QUOTE(TakoC @ Jul 5 2013, 12:28 PM)
Yes, bro gark. I understand the risk tolerance element.
But referring to my earlier post, even if you fall under the higher risk tolerance (UT) bracket, most people opt for their UT distributions to be reinvested. This will not generate passive income. I'm not talking about passive income for 40-60 years old people. I'm referring to 25-40 to the very least. I believe passive income should start young if possible. In order to generate passive income from your UT investment, the person will have to cash out their distributions. For 25-40 years old, I personally feel they should opt for redistribution. So UT does not generate passive income, which means we're only left with stock and FD.
Not sure if you understand where I'm coming from, but you only answered partial of my question.
I'm holding stocks, FD and UT. But my UT holds around 40% of my total portfolio (FD + UT + stocks), and they are not generating me passive income. Only my stocks and FD. Hence, the question.
You got it all wrong about passive income.
There are two stages for investment, accumulation and distribution.
During the accumulation, you are to take the
passive income and capital gains to be reinvested FULLY for it to compound. Compound interest as Einstein said it is the 8th wonder of the world. This means all passive income and other gains from selling should be used as opportunity fund to purchase more investment to raise your total accumulated wealth. These passive income is not for spending otherwise you will not be able to compound your gains. Typically during this period depending on your investment horizon you would be in more risky investments. Typical ratio will be 50% to 80% stocks/UT, the rest in fixed income.
During the distribution, you are to convert your accumulated wealth generated during the accumulation stage and
convert to yield investments, where you will be now time to enjoy your hard work and draw down your investments as cost of living. At these time your passive income will be most useful to you to spend and not for accumulate more wealth. Typically at these time you would want to be invested in safer securities with lower fluctuations. Typical ratio will be 0%-30% stocks/UT and majority in fixed income.
For most people, once the accumulation stage enable them to go to the distribution stage, they they can finally retire and stop working and enjoy their passive income. This is what we call
financial freedom. Of course all of it depends on the risk profile as I have mentioned above.
This post has been edited by gark: Jul 5 2013, 12:49 PM