what strange creatures have come out of hidden places??

please provide evidence when you want people to believe in something.

There are holes on the poles and having hole on Arctic obviously the ocean continues on other side of the hole in inner earth.

Dimension of the holes are :inner span(center of the hole)is 95 NM wide and the diameter of the rim or the start of downward curvature is 1400 NM cca.
Earth crust close to the poles is 1050 NM thick.

Why we do not see those holes on many images from the space?
Firstly because there are not available high resolution images for great public(Google Earth etc)
Even if good photo of polar regions is seen by inexperienced eye hardly any hole will be distinguished.The center of the hole is always covered by thick cloudiness(temperature diff) and the passage of earth curvature to hole curvature is so slight that hardly visible.Example is down bellow:



and our planet's cross sections is probably as shown down bellow except that most probably the thickness of the crust in equatorial region is bigger:

How can a junk thread like this lasts 13 pages? @_@

For the sake of argument and constructive post, why didn't the earth surface/crust crumble due to gravity? Since if it is hollow hence there will be no support for the crust, the down force would've pull the crust to eventually crumble and fall.

That's explained somewhere within the 13 pages of text. Something about centrifugal force keeping the structure stable.

The reason why this thread expanded to such a length is due to the thread starter's faith that there exists a paradise within the planet. A place where people don't get sick, old and such. Since he doesn't have the means to prove such a thing, he hoped to get more believers so they can start an expedition to find this place and live there. The thread more or less died after that was pointed out.

Look at the design LYNN.The space is on outside and inner side of the globe so the pressure is equal.The mass of the crust has its own gravity and inner sun which definitely much denser own gravity.

In primordial time of formation of any planet there were gases and elements rotating and centripetal and centrifugal forces at work.Heavy elements remained at center forming the core,lighter elements were expulsed off that center due centrifugal force.On those lighter elements however at work also centripetal or gravity force of heavy center core.At some distance from the center those two forces were equal opposite where the lighter elements were imprisoned and formed the crust.The forces of rotation on those lighter elements were least in the axis and no elements were imprisoned there and holes were formed.

An argument of not false no true until proven. Gambateh.


Faith is blind....

What prevent ships from the inner earth from sail through the s hole? Got clouds or not? Got tornado? Earth quake? What about solar flare? won't get over heat meh?

if there is holes in the poles why have all the water in the ocean not gone inside the hollow earth already?

just because there's an a hole there, doesn't mean it's empty. If the theory is true, then sea water would be both inside and outside of the crust.

let assume the water filling the hole, does the water move around? if it does, it will have major effect on sea current.

if there is not water filling the hole then the air current from the hollow earth would have affect the climate pattern on our side.

This post has been edited by robertngo: Jan 2 2011, 11:42 PM

So marine creatures can swim through loh? Maybe the dinosaurs are there too ah? TS says Hitler went there too, I wonder who else.

I suppose that would be my prerogative to read all 13 pages firstly. I would, really, if the topic was well initiated and there is some sense in it.
Pardon me, as I remember previously, PhD School (when it was a standalone subforum) was flooded with myths and psychological and ghosts and metaphysics thread. I went ahead to assume this was another of such thread.
The blame is mine to take for assuming things too quickly.

1. Earth's rpm is not that great to 'fling' off lighter elements to great distance. EVEN IF it is able to fling them off, this would mean the flung mass is very small compared to the core. Thus, effect of gravitational force of flung-mass towards the core would be almost negligible. With that, I'm not so convinced if there would be a gravitational balance point to support the crust.

2. If rotational force is least at the axis, why would the distribution of flung-mass i.e. outer shape of crust be almost spherical? By your logic, rotational force would be maximum at the equator, hence the Earth should be almost of ellipsis shape (fact is, Earth IS slightly off spherical).

3. Lastly, if at all there were such finding, why wasn't it revealed? Political interests? Religion issues? Monetary gain? Secret training base for the Aryan race?

I'm sorry but I'm still very skeptical about this.

How come the inner earth got opposite gravity? centrifugal fling flung force it to counter the outer earth? Screwballx change name to CDP?

No idea. Maybe inner earth rotates clockwise while outer earth rotates at counterclockwise. Or maybe their rotational axis are perpendicular to each other. Or maybe Magneto lives in inner earth. XD

There are two great masses which produce gravity in inner earth.
The crust and it's center of gravity which is at cca one third of it's thickness.Therefor the water down the hole and in the inner earth are held by gravity perpendicular to its surface.Definitely there is an exchange of the air and the water currents through the holes.Most of the icebergs on both poles are the produce of that exchange of water currents.
The other big mass in the underworld is inner sun,which is of much bigger density and therefor gravity force, than the crust. That inner sun's gravity has it's effect on the surface of inner crust in such a way to diminish crust's own gravity in inner lands.
Holding in mind the above mentioned we have to conclude, that due to lower gravity, in inner lands everything is bigger:mountains,flora and fauna and eventual but most probable people living there.

By the way I am not SBX

The are a couple of holes with your theory on pressure maintaining the structure of your hollow earth. Have you seen a balloon hold it's shape if its opening was not sealed? You have a hole at each of the planet's poles.

Centrifugal force may explain how a hollow structure can be maintained. It can't explain how it can form a hollow shell. While it is possible for elements to enter a stable orbit around a forming planet, it is very unlikely in this case for a few reasons.

The item orbiting the planet would have to have an exact velocity at a perpendicular angle to the planet. Too slow and it falls into the planet. Too fast and it leaves orbit. Have the wrong angle, the item will either fall onto the planet or fly into space. The odds of entering a stable orbit isn't that good.

In a forming planet, the mass of the planet increases overtime. Items previously in orbit will fall into the planet as their velocity will not be sufficient to provide the centrifugal force needed to remain in orbit. This will add more mass to the planet. Resulting in more items falling out of orbit and so on. As the planet continues to get larger, it starts having an atmosphere as its gravity is capable of holding gas molecules on it surface. An atmosphere causes air friction to anything that moves within it. This results in more items falling onto the planet.

The Sun or stars are made of hydrogen. The lightest element in the universe. Based on the reasons above, hydrogen would probably be the last elements to be captured by a planet. This makes it very unlikely for the planet to have a core made of hydrogen. No hydrogen, no mini sun.

Naturally occurring mini suns don't exists for a reason. A star can only have a fusion reaction if its gravity is sufficient to cause hydrogen atoms to fuse. You can fill around a hundred earth inside our sun. Gas giants like Jupiter have the necessary elements for a star but it's still not big enough for fusion to occur.

I think I can relate and agree more with Eventless' arguments.

hollow earth supporter read this

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/01/...tok-antarctica/



Drill Close to Reaching 14-Million-Year-Old Antarctic Lake

wow.. that is really something to shed light into the hollow earth theory..

before this i thought its all bullshit and fantasy created by TS because all the arguments are maybe this and maybe that..

but now i kinda start to agree abit just like agreeing on 2012

i don't get the significance of how finding an underground lake would relate to the hollow theory.
there are plenty of underground lakes throughout the earth...