AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat
|
|
 Aug 3 2011, 02:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
 
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009   
|
looks like quite good improve in the imc.
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Aug 3 2011, 03:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(shojikun @ Aug 3 2011, 04:44 AM) so... when will this new chip coming out? (bulldozer) @_@ i pening Zambezi launch date all but confirmed   AMD to have Llano triple-core after all  Bulldozer to launch in September  |
|
|
Aug 9 2011, 05:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(dwks @ Aug 8 2011, 05:24 PM) just thinking, people keep saying most application cant fully utilize our current 4CORE CPU. folding@home smp client definitely will take advantage of this 8 cores cpu. Is there any reason to even get 8CORE Bulldozer? Hope someone fix this thinking of mine so that ill anticipating bulldozer release!  |
|
|
Aug 10 2011, 03:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(n3w @ Aug 9 2011, 09:35 PM) Basically we could have 4 cores running games and the other four running on clients. hehe, most games use 2 cores, I was just wondering the temp on 4 cores running clients. Anyone running all cores? Curious about the temp. If say, 8 cores running wouldn't be the chip would be a bit hot?  so 6 cores can be used to run the folding@home client. but there are still games can utilize 4 cores.  i m running the client on all cores. cpu temperature around 51'c. not as hot as prime95. yea, like bro 1024kbps say, the 8 cores cpu is 32nm part. altough 8 cores are running, but still less heat. QUOTE(1024kbps @ Aug 10 2011, 12:46 AM) Lol saturn is folding freak. yes, i m, hahaha. Temp would be depend on what cooler you are using and you are oc or not. the 8 cores bulldozer is 32nm chip, smaller fabrication = can put more transistors, or more cores, lower power consumption and less heat than the phenom II 45nm manufacturing process. |
|
|
Aug 10 2011, 05:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(HoNeYdEwBoY @ Aug 10 2011, 07:27 AM) i just wonder, can i folding with my phenom II x4? yes, you can run folding with phenom ii x4, no problem. 6 cores temperature aroudn 51'c is not hot at all ? come, visit the forum: https://forum.lowyat.net/Folding@Malaysia 51'c on full load, i think is acceptable la. but i m using 4 cores. QUOTE(shinjite @ Aug 10 2011, 07:33 AM) Even a single core also can fold ma haha, yes. QUOTE(kuntawakaw @ Aug 10 2011, 07:42 AM) any link that i can refer about the temperature? oops, it is a guessing bro. as the llano is quite hot even its 32nm. even only CPU is stressed..  32nm, theoretical should run cooler. QUOTE(StratOS @ Aug 10 2011, 08:59 AM) Im folding using a sempron.. no problems with it.. bro StratOS also a folder, nice. The bulldozer actual review not out yet so we can only play guessing game here until someone got 1 to test it out. QUOTE(HoNeYdEwBoY @ Aug 10 2011, 09:57 AM) that mean i no need build another rig for myself ? just wait for the review first. bulldozer look tempting, thinking changing the board to AM3+ .. dunno worth a not, and dunno can it support fX core next time  |
|
|
Aug 12 2011, 07:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#46
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(everling @ Aug 12 2011, 03:29 PM) Or a desperate action to stay relevant if BD remains woefully inefficient and overclocking is the only way to compete with Intel on performance. sad to hear that.  architecture still not strong enough. |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 14 2011, 10:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#47
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(MichaelJohn @ Aug 14 2011, 08:20 PM) Wait... they wanna change from the classic cpu heatsink to a LCS? haha, haven't confirm. just wait and see. |
|
|
Aug 16 2011, 04:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#48
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
gpu unlocking somemore.
 what kind of model also come out. |
|
|
Sep 13 2011, 10:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#49
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
|
|
|
Sep 16 2011, 03:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#50
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Sep 16 2011, 12:03 AM) why they used different CPUs for both tests? haha, make sense. what about 980X on Handbrake? and 2500 on Dirt3? think about it   |
|
|
Sep 16 2011, 04:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#51
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(Irishcoffee @ Sep 16 2011, 04:14 AM) which means bulldozer single thread performance is arnd 1st gen i7 their fps are close, maybe gpu bottleneck also. |
|
|
Sep 18 2011, 05:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#52
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(whitedrake88 @ Sep 18 2011, 11:28 AM) I just hope they will release before BF3 you can try the athlon ii x4 at 3.61ghz to run superpi and compare the result on bro lex post. .... I need upgrade my Athlon II x4 !!!  probably didn't have much different? QUOTE(wcypierre @ Sep 18 2011, 01:16 PM) I wonder what would be the price of AMD FX? btw, just asking, will my AM2+ motherboard support it? amd fx (bulldozer) need am3+ board,since it is not support ddr2 ram. QUOTE(whitedrake88 @ Sep 18 2011, 01:33 PM) BTW issit possible to fit in AM3 after bios update? i think previously asus got announce some of their board can support amd fx cpu with bios update.but the FPS different between X4 and i5 is huge but now no news.. sandy bridge architecture perform better in gaming. |
|
|
Sep 18 2011, 05:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#53
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(whitedrake88 @ Sep 18 2011, 05:11 PM) ya not much different in gaming...just hope the FX series will win over SB else I wait for IB but sadly most rumor results now point out that amd fx can't fight with sandy bridge core i7. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 21 2011, 10:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#54
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(lex @ Sep 21 2011, 08:30 PM) Possible pricing and a launch date? techPowerUp: AMD FX Processor Prices Lower Than Expected (taken from original source here: FX processors, AMD's Bulldozer and prices for the official release date!)... hmm, 12 october, lets wait and see. |
|
|
Oct 8 2011, 04:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#55
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(kwlian @ Oct 8 2011, 01:08 PM) =O if FX-4XXX series cheaper than i3 2100 , im so buying it QUOTE(smokymcpot @ Oct 8 2011, 01:59 PM) Hope the price is cheaper or around the same as i3 2100 and similar or better performance than the i3 2100. yea, this is what consumer want. the FX-4170 clock at 4.2GHz, high chance can compete with core i3 2100. |
|
|
Oct 11 2011, 06:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#56
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
|
|
|
Oct 12 2011, 03:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#57
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
|
|
|
Nov 2 2011, 05:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#58
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
|
|
|
Nov 15 2011, 03:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#59
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
|
|
|
Dec 17 2011, 04:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#60
|
|
Senior Member
8,686 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/2...ozer_Chips.html
UPDATE: Microsoft has pulled down the patch as it had been released prematurely. |
| Change to: |  0.0198sec
 0.45
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 11:30 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.