Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Panasonic DMC-LX5 premium compact thread, The LX-3's successor

views
     
ianho
post Aug 12 2010, 09:34 AM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
It looks sooooooooooo much better now with the totally black look including the all black grip. LX3 looked horrible with the silly chrome thingy at the grip.

Any1 seen it at retail shops yet?



This post has been edited by ianho: Aug 12 2010, 09:35 AM
ianho
post Aug 12 2010, 10:20 AM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
QUOTE(maxilias @ Aug 12 2010, 10:10 AM)
for me i still prefer LX3, LX5 they have the grippy thingy at the front of the camera, plus, tho its the successor of LX3, not much significant improvement from LX3,and im sure the price will be lot different from the market price of lx3 now.
*
The LX3 grip is useless n looks ugly with the chrome thingy too. Not much improvement? Much better noise control, more zoom, better dynamic range, better OIS, better optics is called not much difference? Price is same exact price of the LX3.
ianho
post Aug 13 2010, 08:38 AM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
QUOTE(maxilias @ Aug 13 2010, 04:02 AM)
well.probably i wouldnt see those improvements is essential to me, as for the look, i still like the lx3 personally, haha..personal preference i guess, considering the money u pay for. but then again, LX series has been at the top ever since lar...i wanted an LX3 so much back but couldnt get a deal with it and ended up with a g10 which i just sold..haha...now they've come out with lx5.....btw, theres no LX4 ?..is it replaced by leica D-lux 4 ?..some say d-lux 4 is actually the LX4 ?
*
Now ur really confused. Leica D-Lux4 is Leica. LX3 is Panasonic. D-Lux4 is rm3k. LX3 is rm1.5k. Panasonic LX3 is like the Proton Wira n Leica D-Lux4 is the real Mitsubishi Lancer. Wanna read all about D-Lux4 vs LX3? I bought both n did a comparo article here.
http://ianho.blogspot.com/2008/11/panasoni...ca-d-lux-4.html

The LX3 was never the best compact ler. Whoever gave u that idea? The best compact back then was the Sigma DP1 n DP2. Both had APS-C sized sensors way before any1 else dared to put such a big sensor into a compact. LX3 was popular coz it was nice n cheap n those who couldn't afford the Leica would opt for the Panasonic.

Pana skipped LX4 name coz #4 is DIE in Chinese n Japanese. They went straight to LX5. Whether u think the improvements r worth it or not, it would be ridiculous to buy an LX3 now since it's obsolete n the LX5 is the current model at the same price with all those new improvements.

This post has been edited by ianho: Aug 13 2010, 08:51 AM
ianho
post Aug 21 2010, 09:44 PM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
QUOTE(Nightstalker1993 @ Aug 21 2010, 06:18 PM)
in a way its more like reverse. proton rebadged the lancer for sale while leica was the one that rebadged the lx3 for sale xD though leica did play a part in the optics, majority of the components are still panasonic laugh.gif
*
U must b dreaming. The optics are ALL Leica. Panny tied up with Leica just to gain access to the legendary Leica glass. Panasonic can slowly dream la if they think they can design Leica grade glass.

The only reason Panny has come so far so quickly is simply coz they get to use the legendary name just like how Proton abuses the Lotus name. laugh.gif

This post has been edited by ianho: Aug 21 2010, 09:47 PM
ianho
post Oct 7 2010, 10:15 PM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
QUOTE(ahyie @ Oct 7 2010, 11:18 AM)
goodluck and hope to hear good news from you  brows.gif
btw, lx5 users
what bag you use?
*
Buy Billingham bags. brows.gif
ianho
post Oct 7 2010, 11:20 PM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
U guys must be mad to go stick those lens protectors. sweat.gif


ianho
post Oct 10 2010, 09:59 AM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
QUOTE(littleprawn @ Oct 10 2010, 08:47 AM)
i'm not a sifu lar but if u wan changable lens u choose the nex5...its a micro 4/3...

if u want a bit compact u can choose lx5...

if u means better in term of specs, i would said nex5...

but still i love my baby, lx5~  wub.gif
*
NEX is not m43 la. m43 is a puny lil sensor. NEX is APS-C sized sensor which is much bigger. APS-C is the same type of sensor in the SLRs like Canon 7D, Nikon D300, Sony Alpha A550 so u get the same quality as SLRs.
ianho
post Oct 11 2010, 08:46 AM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
QUOTE(ahyie @ Oct 11 2010, 07:07 AM)
why want to let go?
lx5 tuuu  brows.gif  brows.gif
*
He wanna buy Leica D-Lux 5 la. thumbup.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif
ianho
post Oct 11 2010, 09:44 AM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
QUOTE(ahyie @ Oct 11 2010, 09:27 AM)
aiseh  sweat.gif  sweat.gif
uncle buat la review for lx5
*
I dont have LX5 ler. U pinjam me few days then I review la. Hehe. I go take the same exact pics that I did for the LX3 vs D-Lux4 article I did last time. See what difference the LX5 makes to IQ. Hehe
ianho
post Oct 14 2010, 09:54 AM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
LX5 cannot do bokeh shots 1 la. Don't mislead ppl. The sensor is so small, f2 oso no use coz f2 is at 24mm. Small sensor + 24mm wide angle gives huuuuuuge DOF n practically everything is sharp unless ur background is like miles away. laugh.gif

This post has been edited by ianho: Oct 14 2010, 09:56 AM
ianho
post Oct 14 2010, 11:04 AM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
QUOTE(littleprawn @ Oct 14 2010, 10:40 AM)
Paiseh Uncle Ian, din intend to misled ppl... juz stating my 2cents opinion only...  tongue.gif
But i can take those "bokeh" with my lx5 altho not so good as those dslr lar...
*
When ppl ask that kinda question, they're usually expecting SLR type of bokeh. When they see compact cam small small boekh they will boh song 1. laugh.gif
ianho
post Oct 14 2010, 06:38 PM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
I think LX5 best is to try n use 90mm for portrait since now it goes to 90 instead of 60mm like the old LX3. 90mm shud give just a touch of background softness. I wouldn't go as far as to call it bokeh shot though. Hehe
ianho
post Oct 14 2010, 09:48 PM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Oct 14 2010, 09:35 PM)
Shallow dof is nice lar but it gets old after a while especially when wanna get more things in focus w/o sacrificing shutter speed  doh.gif
*
Bokeh where can get old n boring 1? More is GOOD. brows.gif What gets old is our wallet n bank account when we want more n more n more bokeh. By the time we reach f1.0 aperture our wallet is really old n near death oredi. laugh.gif

U want speed n everything sharp then use fast compact like LX5 or ur S90 lor.
ianho
post Oct 19 2010, 02:07 AM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
Littleprawn, the pic #5 in post #515 will look a whole lot better if u crop out that jamban looking thing at the bottom. Looks terrible like a jamban there. Then if u can rub off that white gunny sack thing too then lagi best.

This post has been edited by ianho: Oct 19 2010, 02:09 AM
ianho
post Oct 20 2010, 01:20 AM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
QUOTE(ohmlawx @ Oct 19 2010, 08:05 PM)
pic for today..
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
OMG. Kodak Brownie!!!! Where did u buy it from dude? I'd loooooooooove to get 1.
ianho
post Oct 20 2010, 10:26 AM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
f2 n high ISO is when u dont have tripod or something to rest camera on. Whenever u have choice, use lowest ISO n stop down the aperture a bit for sharper pics. If taking pics of buildings n bridges then use about f4 on the LX5 coz f8 is the max n u will lose IQ there. Always stay in the mid range of ur aperture for best IQ.
ianho
post Oct 20 2010, 10:39 AM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Oct 20 2010, 10:34 AM)
It's not "require" or what.. try to understand what is exposure. There's lots of articles on the net that can explain it better me  doh.gif

What we have to work with is the relation between ISO, Shutter speed, Aperture.
For night shots.. you want black to look black without the noise and everything sharpest, blingest possible right?

ISO: higher ISO = more noise = detailed lost of noise cancelation. So you want to keep this as low as possible

Aperture: Using a smaller aperture like F8 allows for better sharpness across the frame. Lens are usually sharper corner to corner when stopped down.

Shutter: So if you have small ISO, small aperture... this means you have to use a very very slow shutter speed to get the right exposure. With the use of a tripod, this doesn't matter already.

If handheld, naturally you need a faster shutter speed to avoid camera shake and what not, in this case ISO and Aperture will be reversed to whats above lor (like the f2 and high ISO you mention)
*
LX5 aperture smallest is f8 IINM. If stop down to f8 not nice oredi. Use about f4 cukup.
ianho
post Oct 21 2010, 08:45 AM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
littleprawn, that reflection thingy sure to kena when u shoot straight into light.
ianho
post Oct 22 2010, 10:16 AM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
QUOTE(littleprawn @ Oct 22 2010, 09:27 AM)
for me, bokeh or cant bokeh not so important...
as long i can take nice pics can dy...
dslr is still not my type yet... too bulky... =p
*
U wait la. After a while see u gila bokeh or not. Cannot isolate ur subjects very frust 1. brows.gif brows.gif brows.gif
ianho
post Oct 22 2010, 10:24 AM

Cucimangkoklife
Group Icon
VIP
15,705 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Tg. Rambutan
QUOTE(littleprawn @ Oct 22 2010, 10:19 AM)
Dont poison me with bokehness 1st...  cry.gif
I no budget dy...  tongue.gif
*
Nah show u bokeh shot. N this was nowhere near macro distance. This was taken 1 meter away from the cup. What is in front or behind oso dont care. Even whole pile of rubbish behind oso dont care coz all blur blur. brows.gif brows.gif brows.gif

user posted image


2 Pages  1 2 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0454sec    0.29    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 09:00 PM