Micro Four Thirds (m43) User Thread V3, Panasonic G/GH/GFx & Olympus E-P/E-PLx
Micro Four Thirds (m43) User Thread V3, Panasonic G/GH/GFx & Olympus E-P/E-PLx
|
|
Nov 21 2010, 01:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
Congratz new thread !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 23 2010, 04:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Nov 23 2010, 03:15 PM) Gonna get shot for this but seriously... m43/mirrorless's strength is in size.. as in not having to lug around a dedicated camera bag... as a compact replacement, second/backup camera. I actually have a mid size bag for my camera stuff, unless I just hang it on my neck, I don't think m43 is any where consider as small. 550D also small lor. What's the point of getting long zooms for it? Since it's a 2x crop factor it would be better for extra reach right? Just get a 200mm or 300mm u get a 400mm or 600mm equivalent for 35mm. It's much lighter compared with a DSLR of the same reach right? BTW, is there anyone playing manual focus lenses with their m43 ?? |
|
|
Nov 23 2010, 05:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Nov 23 2010, 05:11 PM) Yeah.. but then ... wouldn't it be only useful in the best lighting conditions, with tripod and with the bonzai dslr's ergonomics only. I bought GF1 because I dun like DSLR's bulkness, but it's not small overall also. What I dun like about m43 is that it really lacks m43 lenses and they are pricey. Currently I'm looking at some MF prime lenses now, wonder how practical would it be. Which brings back to mirrorless's unique selling preposition. |
|
|
Nov 23 2010, 08:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Nov 23 2010, 06:51 PM) You can try to simulate the experience by going out jalan jalan in good light, bad light, no light ... snap some photos with manual focus only. I've tried MF on the 20mm it's different I think. I had to turn the ring a few cycles before I can get in focus. Maybe it's the focus by wire thing on the pancake I think the manual focus lenses are easier right, not more than 360 degrees since it's mechanical MF ring? Correct me if I'm wrong |
|
|
Nov 24 2010, 09:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(raptor_cZn @ Nov 23 2010, 09:11 PM) The feel is different with fly by wire focus.. You say focus travel is longer, meaning it can focus faster right with less turn? Ya I feel that's better. Of course older MF only lenses are more "accurate" in getting the focus you want since they have a longer travel from infinity to MFD and they are meant to be manually focused after all =p. Comparing to the likes of AF lenses now, the focus travel can be really short like my tamron 17-50VC(not for m4/3 btw). But the fly by wire focusing does change focus faster the faster you turn the ring though to a certain limit as to how fast it can go. QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Nov 23 2010, 10:09 PM) What I meant is the feel of focussing with LCD and the other hand working on focussing the lens while trying to keep hand steady with magnified view... without being on the tripod. Ya man I know how it feels with the LCD and with/without magnified view, of coz if got EVF better la, but I'm not getting the EVF for GF1. I'm ok with LCD just I feel the focus-by-wire MF takes too long to focus, thus NOT practical. |
|
|
Dec 22 2010, 05:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
--Post removed--
This post has been edited by Wuahaha: Dec 29 2010, 11:11 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 28 2010, 10:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(faidz85 @ Dec 28 2010, 10:31 PM) Just sharing a news with you guys: Wait for Olympus's m43 pro body, maybe E-P3 http://www.43rumors.com/ft5-and-here-it-is...us-e-pl2-image/ Maybe an upgrade for me? xD Can reuse my EVF! |
|
|
Dec 30 2010, 11:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
Hi guys, I have 2 sets of GF2 with pancake lens 20mm won from bid ... want to let go. Those interested please check my signature link. Thanks.
|
|
|
Jan 1 2011, 10:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
|
|
|
Jan 2 2011, 05:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(dannygeni @ Jan 2 2011, 05:28 PM) Micro Four Thirds for short is m43 or m4/3 Added on January 2, 2011, 9:33 pmE-PL2 looks interesting .. This post has been edited by Wuahaha: Jan 2 2011, 09:33 PM |
|
|
Jan 17 2011, 06:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Jan 17 2011, 05:51 PM) Kenot say like that lar. Last time got no competition. Now got NEX to come spoil the market. Ya lor ... I'm thinking of getting a E-PL2 body liao too hahaha ... E-PL2 also ngam ngam selling in Taiwan but the price feels not very ngam as both NEX5 and GF1/2 is cheaper. Summore have to buy the 20 f1.7 separately to make it a worthwhile package. All that added together = mucho $$$ Nevertheless.. still find the E-PL2 one of the more interesting recent cameras. |
|
|
Jan 17 2011, 10:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(ahmadpintu @ Jan 17 2011, 09:25 PM) Unless u prefer touch screen, HD video recording and shooting 3D, oh ya and stereo sound for your videos. I'll say stay with GF1 if you are using it still. This post has been edited by Wuahaha: Jan 17 2011, 10:04 PM |
|
|
Jan 18 2011, 12:52 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(hellfire8888 @ Jan 17 2011, 10:55 PM) hi just to share..today i call up panasonic malaysia i ask them if my panasonic lens is spoil where do i send for repair. To my horror they say lens do not have any warranty!! yeah that right panasonic say lens no warranty..then i get real piss off and ask her to check properly. Then she come back and say sorry sir got warranty you can send back the unit to panasonic to check and if got issue we will send to Bintang Maju. Once again i am shock!! i ask wtf dont panasonic have their lens repair division? She answer no panasonic malaysia do no repair any slr or lens. so they will all send to bintang maju. I ask again if Bintant Maju is certified as a repair center for panasonic or not..she did not answer and keep quiet...So guys just to inform you if you buy any panasonic slr or lens..you either need to send it back to japan for repair yourself or let panasonic send your lens to bintang maju for "repair" I thought this is old news already? Unlike olympus who have their real service center for camera and lens in mt kiara who handle local repair very well... So think twice before you get any panasonic lens or slr.. This post has been edited by Wuahaha: Jan 18 2011, 01:01 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 18 2011, 11:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
|
|
|
Jan 18 2011, 02:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
|
|
|
Jan 18 2011, 03:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
|
|
|
Jan 18 2011, 06:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Jan 18 2011, 05:06 PM) Can elaborate on that? Can you justify why do you "need" a camera between 550D and S90 ? I guess after lurking around here for so long.. I still need to justify to myself that I "need" another camera between my 550D, S90, IP4 This one straightforward question... the no-warranty-panny 20mm f1.7 already cult status for m43. Slightly over 1-stop faster than the Olympus = if you need to use ISO1600 on the Olympus... you can get away with ISO800 with the panny. The quintessential review site --> http://www.photozone.de/olympus--four-thirds-lens-tests |
|
|
Jan 18 2011, 07:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Jan 18 2011, 07:33 PM) That's the problem... hard to justify though suffer from gearlust everyday. Must control the gearlust dude ... anything u think cannot be achieve by ur 550D? I tot it can do wonders. Bleh... my 550D already ~40K liao. What are u looking for in m43, other than it's just smaller and looks better in rangefinder design? |
|
|
Jan 18 2011, 11:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
|
|
|
Jan 19 2011, 10:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,528 posts Joined: Dec 2004 |
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Jan 19 2011, 12:47 AM) So far not justifiable yet mar Maybe you should try E-PL2 and see if any improvements I like the PEN's but with the GF's speed. E-PL1 felt very slow.. the shot to shot time... probably the low reso screen, the tacky lens and lack of dials adds to that rather rudimentary feel. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0346sec
0.36
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 10:17 AM |