as the benchies for the 5xxx series in the review were measured using previous catalyst version, is it really the scaling improvement on the 6xxx series, or improvements in catalyst 10.10?
AMD Radeon™ Discussion V4, Cut Cut Cut!~ Go Red !
AMD Radeon™ Discussion V4, Cut Cut Cut!~ Go Red !
|
|
Oct 23 2010, 11:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
520 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
the crossfire scaling for the 68xx is really impressive. beats 5870 crossfire in most of the games reviewed here. makes me tempted to sell off my 5870 + top up for dual 6870
as the benchies for the 5xxx series in the review were measured using previous catalyst version, is it really the scaling improvement on the 6xxx series, or improvements in catalyst 10.10? |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 3 2010, 05:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
520 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
QUOTE(law1777 @ Nov 3 2010, 12:58 PM) someone at nvidia thread complain that it shouldnt be called 580 but instead 485 because they only fix the bug for gf100'c chip and everything is same old features. its not a new gen anyway not so interested they've did it with 8800 GTS (512Mb) -> 9800 GTX -> GTS 250. 1 chip that renamed and used for 3 generations.what makes you think nvidia wont do it again? |
|
|
Nov 4 2010, 12:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
520 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
|
|
|
Nov 10 2010, 02:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
520 posts Joined: Mar 2007 |
yea, around there. not like 50%. no doubt it's 25%-30% faster, the power consumption is also 25%-30% more compared to HD5870.
HD5870 188w GTX480 250w GTX580 244w |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0219sec
0.70
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 09:19 PM |