AF-S 70-300mm is utilizing VR2.
Nikon D90 V10, V10 but D90 still going strong
Nikon D90 V10, V10 but D90 still going strong
|
|
Nov 7 2010, 10:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,247 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
AF-S 70-300mm is utilizing VR2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 8 2010, 05:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,247 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
|
Nov 8 2010, 06:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,247 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
|
Nov 9 2010, 10:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,247 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
|
Nov 10 2010, 06:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,247 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(newx @ Nov 10 2010, 06:25 PM) Yeah, I dont need the video recording, really. Even if you get D7000, 8years later it will not become dinosaur but an artifact.I plan to use the camera for a long period of time since I am not into photography that much. Just want to have a good camera since I will be traveling to a distant land far far away... I am afraid with the introduction of D7000, D90 will become a dinosaur. How long can I expect to use this camera and not carrying a dinosaur? Is 8 years reasonable? |
|
|
Nov 11 2010, 07:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,247 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2010, 02:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,247 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
85mm at f1.4, the words on Danbo's face bokeh-ed.
|
|
|
Nov 13 2010, 05:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,247 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Nov 13 2010, 02:13 PM) Yeah, the DOF in 85mm f/1.4 is thinner. But the background both already bokeh till that level can't see much differences LOL. Maybe should try with a candle light source at the back Yes, please do another test and let us see the background bokeh differences. |
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 11:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,247 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 11:58 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,247 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
^ 35 on the shelf already?
|
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 12:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,247 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
I hope the 50 1.4G can be there with gold ring and on par optic performance with those lenses.
|
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 03:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,247 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 04:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,247 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
|
Nov 17 2010, 05:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,247 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0299sec
0.41
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 02:04 PM |