QUOTE(UFO-ET @ Jun 29 2012, 05:50 PM)
Taikor, is it mean that equine park is going use skip to access mex? Not another access road to access mex? Tqtq Investment KINRARA RESIDENCE [OWNERS' THREAD], Lifestyle landed homes from Mah Sing
Investment KINRARA RESIDENCE [OWNERS' THREAD], Lifestyle landed homes from Mah Sing
|
|
Jul 4 2012, 11:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,442 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 4 2012, 12:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,442 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(UFO-ET @ Jul 4 2012, 11:53 AM) Good enuf Like this gone case already my favorite mex highway. MEX initial proposal wasn't cater for the usage of Puchong/Seri Kembangan/ Putra Permai folks. This highway is for those travelling fr KLIA & KL passengers. with the new interchange proposed, I forsee another Federal Highway in the making |
|
|
Dec 13 2012, 08:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,442 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(UFO-ET @ Dec 12 2012, 07:31 PM) Most of the BKs zone hv formed theirs' respective RA, there are bout 10 of them, we (BK4) formed our RA in 2000, BK5 Selatan formed in 2002, BK5B in 2003, all started quite "o.k", after a series of fund raising hardwork, we managed to secure 62% of residents to join the guarded security programme, both BK5 manage to achieve 50%++, fr the 1 day of the security operation, the number of members has dropped gradually to 45% after 4-5 years, both BK5 even drop below 40%. I agreed, quality of the neighbourhood is more impartant than lease or free hold. Last month, BK4 RA was officially dissolved, no more guards patrolling anymore. BK5 (1/3 members) is struggling at the moment. Quality neighborhood is very important to ensure the prosperity of a Taman. KR starts off with security services, I believe every house purchaser is aware of the responsibility to bear the maintenance cost, greater awareness as compared to those BK areas. My house was broken in when I stay in BK4 (alarm installed). My maid was "stolen" by the agency this year in BK5B, I lost 11K, too many incidents happened in BK. My area RA is very strong and hardworking, they work hard to secure at least of the residents to pay the security. After few years they manage to save some money and install auto gate. Very good job from RA to improve the security. After the autogate i can see the pay residents go up to 70-80%. however this has cause unconvienient to non pay resident and their visitor. There is one guy keep complaining to majlis to take action on gate and guard system, frequent complain from the guy force majlis no choice but to act according to rules and given notice to our RA to uninstall the gate and dismiss the guards. Now my RA feel upset after all the hardwork and get this kind of results, they all given up and all want to resign from their post. Few weeks later my area got no gate no guards becoz of one guy, i will be planning to move out if that really happened. Conclusion is if the area didnt start as gng it will make it difficult to make it as gng later dependent on how is your neighbourhood quality and what do they think ... |
|
|
Dec 13 2012, 09:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,442 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(froglai88 @ Dec 13 2012, 09:01 AM) We cant expect everyone or 100% of owners in d community will have same mindset with others. But this 1 minority owner can ruin the entire system that implemented by the RA and 80% of the owners grp, so wat is the point of having a RA then ? Please do not misunderstand that I undermine the amount of hardwork and effort of RA input, to make d community become a safety and frenly area, but I just dont understand why 1 person can ruin a entire community ? U ned to move out instead of him ? I think the rule is if the infrastructure in taman is maintained by majlis daerah, you can deny, put guard or gate to block people from accessing the taman, the road still belong to public, currently the local authority just close one eyes didnt take action as long as no people complain. If got people constantly complain then they has to take action, probably the guy know the laws well ...Added on December 13, 2012, 9:58 pm QUOTE(UFO-ET @ Dec 13 2012, 09:27 AM) I can assure you that every Taman has these good person. I wouldn't say he is wrong because he has his stand to object, not all people feel unsafe like us Tarak luit la taikor SKVBB, come to KR to staylah.. This post has been edited by nkhong: Dec 13 2012, 09:58 PM |
|
|
Dec 14 2012, 08:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,442 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(rocklee88 @ Dec 14 2012, 02:42 PM) Yes, some of the attitude of Malaysians are like SHIT. Always stingy to pay small small amount and yet want to enjoy security etc. Fxxed up mentality. If the taman is kept nice and clean with good security, property value will appreciate and yet these ppl do not want to pay! They are shooting themselves on their own foot. +1, spend money to make more money ... |
|
|
Dec 15 2012, 03:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,442 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
|
|
|
Jan 7 2013, 07:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,442 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
The three storeys superlinks facade look nice!
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0466sec
0.46
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 12:45 AM |