110 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(douchebag2 @ Sep 29 2011, 01:34 AM)
Knight_2008  Posted Sep 18 2011, 05:48 PM

i've been offered a position in a boutique cf firm. would having a boutique (ie. small firm) on my resume affect my chances to get into the cf dept in a large Ib or Pirvate equity in the future?
do the size of the deal you worked on really matter or it is the different type of deals you work on that matters?
Depends, if we are talking about analyst or associate levels its fine. Yes a big deal does stand out, but what really counts is which part/role did you play in the whole transaction? I rather hire a guy who did the model and ran all scenarios in a US$50 million deal vis-a-vis a guy who just did the due dilligence room on a US$1 billion dollar. But if we are talking about director-level, I have no visibility what-so-ever.


mercury8400  Posted Sep 19 2011, 08:29 AM
 
No, not really. What you should do is get jiggy with all the dato' and tan sri's. Once you have the relevant contacts (strong ones, something like a personal bff) and have their no on speed dial, ask them to drop a few good words for you when they meet up with these IBankers. Guarantee get the job! Connection is king!

Yeah if you have that kind of connections no doubt about it. I think few years back Goldman Sachs hired the personal assitant to George Bush even though the dude was a college-drop out. But hey, how many of us got those kind of connections? If you do, good for you, might as well start a business or something.
Jacky Phang  Posted Sep 19 2011, 05:54 PM
Since I have gave up joining an investment bank, I never experienced those hours and environment.

My friend is 29 now and still making only 5k+ a month from some “tier-3” local investment bank. I wonder if the one at CIMB or Maybank IB gets much more money compared to my friend, who joined IB at 26.

If he is 29 and making only that much, many engineer would have made 7k by 29, summore shorter hours, can go clubbing everyday.

So, my question are
(1) why everyone wants to join IB?
(2) Izzit that good and that much money there?
(3) when will the local bank CF people sees their sharp increment?
(4) What is the stagnant point?

For those who want to guess who my fren is, pls PM me, just in case he sees his own name here.

TQ.


First of, please don't benchmark against Third-tier. Thrid tier to me is like PwC Corporate Finance. Your friend is probably working in some mom and pop shop.

(1) Personally for me, it is the only job out there which (other than consulting) gabe me C-level exposure right out of University. It allowed me to build an amazing network at such a young age. Money and prestige was not my concern at that time.

(2) My total compensation for my first year right out of University was c.US$100k. Go figure.

(3) When they decide to remove all protectionism. I expect a wave of consolidation. But fact is, Malaysia is NOT a financial hub and if local banks can get away with paying cheap, why would they see the need to increase their compensation?

(4) You got to clarify question 4 my friend.

*
I want to give a pat on douchebag2's back. Really, I read a few front pages and I see OP being polite and clear with his questions BUT lots of *flame*/putdowners/'make you small' questions came back. Makes me think these LYNers want others to be poorer than them comparatively.


Nomad_mercenary
post Sep 29 2011, 01:37 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(ThanatosSwiftfire @ Sep 29 2011, 11:31 AM)
@douchebag2,

Just a question, do you have a rough estimate of how many people are there in PE/IB/CF? I'm just trying to get a feel of the employee size of this 'niche' field.
How big (no of employee) is the PE/IB/CF depts in the big bulge brackets?
*
If you're doing some research, I'd like to know the results as well!! Do publish them.

I heard sometime back the major IBs are in recruitment mode again, if anyone's interested.

I like how douchebag2 refers to PwC Corporate Finance as 3rd-tier haha... although, it has to be said, some corporates did come out from there, so perhaps it's not too bad.
If exposure to C-suite / Boards is what you're looking for, just become an auditor; every quarter / year-end you can meet these types of people if you stay long enough.
douchebag2
post Sep 30 2011, 10:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
57 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
ThanatosSwiftfire Posted Yesterday, 10:31 AM
Just a question, do you have a rough estimate of how many people are there in PE/IB/CF? I'm just trying to get a feel of the employee size of this 'niche' field.
How big (no of employee) is the PE/IB/CF depts in the big bulge brackets?

Alright, lets breakdown each of them.

Private Equity = Creme de la creme. All Investment Bankers wants to end up here. Notable names: KKR, Blackstone, Carlye, CVC, TPG, etc. Met Carlye guys before, office in the country I'm working at excluding support staff 12 men.Really competitive, it is almost a pre-requisit to have done Investment Banking to get in.


IB = Investment Banking more specificly M&A, ECM, and DCM we are talking about 5 - 30 strong depending on which banks we are talking about. Bulge Brackets ("BB") would be closer to the 30 mark. However, Merill for example has downside their team from 20 strong to 5.

CF = M&A, ECM, and DCM.


@kaiserwulf: Thanks mate. Sour grapes are everywhere.




Nomad_mercenary Posted Yesterday, 01:37 PM

If you're doing some research, I'd like to know the results as well!! Do publish them.

I heard sometime back the major IBs are in recruitment mode again, if anyone's interested.

I like how douchebag2 refers to PwC Corporate Finance as 3rd-tier haha... although, it has to be said, some corporates did come out from there, so perhaps it's not too bad.
If exposure to C-suite / Boards is what you're looking for, just become an auditor; every quarter / year-end you can meet these types of people if you stay long enough.


Buddy, first of all, IBs are far from recruiting, they are firing people as we speak. My firm has started. Second, PwC is 3rd tier, end of story.
Lastly, being an auditor bugging top management (only true if its a small / medium size firms, you won't see billion dollar firms sending their CEO to meet an auditor) to give you information is of NO VALUE what-so-ever, compare to say sitting down with top management, discussing strategies and charting the way to grow a company through acquisition (but at my level i do more listening than talk). Very very different my friend


DONE PEOPLE, its a Friday, I'm going to party it up! And why don't we have spell check for this?

This post has been edited by douchebag2: Sep 30 2011, 10:55 PM
mercury8400
post Sep 30 2011, 11:17 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,703 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


ahhh... so i can see there are true IBankers around. (and i don't mean the associate level PWC consulting ones talking as though they are in GS or something). Anyhow, if you guys are in the market for deals that require financing, do drop me a PM.(eventually we will make it more formal).

I'm in corporate banking (i.e. the bankers who actually fork out the moolah) and see if we can work something out. We do syndications, project financing, asset based financing, leverage buyouts, IPO bridger, etc and we work extensively with IBankers, PE (CVC is one of the sponsors for one of the LBO deals we are in), etc.


Added on September 30, 2011, 11:21 pm
QUOTE(kinwing @ Sep 19 2011, 12:01 PM)
If you got connection, why bother to work in IBs? Might as well get the AP faster make $ lah whistling.gif
*
Not a bad idea! Maybe you can set-up one of 'em alibaba RM2 start-up company and secure a RM 500 million construction project which you will eventually sub-contract it (along with all the liabilities and responsibilities) to some top tier constuction company and in the process pocket yourself a cool RM 50 million or so.... thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by mercury8400: Sep 30 2011, 11:21 PM
Nomad_mercenary
post Oct 1 2011, 08:40 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(douchebag2 @ Sep 30 2011, 11:55 PM)
Nomad_mercenary  Posted Yesterday, 01:37 PM
 
If you're doing some research, I'd like to know the results as well!! Do publish them.

I heard sometime back the major IBs are in recruitment mode again, if anyone's interested.

I like how douchebag2 refers to PwC Corporate Finance as 3rd-tier haha... although, it has to be said, some corporates did come out from there, so perhaps it's not too bad.
If exposure to C-suite / Boards is what you're looking for, just become an auditor; every quarter / year-end you can meet these types of people if you stay long enough.
Buddy, first of all, IBs are far from recruiting, they are firing people as we speak. My firm has started. Second, PwC is 3rd tier, end of story.
Lastly, being an auditor bugging top management (only true if its a small / medium size firms, you won't see billion dollar firms sending their CEO to meet an auditor) to give you information is of NO VALUE what-so-ever, compare to say sitting down with top management, discussing strategies and charting the way to grow a company through acquisition (but at my level i do more listening than talk). Very very different my friend


DONE PEOPLE, its a Friday, I'm going to party it up! And why don't we have spell check for this?
*
Hmm...I think we're speaking in a different context altogether; you're probably based overseas where the market is downsizing. Malaysia-wise, CIMB has frozen recruitment, others seem to still be recruiting so that's the basis of my statement. International IBs in Msia is an exclusive crowd, can't get in without a golden ticket. I laughed at your 3rd-tier statement due to the fact that I didn't consider them as an IB, if I'm not wrong the post u were replying to was implying a local 3rd-tier IB.

While I agree auditors meeting mgmt to extract information adds nil value in terms of building up your CV and experience, they do get face-time with CEOs and Boards to discuss future strategies and all, but this would be as you progress higher up the chain, and also it'll involve the advisory arm of the auditing firm. Again, this is from a Malaysian setting, I won't pretend to know how it goes in other countries.

At the end of the day, we're all just another Ari Gold trying to make money, the true celebrity is the client.

Enjoy the weekend!
douchebag2
post Oct 2 2011, 02:10 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
57 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
ahhh... so i can see there are true IBankers around. (and i don't mean the associate level PWC consulting ones talking as though they are in GS or something). Anyhow, if you guys are in the market for deals that require financing, do drop me a PM.(eventually we will make it more formal).

I'm in corporate banking (i.e. the bankers who actually fork out the moolah) and see if we can work something out. We do syndications, project financing, asset based financing, leverage buyouts, IPO bridger, etc and we work extensively with IBankers, PE (CVC is one of the sponsors for one of the LBO deals we are in), etc.


I'm guessing when you say CVC you mean the recent KFC deal that didn't happen?
Are you based in Msia?



Hmm...I think we're speaking in a different context altogether; you're probably based overseas where the market is downsizing. Malaysia-wise, CIMB has frozen recruitment, others seem to still be recruiting so that's the basis of my statement. International IBs in Msia is an exclusive crowd, can't get in without a golden ticket. I laughed at your 3rd-tier statement due to the fact that I didn't consider them as an IB, if I'm not wrong the post u were replying to was implying a local 3rd-tier IB.

While I agree auditors meeting mgmt to extract information adds nil value in terms of building up your CV and experience, they do get face-time with CEOs and Boards to discuss future strategies and all, but this would be as you progress higher up the chain, and also it'll involve the advisory arm of the auditing firm. Again, this is from a Malaysian setting, I won't pretend to know how it goes in other countries.

At the end of the day, we're all just another Ari Gold trying to make money, the true celebrity is the client.

Enjoy the weekend!


Yeah if you're from the advisory arm thats pretty decent. Deloitte Consulting is a pretty solid brand name. It amazes me that local IBs are still hiring.
ThanatosSwiftfire
post Oct 2 2011, 06:05 PM

Irregular
*******
Senior Member
2,787 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


@douchebag2,

well, that's enlightening.
I guess the odds of me starting a food business that might make US1m in profits after 5 years, is higher than the odds of me getting into IB/PE after 5 years, and make US1m.

Sigh, and here I tot there's a way to work my way into richness. Time to start my own char kuay teow store instead...

douchebag2
post Oct 4 2011, 10:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
57 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(ThanatosSwiftfire @ Oct 2 2011, 06:05 PM)
@douchebag2,

well, that's enlightening.
I guess the odds of me starting a food business that might make US1m in profits after 5 years, is higher than the odds of me getting into IB/PE after 5 years, and make US1m.

Sigh, and here I tot there's a way to work my way into richness. Time to start my own char kuay teow store instead...
*
Well, its not really an ideal time right now.
In 2007 you see accountants getting hired into investment banking, my view is that, its going to be awhile before we get back to that level.
RedShirt
post Oct 5 2011, 01:22 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
515 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: PJ


As far as I know, CIMB Investment has frozen recruitment. ROE and ratio.
copenhagen1
post Jan 16 2012, 03:51 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
11 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
From: United Kingdom
QUOTE(confused*88* @ Nov 25 2010, 12:49 AM)
Some good advice there. Thanks.

Anyway I'm fresh from uni, so I'm still in my early 20s. =)

I guess I'll try plan B in the future after getting a few years experience.

Mind explaining more about plan A? I've applied for BB but I'm not putting much hope on it.

Is MY Tier 1 IB experience better than Big 4 CF or the other way round? Which is more credible for BB IB?
I'm really interested in the area and I enjoyed my internship very much. I like the challenges put upon me and I find value in that. Well, the money really is a plus for more motivation in this case, I wouldn't deny that.

I'm sure I'm capable of performing at this area and I also realise that I have to polish my communication skills but that can be trained as I get more experience.
Yeah I've applied for graduate positions but the competition is really intense. It's good if I'm able to land it but I wouldn't be sad if I couldn't.

I'm afraid to be rotated into the commercial banking side of the business. LOL. I have a basic understanding of their hiring practice so I think I'll go for the alternative route. That's if I decided to join them down the road.

Anyway, from ur advice, u reckon local IB is better than Big 4 CF experience? Thanks.
U reckon local IB is better than Big 4 CF experience?

Maybe we're talking about different company here or maybe they have changed their system. Before this I heard it's possible for a fresh graduate to join as an executive but I think they've changed their policies. Fresh graduates must now go through the MT program and be rotated. That's from what I understood. Correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks.
*
Yes, I do agree. Entering a top B-school surely open doors for you, and you have plenty to choose from. I am currently at LSE doing an MBA and it has certainly opened plenty of doors and opportunities for me. biggrin.gif
Knight_2008
post Jan 16 2012, 12:44 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(copenhagen1 @ Jan 16 2012, 03:51 AM)
Yes, I do agree. Entering a top B-school surely open doors for you, and you have plenty to choose from. I am currently at LSE doing an MBA and it has certainly opened plenty of doors and opportunities for me.  biggrin.gif
*
wow. Nice smile.gif

anyway, if u don't mind, what's your gmat score and where did you do your undergraduate? I'm planning to do my mba in a good b-school like yours and would like to know the profile of the accepted candidates in order to asses my chances of getting in. Lol
copenhagen1
post Jan 16 2012, 07:43 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
11 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
From: United Kingdom
QUOTE
wow. Nice

anyway, if u don't mind, what's your gmat score and where did you do your undergraduate? I'm planning to do my mba in a good b-school like yours and would like to know the profile of the accepted candidates in order to asses my chances of getting in. Lol


I did my undergraduate in the UK at the University of Nottingham. The MiM and CEMS I'm doing is for students fresh out of undergraduate and without 5 years of working experience. It's very interesting cause they structured it like an MBA. It has been consistently been ranked in the Financial Times as no.1/no.2.

They placed a lot of emphasis on your personal statement and CV. My other European and Asian classmates needed a GMAT score of more than 650 as places are very competitive. I did not need a GMAT as I graduated in the UK.

All the best to you! smile.gif

This post has been edited by copenhagen1: Jan 16 2012, 07:46 PM
verticalforce
post Jan 16 2012, 08:24 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
152 posts

Joined: Apr 2006


QUOTE(copenhagen1 @ Jan 16 2012, 12:43 PM)
I did my undergraduate in the UK at the University of Nottingham. The MiM and CEMS I'm doing is for students fresh out of undergraduate and without 5 years of working experience. It's very interesting cause they structured it like an MBA. It has been consistently been ranked in the Financial Times as no.1/no.2.

They placed a lot of emphasis on your personal statement and CV. My other European and Asian classmates needed a GMAT score of more than 650 as places are very competitive. I did not need a GMAT as I graduated in the UK.

All the best to you! smile.gif
*
How are you finding the job market in UK? Is LSE peeps doing well with current year recruitment?

My friend is doing MPhil Finance at Cambridge and majority of his classmates at Cambridge is struggling to get into investment banking jobs in London
copenhagen1
post Jan 16 2012, 08:38 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
11 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
From: United Kingdom
QUOTE(verticalforce @ Jan 16 2012, 08:24 PM)
How are you finding the job market in UK?  Is LSE peeps doing well with current year recruitment?

My friend is doing MPhil Finance at Cambridge and majority of his classmates at Cambridge is struggling to get into investment banking jobs in London
*
The job market in the UK is horrendous. The ratio of a position is approx 35,000 to 1. IBs are now focusing on emerging markets. I would go to emerging markets. Plenty of opportunities and asymmetric information biggrin.gif
Knight_2008
post Jan 16 2012, 09:46 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(copenhagen1 @ Jan 16 2012, 08:38 PM)
The job market in the UK is horrendous. The ratio of a position is approx 35,000 to 1. IBs are now focusing on emerging markets. I would go to emerging markets. Plenty of opportunities and asymmetric information  biggrin.gif
*
haha, but in emerging markets you pay is lower right?


Added on January 16, 2012, 9:47 pm
QUOTE(copenhagen1 @ Jan 16 2012, 07:43 PM)
I did my undergraduate in the UK at the University of Nottingham. The MiM and CEMS I'm doing is for students fresh out of undergraduate and without 5 years of working experience. It's very interesting cause they structured it like an MBA. It has been consistently been ranked in the Financial Times as no.1/no.2.

They placed a lot of emphasis on your personal statement and CV. My other European and Asian classmates needed a GMAT score of more than 650 as places are very competitive. I did not need a GMAT as I graduated in the UK.

All the best to you! smile.gif
*
so you're doing MiM and not MBA?

This post has been edited by Knight_2008: Jan 16 2012, 09:47 PM
copenhagen1
post Jan 16 2012, 10:54 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
11 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
From: United Kingdom
QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Jan 16 2012, 09:46 PM)
haha, but in emerging markets you pay is lower right?


Added on January 16, 2012, 9:47 pm

so you're doing MiM and not MBA?
*
Yep it's MiM & CEMS. LSE does not offer MBA, and they structure their MiM in the style of MBA and more. That was what we were told on orientation day.
Knight_2008
post Jan 17 2012, 01:27 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(copenhagen1 @ Jan 16 2012, 10:54 PM)
Yep it's MiM & CEMS. LSE does not offer MBA, and they structure their MiM in the style of MBA and more. That was what we were told on orientation day.
*
icic. interesting, so it don't need any working experience to take it?? And how are the job opportunities like after the students graduate? is the career service useful?
copenhagen1
post Jan 18 2012, 03:55 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
11 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
From: United Kingdom
QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Jan 17 2012, 01:27 PM)
icic. interesting, so it don't need any working experience to take it?? And how are the job opportunities like after the students graduate? is the career service useful?
*
Years of working experience is not a main requirement. But most of the students have had at least a few internships and some prior joining the course had worked for less than 5 years. Before graduation, more than 60% of the class would have got a job. The following are some of the companies which students went to:

Accenture
AstraZeneca
A.T. Kearney
Barclays
Boston Consulting Group
BP
Citi
Coca Cola
Credit Suisse
Deloitte
Deutsche Bank
Diageo
Ernst & Young
Goldman Sachs
Google
JP Morgan
KPMG
Lazard
L'Oréal
Markit
Mercer Consulting
McKinsey
Morgan Stanley
Oliver Wyman
Palantir Techologies
Procter & Gamble
PwC
Rolls Royce
Rothschild
Shell
Standard Bank
Tesco
Total
UBS
United Nations
douchebag2
post Jan 18 2012, 09:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
57 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
Man, things are bad, my advisor from ML just got fired.
I'm still here though, waiting to ride out the storm.

For the record, IB pay is pretty standard taking into account taxes.
Mrlulu
post Apr 2 2012, 06:03 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
16 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
Spent almost an hour to read through all the posts up there. Thanks for those who contributed to these posts, really found it very useful:)

I just recently secured a CF job in a a mid tier accounting firm (wanted to get into IB but my academic result is not that decent), found this firm in the SC web site which listed all Capital Markets Services Licence holders for Advising on Corporate Finance in Malaysia.

Is there any advises for a newbie like me? (i'm an accounting grad without finance knowledge)
etc what books to read and things that help in improving skills and knowleges:)
iceypain
post Apr 2 2012, 09:31 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
503 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(Mrlulu @ Apr 2 2012, 06:03 PM)
Spent almost an hour to read through all the posts up there. Thanks for those who contributed to these posts, really found it very useful:)

I just recently secured a CF job in a a mid tier accounting firm (wanted to get into IB but my academic result is not that decent), found this firm in the SC web site which listed all Capital Markets Services Licence holders for Advising on Corporate Finance in Malaysia.

Is there any advises for a newbie like me? (i'm an accounting grad without finance knowledge)
etc what books to read and things that help in improving skills and knowleges:)
*
http://www.amazon.com/Investment-Banking-V...s/dp/0470442204
LightningFist
post Apr 12 2012, 06:28 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
Hey guys, I'd like to do an internship (in IB) to get some exposure/experience. Would be 2 months.

Will be second year undergrad, should have decent results, have significant work exp in BO - Global Markets at British bank. If applications are processed efficiently and fairly, I should get a place, I think.

Which would be best, Maybank, CIMB, or others, for IB?

I know CIMB just bought some of RBS's businesses. Not sure how that affects its KL operations. But clearly CIMB is quite big and ambitious.

On the other hand Maybank is the biggest bank. But I not sure what experience (in terms of IB) I can expect to gain, as I know someone else who did an internship there, and I heard I would be doing the same, even tho I would be a penultimate year student, and my contact has not even started undergrad.

Any advice?

I know I can't expect too much. Last internship I did was less than 2 months (not the BO job at the bank), and unfortunately I did not gain much.

Thanks.

QUOTE(verticalforce @ Jan 16 2012, 10:24 PM)
How are you finding the job market in UK?  Is LSE peeps doing well with current year recruitment?

My friend is doing MPhil Finance at Cambridge and majority of his classmates at Cambridge is struggling to get into investment banking jobs in London
*
You know things are bad when the Oxbridge folk are struggling. Anyone miss the good old days pre-GFC when guys like Kweku Adoboli could get FO jobs (no offence to Nottingham University)?
ooyellowoo
post Apr 13 2012, 03:42 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
Hello, I would like more information on local bank's CF and VC and whether the pay is decent for a Singapore undergrad interviewing for a Summer Analyst position. I have had M&A experience in a regional IB and my main concern is the standard of living that I can afford with my SA pay in KL.

How does accommodation/ transport total up in KL? Also, regarding the interview, apart from current affairs, how technical will the questions get? Should I expect them to quiz me on assumptions of CAPM, Delever/Lever Beta, Accretion/dilution etc? Or are the questions more towards the generic side? Finally, if I were to talk about my modelling experience, should I use the terms Precedents/Comparables or should I use TCA/CCA? Honestly, I have never seen the abbreviations TCA and CCA until I came across this forum.

Thanks!
iceypain
post Apr 15 2012, 12:03 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
503 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(ooyellowoo @ Apr 13 2012, 03:42 PM)
Hello, I would like more information on local bank's CF and VC and whether the pay is decent for a Singapore undergrad interviewing for a Summer Analyst position. I have had M&A experience in a regional IB and my main concern is the standard of living that I can afford with my SA pay in KL.

How does accommodation/ transport total up in KL? Also, regarding the interview, apart from current affairs, how technical will the questions get? Should I expect them to quiz me on assumptions of CAPM,  Delever/Lever Beta, Accretion/dilution etc? Or are the questions more towards the generic side? Finally, if I were to talk about my modelling experience, should I use the terms Precedents/Comparables or should I use TCA/CCA? Honestly, I have never seen the abbreviations TCA and CCA until I came across this forum.

Thanks!
*
If pay is a concern, most banks here will disappoint you. I was told that cimb pays about 700myr a month, which is barely enough to cover rent in kl. Transportation is a nightmare compared to singapore.

As far as technicals, I'm not sure because I've never interviewed here before. But from what my friends who have spent summers at the banks here say, I wouldn't expect merger/lbo modeling, a lot of the work you'll be doing would be b****work and making pitchbooks/documents. It looks like you're familiar with basic valuation and accounting, so I think you'll be fine on the technical front.

Any reason you're targeting malaysia, esp coming from singapore? I'm sure there are boutique banks still looking now that you've missed bb recruiting.
ooyellowoo
post Apr 15 2012, 02:52 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(iceypain @ Apr 15 2012, 12:03 AM)
If pay is a concern, most banks here will disappoint you. I was told that cimb pays about 700myr a month, which is barely enough to cover rent in kl. Transportation is a nightmare compared to singapore.

As far as technicals, I'm not sure because I've never interviewed here before. But from what my friends who have spent summers at the banks here say, I wouldn't expect merger/lbo modeling, a lot of the work you'll be doing would be b****work and making pitchbooks/documents. It looks like you're familiar with basic valuation and accounting, so I think you'll be fine on the technical front.

Any reason you're targeting malaysia, esp coming from singapore? I'm sure there are boutique banks still looking now that you've missed bb recruiting.
*
Thank you so much for your reply!

As I'm not a local (Malaysian), I will have to rent an apartment and pay for my laundry/food/clothes etc so I'm really really concerned about the pay that I might receive as a non-local SA. I dont think I would be able to survive - much less live comfortably - in KL on MYR 700.

I suppose many recent SAs do rubbish work because of the dry deal pipeline in Asia, but luckily (or not) I do have modelling experience and I can spread comps with reasonable accuracy in about 1-2 hrs with ThomsonOne/Bloomberg access. I worked like a dog (90 hour weeks/4months) in 2011 but I really love the work hard play hard culture that only CF provides.

Unfortunately, very seldom do BBs in sg open CF positions to local grads and the recent superday that I've been to for a decent bank (DBS/OCBC/StanChart...) are full with grads from Ivies/UC schools/Oxbridge etc.

I actually hope to improve on my deal exposure and to rebrand myself with some of the better known banks here in Malaysia (CIMB/RHB/OSK...) and to seriously consider starting my career here in Malaysia with a top CF team before any embarking on my long-term plans. Interestingly enough, banks here tie their IB recruitment channels with retail/corporate banking recruitment channels and I find this flexibility very refreshing.

On the issue of my SA stipend, how open do you think HR would be for negotiations on pay matters? Do you think breaking into buy-side is a viable route here in Malaysia? I find the notion of carry and generally lesser hours very assuring if I were to contemplate starting a family in the near future.

Thanks again!

This post has been edited by ooyellowoo: Apr 15 2012, 02:57 AM
iceypain
post Apr 15 2012, 06:12 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
503 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(ooyellowoo @ Apr 15 2012, 02:52 AM)
Thank you so much for your reply!

As I'm not a local (Malaysian), I will have to rent an apartment and pay for my laundry/food/clothes etc so I'm really really concerned about the pay that I might receive as a non-local SA. I dont think I would be able to survive - much less live comfortably - in KL on MYR 700.

I suppose many recent SAs do rubbish work because of the dry deal pipeline in Asia, but luckily (or not) I do have modelling experience and I can spread comps with reasonable accuracy in about 1-2 hrs with ThomsonOne/Bloomberg access. I worked like a dog (90 hour weeks/4months) in 2011 but I really love the work hard play hard culture that only CF provides.

Unfortunately, very seldom do BBs in sg open CF positions to local grads and the recent superday that I've been to for a decent bank (DBS/OCBC/StanChart...) are full with grads from Ivies/UC schools/Oxbridge etc.

I actually hope to improve on my deal exposure and to rebrand myself with some of the better known banks here in Malaysia (CIMB/RHB/OSK...) and to seriously consider starting my career here in Malaysia with a top CF team before any embarking on my long-term plans. Interestingly enough, banks here tie their IB recruitment channels with retail/corporate banking recruitment channels and I find this flexibility very refreshing.

On the issue of my SA stipend, how open do you think HR would be for negotiations on pay matters? Do you think breaking into buy-side is a viable route here in Malaysia? I find the notion of carry and generally lesser hours very assuring if I were to contemplate starting a family in the near future.

Thanks again!
*
I wouldn't count on asking for more pay, interns are commodities--you really have no leverage to negotiate. Buy-side in Malaysia is tiny, the only PE firm with a decent rep is navis capital, and you probably have no shot of breaking in. Even the local banks prefer uk/us students.

The truth is, banking is an industry of prestige whores, that's why you're finding it hard to compete with ivy and oxbridge students even though you're probably way ahead with m&a experience. I went to an ivy and it's definitely not cakewalk for us to get in too but I know it must be a lot harder for local grads. If you really want to break in eventually I think you should look into getting a brand name masters in finance some time down the line.

Why don't you stay with your old firm, it seems like you had a decent experience there?

ps heard from someone that lazard singapore is looking so you might want to check that out.

This post has been edited by iceypain: Apr 15 2012, 06:12 AM
ooyellowoo
post Apr 15 2012, 04:18 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Apr 2012
QUOTE(iceypain @ Apr 15 2012, 06:12 AM)
I wouldn't count on asking for more pay, interns are commodities--you really have no leverage to negotiate. Buy-side in Malaysia is tiny, the only PE firm with a decent rep is navis capital, and you probably have no shot of breaking in. Even the local banks prefer uk/us students.

The truth is, banking is an industry of prestige whores, that's why you're finding it hard to compete with ivy and oxbridge students even though you're probably way ahead with m&a experience.  I went to an ivy and it's definitely not cakewalk for us to get in too but I know it must be a lot harder for local grads. If you really want to break in eventually I think you should look into getting a brand name masters in finance some time down the line.

Why don't you stay with your old firm, it seems like you had a decent experience there?

ps heard from someone that lazard singapore is looking so you might want to check that out.
*
So true. I'm sure the reason I was selected for superday was because of my prior deal experience. I'm working on the brand name too, that's why I'm looking to rebrand myself in Malaysia. If it doesnt work out i'll probably go to warwick/lse for my msf depending on how good my finals are.

I've thought about that, but the deal size is too small (< USD 50m).

Thank you for the info i'll see what contacts I can find.
mercury8400
post Apr 15 2012, 05:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,703 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(too_old_for_this2 @ Aug 22 2011, 07:04 PM)
The sg job market was hit really badly during the crisis and I pretty much found a lot of my own friends and other peers in same situation as me..  In fact, some have not even found a job since 2009. I would argue it has not really recovered ever since - unless you are covering Indonesia ..  KL market on the other hand is relatively more stable (I guess that probably is due to the lower cost base than anything else).. Cant say I am really a reluctant returner but begger cant be choosers so I have to make the most out of it.. it's sth that I am actively pursuing now.. been in touch with few headhunters but market is still very luke-warm.

To Maverick2011, I dont have your answer to your exact question but as usual, I can try to pinpoint some data point (I try to limit data point to local banks)

1)CF - Head of Department. A typical MD level at says CIMB (they call it Team Director or sth) would be raking in something close to RM40 - 50k p. mth as based. bonus would be anywhere from 12 mths to 36 mths.  Head of CF would probably rake in 80k per mth but you are not likely to get there with just 15 yrs experience, unless the odder batch steps down. These days, I were made to understand even if a 10 years Director can make close to 30k at cimb. at the same time, Maybank under TZ has greatly revamped its senior troop comp to be on par or even more competitive than cimb.

2) Sell Side Analyst . A typical Head of Research would probably raking in RM30k+ but bonus usually wont be more than 12 mths. I stand to be corrected here as I dont have that much analyst friends.

3) Head of Dealing. This is really hard to gauge cos I heard that one CIMB Head of Treasury actually made a lot more money than Jay Razak (sth like RM15+ million in a good year). On the other hand, one senior dealer at Ambank that I know of made some RM30k per mth whereas another guy at OSK only make 15+k. This fluctuates hugely but my guess is that this CIMB fella is probably more or an outlier than anything.

In summary, IB head > Analyst > Head of Dealing on average.

This is the trend at foreign IB as well .

There are quite a few top gun Malaysian just for sharing:-

Check out the Richard Ong brothers (both spent years at GS, and one is a multi-billionaire running his own pe fund in China; the other now the Chief Investment Officer at Temasek / GIC). They are probably the top percentile-representative of the IB career path. And then there's Kendall Court's Chris and a few more..

Then there is this Penang fella Cheah of Value Partners, ex Morgan Greenfell Analyst Head who then founded one of the largest hedge funds in asia with >usd5b AUM (just fees alone he would be pocketing some USD50m per year).  He would probably the top % representative of the Analyst career path. -and if you never hear of him, google it. his story would be a true source of inspration (he has to drop off high sch at 15/ 16 and work as rubber tapper in some kinda of sob story)

I cant thk of anyone who made as much money  or as high profile as Head of Dealing. but if you mean Trader, there is one Malaysian ex-Citi prop trader based in NYC - his firm is called Kamunting Capital or sth like that - again with ten of billions AUM..

So sky is indeed the limit.

No doubt everyone has a burning desire for big money but what make you stand out from the other guys to really excel in the industry (and how to get in if you are not in yet)?

This is the question I ask myself every day!!
*
spoken like someone who's been there before.
But seriously, the market especially in rest of the world (ex M'sia) is pretty much doom and gloom at the moment for Ibankers
They are massively laying off people by batches even now. Just got a call from my friend that HSBC has layed-off almost 100 people some in Ibanking. Next batch comming soon. Many others boutique firms are also laying off people discreetly. The rest of the boys have effectively frozen recruitment until further notice.
Definately not a good place to be in if you have mouths to feed and mortagages to pay.
douchebag2
post Apr 15 2012, 11:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
57 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
QUOTE(iceypain @ Apr 15 2012, 06:12 AM)
I wouldn't count on asking for more pay, interns are commodities--you really have no leverage to negotiate. Buy-side in Malaysia is tiny, the only PE firm with a decent rep is navis capital, and you probably have no shot of breaking in. Even the local banks prefer uk/us students.

The truth is, banking is an industry of prestige whores, that's why you're finding it hard to compete with ivy and oxbridge students even though you're probably way ahead with m&a experience.  I went to an ivy and it's definitely not cakewalk for us to get in too but I know it must be a lot harder for local grads. If you really want to break in eventually I think you should look into getting a brand name masters in finance some time down the line.

Why don't you stay with your old firm, it seems like you had a decent experience there?

ps heard from someone that lazard singapore is looking so you might want to check that out.
*
What they are still looking for someone? It's an analyst postion, they've been looking for someone since last year.
Lazard in Singapore isn't that great. They are strong in North America, but their asian presence is crap, excluding HK and Australia.

Rothschild in Singapore is pretty decent.

Iceypain, you went to an ivy and you join a local bank?? Times must have been extremely tough when you graduated.

LightningFist
post Apr 16 2012, 12:18 AM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
QUOTE(douchebag2 @ Apr 16 2012, 01:56 AM)
What they are still looking for someone? It's an analyst postion, they've been looking for someone since last year.
Lazard in Singapore isn't that great. They are strong in North America, but their asian presence is crap, excluding HK and Australia.

Rothschild in Singapore is pretty decent.

Iceypain, you went to an ivy and you join a local bank?? Times must have been extremely tough when you graduated.

*
Lazard is Asset Management right? It's a hedge fund type firm?

Even if it's not IB, any worthwhile position in Finance is better than none, I suppose.

Why does Mergers and Inquisitions (the blog) seem to have a very negative view towards Sales and Trading in general? I know IB and trading are very different, but the blog tells it as if traders are screwed and will never reach the god-like status of IB bankers. I know traders and IB bankers have very different skill-sets, but it's a bit condescending and I'd like to know why. Only because of the average pay difference?
iceypain
post Apr 16 2012, 12:22 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
503 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(douchebag2 @ Apr 15 2012, 11:56 PM)
What they are still looking for someone? It's an analyst postion, they've been looking for someone since last year.
Lazard in Singapore isn't that great. They are strong in North America, but their asian presence is crap, excluding HK and Australia.

Rothschild in Singapore is pretty decent.

Iceypain, you went to an ivy and you join a local bank?? Times must have been extremely tough when you graduated.

*
This post has been edited by iceypain: Jun 26 2012, 12:26 AM
jasperng
post Apr 16 2012, 11:19 AM

- Eminent Leader -
******
Senior Member
1,264 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: KL, Malaysia



may I know if there's any chance for engineering graduate to go for IB ? I know it's difficult but I would like to know how possible it is ...
LightningFist
post Apr 16 2012, 01:47 PM

Minion of the Damned
Group Icon
VIP
3,965 posts

Joined: Apr 2009
CIMB vs Maybank vs RHB/OSK vs others, anybody?
fletcherwind
post Apr 16 2012, 04:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
QUOTE(LightningFist @ Apr 16 2012, 12:18 AM)
Lazard is Asset Management right? It's a hedge fund type firm?

Even if it's not IB, any worthwhile position in Finance is better than none, I suppose.

Why does Mergers and Inquisitions (the blog) seem to have a very negative view towards Sales and Trading in general? I know IB and trading are very different, but the blog tells it as if traders are screwed and will never reach the god-like status of IB bankers. I know traders and IB bankers have very different skill-sets, but it's a bit condescending and I'd like to know why. Only because of the average pay difference?
*
Lazard is known for their CF advisory.

Finance positions advertised in the market are usually not IB FO jobs. Be aware of what you're applying for.

In the end, it's down to what you want to do.

QUOTE(jasperng @ Apr 16 2012, 11:19 AM)
may I know if there's any chance for engineering graduate to go for IB ? I know it's difficult but  I would like to know how possible it is ...
*
It's pretty common to see engineering grads working in IB. Uni brand name, results and other qualities matter more than the choice of your undergrad course.
kingkhong2008
post Jun 15 2012, 12:59 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
123 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(IBank BeanBag @ Jun 14 2012, 09:49 PM)
what foreign IB is hiring in Malaysia? I am going to interview with CIMB CF, any idea if their ECM is hiring?
*
CIMB CF is hiring?? How you apply? How come not stated in the website career?
earplug
post Jun 15 2012, 04:56 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
7 posts

Joined: Jun 2012
QUOTE(iceypain @ Apr 16 2012, 12:22 AM)
Nope, got an offer here in the us at a mm, will be starting in a few months. Times were/are definitely tough, even in target schools the success rate was little over 50 percent.

Yeah I know laz asia isn't that great, just heard that they were looking for interns a while ago.
*
Is Lazard still hiring for analyst position?

I'm finishing up my masters at ivy league/oxbridge (not going to reveal here) and finding it difficult to find a job outside malaysia.

Thanks.

This post has been edited by earplug: Jun 15 2012, 04:57 AM
cristiano7mu
post Aug 8 2012, 08:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,588 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


Edited

This post has been edited by cristiano7mu: May 6 2014, 10:44 PM
Confusedgirl99
post Oct 13 2016, 11:10 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Oct 2016
HI all,

Anyone here currently with Aminvest?

Mind to share more about their remuneration package/culture/people?

Thanks!
Dogta
post Oct 15 2016, 12:20 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
200 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
QUOTE(Confusedgirl99 @ Oct 13 2016, 11:10 PM)
HI all,

Anyone here currently with Aminvest?

Mind to share more about their remuneration package/culture/people?

Thanks!
*
Brutal hours, but trust me, you will be well compensated.

Team size is small ~10 people so you'll be with a close knit bunch. Easy to make friends since you'll be spending many a late night with the bunch.

If you can get in just do it for the experience and potential godlike resume.
Confusedgirl99
post Oct 16 2016, 04:19 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Oct 2016
QUOTE(Dogta @ Oct 15 2016, 12:20 AM)
Brutal hours, but trust me, you will be well compensated.

Team size is small ~10 people so you'll be with a close knit bunch. Easy to make friends since you'll be spending many a late night with the bunch.

If you can get in just do it for the experience and potential godlike resume.
*
Thanks for the info!

I guess the grueling hours are expected. Hope I could catch up with their pace.

Are people there consider friendly bunch?


Dogta
post Oct 16 2016, 11:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
200 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
QUOTE(Confusedgirl99 @ Oct 16 2016, 04:19 AM)
Thanks for the info!

I guess the grueling hours are expected. Hope I could catch up with their pace.

Are people there consider friendly bunch?
*
It varies from team to team, but generally speaking if you spend that many hours with the same people, there will be a sense of communion and strong bonds tend to form over time due to similar hardships faced (i.e., grueling hours, last min client requests on Friday or even coming back to the office together on weekends) smile.gif
Corporate Finance
post Oct 17 2016, 02:09 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
31 posts

Joined: May 2016
QUOTE(Confusedgirl99 @ Oct 14 2016, 12:10 AM)
HI all,

Anyone here currently with Aminvest?

Mind to share more about their remuneration package/culture/people?

Thanks!
*
Lol aminvest.. Good luck, u will really need it
XxAC3xX
post Oct 18 2016, 10:22 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: KL


Hi all.

Thanks for all the valuable inputs contributed.

On a broader sense, I'd like to understand the odds for a non-finance background graduate in breaking into the following entry-level finance roles:
1. Research at buy-side or sell-side
2. Risk management
3. Treasury/asset management
4. CF at foreign and local investment banks (pretty much unrealistic if you're not top graduate from top unis from what I gathered)
5. CF/financial analyst at Big4 or mid-tier firms
6. Financial analyst at companies (well at least it's likely for GE FMP)

I'd be most grateful if someone could advise what are the options and companies for this case.

Thanks!

This post has been edited by XxAC3xX: Nov 17 2016, 08:26 PM
Dogta
post Oct 22 2016, 02:37 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
200 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
QUOTE(XxAC3xX @ Oct 18 2016, 10:22 PM)
Hi all.

Thanks for all the valuable inputs contributed.

What are the realistic odds and options of breaking into CF for a candidate with the following profile:
-first class honors
-engineering degree
-Universiti Malaya (UM)
-<1 year Corporate Strategy experience at a public-listed telco startup
-finance internship at a MNC
-active extra-curricular participation and achievements

On a broader sense, I'd like to understand the odds for a non-finance background graduate in breaking into the following entry-level finance roles:
1. Research at buy-side or sell-side
2. Risk management
3. Treasury/asset management
4. CF at foreign and local investment banks (pretty much unrealistic if you're not top graduate from top unis from what I gathered)
5. CF/financial analyst at Big4 or mid-tier firms
6. Financial analyst at companies (well at least it's likely for GE FMP)

I'd be most grateful if someone could advise what are the options and companies for this case.

Thanks!
*
To break into CF sometimes it depends on luck as well, of course competition will be tough. You can send me your resume for review if you need extra help. A word of caution, CF departments tend to prefer overseas universities / non-local students and while corporate strategy tends to be viewed as less sexy than CF, you're already ahead of the pack with two internships.

I'll say if you have a quant centric degree i.e., engineering, maths, physics etc. it'll be easier to get into ER.

Risk and treasury are more MO while AM shops prefer CFA charterholders.

Financial analyst at PLCs or MNCs tend to be easiest to get into as it competition is lower.
old_and_slow
post Oct 23 2016, 12:48 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,602 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: Malaysia



it gets better if u know someone from the industry themselves (recommendation by peers). also you must prove your interest in the said industry, not just paper qualification. we have a lot of highly paper qualified people who cant do the job.
Dogta
post Oct 23 2016, 03:52 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
200 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
QUOTE(old_and_slow @ Oct 23 2016, 12:48 PM)
it gets better if u know someone from the industry themselves (recommendation by peers). also you must prove your interest in the said industry, not just paper qualification. we have a lot of highly paper qualified people who cant do the job.
*
The three most important things in finance are network, network and network!
XxAC3xX
post Oct 25 2016, 03:45 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(Dogta @ Oct 22 2016, 02:37 PM)
To break into CF sometimes it depends on luck as well, of course competition will be tough. You can send me your resume for review if you need extra help. A word of caution, CF departments tend to prefer overseas universities / non-local students and while corporate strategy tends to be viewed as less sexy than CF, you're already ahead of the pack with two internships.

I'll say if you have a quant centric degree i.e., engineering, maths, physics etc. it'll be easier to get into ER.

Risk and treasury are more MO while AM shops prefer CFA charterholders.

Financial analyst at PLCs or MNCs tend to be easiest to get into as it competition is lower.
*
Dogta, thanks for the input and offer. Sent you a PM.




commtrader
post Oct 25 2016, 08:27 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
343 posts

Joined: Jul 2014
QUOTE(XxAC3xX @ Oct 18 2016, 10:22 PM)
Hi all.

Thanks for all the valuable inputs contributed.

What are the realistic odds and options of breaking into CF for a candidate with the following profile:
-first class honors
-engineering degree
-Universiti Malaya (UM)
-<1 year Corporate Strategy experience at a public-listed telco startup
-finance internship at a MNC
-active extra-curricular participation and achievements

On a broader sense, I'd like to understand the odds for a non-finance background graduate in breaking into the following entry-level finance roles:
1. Research at buy-side or sell-side
2. Risk management
3. Treasury/asset management
4. CF at foreign and local investment banks (pretty much unrealistic if you're not top graduate from top unis from what I gathered)
5. CF/financial analyst at Big4 or mid-tier firms
6. Financial analyst at companies (well at least it's likely for GE FMP)

I'd be most grateful if someone could advise what are the options and companies for this case.

Thanks!
*
I have the same degree like you, instead of going to a bank, end up going to commodities trading which not many ppl know it and the pay believe is quite okay compared to bank
XxAC3xX
post Nov 17 2016, 08:46 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
380 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: KL


Hello.

Would be great if someone could provide insights on the following:
1. Differences in terms of analyst work and exposure: Large IB’s CF (i.e. Maybank IB) vs Boutique Firm’s CF (i.e. ZJ Advisory Sdn Bhd) vs Big4’s CF
Seen posts saying there's differences, but I can't seem to find the discussion on what EXACTLY is the differences.

My understanding of CF work can generally be broken down into following components:
i. Pitch decks/presentations
ii. Financial modelling/technical analysis
iii. Due diligence to validate financials and activities through documents cross-checking by liaising with clients, companies, audit, tax, regulatory bodies, different entities etc.
iv. Necessary documentations

Apart from deal size and working hours differences, what and how exactly different it is in terms of the kind of work?

2. Always heard people saying the pay is high, if you don’t mind to share, what is the usual bonus range for entry levels at local IBs, boutique advisory firms, and Big4? Based on what I gathered online, the base salary is RM3-4k/month right?

3. About networking: Don’t have much close contacts in the CF career. So I’ve been sending out cold-emails through LinkedIn to set-up appointments/phone calls. Then, they usually offer to forward my resume to HR at the end of meetup/conversation. Am I doing it right? I'm not quite sure about the mindset/courtesy behind of asking someone I barely know to refer me in while I'm inexperienced in CF and financial modelling.


Thanks!

QUOTE(commtrader @ Oct 25 2016, 08:27 AM)
I have the same degree like you, instead of going to a bank, end up going to commodities trading which not many ppl know it and the pay believe is quite okay compared to bank
*
Hi, good for you sir

The work involves technical analysis (supply-demand and charts type as opposed to fundamental analysis) and trade execution I suppose? Mind to share a little what does the work entails at commodities trading
Topace111
post Nov 18 2016, 11:24 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,102 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
QUOTE(XxAC3xX @ Nov 17 2016, 08:46 PM)
Hello.

Would be great if someone could provide insights on the following:
1. Differences in terms of analyst work and exposure: Large IB’s CF (i.e. Maybank IB) vs Boutique Firm’s CF (i.e. ZJ Advisory Sdn Bhd) vs Big4’s CF
Seen posts saying there's differences, but I can't seem to find the discussion on what EXACTLY is the differences.

My understanding of CF work can generally be broken down into following components:
i. Pitch decks/presentations
ii. Financial modelling/technical analysis
iii. Due diligence to validate financials and activities through documents cross-checking by liaising with clients, companies, audit, tax, regulatory bodies, different entities etc.
iv. Necessary documentations

Apart from deal size and working hours differences, what and how exactly different it is in terms of the kind of work?

2. Always heard people saying the pay is high, if you don’t mind to share, what is the usual bonus range for entry levels at local IBs, boutique advisory firms, and Big4? Based on what I gathered online, the base salary is RM3-4k/month right?

3. About networking: Don’t have much close contacts in the CF career. So I’ve been sending out cold-emails through LinkedIn to set-up appointments/phone calls. Then, they usually offer to forward my resume to HR at the end of meetup/conversation. Am I doing it right? I'm not quite sure about the mindset/courtesy behind of asking someone I barely know to refer me in while I'm inexperienced in CF and financial modelling.
Thanks!
Hi, good for you sir

The work involves technical analysis (supply-demand and charts type as opposed to fundamental analysis) and trade execution I suppose? Mind to share a little what does the work entails at commodities trading
*
I think you are broaching into very sensitive information in an industry that is highly regulated. Hence, I think it’s unlikely you will find people willing to share that information with you. If you are looking for interview opportunities, your information is more than sufficient if you do not have any working experience.

If you really want to know what each firm can or cannot do, you can look up under BNM and SC website whether those firms have the prerequisite license (Ie: principal adviser, CF adviser, dealing in securities, ….) For example, Maybank IB will have most of the license. Hence, they can participate in most of the undertaking such as underwriting, placing, broker, adviser, valuer part of the M&A or IPO. If you are just a boutique CF adviser that only holds the CF adviser license, it’s not comparable at all.
All the things you mentioned for CF work is largely the same but difference could lies with the boss. If your boss is a financial quant person, you will deal with a lot of data. If it’s a marketing guru, you will deal more in presentation. You will know during interview.

Most of the big deals involved cross-border transactions. Most large firms will hire JP, Morgan Stanley or Citi from SG for high level deals that will pay big. Small CF firms, local banks and Big4 will fight it out over smaller piece of the pie. Most deals are similar to legal firm “pay when win”. Normally, there is no pay until the deal is successful. So if the deal is not successful, the firm will have no pay for all the months’ work but get huge windfall if it goes through.

Pay is highly confidential area, but bonus for deals in ASIA is always smaller than the western counterpart. As most banks are taking lower fees to get potential business opportunities, maybe not even a dime. However, the bank policy of remunerating staff is different for each bank.

I believe there is nothing wrong with your approach in networking. However as it’s a highly regulated industry, expectation is very high and errors are hardly tolerable. If you choose an unorthodox approach, be prepare for a very high level of expectation compared to a normal route.

JohnnyIBK
post Nov 20 2016, 01:16 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
13 posts

Joined: Nov 2016
QUOTE(XxAC3xX @ Oct 18 2016, 10:22 PM)
Hi all.

Thanks for all the valuable inputs contributed.

On a broader sense, I'd like to understand the odds for a non-finance background graduate in breaking into the following entry-level finance roles:
1. Research at buy-side or sell-side
2. Risk management
3. Treasury/asset management
4. CF at foreign and local investment banks (pretty much unrealistic if you're not top graduate from top unis from what I gathered)
5. CF/financial analyst at Big4 or mid-tier firms
6. Financial analyst at companies (well at least it's likely for GE FMP)

I'd be most grateful if someone could advise what are the options and companies for this case.

Thanks!
*
Have u managed to get some interview?
Confusedgirl99
post Nov 21 2016, 11:18 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
5 posts

Joined: Oct 2016
QUOTE(Corporate Finance @ Oct 17 2016, 02:09 AM)
Lol aminvest.. Good luck, u will really need it
*
lol.. good luck? sounded tough *fingers crossed*
Topace111
post Nov 28 2016, 02:06 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,102 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
QUOTE(Manada @ Nov 27 2016, 12:13 AM)
Hey guys just wondering if I am current a Summer Associate at one of the bulge bracket bank locally but on the consumer banking side, am I still able to move to IB side of the same bulge bracket bank?

Something is telling me that making that switch from consumer to institutional clients is going to be hard sad.gif
Thanks in advance.
*
Definitely harder due to size of the transaction and level of disclosure. Institutional side also required less people due to its nature of low volume but sophisticated nature.
beanbag ibank
post Nov 28 2016, 03:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
88 posts

Joined: May 2014


QUOTE(Manada @ Nov 27 2016, 12:13 AM)
Hey guys just wondering if I am current a Summer Associate at one of the bulge bracket bank locally but on the consumer banking side, am I still able to move to IB side of the same bulge bracket bank?

Something is telling me that making that switch from consumer to institutional clients is going to be hard sad.gif
Thanks in advance.
*
Citi intern in consumer bank and citi IBD is quite difficult.

HSBC IBD to Citi IBD more possible, but if u r oxbrigde den easier
Marss
post Jun 1 2017, 11:45 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
23 posts

Joined: Mar 2015
Hi guys,

need some help here( if there is anyone to read this old thread, cuz i dont want to duplicate another one).

After years of searching, finally gotten in to so-called CF. Being a fresh entry in a small firm, there is no guidance like what u have in those big firms - seniors. It is "one-leg -kick"here. So my main point here is to ask if , any of you here can share some samples of ipo proposals or the business expansion proposal?


Many thanks in advance notworthy.gif
franklooi96
post Jun 1 2017, 12:52 PM

b**ch
****
Senior Member
575 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
QUOTE(Marss @ Jun 1 2017, 11:45 AM)
Hi guys,

need some help here( if there is anyone to read this old thread, cuz i dont want to duplicate another one).

After years of searching, finally gotten in to so-called CF. Being a fresh entry in a small firm, there is no guidance like what u have in those big firms - seniors. It is "one-leg -kick"here. So my main point here is to ask if , any of you here can share some samples of ipo proposals or the business expansion proposal?
Many thanks in advance  notworthy.gif
*
Hi, not a IB or CF person but I do know somewhere you can seek help smile.gif

I used a mentorship website when I was a fresh entry (to learn even from outside the company and industry) - just pick the person carefully and you may be able to ask them for things like this if the conversation goes well. nod.gif Moving forward, they can be the people you refer to when you need guidance (which happens a lot, but it's ok!)

Search Corporate Finance here: https://futurelab.my/

This post has been edited by franklooi96: Jun 1 2017, 01:00 PM
Marss
post Jun 1 2017, 02:19 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
23 posts

Joined: Mar 2015
QUOTE(franklooi96 @ Jun 1 2017, 12:52 PM)
Hi, not a IB or CF person but I do know somewhere you can seek help smile.gif

I used a mentorship website when I was a fresh entry (to learn even from outside the company and industry) - just pick the person carefully and you may be able to ask them for things like this if the conversation goes well.  nod.gif Moving forward, they can be the people you refer to when you need guidance (which happens a lot, but it's ok!)

Search Corporate Finance here: https://futurelab.my/
*
no problem. thank you very much thumbup.gif
Charsiupao
post Jun 2 2017, 12:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
128 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Marss @ Jun 1 2017, 11:45 AM)
Hi guys,

need some help here( if there is anyone to read this old thread, cuz i dont want to duplicate another one).

After years of searching, finally gotten in to so-called CF. Being a fresh entry in a small firm, there is no guidance like what u have in those big firms - seniors. It is "one-leg -kick"here. So my main point here is to ask if , any of you here can share some samples of ipo proposals or the business expansion proposal?
Many thanks in advance  notworthy.gif
*
I don't know about now, but back when I was in CF about 15 years ago the Securities Commission had a checklist and format for IPO applications. Now that the governing authority is the Bursa, I'm pretty sure the Bursa will have released a copy of the documents they require as well as a brief format as to what kind of information they expect to receive. Your bank itself should have these guidelines available. If not, request to look at the last IPO proposal done by a friend or colleague in the office, and if they're nice they'll show you - or even give you a soft copy of their proposal so you can just use it as a template. That's what happened back in my day anyway.

During my time the main proposal was split into seven sections - corporate information, historical financial information, future financial information, utilisation of IPO proceeds, effects of proposals etc, plus a qualitative write-up detailing industry analysis, company history and products, followed by future plans. It's all really organised and easy to put together once you know the format.
Dogta
post Jun 2 2017, 06:38 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
200 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
QUOTE(Marss @ Jun 1 2017, 11:45 AM)
Hi guys,

need some help here( if there is anyone to read this old thread, cuz i dont want to duplicate another one).

After years of searching, finally gotten in to so-called CF. Being a fresh entry in a small firm, there is no guidance like what u have in those big firms - seniors. It is "one-leg -kick"here. So my main point here is to ask if , any of you here can share some samples of ipo proposals or the business expansion proposal?
Many thanks in advance  notworthy.gif
*
There won't be much guidance, you'll be able to learn on the job. If you're in a small firm, I don't think you'll be getting many IPOs done though.
Marss
post Jun 6 2017, 02:30 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
23 posts

Joined: Mar 2015
QUOTE(Charsiupao @ Jun 2 2017, 12:20 PM)
I don't know about now, but back when I was in CF about 15 years ago the Securities Commission had a checklist and format for IPO applications. Now that the governing authority is the Bursa, I'm pretty sure the Bursa will have released a copy of the documents they require as well as a brief format as to what kind of information they expect to receive. Your bank itself should have these guidelines available. If not, request to look at the last IPO proposal done by a friend or colleague in the office, and if they're nice they'll show you - or even give you a soft copy of their proposal so you can just use it as a template. That's what happened back in my day anyway.

During my time the main proposal was split into seven sections - corporate information, historical financial information, future financial information, utilisation of IPO proceeds, effects of proposals etc, plus a qualitative write-up detailing industry analysis, company history and products, followed by future plans. It's all really organised and easy to put together once you know the format.
*
Thank you !
CainHighwind
post Feb 19 2018, 10:11 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Jan 2013
Hi Guys, need some insights over here as i would need more information on how corporate finance works in a public listed company compared to Investment banking.

Appreciated if you could provide me some valueble advise on it...
Corporate Finance
post Feb 19 2018, 11:48 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
31 posts

Joined: May 2016
QUOTE(CainHighwind @ Feb 19 2018, 11:11 PM)
Hi Guys, need some insights over here as i would need more information on how corporate finance works in a public listed company compared to Investment banking.

Appreciated if you could provide me some valueble advise on it...
*
totally different scope, learning curve not high cause u r the receiving end. ur tasks will probably only delegate to other departments to collect info etc.
P33pin
post Feb 20 2018, 10:09 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
16 posts

Joined: Feb 2018
Hi, im currently one of the management trainee programmes in a commercial bank that gets rotated around the business banking departments only. This is my first job , the whole programme is about a year. Once the programme ends, I’ll be permanently attached to the corporate side as a RM ( giving out loans, facilities etc).
Im really keen on tapping into IB, and I would like to seek for advices on how to, with my experience and all. What are the pathways available And what are the fields in IB that are related to my current work experience (other than operational work/processing).

Dogta
post Feb 20 2018, 09:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
200 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
QUOTE(P33pin @ Feb 20 2018, 10:09 AM)
Hi, im currently one of the management trainee programmes in a commercial bank that gets rotated around the business banking departments only. This is my first job , the whole programme is about a year. Once the programme ends, I’ll be  permanently attached to the corporate side as a RM ( giving out loans, facilities etc).
Im really keen on tapping into IB, and I would like to seek for advices on how to, with my experience and all. What are the pathways available And what are the fields in IB that are related to my current work experience (other than operational work/processing).
*
It's gonna be tough, my only advice is try to network for an internal transfer to the IB side.
P33pin
post Feb 20 2018, 10:46 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
16 posts

Joined: Feb 2018
QUOTE(Dogta @ Feb 20 2018, 09:27 PM)
It's gonna be tough, my only advice is try to network for an internal transfer to the IB side.
*
Internal transfer is a pain in the ass... it usually causes more conflict as they r both different entities.

a mentor of mine even advised me to resign and rejoin in as new hire in IB.

This post has been edited by P33pin: Feb 20 2018, 10:47 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.1720sec    0.41    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 06:54 AM