Hi,

i have bought a unit from UOA in menjalara, they used to make it corner unit for almost all units. One thing, i dislike UOA is they used to block those nice units and told many story force to buy those 'not nice' unit first then will release out to sell higher price. Somemore now, they are amending their plan and purposely to attack other site with their weakness. Thats why they sure will tell you their goodness to convince u. Anyway, i would say UOA is trust worthy on they end product while i never encounter with any end product from KP, but if they are really the main contractor of st. mary and my habitat, think is should be fine to get the trust from public on their capability by delivering the good quality and on time for sure.

well, just my opinion for you. hope it helps.

no one know..same like i bought the previous from UOA by just conveying message by the sales agent..who can assure even they told us how good is it?

i agreed with kh8668. UOA is too rush this time.

---

Added on October 22, 2010, 9:20 amyes, i think the same way. i am member of UOA and eventually i gave up to place booking in SG but voted to 288. UOA has been rushing to compete with 288 and what they said to buyer is just too fantastic while might not be able to deliver at last (remember all drawing and spec with price is subjected to be changed). Somemore their design is too conservative and sure might be able to deliver same spec as bangsar south residency.

This post has been edited by carlhoe: Oct 22 2010, 09:20 AM

well, no matter we buy the house either for investment of personal stay, just buy whatever you like based on the layout design and environment concept which suit to your idea by paying the price for it. both sure have their own good and bad. yes, so far KP what they have delivered is on time and good quality which is no doubt for sure.

i am a bit dissapointed with UOA too this time as what they spoke and trying to crab the buyer in short time by keep changing the design just to attack other developer.

yes. now timing is the most important factor in making decision earlier or later. 2 months later, no one will know the consequences of most unit in 288 being taken up by public or just u grab a better unit in SG.

---

Added on October 22, 2010, 1:18 pmSorry, i just read back the information and would like to share with you guys.

I have a property from UOA too. We are the committe who was taking over from UOA. They really bullshit as they have not install the fire safety in the building and we (commitee) have to pay for much more fire insurance and we need to increase the maintainance fees to residents. Sommore, they said the sinking fund and mainatainance fees is not sufficient at all to pay in the compound. so what i want to deliver is their maintainance is the same like other said if KP cant do as good as UOA. well, be fair, just voice out for those may not encounter with UOA before.

This post has been edited by carlhoe: Oct 22 2010, 01:18 PM

Hi,

sorry not to mention well here. For your information, i just got the information from the committee of my apartments (i am not the member of committee). The committee taken over from them and just have to renew the fire insurance, but just heard from committee said we have to pay more due to the safety factor not being installed. i am wondering too to get CF last time. hence, a bit dissapointed. Somemore my sanitary parts in toilet was not installing with good quality parts (broken within 2 month which borne by end user as claimed by developer). I just want to share, those so called good and well known developer might not deliver the good stuff at the end, somemore just look at the paper with so many factors migth be changed? I suppose those hard money earner should bet the money on those paper? well, there is nothing wrong as investment is always taking the risk to have better or worst product at last which we need to make sharp decision earlier or later merely.

---

Added on October 25, 2010, 9:37 amyup.. agreed. however, how about if pay about the same but get lesser facilities?

---

Added on October 25, 2010, 9:40 amyes. agreed with it. i have been trying to sell some of my own subsale properties, the more facilities the higher price we can ask for.

---

Added on October 25, 2010, 9:56 amwell, just share again with you all. I have one property built by UOA too. Before i pay for booking, they mentioned is service apartment and somehow later have been told is only apartment, but i believe many of the residents in my compound not sure the title. well, i have no doubt if you all talking about this issue again in SG.

This post has been edited by carlhoe: Oct 25 2010, 09:56 AM

May i know are you from developer or just got the sms from them?

Done with new post.

This post has been edited by carlhoe: Oct 25 2010, 11:08 AM

no, no offend. i just thought u r from developer and i got the same sms from them too. Are they still having 7+1% discount for member?

took one in 288. me and other frens thinking to grab another one more for investment (not really setapak area).

wow..so rich..haha

but good enough to have 1 in 288 and 1 in sg lo....hehe

haha...just got news from OCBC..approved with BLR-2.2 for 288..how about SG package

for 288

---

Added on October 27, 2010, 10:25 amnope..just double confirmed with OCBC, they said is not compulsory to buy MRTA at all. They have submitted to appeal for -2.3 anyway, is an extra bonus if can get it.

my tenure is for 36years..how about urs?

---

Added on October 27, 2010, 10:27 amyes

This post has been edited by carlhoe: Oct 27 2010, 10:27 AM

think u can clarify only with developer, im sure they have answer for you. If they still have no asnwer for it, i doubt on their trust to buyer.

well, regarding the condo/aprt issue. i think they are still thinking to figure out the strategy, but do not put high expectation on it as i also one of the victim last time with a project from them.

yes, agreed with calling straight away to their main office in UOA jalan pinang

i dun agree with the statement as well. Customer always come in the first place always, or else no more reputation from public one day.

u mean SG? i saw there is a place for office last weekend at site in SG.

CIMB and UOB not panel so i didnt apply..HSBC and have approved too by giving same package and figth for -2.3 now by lower login period.

other than OCBC..what bank have offered u?

ic...i gave up SG eventually..goes for only 288.