QUOTE(ken2291 @ Dec 1 2010, 10:37 AM)
ya ok build31Samsung Galaxy S I9000 Official Thread V8, Please read FAQ at 1st page!!
Samsung Galaxy S I9000 Official Thread V8, Please read FAQ at 1st page!!
|
|
Dec 1 2010, 10:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#61
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,408 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 1 2010, 10:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#62
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,408 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
QUOTE(ken2291 @ Dec 1 2010, 10:40 AM) Cause I see some people having problem when enabling the 4th tweak. for the 3rd one, I dunno what's that, so din enable it alrite thx!Added on December 1, 2010, 10:41 am yup, rooting is easy as ABC, like installing software in PC. just next next next nia. lol.. but make sure your 3 combo button is working Added on December 1, 2010, 10:41 am You can just flash Doc's rom directly using CWM, no worries Added on December 1, 2010, 10:43 am The main problem will be a bit laggy and GPS, so far no other issues. Samsung has released GPS fix for Vibrant I think |
|
|
Dec 2 2010, 09:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#63
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,408 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
going back to doc v9.1@@ ultimate is a buggy rom@@
|
|
|
Dec 2 2010, 10:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#64
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,408 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
hmm..so 256 is better than 500?
|
|
|
Dec 2 2010, 10:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#65
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,408 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
Dec 2 2010, 10:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#66
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,408 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 2 2010, 10:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#67
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,408 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
Dec 2 2010, 10:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#68
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,408 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
hmm as for docs 9.1,still nid to install tat zipalign?
|
|
|
Dec 2 2010, 11:02 AM
Return to original view | Post
#69
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,408 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
Dec 2 2010, 11:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#70
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,408 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
Dec 2 2010, 11:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#71
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,408 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
wow u guys din do any lagfix can survive?XD
|
|
|
Dec 2 2010, 11:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#72
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,408 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
Dec 2 2010, 11:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#73
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,408 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
QUOTE(mengsuan @ Dec 2 2010, 11:24 AM) 500HZ compile option gives smoother UI because of its rapid kernel refresh. However it uses more CPU% at idle by itself. Hence use more power. Under high processing load, there is slightly lesser CPU% left for other application, hence also lowers throughput. 256HZ is just the other way round. Higher latency but higher throughput. I have been flashing kernel over 30 times. Never once had anything bad happen. Added on December 2, 2010, 11:25 am Hi angel-bird! |
|
|
Dec 2 2010, 11:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#74
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,408 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
k10C did not overclock to 1.2 rite?
|
|
|
Dec 2 2010, 12:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#75
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,408 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0445sec
0.66
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 05:45 PM |