QUOTE(UFO-ET @ Mar 22 2011, 10:48 PM)
Precisely, security sure tight.
IMO, to form a gated and guarded community is very easy, but to ongoing maintain the common facilities is a big big task, sometimes I wan to blame developer for not perform their duty to educate residence on theirs' responsibility and duty in g+g area, we mustn't assume that all the g+g residences understand the concept, till today many g+g areas appear to hv problems after few yrs operation, some owners think that if their management office is not doing well, then they can still hand the maintenance jobs back to respective authorities to take care.....it really happen, no joke (frankly I dun like g+g b'coz of tis)
If KR has many investors buy to flip, then may hv problem also if hse kenot be sold, vacant & owner give excuse not to pay mthly maintenance, be prepare to face this ya
Another thing I worry is developer absorb the 1st 2 yr fees, it is gd can save money, but problem may arise when terms expire, to start collecting hundreds of mthly fees will be challenging, becoz to serve maintenance fees, one needs to make it a habit.
I always hv a "dream", if for the 1st 2 yrs, although developer absorbs fees, residence can still starts to pay a little bit fr day one (certain %) to a stakeholder a/c (FD), until the 3rd yr, it is easier to keep the pace...
The true G&G is for only strata landed homes, i only know a few of these housing estates like subang tanamera, puchong lakeedge, dpc zenia, etc. they are managed by a proper body and maintanence fees is mandatory. you'll be asked to sign a DMC agreement with spells out the rules of like no changing of exterior paint colour, extension etc just like you're in a condo.IMO, to form a gated and guarded community is very easy, but to ongoing maintain the common facilities is a big big task, sometimes I wan to blame developer for not perform their duty to educate residence on theirs' responsibility and duty in g+g area, we mustn't assume that all the g+g residences understand the concept, till today many g+g areas appear to hv problems after few yrs operation, some owners think that if their management office is not doing well, then they can still hand the maintenance jobs back to respective authorities to take care.....it really happen, no joke (frankly I dun like g+g b'coz of tis)
If KR has many investors buy to flip, then may hv problem also if hse kenot be sold, vacant & owner give excuse not to pay mthly maintenance, be prepare to face this ya
Another thing I worry is developer absorb the 1st 2 yr fees, it is gd can save money, but problem may arise when terms expire, to start collecting hundreds of mthly fees will be challenging, becoz to serve maintenance fees, one needs to make it a habit.
I always hv a "dream", if for the 1st 2 yrs, although developer absorbs fees, residence can still starts to pay a little bit fr day one (certain %) to a stakeholder a/c (FD), until the 3rd yr, it is easier to keep the pace...
For the rest of the individual titled landed, its pseudo G&G, F&G, guarded and gated whatever you wanna call it.
Usually the resident will form a Resident Association (RA) once the developer hands back the management of the security. So it all depends on how efficient your RA is. There is no law to force someone to join the RA and pay the security fees, so there are always freeloaders or tidak apa residents.
The suck part now is the govt recently came up with some really ridiculous guidelines for the psuedo G&G taman, which includes like booms gates can only be operational from 12mn to 6am, no brick perimeter walls , public can enter without surrendinng any documents, no oil drums, guard house size, etc. you can google or read more here http://www.sjecho.com.my/article/1111
the guidelines are support to be effective 31 march, and many RAs are still trying to fight the rulings as most taman cant comply with those rules, so we will see soon , if the local authority will take action to dismantle the security fittings .....
Mar 25 2011, 04:31 PM

Quote
0.0410sec
0.31
7 queries
GZIP Disabled