By the way, do you guys know Slandar's ultimate can make the opponent hero visible? Before those WW hero invisible, u cast the ultimate on him, then it will be visible even he ww. Many ppl donno but i have kill BH and NA with this skill while they donno i can see them perfectly...

fuah yesterday kena pwn gao gao 1 a match
ap n my team got full stunner team
sladar skel king centaur sven vs
oppoent got kotl dp chen lich sniper
too cha liao me

U know wht, just now i try to use shadow field for fun, i just bought PT, burize, buttery, Y&S and 2 hyperstone. And the roshan is standing there crying for mama... Haha.

erm u try on creeps .. its longer also .. mebbe due to the fact they are low level creatures .. so it must be longer kua ...

did morph a GOD hero after get EOS + BKB?
after tis 2 item wat should i get?

it's a nbtd weekend so i play wif AI using pudge
set whosyourdaddy mode on n learnt fresh heap level 4
after getting all item using chicken then i left my pc n go out yum cha wif frens

after come back from yumcha i got this
yeah i am dam lame n nbtd

Its not random at all. Just like the dmg you deal as a hero in DotA. Lets say u are Chaos Knight with 30-70 dmg. The computer decides your dmg in a way that you have to do the last hit to get the creep kill, whiich shows that although the dmg was meant to be random, its not

you know i noticed something really really wrong in v6.29b... and yes, it's a rant...

too often i have found myself stunning an ult stunner(tidehunter). i was using lina. i stunned tidehunter 1st before he casted his Ravage... and you know what happened? ME AND HIM BOTH STUNNED AT THE SAME TIME, WITH ME STUNNING HIM FIRST!!! wtf man ?! it did not work like that in previous v6 and v5s......

i can understand this in the case of pugna, but this... this is just tooo damn farking fake!

Basically in statistical analysis, extrapolating is always an estimate and not accurate at best.
Yes it is true you do not know which 16 hits will bash. But if a large enough sample size is taken, approximately 16% of your hits consists of Greater Bash, if it is truly random. Plus minus some percentage. The larger your sample size, the smaller you deviation from the ideal figure would be.
Yes I agree. Sorry for not doing so but here I go

Background
Actually back when me and my friends were crazy about DotA (well now we really lost all our enthusiasm), we did many many tests on it. One of it was the random-ness of the dmg dealth by a certain hero.

Hero of choice
Chaos Knight, at lvl 1 he has a dmg range of 33-73 (as according to 5.67), which was the largest range around among the DotA heroes, and seemed the most ideal candidate for a random-ness test by measuring his damage over time.

Experiment Design
The sample involves 50 level 1 melee creeps. We had a team of 10 people and each of us would note down the HP of the creep before and after the damage was dealt, which after mathematical processing would show the damage dealt. Regen of the creep was considered negliegeble. If the Chaos Knight should level up, the game would be restarted and the experiment continue. Any waves of creeps that are suspected to be relatively close to the tower would not be calculated in fear that should the creeps come close to the tower for any reason it would make the calculation difficult. Another 4 heroes was selected and placed in the same lane as chaos knight to delay its leveling up time.

Results were mainly separated into 2 sections. Mainly, the dmg dealt before the creeps HP is above 200 (Table 1) and below (Table 2). Note that the creep had approximately 800 HP as its maximum HP thus our hypothesis was that the dmg dealt would be different as the creep's HP hits below 25% and therefore be shown not random as all. The figure 25% was selected simply because this number being relatively significant as according to our opinions. The same judgement was made for the sample size chosen.

Results
A graph of score against damage dealth was plotted. The score represents the number of times a certain dmg has been dealt. According to the graoh, table 1 results yielded an almost perfect bell-shape curve (Figure 1) whereas for table 2 a graph that was unequally skewed to both lefft and right was yielded (Figure 2). A shape that is in sharp contrast to the former.

Discussion
According to figure 1, the yielding of an almost perfect bell-shape curve, in contrast to figure 2, an unequally skewed graph, shows a sharp contrast in the scores between the tables. The results obtained was in accordance to the hypothesis. If the dmg dealt was random, there should not be a significant difference between the 2 graphs. The sample size chosen was believed to be large enough to accomodate such a conclusion.

Conclusion
In conclusion, the damage dealt by a DotA hero, is assumed to not be random, with Chaos Knight as a reference.

Although not much explanation is done right here, I believe the data would be enough.

walabies, remember the time when I was promoting the greatness of DotA and you were just lying on the bed promoting normal warcraft and saying how lame was it? It was at that time I did the test

P/S now doing watch movie. I have something else to say but I would tell u guys later.

Look like someone is angry. No worries, I do what you suggest..hahaha. Perhap you can do that too because they did a hell of a job raising a kid like you! hahaha.......No offence...

Cut the crab now. Back to story. I'm leaving to hell now. So you guy continue lar..bye bye...hehehe....

Regards,

Terror from the Hell..

After being through DotA since the old times, the balancing issue is always there, no such thing is "now is more balance than last time". Its how you see it.
No such thing as few heroes dominating the game, except for clan matches. And its still the case in ver 6

Version 5 has quite a number of comboes available, if you check out the replays of tournaments To say they are dull, is inaccurate at best.

In v6 clan matches do you guys think hyperstone > mask of madness for Sven?

mm, eni1 know how 2 use broodmother? i mean the killer type..dun wannabe pusher..lol