QUOTE(lumutafuka @ Oct 11 2010, 11:32 AM)
xpensive la..reali xpensive..pv oso not tat high..
Added on October 11, 2010, 11:35 amu cn try search PV..i think nt tat xpensive..if i not mistaken 1400sq ft..ard 360k
you cannot compare a property under construction vs a completed property.
Added on October 13, 2010, 1:33 amQUOTE(kh8668 @ Oct 11 2010, 04:38 PM)
222/288 view to KLCC does not block by Setapak Green. However, SG 's genting view is blocked by 222.
Try to check using google earth or google map.
u sure? from what i see, 222/288 KLCC view is not KLCC view.
Added on October 13, 2010, 1:37 amQUOTE(hidden830726 @ Oct 11 2010, 10:16 PM)
The thing i don't like about 288 is the fact that the entrance is facing the monsoon drain and way too near the the school. I heard there will be a small bridge connecting the school and this side.
Even with the new 4 lane road (promise by Kp to build), i can only imagine traffic jam near the entrance when after / start school time. Also, school always ring a bell.
Nonetheless, with the 3 development (SG, 222 & 288), with the inflow of resident (potentially with higher spending power) i can see the resurrection of the shop lot nearby, i can only imagine, old town, paparich etc inĀ the corner.
If you looking at the bigger picture, the price ain't too expensive.
4 lane road at 222? quite impossible.
not enough land for it, unless the 4lane road is not build according to specification.
Added on October 13, 2010, 1:39 amQUOTE(hidden830726 @ Oct 12 2010, 04:55 PM)
288 offering 40k worth of furnishing which already imbued to its selling price. Imo:
It would be great if UOA can provide the options for owner to opt for customization / premium add-on, such as kitchen cabinet, fridge, oven, burner/hood etc, possibly with additional cost, but at least, customer get what they want. And they (UOA) nullify their rival's (KP) competitive advantage.
40K worth of furnishing? it probably cost only 10k
Added on October 13, 2010, 1:44 amQUOTE(hidden830726 @ Oct 12 2010, 11:57 PM)
yup, 222 Commercial lot, thats why it is service apartment, but i heard 288 is residential lot, just like UOA SG, residential as well.
be carefull when buying service apartments.
its not covered in the act
This post has been edited by 106127: Oct 13 2010, 01:44 AM