lol.. again with sharpness....

just get 55200... period.

in a more relaxed and abit OOT topic,



world cup winner, Casillas and his partner caught playing around with the one and only NEX-5...

lwliam: yeah.. of course sharpness is a good thing... but without proper technique and composition.. a photo that is 'sharp' only wont mean a thing... the beercan is a great option... im looking to get that some time soon too..

ieR: what u doing taking photos from dark place?

jerrylyh: whats ur budget? sometimes the extra push needed for the extra rm100-200 is worth it.

actually the VG10 bokeh is quite ugly IMO... not all the time.. but for eg. 3:07

IMHO... i dont really need warranty but obviously its better la just incase anything happen..

between 55200 and 75300... my personal preference is the 55200, coz i dont really need 300mm... but i will use 55mm more compared to 75mm... so hence... the easy choice for me... but what about u?

do u need the 55mm more or the 300mm more?

just my opinion bro, if you're the bird photographer type... or like to become peeping tom... then 300mm is nice... but its up to what you NEED...


dont hesitate to ask here if you have any questions, the sifus here wont bite.. (most of the time)

haha.. of course la bro... if they stood still means dead dy. haha.... follow albnok's style la... chase after the birds.. lol.

im not sifu la... anything u can always ask here or check at dyxum...

haha... NEX, owh NEX.

lwliam: i prefer the your original colder shot because it gave a somewhat light glow and also it made me focus more on the model's face... and i have to agree with albnok that viking's tweak gave he model bad teeth.. lol... and also i notice with the warmer shots, the model's hair looked more messy than in the colder one.. cheers.

ahpingko: stick a knife on the camera la, sure sharp.. lol...with ur limited budget, give the sharpness a rest. unless of course u have unlimited budget then by all means google 'the sharpest lens in the universe'.
all lenses have their sweet spot la... someone told me the sweet spot for the DT 50mm is at f2.2 ... i dont know how true this is but it worked out for me... and the 35mm 1.8 will definitely be more expensive than the 50mm 1.8

ALL Muslim Alpharians: Selamat Berpuasa, may the force be with you!

no need quit la.. just go for nex.. im also thinking of heading in that direction.. coz when i go overseas.. carrying so many huge gears is dangerous

put ur f42 to work la.. dont leave in the bag only to collect dust.

Aiyo... If u no confidence to use takkan u wanna just keep only. Do research, trial and error.

clean it urself lo. haha

cheeshyan94: too much halo effect in my opinion..

^ much better.. the clouds looked like painting..

ur paying for the service? but u knoe how to clean it for FREE? any typo?

ei, if say we 'rosak' our sensor right, how much to replace ar?

well, of course u can tell ur mum. as long as ur mum can keep quiet about it..

haha.. my sensor tak rosak la.. but i just wanna know la..

i was super bored and havent touched my a700 and flash for quite awhile... so...

midnight random flash-playing picture spam series: (minor tweaking for fun)

1.


2.


3.


4.


5.

---

Added on August 14, 2010, 12:05 amas usual, any CnC is most appreciated

This post has been edited by Mikeshashimi: Aug 14 2010, 12:05 AM

Thanks hazril... I was really bored and i didnt know what else to shoot...