QUOTE(Redcross @ Oct 12 2010, 03:57 PM)
Why not?
Canon 450D + 24-105L
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
10-22 and 24-105 already cover the whole 10 - 105mm range with great IQ
got money go for it lar

wow.. nice bokeh.. but need zoom to 105mm to get tat effect?
QUOTE(wha7ever @ Oct 12 2010, 04:45 PM)
I own a 17-35 f/2.8-4.0 and 28-75 f/2.8; thought I will be happy with these setup but later got frustrated with 28-75. Change my setup to 17-35 f/2.8-4.0 and 50 f/1.7; and the 50mm became my primary lens which attached to the body most of the time. Of course, I'm very much comfortable having 50mm on a crop body and shoot with 17-35 only when I needed wide shots.
Pairing 10-22 with 24-105 is great but I would prefer to pair the wide angle with a low light performer prime lens like the 50mm f/1.4 USM or f/1.8. The Canon 24-105 f/4 is not that bright at f/4. That's my preferred setup.
Each person has their own style, so... best is still try it out yourself

hmm..i got 50mmF1.8... but but... the stupid Iris just die las week
QUOTE(DecaPix @ Oct 12 2010, 05:04 PM)
depends on your shooting style.
if you can live with 38mm equivalent then by all means go ahead.
if not you will find yourself keep changing lens!
but i think the 18-24 range is quite useful to have on crop camera.

mayb i need to borrow one 24-105 to see how "narrow" it is