Bank panel of lawyer or adhoc better ?
Bank panel of lawyer or adhoc better ?
|
|
Oct 19 2010, 08:38 PM, updated 16y ago
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,927 posts Joined: Sep 2009 |
Should we hire the bank loan panel of lawyer or ad hoc lawyer ? What are the pros and cons with hiring an ad hoc lawyer for the purchaser ? |
|
|
Oct 19 2010, 11:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,927 posts Joined: Sep 2009 |
QUOTE(dariofoo @ Oct 19 2010, 10:34 PM) When you say ad hoc, I presume that you meant your S&P lawyer will do your loan doc as well (hence the ad hoc basis). In the end it would be better as it eliminates the need for another firm to be in the picture and things can (hopefully) move faster. It would be easier to be updated as with one call you can find out the status of the S&P as well as the loan. I am trying to find a lawyer that does both S&P and loan. The panel of lawyer recommended by the bank is just a small firm (not big firm), so which is better for purchaser ? |
| Change to: | 0.0149sec
0.87
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 02:29 PM |