QUOTE(all blacks @ Oct 15 2010, 05:12 PM)
"The old owners, from beyond the grave, are trying to exercise with their dead hands a grip on this company."
EPIC!!!
i know it's bad to think of it, I just wish they will just die. EPIC!!!
English Clubs Liverpool Football Club - The Kop Talks 2010, DONE DEAL: WELCOME NESV,JOHN HENRY
|
|
Oct 15 2010, 04:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: KL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 15 2010, 06:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: KL |
QUOTE(all blacks @ Oct 15 2010, 07:10 PM) OWH SHIT!!! Tell me it's nt true... Seriously u gt be kidding... this could be his (hicks) parting shot at us The board is gone arrange a Board meeting tonight but looks like Hick is having the advantage by moving more quickly... » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « all the hard work by the LFC board with NESV may come to nought. (hope not) This post has been edited by koolspyda: Oct 15 2010, 06:24 PM |
|
|
Oct 15 2010, 06:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: KL |
next thing we'll hear, hollywood will make a movie of this
though the argument on what basis (collateral) will MillsFinancial have to 'lend' the money to Hicks? technically he (hicks) cant sell to his shares to Mill financial. i'm at faith that the ordeal will be over & its gonna be NESV, & the old owners (G&H) rot in hell. This post has been edited by koolspyda: Oct 15 2010, 07:01 PM |
|
|
Oct 15 2010, 07:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: KL |
QUOTE Anfield Online: Premier League DECLINED to put Mill Financial through owners test without further direction from #LFC board. dem nervous now. |
|
|
Oct 18 2010, 12:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: KL |
it looks like statements when NESV got control of LFC, they will listen to the problems but likely not indulge in quick fix, for now (pre everton game) will stand behing RH. as in several forumers here too (u know who u are) the pro RH<give him more time
january buys? i'm not in expectation of going big spend in january in case those (players) that was indentified by RH & as in case RH gets the boot at the season's end; these players will/could be isolated then. so..be prepared to fight for relegation, which as some of us pointed out, we are too good to be relegated, & highly won't. so to those who help boot rafa (& those vocal of his strategy), it sure is not that easy to manage an illustrious english team & the english media, huh. This post has been edited by koolspyda: Oct 18 2010, 12:32 PM |
|
|
Oct 18 2010, 05:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#46
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: KL |
QUOTE(Duke Red @ Oct 18 2010, 04:06 PM) My post was directed at anyone taking the mickey out of those of us who thought that Rafa had taken us as far as he could. What blew my top however is indirect accusations that Hodgson's appointment was our fault. If you look at koolspyda's (whom I've met in person) posts, it always ends with "hope you anti-Rafa supporters are happy". I don't like to snap at people I've met personally, so I hope he can explain to me how Hodgson's appointment was the direct result of Rafa leaving? thank you duke (for not snapping at me while i can understand if u do feel like 'strangling' me I have tremendous respect for duke, & host of forumers who has & quote games, statements, players, at their fingertips. Myself I can't , not all players, not all opposition names, but I remember the moments, managers quips, & the context or the bigger picture. I sure I'll be ravaged if i ever go 20 questions quiz of Liverpool against them. my last statement. QUOTE so to those who help boot rafa (& those vocal of his strategy), it sure is not that easy to manage an illustrious english team & the english media, huh. without doubt it was aim at general, usually not in reply at anyone specific. unfortunately i would group the anti-rafa or vocal about him (rafa) being detrimental to the state of affairs at LFc. Time & again, many felt rafa was too micro managing LFc to the extend he appeared too powerful for LFC. players in & nitty gritty salary negotiations were usually NOT under the perview of the manager (or so i understand). Rafa was made to be too distant by players, explayers, media. basically no 'mourino-copy' in man-management. Maybe rafa made it TOO professional & it made it boring & hard to communicate to. There are traits I dont like about rafa but I do identify that He did want TO WIN things, (not contented with draws, opps i dont mean to step on err someones toes) He, rafa would (unfortunately) have to not please anyone in order to WIN at LFC. maybe the fight with the english media got him weary. Many of the anti rafa had said he go too many excuses. I tend to look at rafa was left alone to fight at too many fronts. fighting with owners, fighting to win, fighting for more (better) players, fighting with media, fighting his critics etc. rafa had the strategy, his mind is always ON football. pre games, post games, season break, tactics. even some players have been asked to do certain things (post match), never ever contented on the players performance (even if they had a marvelous game). never pat the players shoulder when they had a fantastic game. IT's just rafa, a perfectionist. maybe TOO perfection to some whinny players? Should rafa had been not removed, maybe we wont be still no better at the top BUT i dont think we would ever, ever at second from the bottom. His strategies may not still win games (cause he thinks we dont have the right personel) but I dont think we could be crucified at man city, lame games in blackpool, everton >insert the forgetable loses< etc I still believed if we had built on the 2nd place in the standings (spend on GOOD reinforcement/players & not selling/trading good players to buy players. (many many season red nose finally won the league? he too invested every 3-4 seasons & built on championship seasons) Some felt that LFc was too foreign hence the 'pro english' came into the picture, this is where as a direct result of rafa leaving, we then to indulge sentiments. cole came in, Roy came in, out were some non-english palyers. we weren't thinking football but left on sentiments. I believe RH apppoinment to lfc was base on sentiments, not really football reasons (unless one might have to take in account the shortlisted candidates forward to the board, which in that context RH was & a better choice over the less forgetable list) This post has been edited by koolspyda: Oct 18 2010, 08:41 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 18 2010, 06:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#47
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: KL |
following up on my post, if anyone of you had or experienced a englishmen as client (i did), head-of-department, etc, if you ever meet their requirement, its compliments like
"great" , "super" "that's it, you delivered, I knew i can count on you" etc it not like ... when post LFc match, just won or played an excellent game trashing of opponent, & gerrard score 2 or more & rafa would pull gerrard aside to tell him "gerrard, you know in the 65th & 70th minute where you we at position of the centre, you should have instead pass near oppose to wide...." probably no compliments like "super strikes, captain!" [gives gerrard hug] sorry i need to entertain/unstress myself with some nonsensical post This post has been edited by koolspyda: Oct 18 2010, 08:58 PM |
|
|
Oct 18 2010, 08:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#48
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: KL |
QUOTE(livingmonolith @ Oct 18 2010, 08:57 PM) i may not be happy with the direction and ambition the club is heading now, but i won't be calling for RH's head though. we have been through worse moments. before shankly took us to the glory days, we were languishing in second division. in the end of the day, we still say the same thing, you'll never walk alone, through good and bad times. I said this before, some felt we suffered 5 years under Rafa, we should at least have to be fair to RH. (at least 1 season they ask) |
|
|
Oct 18 2010, 08:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#49
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: KL |
QUOTE(carloz28 @ Oct 18 2010, 09:36 PM) Suffered 5 yrs under Rafa? Don't let your blind loyalty fool you. Under Rafa, we had played some of the best football i have ever seen and most important of all we have some golden moments during his tenure. Well it seems we'll have to see how it played, given the (as I see it) kids glove treatment of RH by the English media at LFC current predicament. We all know how they ravage rafa at his rotation policy....uoh I don't want to start this again. Yes he was poor at signings and man management, had a bad season BUT no matter how you look it, his underachievements and failing pales in comparison to Hodgson's doing right now. HOGDSON BY FAR IS THE WORST LIVERPOOL MANAGER EVER IN OUR ILLUSTRIOUS HISTORY! Give him time? You are having a laugh. Don't be silly. |
|
|
Oct 18 2010, 09:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#50
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: KL |
QUOTE(livingmonolith @ Oct 18 2010, 08:57 PM) and the problem is, 80-90% of these players are those who took us to 2nd place 2 seasons back. what happened in this short period of time? QUOTE(livingmonolith @ Oct 18 2010, 08:57 PM) and too often than not, we have been replacing our players with mediocre ones. i must say RB did make such mistakes throughout his tenure. As above. Instead of building, we are taken to look at pool /grade B,C players at transfer market. I'm not trying to absolve rafa faults , but I do look into that context. |
|
|
Oct 19 2010, 12:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#51
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: KL |
DR, tks for taking the time to address my discontentment.
QUOTE(Duke Red @ Oct 19 2010, 12:22 PM) This sounds like a stretch to me. I really doubt the board, or owners at the time would put millions of pounds at risk purely on sentiment. I think it was more a case of which manager we could afford and has a proven record in the Premiership. I also think that Roy was appointed because he could work within a limited budget and was seen as being able to bring out the best from average players. yeah i know its a stretch, but at-the-time G&H is probably in the mind of disposing LFc, • wanted a manager who would toe-the-line, • keep LFC to be better than at least 7th placed (at least they thought that even a monkey can do better than the last manager), • good candidates that could help LFC back to 4th is too expensive for the board at that time (look at rafa's salary) & • potentially another 'rafa copy' when asking for transfer budget, the list goes on.RH in that sense, a sentimental favourite, he's english (mannered), wont be fighting with the media thus won't be frightening away investors/buyers for the club (LFC), is in the circle of good relations with fergie's cartel. maybe the last point it's too much conspiracy for some, but if one take in account the players transfer between that 'cartel', you (might just) sniff a whiff that something is amiss. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- the players is backing RH at the moment. (who is really telling the truth), we are told, see the body language of certain players, supposedly not in contentment with the manager's strategies. I think not all players are willing to stand up for (my thoughts): - in the even speaking out could mean shipped out, we have a manager that probably shd have defended player earlier than week(s) later. it would be an embarrassment the the player is singled out. Let's be really honest we only have 2 or 3 world class players, some good & the rest slightly above mediocre. RH brought in sub-mediocre. joe cole? please.. he has 5 outstanding games in a season for chelsea, the rest mostly warming the bench. being shipped out of LFC would mean having playing for a mediocre club in the future. only 3 i know/guess would be sought after by big clubs. if there is anything LFc needs to learn in todays global football, its to have the killer's instinct. (double edge sword i know) we aren't the manager swapping club like RMadrid (not that i admire). but who is up there, & who is languishing above west ham. This post has been edited by koolspyda: Oct 19 2010, 12:34 PM |
|
|
Oct 19 2010, 01:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#52
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: KL |
+1
faith alone cant win matches. in that, you probably need 40% good players + 30% tactics + 20% ability + 9% home ground + 1% unbiased referee. (well it can change depends on opponents) we need a concerted effort that starts from the top. (manager) but if he can't or doenst have the calibre to do so, LFC needs to shake thing up. This post has been edited by koolspyda: Oct 19 2010, 01:10 PM |
|
|
Oct 19 2010, 01:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#53
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: KL |
QUOTE(livingmonolith @ Oct 19 2010, 02:14 PM) i'm not surprised with all the anger showed right now, but i'd like to point of that RH was obviously signed as the manager to carry liverpool through a transition period while we're trying to find a new owner. the clauses in his contract says it all. in my books (those reasons alone) appointing RH it seems base on sentiments, not my standard of 'footballing reasons'. why was he appointed when there are better managers available back then? because he's content to coach without being given big budgets to spend on players, and not complaining everyday like how RB did. perhaps for the board, they took into consideration that hiring a manager with a respectable portfolio will see more communication breakdowns due to the lack of support provided, and that would probably lead to more problems on and off the pitch. at least now with RH, he's going to be an easy target. it was liverpool's decision to appoint RH, RH didn't walk right into that post. don't blame RH for being not great enough because he never had the reputation as a great manager, not even with fulham's cup final last season. we're caught in this mess because of bad decisions. we had to indulge to some (senior) players feelings, some ex players (the vocal bunch), to bring or return to the old liverpool ways. I have to be carefull as there are tons of good things that made us who we were < am i mad? past tense? come on. i learn to accept that at the present moment we aren't great. but on the other side, I know as we all will acknowledge, managing football club (esp the big clubs) is different now. we'll keep the good but need to change to progress ahead. I think LFc is in a mess when we could actually need an 'ultra' head. This post has been edited by koolspyda: Oct 19 2010, 01:56 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 19 2010, 02:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#54
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: KL |
dont feed the troll
|
|
|
Oct 19 2010, 03:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#55
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: KL |
QUOTE(Duke Red @ Oct 19 2010, 03:55 PM) Interesting article this. i read our local paper (they had an article on john henry's squeeze to thank for)I must say that he loves the club for the right reasons. It wasn't about the success on the pitch. His first connection with the club wasn't when we lifted a cup but when the Hillsborough disaster occured. It's why I keep advocating the importance of history. You will develop a stronger emotional attachment to the club. but yours is more credible. |
|
|
Oct 19 2010, 04:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#56
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: KL |
QUOTE(triple02 @ Oct 19 2010, 04:21 PM) i read that on Eurosport actually. Linda holds a masters degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. she got the looks & the more importantly brainy too. Linda Pizzuti actually pestered Henry to ask Hicks if Liverpool was for sale during one of the MLB owners's conference. Henry tried to ask Hicks Snr but at that time he was talking to someone else. He approached Hicks Jnr to ask if Liverpool was for sale.He replied with a flat NO. Sure would have been something if Hicks Jnr would have replied Henry with his patented response! i suppose congrats is in order to the proud henry family addition (a baby girl in sept 2010). sorry too many discontentment amongst Lfc chums. wanted to lighten things a little. |
|
|
Oct 20 2010, 12:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#57
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: KL |
thank you hyperyouth_firepower & lilredridinghood for filling in the pieces i suspected off (board room wrangles) but never had the broad links.
rooney? as much as he's a excellent footballer, possibly the jigsaw that some feel could assist torres, i think not. some of which is his loyalty. He may be best pal with gerrard in the england camp (he mentioned gerrard took him under his wings when he first joined england, shared the same room) & as Duke pointed he is perceived to have the loyalty of $$$ over the club. i can see why some fans cream over the possiblity of rooney » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Not an ideal Liverpool player. probably has tons of passion of the game but possibly zero passion for club (well if you pay 250K pounds a week..) I'm sorry. I'll take tavez over him if the 2 is on the table. i know its inevitable to talk about the possibility (now that he could come 'available' & we have new owners), & just maybe some, just someone within might ask to rope in another english player. i digress we might see more Joe Januszewski involvement in LFc. he i guess may be john henry's eyes in LFc. (i suspect he might be taking a transatlantic posting position) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « he has been a LFc fan for many years but he probably knew first hand of the troubles & probably spend a larger amount of watching live LFc games post istanbul. its good that NESV is looking to hear more of the fans. (hey even Linda Pizzuti's twitter is following SOS) This post has been edited by koolspyda: Oct 20 2010, 12:40 PM |
|
|
Oct 20 2010, 04:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#58
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: KL |
I love joe
its him & the many many fans who did something & here we are (post new ownership) truly inspiring reading. tks 4 d link, DR QUOTE "I think I made some kind of connection there emotionally and that was really cemented for me when I went off to university and ran into some ex-pats from Liverpool and made friends with them. They'd espouse the virtues of Liverpool Football Club with the great European nights of Paisley, King Kenny and Souness, and raising the trophies in Rome, London and Paris. It just stuck with me and I thought, 'Liverpool FC - I'm in!' this is soo true, people always critic us of our history, living of the past. we should & always remember its the history of LFC that made liverpool, liverpool fC. the memories of european nights, BPL games, moments, our past victories, failings etc so go forth, inspire new fans my liverpool mates. (dont & not bragging of trophies, superstars, of kissing badges, blah blah) who knows, another joe or more people like joe, will help continue the tradition & be part of the liverpool way. This post has been edited by koolspyda: Oct 20 2010, 04:38 PM |
|
|
Oct 20 2010, 04:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#59
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: KL |
|
|
|
Oct 20 2010, 05:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#60
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: KL |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0230sec
0.76
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 04:19 AM |