Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Bank panel of lawyer or adhoc better ?

views
     
SUSjalsrix
post Oct 19 2010, 08:38 PM, updated 16y ago

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,927 posts

Joined: Sep 2009

Should we hire the bank loan panel of lawyer or ad hoc lawyer ?

What are the pros and cons with hiring an ad hoc lawyer for the purchaser ?


SUSjalsrix
post Oct 19 2010, 11:50 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,927 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(dariofoo @ Oct 19 2010, 10:34 PM)

When you say ad hoc, I presume that you meant your S&P lawyer will do your loan doc as well (hence the ad hoc basis). In the end it would be better as it eliminates the need for another firm to be in the picture and things can (hopefully) move faster. It would be easier to be updated as with one call you can find out the status of the S&P as well as the loan.
*
You're right. Ad hoc means the lawyer is not the bank's regular panel of lawyers.

I am trying to find a lawyer that does both S&P and loan.

The panel of lawyer recommended by the bank is just a small firm (not big firm), so which is better for purchaser ?


 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0149sec    0.87    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 02:29 PM