Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat
|
shinjite
|
Oct 17 2011, 11:17 AM
|
|
Based on the reviews WITH the ASUS Crosshair V formula mobo, definitely not worth it BUT apparently when tested with OTHER mobos, results are surprisingly good for gaming So just wait for other ppl around the world to test it with other boards Added on October 17, 2011, 11:18 amQUOTE(yshiuan @ Oct 17 2011, 11:14 AM) u sponsor me the chip la  im going to get a 970 mobo anyway  Bro, me also PK XD However me running on a 'fake' FX Quad Core processor (see signature) This post has been edited by shinjite: Oct 17 2011, 11:18 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Oct 17 2011, 12:42 PM
|
|
QUOTE(tech3910 @ Oct 17 2011, 12:35 PM) which link? i wanna check out the review. http://www.hardwareheaven.com/reviews/1285...troduction.htmlThe link
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Oct 17 2011, 01:22 PM
|
|
QUOTE(tech3910 @ Oct 17 2011, 01:03 PM) oo nice..... but if u look @ the bigger picture, not much of an improvement from phenom2 x6 & 980. http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/AMD...U-Review/1402/3dis review uses asus formla, but they dun hav the bios issue mentioned...... the result is consistent to the hardwareheaven review. Guess have to wait for more FX's tested with different boards to see nicely
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Oct 17 2011, 01:55 PM
|
|
QUOTE(lex @ Oct 17 2011, 01:27 PM) Edit: Weird, Hardware Heaven is the only reviewer who is able to run Total War: Shogun 2. If you refer to my earlier post, four other review sites ( bit-tech.net, Sweclockers.com, Muropaketti and HardWare.fr) had system crashes when running Total War: Shogun 2.  Memang weird....
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Oct 17 2011, 03:41 PM
|
|
This is also a good clock to clock comparison between the AMD FX-8150 and the Phenom II X6 1100T both overclocked at 4.2Ghz Both using Gigabyte's 990FX-UD7 mobo with F5 BIOS http://wccftech.com/amd-bulldozer-fx8150-p...ark-comparison/
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Oct 17 2011, 04:05 PM
|
|
QUOTE(kingkingyyk @ Oct 17 2011, 04:03 PM) I was talking about reviews with SLi/CFX. Don't see anything wrong there. Thanks for the heads up on the differences in GPU bandwidth but most of the reviews are utilising only a single card So we go from there This post has been edited by shinjite: Oct 17 2011, 04:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Oct 19 2011, 09:02 AM
|
|
Wait for the update on the AMD FX's price slash first
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Oct 19 2011, 12:04 PM
|
|
Yes....FX-8170
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Oct 19 2011, 08:26 PM
|
|
QUOTE(1024kbps @ Oct 19 2011, 06:37 PM) X4 960T? Wow....
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Oct 19 2011, 09:57 PM
|
|
I'll just wait for Enhanced BD and see
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Oct 27 2011, 06:45 PM
|
|
If you accidentally bend it, you can bend it back slowly..... If broken, then that is different
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Oct 31 2011, 10:16 AM
|
|
No no no, the power consumption at load MUST decrease
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Nov 2 2011, 09:49 AM
|
|
8.461Ghz......really scalable like mad this FX
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Nov 2 2011, 02:35 PM
|
|
I would say all hope is not lost, at least there is a competitor to Intel
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Nov 15 2011, 09:03 PM
|
|
AMD's hope is in multithreaded apps, can't go back now
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Nov 16 2011, 05:58 PM
|
|
Well just wait for Enhanced BD next year
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Dec 25 2011, 03:40 PM
|
|
Does your 880GM-USB3 has the updated BIOS to support BD?
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Dec 31 2011, 05:51 PM
|
|
I checked.....is yours the version 3.1 or the version 1.x?
Version 3.1 supports AM3+ processors
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Jan 18 2012, 11:04 PM
|
|
QUOTE(j.hafiz10 @ Jan 18 2012, 10:36 PM) yeah i use 3.1 version. and yeah, sure can support AM3+ but is that means can support AMD Bulldozer as well? Yes you can
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Aug 28 2012, 09:30 AM
|
|
Can't wait for the CPU reviews on this
|
|
|
|
|