Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The Official Nikon Discussion thread V1, All under one roof !

views
     
chiahau
post Nov 20 2010, 10:49 AM

Fatthau StalKer
********
All Stars
14,082 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(maikel @ Nov 20 2010, 09:30 AM)
I think D7000 price depend on what 'free gift' u get  which is not really free. Free item price already included in. If u low the price, so less item u get. So, just think once then decide, more survey more confuse u get. My suggestion for 1st time buyer is buy it with lot of accessories (filter, cleaning kit, lens perhap, etc). After sales service also important. So that can get discount later.
*
>">

I rather buy with less accessories that I DO NOT NEED and get a more cheaper price. Free gifts ain't free actually. They are added to your total cost of camera.
For me, i would get the camera + kit. The rest, I slowly survey if i need it myself or not. What's the point of having so many itemz tat you wont reli use lol.

chiahau
post Nov 20 2010, 12:36 PM

Fatthau StalKer
********
All Stars
14,082 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(geekster129 @ Nov 20 2010, 12:33 PM)
Now I just wanna spend more on batteries and memory cards. It's really a lousy moment when I know that my camera is running out of juice during events. doh.gif
*
bring extra 3 batt 4 body n another extra 12 for flash XD
Memory card you buy berlambak saja la....

Finish then change XD
chiahau
post Nov 20 2010, 01:04 PM

Fatthau StalKer
********
All Stars
14,082 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(BenSow @ Nov 20 2010, 12:58 PM)
not enough cash.. ><
*
QUOTE(ic3rock @ Nov 20 2010, 01:02 PM)
Haha, same to my cousin. Then my friend told him, rather save more then buy a good 1 rather than regret, just my opinion....
*
Somehow, i agree. Getting a lower end one, just to upgrade to a higher end one will cost a lot more than one slightly more exp one lol..

I started with D90. cost more, but it still works fine b4 i sold it off >">
chiahau
post Nov 20 2010, 01:22 PM

Fatthau StalKer
********
All Stars
14,082 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(BenSow @ Nov 20 2010, 01:19 PM)
What is so special about AF motor?
*
AF motor = auto focus motor.

Since D3100 lack AF motor on body, lens need to have AF >">
If lens no AF, means you MF lo..

Correct me if I'm wrong tq~
chiahau
post Nov 20 2010, 01:38 PM

Fatthau StalKer
********
All Stars
14,082 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Nov 20 2010, 01:32 PM)
if you have AF on your body and AF in your lens will it affect the performance?
*
No. It means you can buy lens that dun have AF which is cheaper, i guess.

Nothing more. If no AF at body n lens, means slowly manual focus lo..
chiahau
post Nov 20 2010, 01:57 PM

Fatthau StalKer
********
All Stars
14,082 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(zellleonhart @ Nov 20 2010, 01:37 PM)
Most famous and new nikon lenses are all AF-S already (with motor in the lens). Like 24-70, 70-200, 16-35, and the DX 18-200, 16-85 etc...

Prime wise, 50mm 1.4G, 85mm 1.4G, 35 1.4G, 24 1.4G.

If you plan to use lenses like 50mm 1.8D, 50mm 1.4D, 85mm 1.8D, 80-200mm F2.8D and other AF-D lenses then maybe D90 will suite your need...

but of course AF-S lenses are more expensive la XD
*
I think the term is more more more expensive laugh.gif

Which makes D90 a perfect camera compared to the D3100 or lesser lolz. Somehow, i prefer D90 over D3100.
chiahau
post Nov 20 2010, 04:40 PM

Fatthau StalKer
********
All Stars
14,082 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
From: Malaysia


QUOTE(BenSow @ Nov 20 2010, 04:26 PM)
17-50 tammy why?

Lol yesterday I said 18-55 not good many people disagree now suddenly got one say 18-55 crap
*
QUOTE(zellleonhart @ Nov 20 2010, 04:28 PM)
Sorry bro, 18-55 VR is NOT crap, it's sharp and light and cheap. I don't see any reason why it should be called crap.
17-50 might be better than 18-55 in terms of low light but it doesn't make 18-55 a crap. 18-70 is sharper than 18-55, still 18-55 is not a crap.
please don't mislead the others.
Hmm you want best choice budget, but you actually used the camera before? I suggest 18-55 or 18-105. 17-50 is not bad but I personally don't have good feelings towards this particular tamron...
*
18-55 is not crap.
Seriously its quite decent. Its a kit lens for god sake. What you expect from it lol? It performs fine, for its price lol.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0386sec    0.54    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 04:34 PM