Dinner with TM CEO, ZAMZAMZAIRANI MOHD ISA, Time for some Q&A
|
|
 Nov 9 2010, 12:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
500 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Kuala Lumpur 
|
Suggestion to TM for cap implementation:
cap should be separated to peak and off peak e.g. Unifi 5Mb can have peak cap of 60GB and off peak 180GB or even unmetered peak cap can be from 12pm till 12am and off peak the remainder this will make available more bandwidth during peak periods and allow people to still download off peak |
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 07:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
500 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Kuala Lumpur
|
May we know why different IP address ranges can show different latency (ping) results from the same location to the same server, even when traceroutes shows the same or nearly same route taken? Differences of 100ms or more happens on a consistent basis.
Added on November 9, 2010, 7:47 am QUOTE(amduser @ Nov 9 2010, 01:26 AM) because they set your cap at 1.2mbps that's why you can get 1mbps when using speed test, but the problem is the advertised speed and the user only get 80% of the advertised speed, what's the point to advertise 1mbps when most of us only get 80% of it, why dont just advertise 800kbps instead, and not all people can get 100% 1mbps speed, most of them who get that speed is because they set the cap to 1.5mbps instead. The above is not a fair assessment due to how network works. When you have a DSL line set at e.g. 1024Kbps (1Mb), the best result you can expect is 80-90% of the link speed due to protocol overheads. TM capping you above the speed paid is actually the only way of ensuring that you can get same or more than the speed you paid for. This post has been edited by charymsylyn: Nov 9 2010, 07:47 AM |
| Change to: |  0.0216sec
 0.39
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 10:31 AM |
Quote