Nikon D90 V9, Nikon mid-high range DSLR
|
|
 Oct 29 2010, 02:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#61
|
 
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu   
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Oct 29 2010, 07:31 AM) Trying out different color tone for pic, hmm... Nice. But i love the previous pic, the one u said without bokeh, looks like an ad or something » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «   This one u dwloaded the tone or did by urself? Always wanted to do tones but dunno how  |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 29 2010, 02:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#62
|
|
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Oct 29 2010, 02:51 PM) Thanks! I downloaded the preset for LR, then tweak a little to my liking ^^. I see. 16-35 eh? That's why no bokeh haha. Did you use flash for that pic? Coz the model looked bright but far away I like the previous one too, but that settings only worked for that pic >_<, the others like not so nice urgh.  Btw, can you share the download link if you still have it? |
|
|
Oct 29 2010, 04:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#63
|
|
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu
|
QUOTE(faareast @ Oct 29 2010, 04:04 PM) i saw someone using a cable that allow the picture we take appear in the laptop right after the shutter button is pressed.. what is that cable? Nice. Sport photographers, usually football, upload the pics straight away after they capture it. Technology lol  |
|
|
Nov 1 2010, 12:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#64
|
|
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu
|
QUOTE(KTCY @ Oct 31 2010, 10:21 PM) Damn. MBD-80 keep showing no batt whenever I put on 700200 VR. Me too last time. Brought to Nikon PJ, first they say it was my body's prob. Then brought a Meike one to prove to them, they gave me a new one with a new warranty Connection problem between the batt grip and body I guess.   |
|
|
Nov 1 2010, 04:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#65
|
|
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu
|
QUOTE(KTCY @ Nov 1 2010, 03:18 AM) ^ It's really nice when you a good contact with them I can change it anytime. No problem as I know them very well Will exchange tomorrow  Btw, if D7000 is really RM3.5k body only, I would definitely get one  |
|
|
Nov 2 2010, 12:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#66
|
|
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu
|
QUOTE(KTCY @ Nov 1 2010, 11:43 PM) Yes. So expensive meh. Then RRP of Body only should be around RM5k, street price would probably be RM4.5k, then bye-bye D7000 for me |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 2 2010, 03:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#67
|
|
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu
|
Brought my Tammy 17-50 non-VC to shoot with kelantan football players today. Out of the 30 pics, it backfocused for 5 pics
 I'm losing faith day by day |
|
|
Nov 2 2010, 05:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#68
|
|
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu
|
QUOTE(CoffeeDude @ Nov 2 2010, 05:09 AM) If 4.5k for D7000 body why not get D300S instead? Not yet confirmed lor. Should be a bit cheaper. D7000 = new sensor which improves ISO performance, full HD video and etc. Both of them are different actually, choose which suits you more |
|
|
Nov 3 2010, 05:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#69
|
|
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu
|
Need one confirmation about the 16-85. Is it sharper than Tamy 17-50?
|
|
|
Nov 3 2010, 04:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#70
|
|
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu
|
QUOTE(KTCY @ Nov 3 2010, 07:20 AM) ^ Really bro? I might change to 16-85. I don't use 2.8 that often coz it's kinda soft, but if I really need to use in lowlight, I'll switch to my 50 1.4 Yes. |
|
|
Nov 3 2010, 04:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#71
|
|
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu
|
QUOTE(KTCY @ Nov 3 2010, 04:10 PM) 16-85 more expensive than your 17-50. I see, nice 2k+ for brand new ! And yes. Tested RM2180 here in KB, Kelantan. Don't have any other choices than the 16-85. Good range too, wider and longer, worth it I guess |
|
|
Nov 3 2010, 07:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#72
|
|
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu
|
The sharpness of the 16-85 is after the 17-55 right? I mean it's the second best DX lens?
|
|
|
Nov 3 2010, 10:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#73
|
|
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu
|
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Nov 3 2010, 09:23 PM) If only counts zoom lens, I think so Yeah DX zoom, can't compare to prime meh  So ~1. 17-55 2.8 2. 16-85 3. 18-70 (A lot of difference in terms of sharpness if compared to 16-85? )4? |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 3 2010, 10:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#74
|
|
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu
|
QUOTE(ifaaan @ Nov 3 2010, 10:05 PM) hey cel, what's your honest opinion on the 70-200 f/2.8 VRII ? Based on celciuz's previous pictures, I would say it's awesome! The sharpness, contrast and etc. But I don't own one so I can't say much Is it worth the trouble of carrying a heavy lens or would you have rather used multiple single focal lengths with fast aperture instead? but as i see it, lenses like 85 f/1.4G is already RM5k >< seems like the 70-200 is more worth it. thanks! Added on November 3, 2010, 10:06 pmor anybody who uses or used the 70-200 please feel free to say what's on your mind. |
|
|
Nov 3 2010, 11:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#75
|
|
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu
|
QUOTE(ifaaan @ Nov 3 2010, 10:33 PM) hahah. yeah, his pictures really do give the 70-200 a good image. seriously considering the 70-200 as i really can't think of any other lenses that can meet my needs. thanks! True. The length and weight of the lens will make it more stable to hold IMO. My 2nd dream lens after the 24-70 |
|
|
Nov 4 2010, 12:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#76
|
|
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu
|
"It seems to us that Nikon is reallly missing out lens at the Prosumer level. They have something less than $600-$700 or over $1500. Really nothing in between."
Took this from the net. It's really true, explains my situation now |
|
|
Nov 5 2010, 01:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#77
|
|
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu
|
Manage to get my mom to buy me a SB900 next week
Is it a good time to buy or I should stick to my Di622 first and wait for replacement? Eneloop battery is suitable for the SB900? |
|
|
Nov 5 2010, 07:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#78
|
|
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu
|
QUOTE(faareast @ Nov 5 2010, 01:15 AM) ^ wait till u can buy with ur own money.. then it will be meaningful.. hehe I want to buy a new lens with my money, but I'm 19 lor. Student where to get that much money. My money also from my parents. Haha FX in the future with my own money Ohh btw talking about UWA, I really like the distortion made by it. Planning to get a tokina 1116 in the future. IIRC, kenrockwell said it'a better than Nikkor 1224, though the range is better |
|
|
Nov 5 2010, 08:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#79
|
|
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu
|
QUOTE(faareast @ Nov 5 2010, 08:25 PM) guess what? im student also... and im 20... need my IC to believe? haha... and i worked hard to get money... and still studying in mech eng... I'll work hard when I start working btw, go and get the 11-16 and 12-24 first la.. then u tell me ur review.. How did u manage to get the money? Part-time? Direct selling? Yeah give me money then I'll buy both and do a review for u |
|
|
Nov 6 2010, 02:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#80
|
|
Senior Member
3,435 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Kota Bharu
|
Dunno why it became weird when I said my parents is buying me my camera stuff. Normal only meh, it's like a foundation for me. I wanna do wedding photography in the future when I have enough skills, hopefully soon. Now it's mostly taking family photos, events, etc. When I get money from that, then I stop burdening my parents
 The not-so-sharp-wide-open 50 f1.4 spam This post has been edited by FaezFarhan: Nov 6 2010, 03:16 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0695sec
 0.33
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 05:09 PM |
Quote