tried stock vcore... 3.8ghz max


Attached thumbnail(s)

yerp stable... look at the linx

prime95 cant give as much heat as LinX in my case... dats y i ditched prime95 and use linx to test stability and load temp... if stable in linx, im damn sure p95 wil be stable, and if linx give xx temp, im damn sure p95 will give lower temp results

i did it a few days ago, but i didnt even bother to take ss of it... for ur sake, i'll redo it and post it after a few hours

fyi, my friend used linx on dual core as well, but it turned out that prime95 gives out more heat compared to linx @ 1024mb... but as soon he crank it up to 1536mb, linx won

wwww... y they produce that much heat? cos the program is making the cpu work like mad, although its just a short time, its constantly being pushed to its limit.... have u tried running applications when linx is stressing the proc to its limit? rite now im running prime95, and waddya say, i can play any sort of games without feeling a single lag, where as i couldnt play dota smoothly when running linx... and u cant blame my ram, i have more than enough ram for wat im doing

nevermind... picture tells a thousand words... and i have 2 pics to show u

if p95 is more stressing than linx, i wonder y my superpi is faster than linx?

p95 is not even a stress test to me compared to linx... i can turn on p95 while doing other things that uses processing power, but if i turn on linx, ill get frustrated of the lagging caused by it

edit: i've added the normal super pi result without any sort of cpu stress

This post has been edited by iBenQ: Mar 31 2009, 04:08 PM


Attached thumbnail(s)

ahhhhh, maybe we both got misunderstood... im trying to say, its very effective for quad as well.... i did say my friend tried dual core linx 1024mb, and he got same temp/stress level with p95... in fact, i feel linx is more demanding on quad than dual core, since on same settings, my p95 and linx 1024mb give totally different results compared to my friend's result which is same heat, same stress level since he dont feel lag... only when he put 1536mb, then he can feel it

btw, my friends dual core is e5200... could be c2d different due to larger cache perhaps? cause my q6600 took longer time to complete 1 loop compared to q9650

memang e4xxx hard abit to oc fsb... i remember when i had e4600, couldn't even get it to boot up at 333mhz... highest i got oso was 300mhz T_T, so i'd say, nice fsb man!

omg... 1.57v on vtt is quite high... for me, its possible to put 480fsb with just 1.4v, heck i can even get it till 500fsb... wat vcore did u used for 4ghz? i nvr used occt b4, but is occt stating proc too hot a failure in oc? or just the temp is too high according to the settings?

wa punya quaddie memerlukan 1.3125v untuk 4ghz... lu punya e8400 patut dalam itu punya range... try turunkan itu vcore tengok .... btw u looking for blue ccfl??

@efilah,, pity u need high vcore for it @@ mine jz 1.175 to run 3.6ghz

This post has been edited by iBenQ: May 20 2009, 12:27 AM