If only we live in a perfect world.

Telling people to get married to have sex, is like telling robbers to get money by getting a job.

Can you put money where your mouth is? Would you sponsor/adopt a child that would have been otherwise aborted? Its so much easier to condemn others for their mistakes than to actually solve problems isn't it? So much easier to talk from the moral high ground when you don't have to take any action isn't it?

If all the pro-lifers out there actually went out and said "You don't want your kid, I'll take care of him/her! ", people would find it really hard to argue for abortion.


Unfortunately, its often not the "parents" who have to deal with the bulk of the problem, its really the innocent child and society that deals with the problem from not aborting the child.

There is no difference, and that's one of the reasons why we need less kids "abandoned" kids. If you think adoption is a perfect system, it is not. Even if its just kids without parents (from natural causes), the adoption system is already overloadeed and filled with its own problems. You've been in america for some time, you should know about the problems in their system. This, is when they at least HAVE A SYSTEM.


I'm in no position to even support a child on my own, what makes you think I can adopt a child? I'm not going to be irresponsible to society to ruin a child's life and the life of the community which he is connected to. Don't forget that majority of kids who are not brought up well, end up being a menace to society in one form or another.

if you think this country is backwards, recently a school just opened for pregnant teenagers to give them a place to study and be safe from society's prejudice against pregnant teens. This is a great step forward, as it removes one reason for abortion. Slowly work away at rationales for abortion, and people won't abort. Simply saying "its a life, don't abort!" is stupid.


If only things were so simple eh. As I said, its so freaking easy to tell people what they should do, and not even get your hands dirty to try to help fix problems. People make choices in their lives, and yes they should be responsible for it. Whether that choice is living with a child, or the guilt of killing it, its something they live with.

If you want to tell people what to do, you need to put money where you mouth is and get involved. Otherwise all you're doing is blowing hot air.


Facts weren't twisted. The statistical correlation is very high and there are several academic papers based on that study. So before you go debasing a statistic, perhaps you should read up on it first?

Indeed, its always the people who "seem" to be good that make the most noise. Telling people what they should do, but they themselves don't want to help do anything about it.

I love it when people use that clause without fully understanding its meaning. We're not saying that abortions will definitely reduce crime (causation), but what we're saying is that the statistics do strongly correlate the 2 data points.

The academic papers based on the statistics just go on to prove the validity of the statistics and its implications. I would like to see pro-life academic papers on the issue of abortion, because I think you won't find any. Since the pro-life stance is basically "its a life, don't kill it!". Even science has more or less defined when a fetus is considered "human".

Majority of pro-lifers take a very simple, naive and black/white view of the issue. They cannot comprehend the complexities of abortion, unwilling to go into depth of its ramifications. I would seriously like to see a proper debate from pro-lifers, instead of an emotional reaction.