QUOTE(Bliz @ Aug 25 2010, 08:28 PM)
Tamron 17-50 F/2.8 VC

in my opinion VC is sux doing the lanscape. not as sharp as kit lens at small aperture.
for night, the light glare are a bit blown compare to kit lens n tokina.
for landscape, i much much prefer tokina 116. but slack, the lens only nice for landscape. taking human interest wud make many many distortion. some people love the distortion like me, and some are not.

Added on August 26, 2010, 12:28 amQUOTE(SoLiD @ Aug 25 2010, 07:54 PM)
u mean ise pic?....its quite obvious at the bottom edge of the bridge...u can see purple fringing at the border of the white part...that is CA
yes it has that thingy. thats why nikon create ED glass to counter this part.

after all, i still thinking this lens is value for money. RM1.8k VS RM6k
i dnt thnk i will change my mind at the moment

Added on August 26, 2010, 12:35 amQUOTE(celciuz @ Aug 25 2010, 08:15 PM)
Something you can't achieve with 80-200

.
why compare 1980's technology with 2010?
not all people as rich as u to afford VR2. it just an alternative to me lo

Added on August 26, 2010, 12:37 amQUOTE(celciuz @ Aug 25 2010, 10:03 PM)

Camera Nikon D90
Exposure 0.1 sec (1/10)
Aperture f/2.8
Focal Length 200 mm
ISO Speed 400
1/10s at 200mm hehe, VR2 rocks!
Fixed! Hehe~ D90 grip back to normal... or 'normal' lol.
how much it cost? last time i change at nikon PJ cost me RM50 for change grip and USB cover thing.
grip = 30
usb cover = 20
done withing 15min with ready stock

nikon pj stil not fail me for the third time
This post has been edited by Isepunye: Aug 26 2010, 12:37 AM