QUOTE(ShrugsLova @ Aug 12 2010, 08:42 PM)
1) resistive screen (who still using resistive screen these day, N900!!)
Actually, the public is over-ruled or blinded by capacitive touch. Yes, multi-touch is great, but you cannot use stylus! You cannot use finger-nails, lack of accuracy and NO pressure sensitivity.
Previous tablets, handhelds, Pocket PC all comes default with stylus support and it was great back then. Then comes with Capacitive with multi-touch being made famous by the iPhone.
For people with long fingernails or bigger fingers will curse when using capacitive touch keyboard, and worst when accessing website links in FULL version. Imagine clicking on links in Facebook FULL version, almost impossible unless you zoom in.
QUOTE(ShrugsLova @ Aug 12 2010, 09:03 PM)
just curious:
1) How good is N900 resistive screen? I read reviews, it all say "Amazing resistive screen", "What a resistive screen", "The best resistive screen". But how good is that, comparable with not bad capacitive screen?
2) Why everyone compare N900 with Iphone, they're not even in the same price range.
Resistive screen lets you use any object, especially stylus and it can have good precision/accuracy as well as some sort of pressure sensitivity. Multi-Touch is actually *supported* but the implementation is different from Capacitive.
Why reviews saying Amazing resistive screen for N900? Because N900's resistive touch screen has great sensitivity, not as good as capacitive, but IMHO, IT'S JUST NICE.
Capacitive sensitivity is OVER SENSITIVE, you can accidentally open an app or hit a key/button easily. And also because of this, it lacks of pressure sensitivity.
To appreciate the resistive, try using the provided simple SKETCH app on the N900. You can use the stylus and choose the PENCIL thickness and start sketching.
For better one, install MyPaint and be amazed how amazing this Resistive touch can do.
Honestly, for a tablet device, I'd choose resistive or capacitive ANYTIME.
But there is a new type of screen which will have both advantages of resistive and capacitive.
QUOTE(ShrugsLova @ Aug 13 2010, 12:22 AM)
If it's all about media, undeniably Iphone has it all: music, games, video, beautify touch screen, thousand apps. (with jailbreak, with paid apps)
Entertainment device YES, iPhone is undeniably the best. But it's useless without a proper ear/headphone or speaker. The built in speaker is rubbish, any cheap phone can beat it. WHY? Can you believe it... iPhone is using only MONO speaker!!!!! and the quality is rubbish!!!!!
How can people still accept this and WHY IN THE WORLD DID APPLE STILL PROVIDE MONO SPEAKER???
As for videos, again, iPhone/iPod Touch have very limited support for files types, even worst than ANY smartphone out there, so again, it's failure. The best? Still N900.
Gaming, no doubt, totally cannot compare, iPhone wins hands down. No smartphone stands a chance, not even N-Gage (which used to be really good, I still remember playing King Of Figthers on my 6600 and play bluetooth against my friend, and that was way way back).
My personal advice?
iPod Touch 3G 32GB - around RM1.1K
(Before iPhone4) iPhone 3GS 32GB - around RM2.9K
iPhone = iPod Touch + Phone + GPS receiver + 3.5M Camera
Price difference = RM2.9K - RM1.1K = around RM.1.8K??? just for the phone + GPS + 3.5M Camera?
Heck, instead of buying the iPhone, I will pay RM1.1K to buy iPod Touch and enjoy all the games.
The remaining RM1.8K, I have many options for many powerful smarthones, which have better GPS receiver, better WiFi, better Camera, everything better, and best of all, I get to ENJOY BOTH.
And btw, iPod Touch 3G is faster than iPhone 3GS and also less problem.
Of course, now there's iPhone4, iPhone 3GS is no longer valuable. Soon, there might be iPod Touch 4?
This post has been edited by Andy214: Aug 13 2010, 01:21 AM